I don't think it is necessary or useful to specify "South elevation", unless there also should a very different view from another side, i.e. that the building is not symetric. Yann (talk) 09:06, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
@Archaeodontosaurus: That's the point of this whole project: to promote ONE image for ONE subject. I find it interesting to define which image best represents a building as a whole. I don't find interesting to define a different scope for every image of the same building. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree with this interpretation. Is not shown in the facade of this church. But this facade is important, it also deserves a scope. If we one day aerial view, if we have a view of the interior, all deserve our interest. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:31, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've added "Side view" to the scope. I think Side view is a different scope than facade and interior, and all of them should have different scopes. Halavar (talk) 09:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
