From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

This project page in other languages:

Skip to nominations

These are the candidates for becoming quality images. Please note that this is not the same thing as featured pictures. Additionally, if you just want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at Commons:Photography critiques.

[edit] Purpose

The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users' efforts in providing quality images to Commons.

Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.

[edit] Guidelines

All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.

[edit] For nominators

Below are the general guidelines for Quality images, more detailed criteria is available at Image guidelines.

[edit] Image page requirements

Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at COM:CT.
Quality images must be categorized, have a meaningful title and description. This should include the Taxa naming for organisms.
No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the Image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.

[edit] Creator

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines).

[edit] Technical requirements

More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.

[edit] Resolution

Graphics located on Commons may be used not only for viewing them on a screen. They may be also used for printing or for viewing on very high resolution monitors. We can't predict what devices would be used in the future either, so it is important that pictures being nominated have a reasonably large resolution. 2 megapixels is normally the lower limit, but for 'easy to take' images, reviewers may demand more. (Not applicable for SVG images).

[edit] Image quality

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.

[edit] Composition and lighting

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.

[edit] Value

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia projects.

[edit] How to nominate

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|1=Very short description --~~~~ |2=}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries. Adding more than a couple of images at once can be considered flooding, which is frowned upon.

[edit] Evaluating images

Any registered user can review a nomination.
When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.

[edit] How to review

Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.

If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|1=Very short description --~~~~ |2=}}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|1=Very short description --Nominators signature |2=Why you liked it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.

If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|1=Very short description --~~~~ |2=}}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|1=Very short description --Nominators signature |2=Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator's talk page - as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.

Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.

[edit] Grace period and promotion

If there are no objections in period of 2 days (exactly: 48 hours) from review, the image becomes promoted or fails, according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.

[edit] How to execute decision

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality_Images/Recently_promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then also nominate the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

Manual instructions (open only in cases of emergency)

Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red

[edit] Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 2009 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.

[edit] Consensual review process

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

[edit] How to ask for consensual review

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you can not make a decision, add your comments, but leave the candidate on this page.

[edit] Consensual review rules

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Page refresh: purge this page cache

[edit] Nominations

Due to changes in the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have Javascript enabled. If you do not have Javascript enabled please manually sign with --''yourname'' (ctrl-click)">[[User:yourname|yourname]] 21:23, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] November 29, 2009

Nomination Oil storage tanks of the Lippendorf power station --High Contrast 21:02, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

Nomination Two Phalacrocorax auritus and one fish --Mbz1 20:57, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

Nomination sunset on Tenerife. -- Der Wolf im Wald 19:50, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Decline Very unsharp --George Chernilevsky 20:19, 29 November 2009 (UTC) Comment focus is on the foreground! -- Der Wolf im Wald 21:00, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Right, but there's also CA around the rocks in foreground, and becides it is a landscape shot, everything should be in focus IMO.--Mbz1 21:22, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Seal of Alabama--Svgalbertian 18:09, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion good work --George Chernilevsky 18:15, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Central northern portal of Chartres cathedral. --Eusebius 15:26, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion ok. --Berthold Werner 15:30, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Audi e-tron. --Der Wolf im Wald 14:15, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very good. --Berthold Werner 14:53, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Church Saint Michel in Dijon. --Eusebius 14:12, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. --Berthold Werner 15:00, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination A decorative figure in Dijon. --Eusebius 14:08, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Review the harsh contrast and the light from above seem to be problems - other opinions? --Mbdortmund 16:00, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Jordan, Petra, one of the Djinn Blocks --Berthold Werner 13:27, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

Nomination Bridge in Le Bono. --Eusebius 10:21, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

Nomination Wobbler lure (fishing equipment) --George Chernilevsky 09:58, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion good quality --Mbdortmund 15:56, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Perch Perca fluviatilis --George Chernilevsky 09:48, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion useful topic, good picture, lack the size of the subject-- Archaeodontosaurus 10:23, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Locomotive TEM2M-063 --George Chernilevsky 09:43, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Nice colors and perspective --Kiban 20:11, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Russian Navy Romeo class diesel submarine PZS-50(S-49). --George Chernilevsky 09:35, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

Nomination Veined rapa whelk Rapana venosa. A Black Sea beach at sunset --George Chernilevsky 08:46, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion useful topic, good picture, lack the size of the subject --Archaeodontosaurus 10:23, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination "Kommuna" rescue ship-catamaran. Has been constructed in 1911-1913 and launch in 1913. Used in in Russian, Soviet and now Russian Navy since 1915. --George Chernilevsky 08:46, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

Nomination "Kommuna" rescue ship-catamaran. Has been constructed in 1911-1913 and launch in 1913. Used in in Russian, Soviet and now Russian Navy since 1915. --George Chernilevsky 08:46, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

Nomination San Francisco Bay, Golden Gate Bridge and Marin Headlands at sunset --Mbz1 00:33, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very nice, good for FP --George Chernilevsky 08:11, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] November 28, 2009

Nomination New Year fireworks in Frankfurt. -- Wolf im Wald 23:40, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very good.--Mbz1 00:33, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Cologne cathedral. -- Wolf im Wald 23:40, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion nett, Atmosphäre kommt perfekt rüber --Mbdortmund 00:31, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Napa valley vineyard and winery--Mbz1 23:31, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

Nomination purple crocuses. -- Wolf im Wald 23:14, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very good.--Mbz1 23:31, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination purple crocuses in snow. -- Wolf im Wald 23:14, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Decline I love the image, but the size is too small IMO.--Mbz1 23:31, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Post Tower in Bonn. -- Wolf im Wald 23:14, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Great.--Mbz1 23:31, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination brandenburg gate in Berlin. -- Wolf im Wald 23:14, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Review Comment I would promote when in full resolution --Berthold Werner 09:51, 29 November 2009 (UTC) * Comment it is over the the recommended resolution (2MP) -- Wolf im Wald 20:07, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination DB class 151. -- Wolf im Wald 23:04, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion good quality. Bit more margins need for far better composition --George Chernilevsky 08:59, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Citrus reticulata fruit by George Chernilevsky --Mbdortmund 22:35, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. --High Contrast 23:02, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Canon EOS 400D body. -- Wolf im Wald 21:48, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Review Comment I would promote when in full resolution --Berthold Werner 09:51, 29 November 2009 (UTC) * Comment also over the the recommended resolution (2MP) -- Wolf im Wald 20:10, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
But the guidelines also say that "images should not be downsampled". This argument is rarely used as it can be unfair to cheap camera owners, but here the downsampling is quite significant and the picture was taken with a good camera in a controlled environment. --Eusebius 20:26, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Apache Trail, Arizona --Bgag 21:41, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

Nomination Chain-fruit cholla (Opuntia fulgida), Arizona --Bgag 21:38, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Size a little small but useful topic -- Archaeodontosaurus 10:19, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Ferry in Saint-Malo. --Eusebius 20:45, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion OK.--Mbz1 21:49, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Bucket-wheel excavator in Germany. --High Contrast 16:56, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 18:39, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Nancy, place Stanislas: portal over the Amphitrite fountain. --Cayambe 15:59, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very gold --Archaeodontosaurus 17:08, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Jordan, Petra, a bedouin girl --Berthold Werner 13:19, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
* Comment Nice image, could you please remove dust spots from the sky?--Mbz1 21:42, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Done ;-) --Berthold Werner 13:11, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
I like it --Mbdortmund 15:58, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Rows of corn (maize) in Indiana. Huwmanbeing 13:02, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion I wish there was no out of focus branch, but still a very nice image--Mbz1 21:46, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Ice & Crataegus grayana. --kallerna 10:46, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Decline - depth of focus -- 320td 17:28, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Ice & Crataegus grayana. --kallerna 10:46, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

Nomination Frozen Tansy (Tanacetum vulgare). --kallerna 10:46, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

Nomination Frozen Filipendula-bush. --kallerna 10:46, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

Nomination apophyllite-(KF) with stilbite - Nasik quarry, Nasik District, Maharashtra, India - (10.3x7.2cm) -- Archaeodontosaurus 10:09, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion High quality and nice -- George Chernilevsky 11:04, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Stained glass window of Tuam Cathedral, Ireland, created by Michael O'Connor in 1832. --AFBorchert 09:59, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Excellent. --Cayambe 14:00, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Namsan Tower in Seoul. -- Elmor 17:35, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

[edit] November 27, 2009

Nomination Kagura Tai float description, Takayama, Japan --Bgag 20:32, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

Nomination Birch (Betula pubescens) forest in Finland. --Estormiz 20:08, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Review Comment Great subject and composition, but the CA is very strong. Can you fix that? -- H005 23:44, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Info: I tried with Gimp and Fix-CA -plugin but only made the picture worse --Estormiz 09:10, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Giralda Tower, in Seville. --Kiban 17:38, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. --Cayambe 12:49, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Jordan, Jerash, South gate --Berthold Werner 12:25, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. With some acceptable CA at the extreme top left. --Cayambe 12:40, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Braşov (Kronstadt, Brassó) - market square (Piaţa Sfatului) --Pudelek 12:21, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. (The half cropped bird should be removed and geocode added) --Berthold Werner 16:22, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Braşov (Kronstadt, Brassó). Bastionul Ţesătorilor --Pudelek 12:21, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 16:24, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Sport complex „Olimpia“ in Braşov (Kronstadt, Brassó) --Pudelek 12:21, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

Nomination Braşov (Kronstadt, Brassó) - city wall --Pudelek 12:21, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

Nomination Mărăşeşti mausoleum, a World War I monument in Romania.Andrei Stroe 08:37, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Ok. The CA at the round plaques is imho acceptable. --Berthold Werner 12:22, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] November 26, 2009

Nomination The Town tower in Třebíč, in the Czech republic with a gallery, the largest clock-face in Europe and a large onion Dome --Ria 09:39, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

Nomination The river Dart in flood at Salmon Leap, Devon, UK. Compare with this image at the same location. --Herbythyme 09:34, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Also good. --Cayambe 12:51, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Church of Naantali and guest harbour in winter night. --Makele-90 03:53, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

Nomination Port of Naantali main entrance in winter night. --Makele-90 03:53, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

Nomination MS Independence of the Seas under construction at Aker Finnyards Shipyard, Turku, Finland. Please note a small boat directly in front of the ship. --Makele-90 03:53, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

[edit] November 25, 2009

Nomination Tonto National Monument, Arizona --Bgag 13:44, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Review Comment Not very sharp towards the top of the images and some fringing/ca on the left side I think. --Herbythyme 16:36, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Leaf beetle (Oides fryi) on a leaf near Goomolara Falls, Springbrook, Qld. --WikiWookie 03:22, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

[edit] November 24, 2009

Nomination Marguerite d'Youville Sanctuary, Varennes, Quebec --Bgag 17:53, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

Nomination Sherbakov's park in Donetsk --Butko 15:28, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

Nomination Romanesque corbel. Facade of San Pedro de Trasalba Galicia - Spain --Lansbricae 12:43, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

Nomination Jordan, Umm Qais/Gadara, ruins of the bzyantine church --Berthold Werner 09:05, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

[edit] November 23, 2009

Nomination Village in Madagascar --Bgag 23:53, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

Nomination Braşov (Kronstadt, Brassó) - old city and city wall --Pudelek 16:13, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

Nomination Ion Tiriac - Arena, of the Sports School and the city wall in Braşov, Romania --Pudelek 16:13, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

[edit] November 22, 2009

Nomination Closeup of a mud volcano in the Mud Volcanoes Reservation in Buzău County, Romania. By Radu Ana Maria.Andrei Stroe 22:25, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Review needed

[edit] November 20, 2009

Nomination Details of an indoor of an airlock of an old NATO station --ComputerHotline 17:00, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. --Cayambe 12:57, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Wires in an old NATO station --ComputerHotline 17:00, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Unusual but a quality image to me --Herbythyme 16:33, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] November 19, 2009

Nomination The square of Tiradentes, Ouro Preto, Brasil -- Alvesgaspar 14:17, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Review The building in the center is clearly tiltet cw, otherwise good --Mbdortmund 16:40, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] November 17, 2009

Nomination Mirò, Women and Bird, Barcelona, Spain --Fale 22:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Review Comment It has a slight CW tilt, see the features of the building in the background.Andrei Stroe 08:52, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
DoneNow should be fine :) Fale 21:12, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Consensual review

[edit] Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.

You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Or QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".

The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision - Promoted or Not promoted - will be registered at the end of the text and then executed, according to the Guidelines.

Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.

Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted

In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the image will stay in Consensual Review for a maximum period of 8 days, counted from its entry.
Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Oppose and Support if necessary.
Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".

[edit] Consensual Review

[edit] File:Stamps with reproductions of the paintings by Ivan Aivazovsky.jpg

Nomination Stamps with reproductions of the paintings by Ivan Aivazovsky --Mbz1 21:42, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Discussion
Oppose Sorry, unsharp, bad reflections and (I think) unsure composition. --Eusebius 22:29, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Maybe reflection, but unsharp? It sharp enough IMO.--Mbz1 23:04, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

I don't think so, but reflection is the primary motivation for my opposition anyway. --Eusebius 23:28, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Oppose fine deatails, but the reflections and some CA kills it imo, sorry --Mbdortmund 16:04, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Info: I uploaded a new version over an old one.--Mbz1 18:57, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Mbdortmund 16:06, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Jaguar XF SV8 front.jpg

Nomination Jaguar XF SV8. -- S 400 HYBRID 14:14, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Discussion
Support Very well done (a second time) -- 320td 17:25, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Front too noisy, very badly processed over the roof. --Eusebius 22:45, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
~~Support~~ too noisy? By me it's not too noisy!? -- S 400 HYBRID 14:56, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

As the creator and nominator of the picture, you may not vote. Yes, the flanks and front of the car are noisy, and I think it is a bit too much. But this thing over the roof is what mainly prevents your file from being promoted. --Eusebius 15:29, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes? --Mbdortmund 16:06, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Boojum Tree.jpg

Nomination Boojum tree (Fouquieria columnaris) --Bgag 15:54, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Discussion
Support Good. With a slight regret for the small file size. --Cayambe 12:43, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Main subject not so sharp, signal processing issues in the sky, not corrected by the downsampling. --Eusebius 22:42, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes? --Mbdortmund 16:07, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:TexasIndianPaintbrush-0820.jpg

Nomination Texas Indian Paintbrush (Castilleja indivisa) flower. --Loadmaster 23:07, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Discussion should imo be cropped on the left side and on the top --Mbdortmund 12:12, 22 November 2009 (UTC) Comment Done. --Loadmaster 23:53, 23 November 2009 (UTC)OK --Mbdortmund 20:44, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, overexposed red channel, it is an issue for a red flower. --Eusebius 22:35, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Video_projector_lamp.jpg

Nomination UHE lamp for a digital video projector --Mr.checker 15:34, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Discussion
Oppose Beleuchtung ist gut aber die Schärfentiefe ist zu gering. --Berthold Werner 16:33, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Comment Ich finde, die Schärfe liegt genau richtig und lenkt den Blick aufs Wesentliche, ganz ausgezeichnete Sachaufnahme, die mir wirklich gut gefällt. -- Smial 22:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Nice and very useful photo, but I have to agree with Berthold about the DOF, which is a pity. -- H005 23:48, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Mbdortmund 18:54, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Nová radnice (New townhall), Náchod 04.JPG

Nomination Tower of New Townhall, Náchod --Kozuch 10:37, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Discussion a little tilt to the right --Pudelek 16:15, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Extra 300L Góraszka 2008.JPG

Nomination An Extra 300 with Robert Kowalik holding the stick. Photo by myself. --Airwolf 23:05, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Discussion There are at least five visible dust spots (marked on the image page) and the main subject is far from sharp. Like the composition and angle though - Peripitus 03:37, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Huh, there's got to be something wrong with my monitor, I can barealy see those spots. But I'll try to get rid of them, thanks. Airwolf 06:36, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Comment After correction i will support this photo --George Chernilevsky 07:54, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Pano rive droite Ubayette.jpg

Nomination mountains north of Ubayette Valley --Berrucomons 17:41, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Discussion Comment Overprocessed? Sky too dark, most other parts blurred from noise reduction. -- Smial 23:28, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Comment The sky looks natural to me. Plenty of detail available too. Very scenic. However... there are dust spots in the sky, so I can't support yet, can these be fixed? --99of9 23:30, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Airbus 320-200 Wizz Air.JPG

Nomination WizzAir's Airbus A320. Picture re-nominated, previously declined due to a licencing misunderstanding, photo by myself.--Airwolf 19:14, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Discussion Isn't it slightly tilted to the right? --Tupungato 23:21, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
I can see why you're asking, but I don't think so. Look at the wheels, the nose gear just has to be above the main undercarriage. Airwolf 23:02, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Support. --Cayambe 19:07, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Perhaps have a look at the building, perhaps it is a question of perspective correction --Mbdortmund 05:41, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Timetable (day 8 after nomination)

Sat 21 Nov → Sun 29 Nov
Sun 22 Nov → Mon 30 Nov
Mon 23 Nov → Tue 01 Dec
Tue 24 Nov → Wed 02 Dec
Wed 25 Nov → Thu 03 Dec
Thu 26 Nov → Fri 04 Dec
Fri 27 Nov → Sat 05 Dec
Sat 28 Nov → Sun 06 Dec
Sun 29 Nov → Mon 07 Dec

Commons:Quality images candidates