Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2007-03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

2007-03[edit]

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image:GPLLinksysLogo.png[edit]

This image was deleted by User:Yann because he thinks that it has no source, no license, and no permission. At the time I downloaded the file WRT54GL-US_v4.30.7.tgz, from which this image was extracted, from http://www.linksys.com/gpl/, there was a notice on the top of the page that stated the files below were licensed under the GPL. This means that the image itself is licensed under the GPL, and therefore can be included because the GPL grants permission for reuse as long as I use the same license, which is the GPL. However, I will admit that it now states "The source code files available on this page have been provided under one or more open source licenses." on the top of the page. If you need third party confirmation of the license due to the change in wording, see http://www.wi-fiplanet.com/tutorials/article.php/3562391, and note that the WRT54GL is just a rereleased WRT54G v4. See http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS4729641740.html for details for proof. Jesse Viviano 16:41, 10 March 2007 (UTC)


Image was undeleted, but a deletion process against it was opened (Commons:Deletion requests/Image:GPLLinksysLogo.png) / Fred Chess 19:32, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image:West_leeming_primary_school_logo.svg[edit]

This image was deleted by user:bryan on the grounds of a copy vio. This is not the case. Could the image be tempoerily undeleted? I shall fix the tag.Symode09 23:47, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

No need to cross-post to four different pages. I've answered your question at the administrators' noticeboard where it is likely to get more attention. --Iamunknown 02:32, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Closed / Fred Chess 19:31, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[[:]][edit]

This image was deleted by user:Raymond_de without prior warning on the grounds of copyright violation. The image is my own work. Please undelete. - Cybjorg 16:26, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

According to the tagger this image was a copyvio from [1]. Are you and the site owner the same person? -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Yes, the image belongs to me and I am the site owner. Had this been posted on my talk page before deletion, I could have cleared up any questions. I will update the tag and copyright status upon undelete. - Cybjorg 05:29, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, could you please send an e-mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with a link to the image page from an e-mail address associated with your website (preferrably @ad-nauseam.org). As soon as the permission is received the image will be restored with the proper information to prevent it from being deleted again. In the future you might want to mention that it can also be found on your website as that will help alleviate any fears admins may have of copyright infringement. Thanks, Yonatanh 03:47, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Closed. / Fred Chess 19:33, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Undeletion of File:Lavrentiev i de gaulle.gif[edit]

User:GeorgHH deleted this picture claiming that I do not have the copyrights. But I asked the university of Novosibirsk, which owns all the rights for the pictures of the page http://www.nsu.ru/english/home/history_photo.xml and they agree with their publication. Here is the copy of the e-mails below (it is in Russian but I am sure that one of you understands it. If not, tell me and I will translate in English). Since the owner of the copyrights agree, I would like you to undelete the picture and make it still available on the wikipedia that it uses. Graouilly54 08:49, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Уважаемый Дамьен Жиль,

Меня зовут Ян Резниченко, я являюсь сотрудником Отдела международных связей и ответственным за верстку страниц университетского сайта на английском и французском языках. От лица руководства университета я искренне благодарю Вас за размещение информации об НГУ на французском сайте Википедии. Вы, разумеется можете использовать фотографии, выложенные на нашем сайте для созданных станиц в Википедии при условии указания источника информации - английского сайта НГУ. Фотографии, присутствующие там, размещены с реальным расширением, то есть Вы их можете просто скопировать нашего сайта или написать мне письмо - я вышлю Вам копии необходимых фотографий.

С уважением,

Ян Резниченко

Отдел международных связей Новосибирский государственный университет Тел.: +7 (383) 339 75 83 Факс: +7 (383) 339 73 78 Е-mail: foreign@lab.nsu.ru

and the second one:

Приятно, что есть люди во Франции знающие наш небольшой университет. Мы согласны на публикацию фотографий с сайта НГУ, более того можем выслать не опубликованные на сайте Фото из жизни НГУ. Например посещение НГУ делегацией Эколь политекник.

С уважением проректор НГУ по информатизации Андрей Кочеев.

--Original Message-- From: Damien GILLE Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 3:17 AM To: hdn@nsu.ru; adamansky@post.nsu.ru; nj@nsu.ru; aak@srd.nsu.ru Subject: Просьба об использовании фото с сайта НГУ

Здравствуйте,

Я написал статью во французском сайте Википедии, свободная энциклопедия, о НГУ. Статью закончил, но я бы хотел положить в этой странице 2 или 3 фото о Лаврентьеве и о главном корпусе, которые можно найти на сайте НГУ http://www.nsu.ru/english/home/history_photo.xml. Я бы хотел знать, если Вы согласны с тем, что я их добавлю в сайт Википедии. Вы можете найти такую статью по адресу: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universit%C3%A9_d%27%C3%89tat_de_Novossibirsk

С уважением,

Дамьен Жиль

Unfortunately this e-mail doesn't describe terms of use: are commercial usage/unrestricted modifications allowed? Will be good idea to request to release their images under specific license, for example CC-BY (requirement in this letter). --EugeneZelenko 15:50, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Well, the licence is not namely specified you're right but then the most restrictive licence with use to wikipedia should be assigned, isn't it ? Honestly, I'm tired to lose time for these issues of licence when I asked permission to the copyrights owner for this use. If it is not sufficient, then delete the picture as you wish and it will be lost on wikipedia unfortunately Graouilly54 17:16, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Unfortunately we do not accept permissions for a picture to be used specifically on wikipedia, they must be released under a free license. If you don't wish to spend more time on this issue then that's fine but if you do ask the university to release the image under a free license such as CC-BY or the GFDL and then forward the permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Thanks, Yonatanh 03:49, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Closed / Fred Chess 19:34, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image:Logo-ubuntu.svg[edit]

> Hi!
>
> We are group of Ubuntu users that use and contribute to wikipedia.
> Contributers to wikipedia have their own homepages (mine:
> http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anv%C3%A4ndare:Gablin) at the wikipedia
> site on which they can tell others about what tools, software ,interests
> etc. they use and have. We would like to use the Ubuntu-logo (in here:
> http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mall:Ubuntuanv%C3%A4ndare) in our pages and
> wonders if that's okey with you?
>
> ys.
> Gabbe
På Må, 2007-01-08, 11:41 am, "Marilize Coetzee" <trademarks@ubuntu.com> replied:
The Ubuntu logo and name are registered trademarks of Canonical. We're
happy to grant permission for you to use the logo under the following
conditions:
(a) You observe the logo usage rules described on our website at:
http://www.ubuntulinux.org/ubuntu/TrademarkPolicy ;
(b) Somewhere on the product you recognise that Ubuntu is a trademark
of Canonical Limited.
The logo usage rules basically boil down to "use the logo as is -
don't change it" and I don't expect they should cause you any
trouble.
Kind regards Marilize

//192.165.75.165 07:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi, sorry but this permission isn't enough. They specifically do not allow derivatives of the image meaning it isn't allowed on commons according to Commons:Licensing. For the future, please note that permissions need to be sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and a link to the image file on commons. Thanks, Yonatan talk 07:43, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Closed / Fred Chess 19:34, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Image:Ofarim Esther 66.jpg[edit]

wurde gelöscht mit der Begründung: "6 Tage kein Edit". Das Bild war fertig und soll hier in den Artikel eingebaut werden. --Slartibartfass 19:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)


Restored. As sourcing is defended. If Yann or anyone else thinks it should be deleted COM:DEL awaits...--Nilfanion 23:00, 27 March 2007 (UTC)