Scope difficult to read. Example of a typical deposit best known for this species. High quality photography with annotations. No Geocode : is a studio shoot. -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk)
Opposeas not yet eligible for VI status. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it cannot at present become a valued image since it currently fails valued image criterion 5 (should be geocoded, but is not). "All images are expected to be geocoded unless it would not be appropriate to do so". I have not reviewed the nomination against all the criteria, but if you are able to fix this issue and would like me to re-evaluate the image please leave me a message on my talk page. -- Lycaon (talk) 06:17, 15 June 2010 (UTC) Studio work has been added. Geocoding does not apply. Lycaon (talk) 13:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This point had already been described for the VI, and I was supposed to put "No Geocode Is a studio work" I forgot. The explanation is simple: mineralogy is not given except as a true geocoding within the meaning of that which can be given for a monument. The indications are vague and affect a mining district, which at best cover a few square kilometers at worst an entire region. Even if the shaft us is often known, the sample may have been collected several kilometers from the entrance without speaking to the depth that some specimens are known to us. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:44, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
