Comment If you add the common English name in parenthesis in the scope (which I think is a good idea), I recommend using a more specific species name like (Seven-spot Ladybird) as the more general (Ladybird) is the common name for the entire family Coccinellidae, which includes about 5000 species. -- Slaunger (talk) 22:05, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question I am wondering is the scope is too narrow for this one? Is it possible to visually see the difference between the larva of Coccinella septempunctata and other larva of the Coccinella genus. I am aware that some other species of the genus have a different number of spots as adults, but are they also visually distinct as larva? If not, I think the scope shall be widened up a little bit to, e.g., the Subgenus level Larva of Coccinella (Coccinella). -- Slaunger (talk) 22:05, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for nowVote changed. -- Slaunger (talk) 09:10, 15 October 2008 (UTC) Fair enough, but I would like to get that settled until we continue. Do you have any possibilities to figure out how different the larva of the Coccinella is (I don't)? -- Slaunger (talk) 06:21, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, species larva scope accepted, but I am still not happy about the (Ladybird) in the scope as it is a common term used for about 5000 species, ...(Seven-spot Ladybird) would be more precise. -- Slaunger (talk) 08:35, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Issues resolved. There are a few close competitors, but I think this one is slightly better at illustrating the subject. -- Slaunger (talk) 09:10, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
