Commons:Návrhy na kvalitní obrázky

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Quality images candidates and the translation is 41% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Quality images candidates and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Přeskočit k návrhům
Other languages:
العربية • ‎čeština • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎español • ‎français • ‎日本語 • ‎македонски • ‎Nederlands • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎русский
float

Zde najdete obrázky navržené na zařazení mezi Kvalitní obrázky. Prosím povšimněte si, že jde o něco jiného než Nejlepší obrázky. Pokud chcete ke svým fotografiím nějaké obsáhlejší komentáře a kritiku, je vhodnějším místem stránka Photography critiques.

Cíl[edit]

Cílem projektu kvalitní obrázky je podpořit ty, kteří jsou skutečným základem Wikimedia Commons - jednotlivé uživatele, kteří přispívají k rozšíření Commons svými jedinečnými příspěvky. Zatímco Nejlepší obrázky shromažďují to absolutně nejlepší a nejpůsobivější z veškerého obsahu Commons, cílem Kvalitních obrázků je podpořit uživatele v tvorbě obrázků s definovanou úrovní kvality, a identifikovat obrázky ji splňující.
Kvalitní obrázky nejsou soutěž.

Pravidla[edit]

Všechny navržené obrázky musí být vytvořené přímo uživateli Commons.

Pro navrhovatele[edit]

Níže popsaná jsou přibližná kritéria pro Kvalitní obrázky, podrobný popis je v Quality images guidelines (zatím v angličtině).

Požadavky na stránku s popisem[edit]
  1. Autorská práva. Kvalitní obrázky musí být na Commons nahrané přímo držitelem autorským práv s přijatelnou licencí.
  2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
  3. Kvalitní obrázky musí být zařazené v odpovídajících kategoriích, mít výstižný název a popis. V případě rostlin a zvířat by měl popis obsahovat systematické jméno.
  4. Kvalitní obrázky nesmí obsahovat reklamu či podpis autora v samotném obrázku. Informace o autorovi a autorských právech by se měly nacházet na stránce s popisem, a mohou být v metadatech souboru (EXIF a pod. ), ale neměly by narušovat vlastní obrázek.
Creator[edit]

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Technické požadavky[edit]

Přesnější specifikace je v textu Commons:Quality images guidelines.

Resolution[edit]

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media.

This does not apply to vector graphics (SVG).

Image quality[edit]

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.

Composition and lighting[edit]

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.

Value[edit]

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.

How to nominate[edit]

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the Image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.


Number of nominations[edit]

Carefully select your best images to nominate. Adding more than a couple of images at once can be considered flooding, which is at least frowned upon or may even lead to immediate decline.

Hodnocení obrázků[edit]

Kterýkoli přihlášený uživatel může vyhodnotit nominace.
Při hodnocení se užijí stejná kritéria jako při nominace,

Jak provést hodnocení[edit]

How to update the status

Důkladně si prohlédněte obrázek. Otevřete si jej v plném rozlišení a zkontrolujte, jestli splňuje jednotlivá kritéria pro kvalitní obrázky

  • Pokud rozhodnete že obrázek kritéria splňuje, upravte příslušný řádek ze tvaru
Image: ImageNameHere. jpg|{{/Nomination| velmi krátký popis --~~~~ |}}

to

Image: ImageNameHere. jpg|{{/Promotion| velmi krátký popis --Podpis navrhovatele | Čím je obrázek obzvlášť dobrý. --~~~~}}

Jinak řečeno, šablonu změňte z /Nomination na /Promotion a přidejte popis, případně velmi krátké zdůvodnění.

  • Pokud rozhodnete že obrázek kritéria nesplňuje, upravte příslušný řádek ze tvaru
Image: ImageNameHere. jpg|{{/Nomination| velmi krátký popis --~~~~ |}}

to

Image: ImageNameHere. jpg|{{/Decline| velmi krátký popis --Podpis navrhovatele | velmi krátké zdůvodnění --~~~~}}

Jinak řečeno, šablonu změňte z /Nomination na /Decline přidejte podpis, případně kritéria na kvalitní obrázky, která navržený obrázek nesplňuje. (Používejte názvy sekcí z kritérií). Pokud obrázek nesplňuje větší množství požadavků, stačí uvést 2-3 nejvážnější chyby, zmínit "multiple problems". Když zamítáte nominaci, je přínosné na stránce navrhovatele vysvětlit důvody - ale vždy přívětivě, žádné kousavé poznámky.

Prosba: Hodnoťte nejdřív nejstarší nezhodnocené obrázky.

Zhodnocení a[edit]

If there are no objections in period of 2 days (exactly: 48 hours) from review, the image becomes promoted or fails, according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.

How to execute decision[edit]

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then also nominate the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

  • Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
  • Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
  • Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red

Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)[edit]

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives říjen 2014 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.

Consensual review process[edit]

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review[edit]

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you can not make a decision, add your comments, but leave the candidate on this page.

Consensual review rules[edit]

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Page refresh: purge this page's cache


Contents

Nominations[edit]

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have Javascript enabled. If you do not have Javascript enabled please manually sign with

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 03:35, 21 říjen 2014 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC).
  • Please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first, many are still unassessed.
Thank you.

October 21, 2014[edit]

October 20, 2014[edit]

October 19, 2014[edit]

October 18, 2014[edit]

October 17, 2014[edit]

October 16, 2014[edit]

October 15, 2014[edit]

October 14, 2014[edit]

October 13, 2014[edit]

October 12, 2014[edit]

October 11, 2014[edit]

October 10, 2014[edit]

October 9, 2014[edit]

October 8, 2014[edit]

October 7, 2014[edit]

October 6, 2014[edit]

October 3, 2014[edit]

October 2, 2014[edit]

September 29, 2014[edit]

Consensual review[edit]

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose and Symbol support vote.svg Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".


Consensual Review[edit]

File:2014_Bystrzyca_Kłodzka,_Brama_Wodna_11.JPG[edit]

2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Brama Wodna 11.JPG

  • Nomination Wodna Gate in Bystrzyca Kłodzka 8 --Jacek Halicki 22:51, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Noisy and unsharp at the top. --Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    noise isn't disturbing here in the dark areas, good QI for me --~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Good quality. I have no insight for the criticism above. -- Spurzem 10:26, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Penampang_Sabah_Kaamatan-Celebrations-2014-01.jpg[edit]

Penampang Sabah Kaamatan-Celebrations-2014-01.jpg

  • Nomination Penampang, Sabah: The male and female bobohizan - traditional priests and priestess of the Dusun people - perform the magavau, a ritual dance of the Harvest Festival Rituals. --Cccefalon 20:00, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Noticable noise and posterisation. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    I cannot second "posterization". I also think that there is not too much noise, considering the fact, that the photo was shot in a dimmed location with ISO 640 (which in fact causes a certain granulation). Also, the background perhaps on the fist glance looks like noise, but this is just the matrix of the projection of a nightly sky. --Cccefalon 12:52, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for me. Yann 10:00, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Good quality. Ich kann die oben geäußerte Kritik nicht verstehen. Mehr will ich dazu nicht sagen, sonst handele ich mir möglicherweise einen Ordnungsruf ein. -- Spurzem 10:29, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Building_55_CEF_Ottawa.jpg[edit]

Building 55 CEF Ottawa.jpg

  • Nomination Horticulture Building (Building 55) at Central Experimental Farm in Ottawa --MB-one 11:10, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Unsharp, dark, perspective. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    Can we discuss please? --MB-one 09:49, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment. Dass ausgerechnet jemand „dark“ beanstandet, der selbst sehr viele dunkle Bilder liefert – gewissermaßen Nachtaufnahmen bei Sonnenschein –, verstehe ich nicht. Außerdem erkenne ich nicht, was an der Perspektive zu bemängeln sein sollte, und die Schärfe erscheint mir ausreichend. Lediglich die leichten CAs an dem Laub sollten vielleicht reduziert warden. -- Spurzem 10:39, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment cropped to exclude CAs (thank @Spurzem:) --MB-one 21:27, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Bazylika_Nawiedzenia_NMP_we_Frydku-Mistku_06.jpg[edit]

2014 Bazylika Nawiedzenia NMP we Frydku-Mistku 06.jpg

  • Nomination Basilica of the Visitation of Our Lady, Mariánské náměstí, Frýdek-Místek. Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 15:47, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
    Lacking contrast, top very unsharp. Mattbuck 10:14, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion ✓ Done New version uploaded. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 18:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
    Yes, but as with the other there's a strange horizontal graining. Mattbuck 20:25, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Fixed. New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 17:37, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    Better, but there is still quite a bit of general noise/grain, and the top of the spire is not sharp. Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Mattbuck 17:30, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Not sure as well. --Hockei 15:11, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Overexposed. Yann 17:18, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It's not true. Pleaae show us a printscreen from your software, showing us that this image has overexposed parts. I have 2, and both didn't show it. --Halavar 19:20, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Lądek-Zdrój,_rynek_03.JPG[edit]

2014 Lądek-Zdrój, rynek 03.JPG

  • Nomination Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój 2 --Jacek Halicki 21:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Too strong shadow in the foreground for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 22:44, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Can you brighten the shadow area (or black level) a bit? --Hockei (talk) 15:03, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done--Jacek Halicki 22:44, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good, for me QI. --Hockei 17:49, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Bayon,_Angkor_Thom,_Camboya,_2013-08-16,_DD_27.jpg[edit]

Bayon, Angkor Thom, Camboya, 2013-08-16, DD 27.jpg

  • Nomination Documentation work at Bayon, Angkor Thom‎, Cambodia --Poco a poco 18:17, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Insufficient focus. Above all, the person is disruptive behind the statue. --Steindy 20:06, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support. Sharpness should be better but it is enough for me. The image is an impressive document of the painter. Please diskuss. -- Spurzem 10:04, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ New version with increased sharpening Poco a poco 15:59, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for me. Yann 17:20, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

File:34_cours_Jean-Jaurès,_Pézenas,_Hérault.jpg[edit]

34 cours Jean-Jaurès, Pézenas, Hérault.jpg

  • Nomination Entrance of the 34 Cours Jean-Jaurès. Pézenas. --Christian Ferrer 17:16, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
    Unfortunate lighting imo Poco a poco 18:47, 17 October 2014 (UTC)Poco a poco, it's a good light, I presume that you speak rather about shadows --Christian Ferrer 07:21, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion As discussed, due to the shadows not a QI to me --Poco a poco 15:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    Good quality and nice contrast between shadows and nice light, I ask to discuss, thank you Diego --Christian Ferrer 15:47, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. Sorry. But for me this is not a good image. The shadows are very disturbing. -- Spurzem 21:18, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Kirchspiel_(Dülmen),_Rödder,_St.-Michael-Kapelle_--_2014_--_3070.jpg[edit]

Kirchspiel (Dülmen), Rödder, St.-Michael-Kapelle -- 2014 -- 3070.jpg

  • Nomination Saint Michael chapel, Rödder, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:13, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Moroder 13:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm not convinced by this one - the top's a bit unsharp, and the perspective correction is IMO too great, making it look very unnatural. --Mattbuck 22:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Mattbuck --Jebulon 15:51, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014.06.21.-04-Mannheim Rheinau--Hufeisenklee-Widderchen.jpg[edit]

2014.06.21.-04-Mannheim Rheinau--Hufeisenklee-Widderchen.jpg

  • Nomination Hufeisenklee-Widderchen - Zygaena transalpina --Hockei 18:51, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
    Symbol support vote.svg Support QI for me--Holleday 12:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Seems a bit unnatural to me - oversharpened maybe? Hard to say, but for me this is not QI. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support For me yes --Livioandronico2013 18:26, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014.06.21.-03-Mannheim Rheinau--Hufeisenklee-Widderchen.jpg[edit]

2014.06.21.-03-Mannheim Rheinau--Hufeisenklee-Widderchen.jpg

  • Nomination Hufeisenklee-Widderchen - Zygaena transalpina --Hockei 18:51, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
    Symbol support vote.svg Support QI for me--Holleday 12:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Seems a bit unnatural to me - oversharpened maybe? Hard to say, but for me this is not QI. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support For me yes --Livioandronico2013 18:26, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Brixner_Dom_Orgel_4.JPG[edit]

Brixner Dom Orgel 4.JPG

  • Nomination Organ of Brixen Cathedral --Uoaei1 06:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion slightly tilted and quite dark. --MB-one 10:41, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ fixed --Uoaei1 20:11, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
    Now, it has weird effects at the window part. Maybe you want to ask for discussion. --MB-one 22:28, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ Done CAs removed at the window. More opinions please! --Uoaei1 07:28, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Bettingen_-_Fernsehturm_St._Chrischona_-_Tag_der_offenen_Tür3.jpg[edit]

Bettingen - Fernsehturm St. Chrischona - Tag der offenen Tür3.jpg

  • Nomination TV Tower St. Chrischona --Taxiarchos228 05:57, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
    Could you crop/paint out that little blue thing at the bottom left? Mattbuck 16:07, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion  Not done --Mattbuck 21:08, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support. The "little blue thing" can not be a reason to decline a very good image. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 22:29, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Bettingen_-_Fernsehturm_St._Chrischona_-_Tag_der_offenen_Tür11.jpg[edit]

Bettingen - Fernsehturm St. Chrischona - Tag der offenen Tür11.jpg

  • Nomination TV Tower St. Chrischona, view from operating pulpit --Taxiarchos228 05:57, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
    Noticable barrel distortion. Mattbuck 16:07, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion  Not done --Mattbuck 21:08, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
    QI for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 22:22, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Bettingen_-_Fernsehturm_St._Chrischona_-_Tag_der_offenen_Tür10.jpg[edit]

Bettingen - Fernsehturm St. Chrischona - Tag der offenen Tür10.jpg

  • Nomination TV Tower St. Chrischona, view from operating pulpit --Taxiarchos228 05:57, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
    Perspective/tilt issues. Mattbuck 16:07, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion  Not done --Mattbuck 21:08, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support. QI for me. Please diskuss but not decline! -- Spurzem 22:19, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Championnat_de_France_de_cyclisme_handisport_-_20140615_-_Contre_la_montre_68.jpg[edit]

Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140615 - Contre la montre 68.jpg

  • Nomination Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140615 - Contre la montre. --Pleclown 11:14, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 12:37, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Poor image description. No indication who the athletes pictured. This image use is impossible. Also the face is not to see. --Steindy 18:43, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
    @Steindy: I really don't understand the point you're trying to make.... Pleclown 20:45, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality --Livioandronico2013 08:48, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Championnat_de_France_de_cyclisme_handisport_-_20140615_-_Contre_la_montre_84.jpg[edit]

Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140615 - Contre la montre 84.jpg

  • Nomination Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140615 - Contre la montre. --Pleclown 11:56, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Symbol support vote.svg SupportGood quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:59, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Poor image description. No indication who the athletes pictured. This image use is impossible. --Steindy 18:51, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Castle Combe Circuit MMB C7 Castle Combe Saloon Car Championship.jpg[edit]

Castle Combe Circuit MMB C7 Castle Combe Saloon Car Championship.jpg

  • Nomination Saloon car racing at Castle Combe. Mattbuck 07:08, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:39, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment QI? The main object is not very sharp. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 11:05, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
    • was this a opposing vote? --LC-de 09:00, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support focus is on the car, it's ok IMO, in more weather conditions were not the best. --Christian Ferrer 10:43, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. I know better images of racing cars which were declined. Therefore no QI for me. Sorry. -- Spurzem 22:55, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Spurzem --Livioandronico2013 00:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --LC-de 09:00, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Championnat_de_France_de_cyclisme_handisport_-_20140614_-_Course_en_ligne_handbike_37.jpg[edit]

Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140614 - Course en ligne handbike 37.jpg

  • Nomination Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140614 - Course en ligne handbike. --Pleclown 16:46, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Poor image description. No indication who the athletes pictured. This image use is impossible. --~~~~ I don't feel like searching the right user for this comment.... --LC-de 08:58, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Poor image description. No indication who the athletes pictured. This image use is impossible. --Steindy 21:38, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I do not agree. The description is accurate, it's a participant of the race during the french disabled cycling championship. This is not a superstar, just a normal person. Pleclown 11:42, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Livioandronico2013 13:53, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --LC-de 08:58, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Dülmen,_Kreuzkapelle_--_2014_--_2713.jpg[edit]

Dülmen, Kreuzkapelle -- 2014 -- 2713.jpg

  • Nomination Holy Cross chapel, Dülmen, Germany --XRay 06:02, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose overexposed --Christian Ferrer 17:04, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
    • ✓ Fixed The image is now darker (except the shadows). Please check the image again. Thank you.--XRay 17:48, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 08:53, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Championnat_de_France_de_cyclisme_handisport_-_20140615_-_Contre_la_montre_58.jpg[edit]

Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140615 - Contre la montre 58.jpg

  • Nomination Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140615 - Contre la montre. --Pleclown 15:54, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Poor image description. No indication who the athletes pictured. This image use is impossible. --Steindy 23:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I do not agree. The description is accurate, it's a participant of the race during the french disabled cycling championship. This is not a superstar, just a normal person. Pleclown 11:44, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Pleclown, every athlete has a starting number and the start lists and result lists can these names read. If you write that it is insignificant athletes, where should because then the images so well these are also used in Wikipedia? --Steindy 20:39, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
        • The fact that the person depicted is not named is not relevant here.
        • As for the educational value, and the possible use in Wikipedia, if this is relevant, use your imagination. A disabled person on a trike... Where can this kind of picture be used in Wikipedia ? Pleclown 20:41, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Livioandronico2013 13:54, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good and impressive photo. This we should have to judge and not the description. -- Spurzem 22:59, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A good file description and categorization is an essential prerequisite for QI - See the guidelines --Moroder 21:52, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 08:52, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Fontana_alla_Bocca_della_Verità-Rome.jpg[edit]

Fontana alla Bocca della Verità-Rome.jpg

  • Nomination Good composition with quite good quality, made by Yair-haklai, nominated by --Hubertl 19:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeOverexposed areas --Livioandronico2013 19:47, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    • obviously a return-foul. --Hubertl 20:06, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
      • Hubertl Try to be more respectful of the work of others, however, the base is overexposed it is easily seen --Livioandronico2013 20:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not overexposed, but not drawn areas. Maybe when editing something was going wrong. --Steindy 21:43, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Please check annotations--Jebulon 15:42, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 08:51, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Statute_in_Oria.jpg[edit]

Statute in Oria.jpg

  • Nomination San Carlo Borromeo in Oria --Livioandronico2013 18:52, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Description and categories should be improved. Who is it? Poco a poco 21:47, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Overexposed. --Steindy 22:53, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Good for me. -- Spurzem 11:18, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ New version Poco a poco and Steindy can you check now? thanks --Livioandronico2013 12:44, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Funny posterization on some parts, looks still overexposed to me --Kreuzschnabel 18:52, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Livioandronico2013, no, not good. See the comment from Kreuzschnabel. I'm afraid that there can fix anything, because what does not exist in the image, can not be corrected. --Steindy 20:06, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm afraid it is not a QI. Kreuzschnabel und Steindy are right, IMO.--Jebulon 15:36, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Overexposed. Yann 20:27, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Französische Botschaft Heldendenkmal der Roten Armee Wien 2014 b.jpg[edit]

Französische Botschaft Heldendenkmal der Roten Armee Wien 2014 b.jpg

  • Nomination French Embassy and Soviet War Memorial in Vienna --Tsui 16:46, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice composition, QI, even when it has some Problems on the lower area. --Hubertl 18:14, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very areas unsharp --Livioandronico2013 20:52, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Livio, sharpness problems in lower and upper third --Kreuzschnabel 18:56, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too many unsharp parts. And the compo could have been better IMO...--Jebulon 15:32, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 08:49, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Brixen_Pfaundlerhaus.JPG[edit]

Brixen Pfaundlerhaus.JPG

  • Nomination Pfaundlerhaus in Brixen, South Tyrol --Uoaei1 04:33, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose its pretty unsharp! --Hubertl 17:09, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Pls. add a note where it is unsharp! --Uoaei1 19:28, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very(!) unsharp and CA. --Steindy 21:58, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 08:37, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Royal_Park_of_the_Palace_of_Caserta,down_view.jpg[edit]

Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta,down view.jpg

  • Nomination Royal Park of the Palace of Caserta --Livioandronico2013 21:24, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Blurry at the sides --Uoaei1 14:38, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 08:35, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Kościół_w_Idzikowie_02.JPG[edit]

2014 Kościół w Idzikowie 02.JPG

  • Nomination Church of the Assumption in Idzików 2 --Jacek Halicki 19:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI for me --Halavar 19:24, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A good photo, but the power wires are too disturbing. For a QI, the compositions should fit. --Steindy 23:07, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Sure Symbol support vote.svg Support --Livioandronico2013 23:27, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Steindy --Uoaei1 07:53, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I don't like it when people oppose over power lines. They're very common it's almost impossible to take certain pictures without some getting in the picture. Also, this recently promoted QI has telephone wires. Jakec 18:45, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per STeindy --Hubertl 20:44, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as per others. Yann 20:29, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 08:33, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Championnat_de_France_de_cyclisme_handisport_-_20140615_-_Contre_la_montre_83.jpg[edit]

Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140615 - Contre la montre 83.jpg

  • Nomination Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140615 - Contre la montre. --Pleclown 16:46, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:31, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Poor image description. No indication who the athletes pictured. This image use is impossible. --~~~~
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I do not agree. The description is accurate, it's a participant of the race during the french disabled cycling championship. This is not a superstar, just a normal person. Pleclown 11:45, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Pleclown, every athlete has a starting number and the start lists and result lists can these names read. If you write that it is insignificant athletes, where should because then the images so well these are also used in Wikipedia? --Steindy 20:20, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
        • I don't understand you. We have a lot of files and QI that are depicting "nobodies" (see File:4ème manche du championnat suisse de Pony games 2013 - 25082013 - Laconnex 50.jpg for example). The fact that the person depicted is not named is not relevant here.
          • As for the educational value, and the possible use in Wikipedia, if this is relevant, use your imagination. A disabled person on a handbike... Where can this kind of picture be used in Wikipedia ? Pleclown 06:40, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:26, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 08:31, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Championnat_de_France_de_cyclisme_handisport_-_20140615_-_Contre_la_montre_66.jpg[edit]

Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140615 - Contre la montre 66.jpg

  • Nomination Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140615 - Contre la montre. --Pleclown 11:45, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportGood quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:17, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Poor image description. No indication who the athletes pictured. This image use is impossible. --Steindy 23:28, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I do not agree. The description is accurate, it's a participant of the race during the french disabled cycling championship. This is not a superstar, just a normal person. Pleclown 11:46, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Pleclown, every athlete has a starting number and the start lists and result lists can these names read. If you write that it is insignificant athletes, where should because then the images so well these are also used in Wikipedia? --Steindy 20:22, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
        • The fact that the person depicted is not named is not relevant here.
        • As for the educational value, and the possible use in Wikipedia, if this is relevant, use your imagination. A disabled person on a handbike... Where can this kind of picture be used in Wikipedia ? Pleclown 20:40, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --LC-de 08:29, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Championnat_de_France_de_cyclisme_handisport_-_20140614_-_Course_en_ligne_handbike_20.jpg[edit]

Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140614 - Course en ligne handbike 20.jpg

  • Nomination Championnat de France de cyclisme handisport - 20140614 - Course en ligne handbike. --Pleclown 11:45, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportGood quality.--ArildV 13:43, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Poor image description. No indication who the athletes pictured. This image use is impossible. Also the face is not to see. --Steindy 23:28, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Livioandronico2013 23:46, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I do not agree. The description is accurate, it's a participant of the race during the french disabled cycling championship. This is not a superstar, just a normal person. Pleclown 11:47, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Pleclown, every athlete has a starting number and the start lists and result lists can these names read. If you write that it is insignificant athletes, where should because then the images so well these are also used in Wikipedia? --Steindy 20:24, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 08:27, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:London MMB »0D4 City Canal.jpg[edit]

London MMB »0D4 City Canal.jpg

  • Nomination Reflections in the City Canal. Mattbuck 09:05, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Color noise at right especially at bottom --Christian Ferrer 17:19, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Mattbuck 17:49, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Missing sharpness. I can only detect a narrow sharp area in the lower third of the photo with the best intentions. --Steindy 23:47, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support sharp enough IMO --Christian Ferrer 04:39, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --LC-de 08:19, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:ExCeL Centre MMB 37 Thameslink Desiro City Mockup.jpg[edit]

ExCeL Centre MMB 37 Thameslink Desiro City Mockup.jpg

  • Nomination Thameslink "Desiro City" mockup. Mattbuck 07:01, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Too much magenta. --Cccefalon 07:21, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
    Actually that was the lighting in the venue. Mattbuck 22:14, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
    I trust this. However, isn't it the good right of a photographer to tweak the WB to remove such disturbing colour effects? I just think, this photo could have a fine EV but everyone will think: "Why all this magenta?". For me, it is rather disturbing Face-sad.svg --Cccefalon 14:07, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Mattbuck 20:30, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support ok IMO --Christian Ferrer 17:54, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I disagree, I consider the tone disturbes for a QI --194.39.218.10 09:50, 15 October 2014 (UTC) Onlöy registered reviewers allowed --LC-de 08:17, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Whitebalance not very well --Ehsc 10:27, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 08:17, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Archeology in Alcazaba 1, Almeria, Spain.jpg[edit]

Archeology in Alcazaba 1, Almeria, Spain.jpg

  • Nomination Archeological site in the upper part of the Alcazaba, Almeria, Spain.--Jebulon 19:25, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Croping misstake at the top.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 22:17, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Of course, thank you.Tobias "ToMar" Maier, better ?--Jebulon 17:48, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
      • The cloud and the right side wall edges seem to be unnaturally soft to me. Mattbuck 21:27, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
        • Sorry, I don't understand.--Jebulon 14:10, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
          • I have highlighted a few examples. Bits seem to be surprisingly even. Due to noise reduction in the sky going to far maybe? Mattbuck 20:04, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
            • No, due to bad digital manipulation -shame on me- I'm afraid (for the cloud. Nothing to say for the other part you annotated, I'll try to correct.)--Jebulon 16:06, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
              • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose  Not done Mattbuck 11:44, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok --Livioandronico2013 07:17, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    • not sure - I´d like to have more opinions? --Ehsc 10:21, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For me OK. --Hockei 19:09, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Thanks and sorry for supporters, but opposers are right. This pic will be back soon after a more decent rework.--Jebulon (talk) 15:28, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 08:10, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:London MMB »1D0 Central St Martin's College of Art and Design.jpg[edit]

London MMB »1D0 Central St Martin's College of Art and Design.jpg

  • Nomination Fountains in London. Mattbuck 07:01, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice but blurry --Uoaei1 19:17, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
    • The top is blurred due to long exposure, but the bottom is sharp. I'd appreciate a second opinion on this one. --Mattbuck 20:59, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for QI --MB-one 07:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for me. Yann 20:51, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI for me. -- Spurzem 17:25, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 08:07, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Nuneaton railway station MMB 18.jpg[edit]

Nuneaton railway station MMB 18.jpg

  • Nomination Nuneaton railway station. Mattbuck 07:01, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Good quality. --Code 07:48, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I disagree, pic is not well exposed and has less dynamic --Ehsc 15:20, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • The shadows at left are a bit dark and all the vertical at right are leaning in. --Christian Ferrer 17:16, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Mattbuck 21:02, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support --Christian Ferrer 10:36, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For me is it a good photo and QI. --Steindy 21:14, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI for me too!--Hubertl 20:47, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 08:01, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Fuchsia 'The Doctor'.JPG[edit]

Fuchsia 'The Doctor'.JPG

  • Nomination Fuchsia 'The Doctor'.
    Famberhorst 04:42, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:38, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Foreground and Background not clear differentiated. --Ehsc 15:24, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support acceptable IMO --Christian Ferrer 17:14, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Livioandronico2013 20:47, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Good and nice photo. What should be bad? -- Spurzem 11:13, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 08:00, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2011_Ochryda,_Twierdza_cara_Samuela_(03).jpg[edit]

2011 Ochryda, Twierdza cara Samuela (03).jpg

  • Nomination Samuil's Fortress, Ohrid. Ohrid, Macedonia. --Halavar 20:10, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:24, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose unsharp --A.Savin 09:56, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It's not true. I've added sharpness before. We need more opinions. --Halavar 12:45, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, you can see the unsharpness and the noise especially on the right site. --Hockei 20:41, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for me. Support removed. Yann 20:38, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:46, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Unsharp, oversharpened, noisy, blurry, perspective issues. Mattbuck 11:39, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --LC-de 07:57, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2011_Ochryda,_Cerkiew_św._Jana_Teologa_w_Kaneo_(11).jpg[edit]

2011 Ochryda, Cerkiew św. Jana Teologa w Kaneo (11).jpg

  • Nomination Church of St. John at Kaneo. Ohrid, Macedonia. --Halavar 20:10, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose poor quality: artefacts everywhere but esp. on the water --A.Savin 09:54, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment These are not artifacts, but sharpness added by me. We need more opinions. --Halavar 12:45, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for me. Support removed. Yann 20:41, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
@Yann: Please, elaborate what should be "quality" on this image. Have you looked at it in full view? Your POINTy votes on QIC and on RfD's damage Commons! --A.Savin 09:09, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Yes, I checked it in full size. I think it is very inappropriate to link QIC votes and opinions in RfD. I expect better from an experienced user like you. Regards, Yann 09:28, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
I've noted that you cannot explain what qualifies this image for QI, thanks. --A.Savin 09:35, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
The composition and exposition are good, and sharpness is acceptable. Is that enough? Yann 09:51, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Wrong! The sharpness is not acceptable here. But it's useless, I give up. --A.Savin 10:29, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for me. --Jacek Halicki 11:40, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - per A.Savin, no way is this QI. Mattbuck 11:38, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Livioandronico2013 15:49, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Not enough that you spam QIC daily with your low-quality shots, you also consider it necessary to promote low-quality shots by other people in order to buy their support for future nominations. People like you are the real gravediggers of this project. --A.Savin 16:21, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes? Mattbuck 11:38, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Mayadevi Temple, Konârak 07.jpg[edit]

Mayadevi Temple, Konârak 07.jpg

  • Nomination Artwork in Mayadevi Temple, Konârak, India --Bgag 17:54, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • The central part is very nice, but I think that DOF is too shallow and objects at the periphery are out of focus. More opinions please. --C messier 14:30, 14 October 2014 (UTC) PS: However, i like it Symbol support vote.svg Support. --C messier 14:59, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → More votes?   --LC-de 07:53, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Bettingen_-_Fernsehturm_St._Chrischona_-_Tag_der_offenen_Tür16.jpg[edit]

Bettingen - Fernsehturm St. Chrischona - Tag der offenen Tür16.jpg

  • Nomination TV Tower St. Chrischona, view to Rührberg --Taxiarchos228 05:55, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Pleclown 16:43, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose until a more accurate description --Christian Ferrer 18:08, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --LC-de 07:51, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Saha kabel, 15.saj..JPG[edit]

Saha kabel, 15.saj..JPG

  • Nomination Saha Chapel (by A.palu) Kruusamägi 03:35, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • See note, please. --Johanning 12:47, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Kruusamägi 17:02, 11 October 2014 (UTC).
      • Symbol support vote.svg Support ok then --Johanning 11:44, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose until a more accurate description --Christian Ferrer 18:12, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support ok --Christian Ferrer 04:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 07:48, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Upper_Garden_of_Peterhof_03.jpg[edit]

Upper Garden of Peterhof 03.jpg

  • Nomination Statue in the Upper Gardens of Peterhof --Florstein 17:15, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Chrumps 17:42, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unnatural colors, looks overprocessed --Uoaei1 19:25, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Quality and colors OK for me. --A.Savin 09:32, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The lighting is slightly awkward, but its good enough for me. --PointsofNoReturn 22:33, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I encountered light conditions like this severeal times before, and sometimes much more strange than here. QI to me and IMO pretty good --DKrieger 21:26, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 07:46, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Metro_SPB_Line2_Udelnaya_Platform.jpg[edit]

Metro SPB Line2 Udelnaya Platform.jpg

  • Nomination Udelnaya subway station in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 09:07, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose lacks sharpness --MB-one 20:11, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Strangely, it seemed to me that sharpness is enouth for such dark hall, shooting without a tripod. Sadly, I was wrong. --Florstein 17:25, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support sharp enough --Christian Ferrer 16:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for me. Yann 20:59, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose due to high iso rather noisy - whitebalance could be overworked ? --Ehsc 10:34, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for me.--Hubertl 12:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 07:40, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Clevedon MMB B3 Pier.jpg[edit]

Clevedon MMB B3 Pier.jpg

  • Nomination Clevedon Pier. Mattbuck 07:02, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Noise,not sharp. --Livioandronico2013 07:13, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
    • It's not as sharp as others, but I think this is sufficient for QI. --Mattbuck 19:56, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I agree with Mattbuck. QI for me. --Steindy 10:56, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • weak Symbol support vote.svg Support even a bit oversharpened --Christian Ferrer 04:52, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as Christian Ferrer --Hubertl 20:55, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 07:38, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Canada Water station MMB 12.jpg[edit]

Canada Water station MMB 12.jpg

  • Nomination Canada Water station. Mattbuck 07:02, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeToo much noise. --Livioandronico2013 07:13, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
    • I don't think it's that bad... --Mattbuck 19:56, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI for me. --Steindy 10:54, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI for me. --Hubertl 20:59, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? Yann 20:43, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Kylemore October 2014-1a.jpg[edit]

Kylemore October 2014-1a.jpg

  • Nomination Kylemore Abbey, Irelad -- Alvesgaspar 21:41, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Poor quality. All the left is blurred, anyway irelad would be ireland? --Livioandronico2013 23:08, 11 October 2014 (UTC) --
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment A second opinion, please. The subject is sharp. Thanks for noticing the typo, but would be much easier to correct than to comment on it. Also, please notice that it is "poor quality", not "poorquality"; and "Ireland", instead of "ireland" Alvesgaspar 23:13, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Reread what you write at least irelad is Ireland for you?--Livioandronico2013 23:26, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Agreed for the blurred left. --Christian Ferrer 05:52, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I do not know what happened to the image at the left side, but the doubled and blurred contours are very disturbing. -- Smial 21:32, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 07:33, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Angehaltene_Bewegung_-_Kleinknecht_-_1976-77_Regensburg.JPG[edit]

Angehaltene Bewegung - Kleinknecht - 1976-77 Regensburg.JPG

  • Nomination Sculpture by Hermann Kleinknecht, Campus University of Regensburg, Germany. --Johanning 16:55, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The distortion of the perspective of the background is very disturbing IMO. I think that it's not improvable--Lmbuga 16:28, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
    • I imaged in advance that at least some of you would not like it. However, in this case perspective and distortion are willfully - if not skillfully - chosen. The sculpture - seen as some kind of planet or star - dwarves its surronding and distorts it in its gravity. As far as I know, we judge technical quality and not photographers intentions. Other votes, please. --Johanning 18:35, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Always oppose to the artistic shots,here.Distortion are not required,Lmbuga gave you constructive criticism,I suggest you listen to him because he certainly knows more than you and me together.Regards Clin--Livioandronico2013 20:29, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sorry, distortion is disturbing, see note, please. Perhaps the distorion is normal with 12mm., but not QI for me in this case. Others can think--Lmbuga 01:36, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for the comments, especially for the note. So be it. --Johanning 08:30, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support In this case, distortion is OK. Yann 10:37, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The whole photo looks unnatural distorted what the extreme wide-angle lens is to blame. Since no coordinates are given, I can not judge whether the extreme wide angle was required. --Steindy 22:14, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 07:20, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:20140808_-_Ligue_2_-_Créteil-Châteauroux_062.jpg[edit]

20140808 - Ligue 2 - Créteil-Châteauroux 062.jpg

  • Nomination Créteil vs Châteauroux. Interview for beIN Sports --Pyb 21:43, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportGood quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:23, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not sharp. --Steindy 20:03, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unsharp Alvesgaspar 13:13, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 07:17, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:20140808_-_Ligue_2_-_Créteil-Châteauroux_008_(cropped).jpg[edit]

20140808 - Ligue 2 - Créteil-Châteauroux 008 (cropped).jpg

  • Nomination Créteil vs Châteauroux, warm up --Pyb 21:43, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportGood quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:23, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not sharp. --Steindy 20:03, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not sharp, per Steindy--Lmbuga 22:14, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 07:16, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Berlin_Großer_Tiergarten_Platanenallee.jpg[edit]

Berlin Großer Tiergarten Platanenallee.jpg

  • Nomination Platanenallee Großer Tiergarten Berlin. --Code 21:02, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeThis looks strange, especially the bright areas. Jpeg artifacts, overprocessed? --Uoaei1 06:27, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
    • I did no processing besides brightness decrease and moderate sharpening. I can't see any JPEG artefacts. "Looks strange" is not a criteria for QI. Other opinions? --Code 07:45, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Lack of highlights because of the decrease of brightness certainly because of an overexposion --Christian Ferrer 05:47, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Could you please explain what you mean with "Lack of highlights"? Thank you. --Code 19:24, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
      • I mean the colors of the trees and foliage are washed-out by a too much big decrease of the brightness. --Christian Ferrer 04:58, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Image is low contrast leading to an unnatural appearance, possibly due to the brightness decrease mentioned above. --Generic1139 (talk) 16:33, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 07:15, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Thrifty ice cream - Circus Animal Cookies on cake cone.jpg[edit]

Thrifty ice cream - Circus Animal Cookies on cake cone.jpg

  • Nomination Thrifty ice cream, cylindrical scoop on cake cone --Raphaelled 10:53, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeDisturbing background, also lacks contrast. --MB-one 10:17, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Hi MB-one, thanks for the review. This photo isn't pretty, but was meant to realistically portray Thrifty ice cream in its natural environment. The background conveys the standard Thrifty setup: company logo and menu at top, dual cake cone dispensers (left), and a sugar cone box (bottom right). In this case, doesn't the background support the subject? As for contrast, I used available light... would a QI require an external strobe or dark color of ice cream? Thanks! --Raphaelled 19:51, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not enough depth of field. It is not even mapped the ice cream sharp. --Steindy 22:21, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Hi Steindy, it's true there are no sharp edges in the ice cream, however the camera cannot see sharpness that does not exist. The ice cream is smooth and beginning to melt. Can you examine the cone, label, and top of the ice cream, where we can see definition in the ice crystals? I think the depth of field covers most of the subject, except of course the edges, which recede far into the background. Thanks! --Raphaelled 03:54, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 07:11, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2011_Butrint_17.JPG[edit]

2011 Butrint 17.JPG

  • Nomination Ruins, Buthrotum, Vlorë County, Albania. --Halavar 12:38, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 06:17, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose 1/3 top is blurred + unsharp areas --Christian Ferrer 16:45, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Christian. Mattbuck 11:26, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? Mattbuck 11:26, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Sète_and_the_Étang_de_Thau.jpg[edit]

Sète and the Étang de Thau.jpg

  • Nomination Sète and the Étang de Thau --Christian Ferrer 11:50, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality. Sorry, IMO too hazy. --XRay 06:19, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
    acceptable IMO --Christian Ferrer 10:51, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose lacks contrast. --MB-one 19:44, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done MB-one, XRay, new version contrasted --Christian Ferrer 04:55, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral it's better now. --MB-one (talk) 10:21, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral It's better now, but it still looks hazy and a little bit unsharp. Additionaly there is a touch of green in the sky. --XRay 16:50, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too bluish IMHO --Ehsc 10:00, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 07:06, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:African Monarch (Danaus chrysippus) 1.JPG[edit]

African Monarch (Danaus chrysippus) 1.JPG

  • Nomination Wing upperside of a female African monarch (Danaus chrysippus). --Zeynel Cebeci 17:52, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Like the wing and lower body but the non repeating features are too unsharp. But I will consider it QI if you rename it to "African Monarch (Danaus chrysippus) Wing upperside"--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 18:10, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Name and quality OK. --Yann 15:35, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like the unsharp head. Otherwise I would support it. I wonder where it was sitting. --Hockei 18:20, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose perhaps you can reprocess to get better sharpness? --Ehsc 10:42, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --LC-de 07:04, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Monopteros_Hain_Bamberg.JPG[edit]

Monopteros Hain Bamberg.JPG

  • Nomination Monopteros in the park Hain, Bamberg --J. Lunau 13:14, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeLacks sharpness, sorry --Poco a poco 22:00, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Thanks for review, I replaced image with one, more detail and clarity --J. Lunau 08:36, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
      • The new version is better, but not sure whether it is a QI. Sharpness is just ok, but there is also clipping (loss of detail due to overexposure in some areas). Feel free to go for discussion if you want to hear more opinions. Poco a poco 22:48, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
        • Thank you Poco a poco, let us hear more opinions. --J. Lunau 05:21, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Nice subject, but Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Poco, sorry. --MB-one 19:48, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 07:02, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Hagerhaus Kefermarkt 2.JPG[edit]

Hagerhaus Kefermarkt 2.JPG

  • Nomination Architectural Shot of an newly restored former evangel. Building in Kefermarkt, Austria --Florian Voggeneder 23:24, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportGood quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:33, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeNoticable CA, right side seems to be leaning in. --Mattbuck 23:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I agree with Mattbuck. --Steindy 22:26, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 06:56, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Moro_in_Fontana_del_Moro.jpg[edit]

Moro in Fontana del Moro.jpg

  • Nomination Moro in Fontana del Moro --Livioandronico2013 20:19, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Insufficient quality. I'm really sorry. The image is unsharp. Everything OK with your lens? --XRay 13:52, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
    • I don't think that is unsharp, then I have promoted other 24 photos, I think lenses are ok. --Livioandronico2013 14:25, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - it is not sharp. Mattbuck 16:14, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not sharp. --Steindy 11:06, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not sharp. It’s not the lens, it’s camera shake. White areas overexposed – sorry to repeat this. --Kreuzschnabel 21:24, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as Kreuzschnabel.--Hubertl 21:09, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 06:54, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Plate_on_Fontana_dell'acqua_felice.jpg[edit]

Plate on Fontana dell'acqua felice.jpg

  • Nomination Plate on Fontana dell'acqua felice --Livioandronico2013 19:53, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeLow JPEG quality, oversharpened. --Mattbuck 16:14, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentOthers please Smile --Livioandronico2013 16:21, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support can't see anything wrong here. --MB-one 19:53, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Neither can I. --Kreuzschnabel 21:26, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose How can't you guys see the strong artifacts in the sky? -- Alvesgaspar 12:59, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as per above. Also a bit overexposed in the middle. Yann 17:28, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? Yann 17:28, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Bazylika_Nawiedzenia_NMP_we_Frydku-Mistku_08.jpg[edit]

2014 Bazylika Nawiedzenia NMP we Frydku-Mistku 08.jpg

  • Nomination Basilica of the Visitation of Our Lady, Mariánské náměstí, Frýdek-Místek. Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 15:47, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
    There's some sort of horizontal graining, especially visible in the sky. Mattbuck 10:14, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support for me QI --Hubertl 10:11, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose due to horizontal grain/banding. Mattbuck 20:25, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice --Livioandronico2013 20:35, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per mattbuck. --A.Savin 09:37, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done New fixed version uploaded. --Halavar 22:05, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for me. --Jacek Halicki 11:46, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support For me it's okay. --Steindy 22:34, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- I see no banding in the sky. Good enough for me. Alvesgaspar 12:56, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 21:11, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Lac de Moiry, (2250 m) Grimentz, Stuwdam.JPG[edit]

Lac de Moiry, (2250 m) Grimentz, Stuwdam.JPG

  • Nomination Lac de Moiry, (2250 m) Grimentz, Barrage.
    Famberhorst 15:06, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Over sharpened, leading to odd artifacts in the water --Generic1139 21:31, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ Done. Less sharp.
    Note: the lake is known for its ever changing colors of the water.--Famberhorst 15:41, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok for me --Livioandronico2013 20:44, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This is not sharp enough for QI, and I think there's some perspective distortion too. Mattbuck 19:22, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too obvious artifacts in the water and barrage. Interesting composition though. -- Alvesgaspar 12:53, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 21:09, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Pensiangan_Sabah_Sapulut-Pensiangan_Road-02.jpg[edit]

Pensiangan Sabah Sapulut-Pensiangan Road-02.jpg

  • Nomination Pensiangan, Sabah, Malaysia: Ford Ranger passing a land slide striken part of the Sapulut-Pensiangan Road --Cccefalon 04:09, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Decline perhaps would be too hard. But this short focal distance is not a good kind to photograph a car. I ask for discussion. -- Spurzem 05:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC) Further the crop at the left is too tight. -- Spurzem 22:18, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as for the reasons aöready given by Spurzem --LC-de 21:07, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Too tight crop, extreme distortion -- Alvesgaspar 12:51, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support it is about the road and car together. No wide Angle, not much of a road.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 22:02, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 21:07, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Amiens_France_Hotel-de-Ville-02.jpg[edit]

Amiens France Hotel-de-Ville-02.jpg

  • Nomination Amiens, France: Entrance to the Hôtel de ville --Cccefalon 11:07, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Perspective issues - roof and other horizontal elements are not horizontal --Uoaei1 12:21, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment While the criteria "not rectilinear" can be a reason to decline, there is no reason to complain horizontal lines as this heavily depends on the location of the tripod. --Cccefalon 13:41, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeI presume that a straight frontal view was intended here, so the viewing position should be carefully chosen. But we can discuss. --Uoaei1 08:59, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
double voting --Livioandronico2013 20:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Shouldn't we have a QIC rule, which tripod position is allowed when standing in front of symmetrical or near-symmetrical objects? (scnr) --Cccefalon 10:28, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -In my opinion this is a QI but not a "Featured Image". A Featured Image should be symmetrical if posible, unless it is not intended. But it is a question when to seek symmetry and when not to. Here it looks like symmetry is the goal. Villy Fink Isaksen 17:37, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for me. Yann 22:38, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Me too --Livioandronico2013 20:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 08:12, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Malachit-Eisvogel-Serengeti.jpg[edit]

Malachit-Eisvogel-Serengeti.jpg

  • Nomination Malachite kingfisher (Alcedo cristata), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Tobi 87 17:49, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:04, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Weak oppose With less of 2,5 megapixels it's a bit noisy. Blown out areas IMO--Lmbuga 18:17, 6 October 2014 (UTC) The bird is a bit little in the picture, but the composition is good--Lmbuga 18:19, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Definitely QI for me --Johanning 19:10, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good to me. --Hockei 20:58, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I'm with Lmbuga on this one. Cute image but not enough quality: noise, unsharpness, lack of detail -- Alvesgaspar 12:49, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 20:48, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Southampton Central railway station MMB 12 444020 444003.jpg[edit]

Southampton Central railway station MMB 12 444020 444003.jpg

  • Nomination 444s at Southampton Central. Mattbuck 07:01, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Sorry, should be sharper. Driver does not seem to like pictures being taken. -Johanning 16:55, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
    Sharpened, perspective corrected and CA removed. Also the driver is waving to me. --Mattbuck 12:38, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
    Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment greetings to the driver, not completely convinced I leave the decision to others -Johanning 19:14, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Quality seems ok to me, I think he said hello. --Christian Ferrer 04:52, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Livioandronico2013 16:30, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
    Could you explain what you find lacking? Mattbuck 19:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
    Sure,not enough sharp --Livioandronico2013 22:01, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
    The image looks generally rather sharp to me - which bit do you think isn't sharp? Mattbuck 18:46, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
    Oh very sorry Mattbuck,I saw it just now (maybe next time put the notification so I can see). However, the right one with the blue roof.Do you want me to put a note? Regards.--Livioandronico2013 11:45, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Like Christian Ferrer. --undefined 22:23, 10 October 2014 (UTC) Sorry, login lost. --Steindy 22:26, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Noise and CAs--Lmbuga 17:58, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support QI.--P e z i 22:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Hubertl 21:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --LC-de 20:46, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Steckfrisur.JPG[edit]

Steckfrisur.JPG

  • Nomination Headdress, cosplayer at Leipzig book fair 2014. By User:Lesekreis --Brateevsky 10:04, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • While the overall quality is ok, there is too few space left on the right side. Is it possible to widen the crop? --Cccefalon 12:04, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, composition. Too tight (as Cccefalon)--Lmbuga 22:14, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support In my eyes the composition is good because the object are the hairs. --Ralf Roletschek 08:33, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as Ralf. -- Spurzem 19:00, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Wrong crop --Cccefalon 04:21, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The subject is the headdress, which includes the lace on the flower, which is partially cropped off on the right. --Generic1139 (talk) 14:22, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Crop is tight but this is focusing on the headdress so that's permissible. I assume User:Lesekreis doesn't have a larger crop. -- Colin 15:19, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment If the subject was the hair, hair should be complete. The hair is cropped at bottom and the face is too tight--Lmbuga 17:50, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
    • I suggest Cccefalon, Lmbuga, Generic1139, Mattbuck do a Google Images search for "portrait photography", "hair photography" or even "fascinator photography" and look at the number of professional photographs where the crop is tight and not all the subject is there. We are perhaps on Commons, too used to some kind of encyclopaedic requirement that a subject must be whole and isolated all round. I'm not saying this image is perfect, but goodness me, it is far better than many dull QI on this page, where we seem to have forgotten that good light and an interesting subject is necessary. -- Colin 19:21, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
      I don't require that a subject be whole and with significant border - composition is an art rather than a science, and in some cases a tight crop looks good. Here it does not. Mattbuck 20:23, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
@Colin, I took your advice. I did look in google. Yes, cropping off parts of the head are sometimes suggested in modern times. I didn't see anything, however, that suggesting running your model's nose into a wall. I saw several articles that suggest leaving even more room in the direction the model is looking. Yes, QI is more of a technical category than a fine art category and is somewhat more "rules" based. I've uploaded a version File:Steckfrisur-ps.jpg of the file to show what even a little improvement in the crop of the left (and some blurring) can do for this image. I'm not very good at this, I'd need to spend some time refining the mask, I'm just trying to make a point. --Generic1139 21:46, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Generic1139, I agree with you that the space in front of her nose isn't ideal but most of the comments concerned the crop on the right/hair/fascinator, which I think is reasonable to crop. Your idea of extending the left is a good one, and pretty well done. Note: per CC rules, you should mention this is your modification of Lesekreis's image and say what you changed -- it isn't acceptable to claim Lesekreis created this alone [consider if you made a change he would be embarrased to be credited with]. You can also use the other versions field to link them both. -- Colin 07:19, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
Colin, I made the changes to the credits you suggested. I'm not intending that my version be used for anything other than this discussion. --Generic1139 13:51, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - The crop as is is a too-tight portrait shot which happens to contain a fascinator, it's not focussed on the fascinator. Mattbuck 18:50, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support As for colin. Very good snap shot. Only the background could have been somewhat more blurred. -- Smial 20:58, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The hairstyle is mapped perfectly. If something bothers me, it's the almost severed nose. --Steindy 17:28, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Crop too tight. --Hockei 20:50, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for me. Yann 21:03, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Sorry but Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Cccefalon and Mattbuck--Livioandronico2013 12:27, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support as per the other pros --CHK46 21:28, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose because of the crop. --Kadellar 23:58, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unfortunate crop -- Alvesgaspar 12:46, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not that sharp (flower, lower part of the picture), tight frame, unfortunate crop, maybe chromatic noise.--Jebulon 15:15, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 9 oppose → Decline?   --Kadellar 23:58, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Tarucus balkanicus - Balkan kaplanı - Little Tiger Blue.jpg[edit]

Tarucus balkanicus - Balkan kaplanı - Little Tiger Blue.jpg

  • Nomination Little Tiger Blue (Tarucus balkanicus). Mersin - Turkey.--Zeynel Cebeci 19:56, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:58, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, this is not QI to me. --P e z i 10:58, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Livioandronico2013 21:40, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too dark! Improvable.--Lmbuga 17:30, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Strange color, but OK for me. --Hockei 20:46, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Lmbuga, and blueish cast. --Kreuzschnabel 09:38, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others, far from the QI bar for insects -- Alvesgaspar 12:44, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --LC-de 14:47, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Odles_est_y_Fermedes.jpg[edit]

Odles est y Fermedes.jpg

  • Nomination The Geisler Group in the Dolomites --Moroder 17:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:16, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeUnsharp --Jacek Halicki 21:43, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As per Jacek. Probably the summits got unsharp as a result of untilting. --Cccefalon 05:56, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment "unsharp as a result of untilting" makes technically no sense. I still believe we are, unfortunately, in the region of pixelnerds ...--Moroder 23:53, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sharpness is OK for me, but it is a bit overexposed IMO (clouds, white stones). Regards, Yann 11:20, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for the hint, I uploaded a new version. --Moroder 15:29, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose DoF too low for such a shot. Sorry --MB-one 00:07, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. Looks like very slight motion blur. DOF is ok. Image stabilization aktivated with short exposure time? This sometimes leads to unexpected results, not easy reproducable. -- Smial 19:31, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Sorry I don't understand exactly what you mean by "Image stabilization aktivated with short exposure time". I did not have a tripod this time. I'm glad thet you confirmed that f/5,6 and DOF shouldn't be an issue since the object is hundreds of meters away, cheers --Moroder 18:42, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
      • No, I did not mean the tripod effect, which is well known and detected by some newer lenses and cameras, so they turn IS off automatically. Not so well known is the fact, that IS in some cases can produce unsharpness with short exposure times, which normally are expected to be safe even hand held with deactivated IS. I don't have the sources at hand, will look for it later. -- Smial 14:36, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
        • Thanks, btw this lens AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED does not have an IS device --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:51, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK now. Yann 22:45, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose really nice composition - but blur is disturbing me --Ehsc 10:43, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Without regard to why it is blurred, this image is blurred, especially on the left. My guess as to why we see it here - the resolution of the D800. When pixel peeping, any blur is accentuated. Looking at this image at 1:1 puts an otherwise great image at a disadvantage over a camera with less resolution. Not that I'm suggesting it, but downsampling this one does improve the apparent sharpness at 1:1. Why more blur on the left? Atmosphere, minor tilt in one of the lens elements, who knows --Generic1139 15:52, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose because of the blur. In my eyes it’s motion blur, especially visible at the summits. Being at least 5 pixels wide, you don’t need a pixelpeeper to discover it; in fact you have to scale the image down to 20 per cent to make it disappear! --Kreuzschnabel 09:46, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Decline? Yann 19:36, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Forchtenstein - Pfarrkirche Maria Himmelfahrt (03).jpg[edit]

Forchtenstein - Pfarrkirche Maria Himmelfahrt (03).jpg

  • Nomination Parish church „Assumption of Mary“ in Forchtenstein, Burgenland, Austria --Steindy 20:36, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Some chromatic noise, easy to fix. see note. --Cccefalon 20:44, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
    Thank you, but sorry, I don't see any chromatic noise. The color differences are also present original in the sandstone. They are in other photos of this object the same. Maybe there are metallic inclusions. --Steindy 21:38, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
    Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Perhaps I have the wrong understanding of chromatic noise. We better let the experts add their opinions. --Cccefalon 09:36, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. For me the chromatic noise here is negligible. -- Spurzem 21:13, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose For me the chromatic noise here is improvable--Lmbuga 23:46, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Spurzem. --MB-one 13:39, 11 October 2014 (UTC)