Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests
This is the template page where entries are added. Jump back to Commons:Undeletion requests for information and instructions. See also: Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive.
Current requests [edit]
Contents |
This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:Sanjeev Jaiswal.png [edit]
Sanjeev jaiswal.jpg i have given the source link of file. --Shravanjaiswal (talk) 16:34, 24 May 2013 (UTC)24th may - wikipediahelp
Oppose You indicated upon upload that the author of the file is Sanjeev Jaiswal and that he had "personally mailed" the image to you. Sanjeev Jaiswal is actually the subject of the photo, which looks like it was done by a professional photographer. OTRS permission from the copyright holder would be required to host it on Commons. INeverCry 18:31, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose You indicated upon upload that the author of the file is Sanjeev Jaiswal and that he had "personally mailed" the image to you. Sanjeev Jaiswal is actually the subject of the photo, which looks like it was done by a professional photographer. What INeverCry said -FASTILY 20:55, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:Bhavana Mal Actress.jpg [edit]
I do not agree to the rationale given for deletion. The photographer is a friend of mine and I know for sure that this file is not a copyright violation. He published it in flickr under a commons compatible license and I see no reason to delete the file here. --Sreejith K (talk) 06:44, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- As indicated by the closing admin at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bhavana Mal Actress.jpg, there is legal uncertainty about this image and until that is cleared up we cannot host it. What we would need is clear personal evidence from the photographer: a statement from a friend is not I am afraid sufficient. The image appears to be professional, and no doubt the photographer still has the original image and will be able to provide a high-resolution version as evidence that the picture has not simply been copied from a website. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:37, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'm actually going to
Support undeletion. I can't find a good reason to doubt the Flickr page's authenticity. The southdreamz article is dated 2007, as is the URL on the image upload, which is the basis for deletion (and if it had been on that page in 2007, that would indeed be a good reason). However... there is no way that actual image existed there back then, so perhaps it was a replacement image for something else. The Internet Archive for the southdreamz page only goes back to December 2011, and they do have an image with that URL, but did not archive the actual image, so that is not a help either way. In the EXIF information on the southdreamz download, they have stripped the original creation date. However, it does have an "XMP Toolkit" date of February 2010. Granted, that may be because the download URL generates a new image every time, and that is the software on the website (I can't determine a server-modified date because of that). Their image is the exact same size as the one from the Flickr page, which suggests they took it from there (or from Wikipedia itself), modified it, and uploaded it. If the movie it came from was released in 2010, then the photo is also impossible to have existed in 2007. Secondly, the image on the Flickr page has an EXIF creation date of November 5, 2009, and an upload date of November 24, 2009, which is not a lot of time to pirate it from elsewhere, particularly as the movie was not yet released at that time from the sounds of it. The Flickr author also has separate photos taken with the actress in the exact same clothes with the same creation date (November 5, 2009), which strongly suggests that was in fact the date of the photo, and those were not uploaded until February 2010. A pirate would be more likely to find a gallery elsewhere on the web and upload them all at once. Lastly, this clip supposedly from that movie shows the actress wearing those same clothes. The only reason for deletion is if there is good evidence that the Flickr uploader is *not* the author, and while the image on the southdreamz page at first blush seems to put some doubt into that, in further looking I'm not sure I see enough evidence on the southdreamz page while the Flickr user seems more genuine. If we could find copies of that image dated from before 2009, I would change my mind, but all of the other web copies seem to date from 2010 or later. The upload URL on the southdreamz site is still a little troubling, but... someone would have gone to great lengths to fake the EXIF creation date if the Flickr user is not genuine. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:02, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Support undeletion. I can't find a good reason to doubt the Flickr page's authenticity. The southdreamz article is dated 2007, as is the URL on the image upload, which is the basis for deletion (and if it had been on that page in 2007, that would indeed be a good reason). However... there is no way that actual image existed there back then, so perhaps it was a replacement image for something else. The Internet Archive for the southdreamz page only goes back to December 2011, and they do have an image with that URL, but did not archive the actual image, so that is not a help either way. In the EXIF information on the southdreamz download, they have stripped the original creation date. However, it does have an "XMP Toolkit" date of February 2010. Granted, that may be because the download URL generates a new image every time, and that is the software on the website (I can't determine a server-modified date because of that). Their image is the exact same size as the one from the Flickr page, which suggests they took it from there (or from Wikipedia itself), modified it, and uploaded it. If the movie it came from was released in 2010, then the photo is also impossible to have existed in 2007. Secondly, the image on the Flickr page has an EXIF creation date of November 5, 2009, and an upload date of November 24, 2009, which is not a lot of time to pirate it from elsewhere, particularly as the movie was not yet released at that time from the sounds of it. The Flickr author also has separate photos taken with the actress in the exact same clothes with the same creation date (November 5, 2009), which strongly suggests that was in fact the date of the photo, and those were not uploaded until February 2010. A pirate would be more likely to find a gallery elsewhere on the web and upload them all at once. Lastly, -
- Hmm. While the image is licensed CC-BY on Flickr, it also (at least now) has this statement: "All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission from pyngodan@gmail.com" If that statement has been there all the time, that would cast doubt on the CC license. On the other hand *most* of that user's photos are licensed "All rights reserved", which might suggest they changed the license on this picture in particular. I'm not sure on this question, actually. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:19, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- I am ask Pyngodan to send an OTRS permission, but I feel that that is unnecessary. The reason to delete this image is clearly wrong as explained by you in your first comment. --Sreejith K (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm. While the image is licensed CC-BY on Flickr, it also (at least now) has this statement: "All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission from pyngodan@gmail.com" If that statement has been there all the time, that would cast doubt on the CC license. On the other hand *most* of that user's photos are licensed "All rights reserved", which might suggest they changed the license on this picture in particular. I'm not sure on this question, actually. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:19, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Sreejith says he knows the photographer personally, and that's good enough for me. Of course, OTRS permission would be nice. -FASTILY 22:00, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:Alligator Pond and the Fingernail Moon.jpg [edit]
Please undelete the file I uploaded titled "Alligator Pond and the Fingernail Moon." I am the owner of this content. I think I started doing uploading this file on here before my email address was confirmed and their was some question as to whether this was really me.
Thank you.
Kimberly McIntyre
- The file has not been deleted, just tagged as lacking evidence. Did you send email to OTRS providing confirmation of ownership? If so, the OTRS tag (with number) needs to be added before the deletion tags are removed. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:43, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Not done File hasn't been deleted. INeverCry 18:23, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Juddevadderonser.jpg [edit]
The file was deleted with the reason that fair use is not allowed on Commons. It is a scan of a small text from a dictionary. I think this small text is {{PD-ineligible}}. It was copied from lb-wiki with a bot and the license tag {{PD}} was not corrected. Perhaps that was the reason? --MGA73 (talk) 18:15, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
