Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from Commons:VIC)
Jump to: navigation, search
This project page in other languages:

English | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist. Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

Each candidate should have its status parameter set to discussed, while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment My comment. -- Me You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Me You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Me You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~ *Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Me You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ *Pictogram voting question.svg Question My question. -- Me You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~ *Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Me You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.


Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
13926 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
11723 (84.2%) 
Undecided
  
855 (6.1%) 
Declined
  
1348 (9.7%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Magnac-Lavalette-Villars 16 Mairie façade 2014.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-12-18 13:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Town hall of Magnac-Lavalette-Villars, Charente, France, facade

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:39, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:19, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Szalejów Górny, zespół kościoła, dzwonnica, 14.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-18 15:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Bell tower of Saint George church in Szalejów Górny, view from E

Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ChristianFerrer 17:48, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:19, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Szalejów Górny, zespół kościoła, mur cmentarza, 05.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-18 15:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint George church graveyard wall in Szalejów Górny, view from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:58, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:19, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Szalejów Górny, zespół kościoła, budynek bramny, 01.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-18 16:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Gatehouse of Saint George church complex in Szalejów Górny, view from NNE

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:59, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:19, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Żelazno, dworzec kolejowy 3.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-18 16:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Żelazno train station, view from W

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:59, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:20, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Żelazno, zespół pałacowy, budynek bramny 1.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-18 17:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Żelazno palace, gatehouse

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 22:00, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:20, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Lez River in Domaine de Restinclières, Prades-le-Lez.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
-- ChristianFerrer 17:36, 18 December 2014 (UTC) on 2014-12-18 17:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Lez River in Domaine de Restinclières, Prades-le-Lez, Hérault, France.

Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 22:01, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:20, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Nordbahnhof Carré.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Code (talk) on 2014-12-18 19:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Nordbahnhof Carré, View from East.
Used in:

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 22:01, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:21, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Duomo Santa Maria Matricolare - Verona - Cappella Cartolari.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-12-18 20:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Duomo Santa Maria Matricolare, Verona, Cappella Cartolari

Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 22:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:28, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Saruma henryi 13.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-12-19 05:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Saruma henryi Flower.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Entelodon magnus 2 canines MHNT.PAL.2013.0.1016.1-2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-12-19 06:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Entelodon magnus - Canine - Saint-Antonin-Noble-Val, France
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --P e z i (talk) 09:59, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
San Trovaso Campanile.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-12-19 06:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Church San Trovaso (Venice) - Mascaron - gate of the bell Tower
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --P e z i (talk) 10:08, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Żelazno 109, pałac04.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-19 11:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Palace in Żelazno, view from SSE

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:18, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Kudowa Zdrój, Zdrojowa 36, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-19 12:11 (UTC)
Scope:
36 Zdrojowa Street in Kudowa-Zdrój, view from WSW

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-19 12:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Sts. Peter and Paul in Kudowa-Zdrój, view from SE

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, dzwonnica, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-19 12:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Sts. Peter and Paul in Kudowa-Zdrój, tower bell, view from SSW

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:20, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 24.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-19 13:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Wooden barn in Pstrążna, view from ENE

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:20, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Sers Monument.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-12-19 17:23 (UTC)
Scope:
War memorial of Sers, Charente, France
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 17:41, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Donaukraftwerk Freudenau DORIS DSC5907w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-12-19 19:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Kraftwerk Freudenau, information display for shipping
Used in:
Donau River Information Services

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:20, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 12.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-19 20:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Cottage from Kudowa-Zdrój in museum in Kudowa Zdrój-Pstrążna. view from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Grave Pedro Ramiro de Alva Archbishop Granada Monastery San Hieronimo, Granada, Andalusia, Spain.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2014-12-19 21:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Pedro Ramiro de Alva Grave.
Reason:
Alone in scope. Interesting relief of the 16th-century in the monastery of San Jeronimo in Granada, Andalusia, Spain. Geocoded. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:44, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Duomo Santa Maria Matricolare - Verona - Cappella Abbazia-Lazzari.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-12-19 22:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Duomo Santa Maria Matricolare, Verona, Cappella Abbazia-Lazzari

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Monacha cartusiana 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-12-19 22:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Monacha cartusiana (Carthusian snail), Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:43, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Nevelzwam (Clitocybe nebularis) Hymenium.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-12-20 05:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Clitocybe nebularis Hymenium.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Merville église Saint-Saturnin La chaire.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-12-20 06:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Chuch Saint-Saturnin of Merville, Haute-Garonne France – Pulpit

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 11:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Pstrążna, zajazd.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-20 11:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Old inn from Szalejów Dolny in museum in Kudowa Zdrój-Pstrążna, view from NW

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:18, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 25.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-20 12:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Cottage from Nowa Łomnica in museum in Kudowa Zdrój-Pstrążna, view from SE

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Dzwonnica alarmowa w Pstrążnej, 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-20 12:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Belfry in Pstrążna, view from SSE

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Kudowie-Zdroju, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-20 12:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of St. Catherine in Kudowa-Zdrój, wiev from S

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:20, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ChristianFerrer 07:45, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Kudowie-Zdroju, 05.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-20 12:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of St. Catherine in Kudowa-Zdrój, view from W

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment need geolocation -- ChristianFerrer 19:34, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
::✓ Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:49, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ChristianFerrer 07:45, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Angoulême 16 Deux apôtres Atelier cathédrale XIIe 2013.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-12-20 14:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Two apostles, 12 th century, Museum of Angoulême, Charente, France

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:14, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Nouvel Ambigu Bétail Humain 1920.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-12-20 15:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Victor Margueritte's plays : Bétail humain, at the Nouvel Ambigu, 1920
Reason:
No other poster of Victor Margueritte's plays on Commons. -- Homework : no geocode. -- JLPC (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Château de Restinclières, Prades-le-Lez 03.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
-- ChristianFerrer 17:30, 20 December 2014 (UTC) on 2014-12-20 17:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Château de Restinclières, Prades-le-Lez, Hérault, France. Western facade.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:13, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Brassens TNP 1966.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-12-20 20:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Georges Brassens, 1966

Pictogram voting info.svg Info I put the geolocation at the Théâtre de Suresnes Jean Vilar, as that where was the Théâtre national populaire in 1966, accoding to WP.

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support best un scope et... que de Sètois ici! il ne manquait plus que moi! Jean Vilar est meme un cousin à moi. :) -- ChristianFerrer 21:45, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Duomo Santa Maria Matricolare - Verona - Cappella Cartolari-Nichesola.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-12-20 23:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Duomo Santa Maria Matricolare, Verona, Cappella Cartolari-Nichesola

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Patella vulgata 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-12-20 23:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Patella vulgata (Common Limpet), Shell
Open for review.
Collier en poil de roussette et barillet de jade MHNT ETH AC NC 234 Nouvelle Calédonie Savès.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-12-21 07:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Kanak necklace, in flying fox hair cords

Symbol support vote.svg Support good -- ChristianFerrer 07:49, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Palazzo Soderini (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-12-21 07:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzo Soderini Venice - Facade on Campo Bandiera e Moro
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 09:39, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review.
Krenkeltal Rothaarsteig in Sauerland, handwijzer 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-12-21 07:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Rothaarsteig Fingerposts in Sauerland Germany.

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment IMO picture have unnatural colours --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:56, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done Small correction. There was some snow, the air was heavy and gray.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:19, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Cmentarz przy kościele św. Katarzyny w Kudowie-Zdroju, 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-21 13:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Cemetery at the church of St. Catherine in Kudowa-Zdrój

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:17, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Kościół Podwyższenia Krzyża w Konradowie, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-21 14:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of the Exaltation of the Cross in Konradów, view from N

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:17, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Campanule U&S FR 2013.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-12-21 14:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Campanula persicifolia (Peach-leaved bellflower), flowers
Reason:
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : private garden : no geocode. -- JLPC (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Phobos edit 2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-12-21 15:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Phobos
Reason:
The best image we have of this satellite. No geocoding as taken from space. -- Yann (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:17, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Dwór w Konradowie, 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-21 15:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Manor in Konradów, view from WNW

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 22:10, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Dwór w Konradowie, 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-21 15:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Manor in Konradów, view from ENE

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 22:11, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, dom w rynku 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-21 16:01 (UTC)
Scope:
11 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój

Symbol support vote.svg Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 22:12, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Lądek-Zdrój, dom w rynku 03.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-21 16:08 (UTC)
Scope:
12 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Abbaye de Bonnecombe.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2014-12-21 18:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Abbaye de Bonnecombe, aerial view

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:24, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Duomo Santa Maria Matricolare - Verona - Cappella Dionisi.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-12-21 22:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Duomo Santa Maria Matricolare, Verona, Cappella Dionisi

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:25, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Krenkeltal Rothaarsteig in Sauerland, ingang aquadukt.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2014-12-22 05:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Aqueducts in Germany Entrance aqueduct over an old railway line. (Sauerland Germany.)

Symbol support vote.svg Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Aristide Maria MHNT ETH AC 1176 Porte sculptée.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-12-22 06:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Sakalava people, door with a carved crocodile, nineteenth century

Symbol support vote.svg Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:51, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Palazzo Centani e Rio San Toma.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2014-12-22 06:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzo Centani (Venice) - Facade on Rio di San Tomà

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope. --Joydeep Talk 10:26, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Calendula officinalis flowerbud 22122014 (1).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Joydeep Talk on 2014-12-22 10:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Calendula officinalis (Pot marigold) flowerbud

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Loudenvielle 65 la Neste 2009b.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-12-22 10:49 (UTC)
Scope:
The river Neste du Louron (left bank), Loudenvielle, Hautes-Pyrénées, France , S-SW view

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:12, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Lądek Zdrój, pl. Staromłyński 5, 02.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-22 13:15 (UTC)
Scope:
5 Staromłyński Square in Lądek-Zdrój, view from ESE
Open for review.
2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Skrzynce, 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-22 13:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Saint Bartholomew in Skrzynka, view from SSE
Open for review.
2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Skrzynce, 05.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-22 13:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Saint Bartholomew in Skrzynka, view from SW
Open for review.
Fábrica Nacional de Moneda y Timbre - Real Casa de la Moneda - 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Kadellar (talk) on 2014-12-22 13:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Headquarters of the Royal Mint of Spain, main facade
Used in:
Royal Mint (Spain)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:35, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Trzebieszowice, kościół św. Andrzeja, 02.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-22 13:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Andrew church in Trzebieszowice, view from NNE
Open for review.
Trzebieszowice, plebiania, 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2014-12-22 13:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Rectory of Saint Andrew parish in Trzebieszowice, view from SW
Open for review.
Misc pollen colorized.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Medium69 You wanted talk to me? on 2014-12-22 16:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Electron microscope images of pollen

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:47, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review.
Duomo Santa Maria Matricolare - Verona - Cappella Calcasoli.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-12-22 22:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Duomo Santa Maria Matricolare, Verona, Cappella Calcasoli
Open for review.
Patella vulgata f. radiata 01.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2014-12-22 22:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Patella vulgata forma radiata (Common Limpet), Shell
Open for review.


Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

Collegiate Church in Tum[edit]

   
Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG
View opposition
Nominated by:
Albertus teolog (talk) on 2009-09-21 13:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Collegiate church in Tum, exterior
Used in:
pl:Kolegiata w Tumie

Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok IMO --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:44, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 21:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened, because there is VI within the same scope. Now, we should decide, which one is better. --Halavar (talk) 18:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: Promoted
--Halavar (talk) 10:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Chrumps (talk) on 2014-10-26 13:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Mary and Saint Alexius collegiate church in Tum view from SW
Reason:
Cultural heritage monument in Poland -- Chrumps (talk)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : could you, please, add "NW (or SE...) view" to the scope, as we usually do on this page ? --JLPC (talk) 16:12, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Fine like this too. A scope too narrow does not make sense. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Of course there is a sense for adding a direction, because this church (and other churches and most of the buildings) looks completely different from other side. Yann, We discussed abot this few times here in VI... --Halavar (talk) 16:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done --Chrumps (talk) 17:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good now. --Halavar (talk) 22:09, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened, because there is VI within the same scope. Now, we should decide, which one is better. --Halavar (talk) 18:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This is better --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:48, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree, this one is better. --Halavar (talk) 11:44, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really, this is better. — revimsg 14:17, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Tum kolegiata 2-2.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Collegiate Church in Tum.jpg: Promoted
--Halavar (talk) 10:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)

Léon Blum, 1927[edit]

   
Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg
View opposition
Nominated by:
Yann (talk) on 2013-12-24 16:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Léon Blum
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Yes, I know there are still some lines and scratches, but you need to see where I started. Yann (talk) 16:58, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 14:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened to vote, because there is a candidate within the same scope --Halavar (talk) 11:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: Promoted. 
--Halavar (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
JLPC (talk) on 2014-11-12 15:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Léon Blum, 1927, photograph
Reason:
This picture, shot in 1927 by an unknown photographer of Agence Meurisse, is the best in scope imo. Stiched, restored (all scratches suppressed) and cropped at home : no geocode. --JLPC (talk) 15:39, 12 November 2014 (UTC) -- JLPC (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment There is already a VI for this scope: File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg, but your version is probably better. Could you create a MVR? Regards, Yann (talk) 16:09, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very similar images, but this one is little bit better:) --Halavar (talk) 11:40, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --P e z i (talk) 13:00, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yours is better. ;oD Yann (talk) 15:19, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Leon Blum, Meurisse, 1927.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Léon Blum Meurisse b 1927.jpg: Promoted. 
--Halavar (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)

Justizzentrum Wien Mitte[edit]

   
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte DSC1200w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-10-22 10:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte, SE view
Used in:

City Tower Vienna
Hochhausprojekt Wien Mitte
Landstraße (Wien)

Vienna/Landstraße

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 10:27, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened to vote, because there is a candidate within the same scope --Halavar (talk) 22:43, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 22:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte DSC 5246w.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-11-14 20:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Justizzentrum Wien Mitte, SE view
Used in:
City Tower Vienna
Reason:
Better light; More recent after finishing construction work on adjacent railway station. -- P e z i (talk)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Agree, this one is better. --Halavar (talk) 22:41, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Better imo.--JLPC (talk) 09:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 22:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Valle de los Caídos[edit]

   
Valle de los caidos by forcy-cruz y basilica.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2008-10-29 15:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Valle de los Caídos
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Strong image --Foroa (talk) 06:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
But if anyone has the opportunity of taking a photograph of this site in the cross axis, and with a wider angle, it would be great! --Eusebius (talk) 06:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Meets all of the criteria. Elucidate (parlez à moi) Ici pour humor 12:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support There are few quality problems (tilt, perspective), but this image is really valuable and great illustrative. --Twdragon (talk) 21:25, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 22:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Under MVR.--Godot13 (talk) 06:18, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 22:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
SPA-2014-San Lorenzo de El Escorial-Valley of the Fallen (Valle de los Caídos).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Godot13 (talk) on 2014-12-10 06:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Valle de los Caídos (West)
Used in:
Valle de los Caídos

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : there's already a VI of this site with a similar orientation. Although this one is better imo, it seems that a MVR is needed.--JLPC (talk) 13:33, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 22:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Grasleitenpasshütte, View from East[edit]

   
140626 Grasleitenpasshütte.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Code (talk) on 2014-12-11 20:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Grasleitenpasshütte, View from East.
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 22:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
140626 Grasleitenpasshütte ganz.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Code (talk) on 2014-12-11 20:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Grasleitenpasshütte, View from East.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 22:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]