Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 2010

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Consensual review[edit]

File:Clevedon MMB 10.jpg[edit]

Clevedon MMB 42.jpg

  • Nomination Twilight on the Severn Estuary at Clevedon. Mattbuck 12:44, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Great atmosphere - if it weren't for the noise. -- H005 16:22, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Noise imo acceptable, great atmosphere and colours --Mbdortmund 18:04, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per H005, sorry --Carschten 14:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, too much noise. Looks great at image page size though. --Avenue 00:21, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Avenue 00:21, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Luxembourg City Roost Népomucène 01.jpg[edit]

Luxembourg City Roost Népomucène 01.jpg

  • Nomination Statue of John of Nepomuk in Luxembourg. --Cayambe 07:30, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm not keen on the composition here, especially the umbrella and the cut off lamp. Mattbuck 17:03, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The quality is good. The image of the statue is small, but the context is interesting and little frequent--Lmbuga 00:37, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info New version uploaded, tone-mapping improved, cut off lamp removed. --Cayambe 15:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support a bit noisy, but imo good enough for QI --Carschten 13:55, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Carschten 13:55, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Fama Kunstakademie Dresden.jpg[edit]

Fama Kunstakademie Dresden.jpg

  • Nomination Pheme on roof of the University of Visual Arts in Dresden, Germany -- Der Wolf im Wald 23:46, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Promotion

Symbol support vote.svg Support Surely hard to make. Good result IMO.--Jebulon 23:49, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Statue and sky are oversaturated. -- H005 15:20, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Imo acceptable effects of the lighting situation. --Mbdortmund 11:48, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support - very good, diffocult motive. -- Felix Koenig 19:52, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support for me is good --Pudelek 23:42, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support I find it good. --High Contrast 08:25, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Carschten 09:30, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Preparations for burial of a whale washed ashore on Ocean Beach 1.jpg[edit]

Preparations for burial of a whale washed ashore on Ocean Beach 1.jpg

  • Nomination Preparations for burial of a whale washed ashore on Ocean Beach--Mbz1 03:51, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Same here. -- Pro2 07:25, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment To discussion, maybe too many stiching errors? --kallerna 12:30, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Fixed at least some --Mbz1 18:38, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose for now. An interesting scene, but cloning and stitching problems are still too apparent IMO. --Avenue 00:13, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
    I believe I fixed the ones pointed out by Kallerna. Could you please specify where you see problems? Thanks.--Mbz1 14:11, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
    I've added a few more notes. The "area full of visible cloning" is also still apparent, although I don't think that's a fatal flaw. It would be nice if cloning and stitching was acknowledged on the image description page somewhere, e.g. using a {{Panorama}} template. --Avenue 00:24, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
    Thank you,Avenue. I added {{Retouched}}. I will try to restitch this panorama, but I am not sure when I will have a time, so for now I Pictogram voting delete.svg --Mbz1 02:22, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Carschten 13:53, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Uplistsikhe34.jpg[edit]

Uplistsikhe34.jpg

  • Nomination Old stone stairs in Uplistsikhe, Georgia. By EvgenyGenkin.--Vizu 19:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Promotion

*Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose very good topic, but too many artifacts in the sky. Can be improved --Archaeodontosaurus 12:50, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

  • As for me, normal.--Vizu 18:18, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment see the note --Archaeodontosaurus 14:04, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose unless sky fixed. Good photo apart from that. --Avenue 23:56, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
    • See a new version, please.--Vizu 17:41, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done New version corrected, but i can't vote --Archaeodontosaurus 17:30, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, much better. --Avenue 22:30, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support very good now. Good work, Archaeodontosaurus! --Carschten 17:07, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Carschten 17:07, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Dalahästen Åsbo.jpg[edit]

Dalahästen Åsbo.jpg

  • Nomination: The World's largest Dalecarlian horse, Avesta, Sweden. --V-wolf 12:34, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Review
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ok --Carschten 16:19, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, oversaturated to me. Bad details (Perhaps the plant leaves were red. What plants are they?). Too tight crop. To me it's not QI--Lmbuga 01:03, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think the plant is a Euonymus sp. (there are about 175 species). --V-wolf 19:00, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I'm not quite sure what it is, but something about this image just says "not QI", I just can't quite put my finger on what it is to give a valid decline reason. Mattbuck 03:33, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral The composition somehow annoys me. I don't know what it is; it almost seems like the subject is trying to run away to the left. Maybe there should have been more space to the left? The head should probably have been centered in the image. ZooFari 00:56, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Voting period is over --Carschten 17:58, 4 November 2010 (UTC)


Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Carschten 11:45, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

File:NemrutVolcano09.jpg[edit]

NemrutVolcano09.jpg

  • Nomination Lake inside the crater of Nemrut Volcano, Turkey. By EvgenyGenkin.--Vizu 19:45, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Promotion Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Artifact in the sky. Problem on the sensor or the lens to be cleaned --Archaeodontosaurus 12:59, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
    Yes, the sky stops this from being a QI, but some editing might salvage this and the others. --Avenue 13:25, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
    ✓ Done New version with artifact corrected --Archaeodontosaurus 18:03, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support, much better. --Avenue 01:25, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The dark areas of the rocks are underexposed. The clear areas of the rocks are a bit overexposed. It is possible to be solved the clear areas, but (to me) it is impossible to fix the dark area--Lmbuga 00:20, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Columns in Palmyra, Syria.JPG[edit]

Columns in Palmyra, Syria.JPG

  • Nomination Columns in Palmyra, Syria. --High Contrast 23:22, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment As I said the 17 july: I like the idea, but the sky is very noisy IMO. What is the opinions of others ?. Same question today.--Jebulon 23:46, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
  • then let's discuss --Carschten 18:05, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Noise acceptable IMO. ZooFari 18:49, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The noise was not acceptable some months ago.--Jebulon 22:55, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Noise might be on the edge of acceptable but the colours look slightly unnatural to me (white-balance/saturation) and also doubt the framing makes a quality composition. --Elekhh 23:13, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Noise might be acceptable (can be removed easily due to the single-colored background btw.) but the composition isn' really good. It doesn't show much of the subject nor is it geometrically meaningful. --BennyJ 12:51, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --BennyJ (talk) 12:52, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Vozovna Střešovice, 81-71 na návěsu.jpg[edit]

Vozovna Střešovice, 81-71 na návěsu.jpg

  • Nomination Metro car 81-71 on trailer — Jagro 22:17, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment colourbalance is off --Mbdortmund 06:31, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info picture was reexported from raw file with edited colours — Jagro 23:22, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
  • the floor looks still too yellow --Mbdortmund 11:45, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support yellow comes from the light posts. Good night shot imo --Carschten 18:01, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I find it good, a good evening/night shot. --High Contrast 20:32, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not too sharp image, light flashes from the top (can be edited out), extra yellow colours.--PereslavlFoto 21:57, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The phoho was taken at 7 o'clock AM under street lamps which had two different colours, so it's impossible to set nice WB without working with layers and changing reality. — Jagro 23:43, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support That's correct --BennyJ (talk) 12:41, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --BennyJ (talk) 12:41, 3 November 2010 (UTC) 

File:Moscow_GUM_-_Red_Square.JPG[edit]

Moscow GUM - Red Square.JPG

  • Nomination Moscow GUM gallery in red square --Vcarceler 11:56, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good Picture! --Kudak
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry but sharpness ist not so good, especially on the left side. And the composition is also not satisfyingly, most of the picture shows roadstones. --Berthold Werner 15:19, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Wrong crop. PereslavlFoto 22:00, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? PereslavlFoto 22:00, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Acer tataricum ginnala PfP.jpg[edit]

Acer tataricum ginnala PfP.jpg

  • Nomination Acer tataricum subsp. ginnala, Parc Floral de Paris. --Jebulon 23:11, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI--Mbz1 03:51, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Most leaves are very unshard unsharp and the whole picture has a kind of bad quality. -- Pro2 22:59, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
    //unsigned opposition. Who spoke ?--Jebulon 10:15, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
    I strike the vote out because votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted. --Carschten 14:06, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
    fixed -- Pro2 22:59, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting question.svg Question Google finds an instance of the term "unshard", but I don't understand how it applies to this image.[1] Wsiegmund 18:21, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
    Unsharp (I suppose). Don't quibble. --V-wolf 18:42, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
    Just a careless mistake. -- Pro2 19:23, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The depth of field (f/5.6) is too shallow for this subject, in my opinion. Wsiegmund 17:44, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? Elekhh 00:18, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

File:M-gorici-nikolskaya-3976.JPG[edit]

M-gorici-nikolskaya-3976.JPG

  • Nomination Nicholas church at Goritsky monastery in Pereslavl--PereslavlFoto 12:17, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeThe white/grey sky just takes the eye away from the building. Mattbuck 12:38, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
    Are there any problems with the photo?PereslavlFoto 21:51, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
    That would be an issue with composition. Mattbuck 16:09, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
    So the photo has enough technical quality, sharp, geocoded, described, categorized, — but you do not like the April weather?--PereslavlFoto 19:22, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support weather cannot be good all the time. And I don't find the sky disturbing in any way --Carschten 14:17, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Cayambe 16:06, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? George Chernilevsky 08:34, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Prison in Milan.jpg[edit]

Prison in Milan.jpg

  • Nomination Jail house in Milan. --High Contrast 16:30, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Decline Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I really don't like the street light here. --Sfu 11:49, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
    I had not the courage to remove it. --High Contrast 20:10, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
    How about the courage to move few steps left? --Sfu 20:22, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
    I was able to do this but the result did not convince me. You'd agree to me if you have had seen the other photographs. Anyway. --High Contrast 20:28, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
    We can move it to discuss but still I don't like it - it's distacing - but maybe it's because I don't like street lights at all ;). Let's someone else give opinion. --Sfu 20:52, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
    I hope you did not understand my comments above falsely. Of course I accept your opinion! It is your good right to classify an image as non-QI. --High Contrast 20:54, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
  • So close to a jail, maybe could we consider street lights as something metaphoric (stop-go, freedom-prison etc...). lol.--Jebulon 09:29, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
  • You're laughing - this was little bit my intention. --High Contrast 15:55, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, perhaps I don't understand the metaphoric idea. To me, the traffic light (street light?) is disturbing. If it's not disturbing, it's a bad composition to me--Lmbuga 22:34, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? George Chernilevsky 08:35, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Lurzenbach-068.jpg[edit]

Lurzenbach-068.jpg

  • Nomination Lurzenbach, Germany. --Bartiebert 13:41, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Can you sharpen it please? Mattbuck 16:57, 26 October 2010
  • A little better now? If not, I do not know how to make better, sry. --Bartiebert 19:33, 26 October 2010 (UTC) (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --