Commons:Valued image candidates/Listed Wayside Crosses of Niederkassel-Mondorf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Listed Wayside Crosses of Niederkassel-Mondorf

promoted to Valued image set: Listed Wayside Crosses of Niederkassel-Mondorf, Germany
Images
Description

Listed waysidecrosses of Mondorf (district of the town of Niederkassel, Germany). (This is the complete set of wayside crosses of Mondorf, listed as cultural heritage monuments in Niederkassel, Germany. de:Liste der Baudenkmäler in Niederkassel)

Nominated by Caecilius Mauß (talk) 20:54, 28 June 2013 (UTC) on 2013-06-28 20:54 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued set of images on Wikimedia Commons within the scope:
Waysidecrosses of Niederkassel-Mondorf
Review
(criteria)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question Not a single comment?? -- Caecilius Mauß (talk) 10:02, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The scope must be waysidecrosses of Niederkassel. It seems accepted to link the scope to a wider category, but the set doesn't show all monuments in the town. --Ikar.us (talk) 21:53, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting info.svg Info You are right, these are only the listed waysidecrosses of Niederkassel, DISTRICT MONDORF, not from the whole town. (I have to start the projekt "waysidecrosses" from a smaller basis.) I will create the new category "waysidecrosses of Niederkassel". This set will be the only one in this new category. I tried to avoid creating a new category only for this set. Or should there be created even a subcategory "waysidecrosses of Niederkassel-Mondorf"? Thx --Caecilius Mauß (talk) 06:55, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
      • I think it isn't necessary to create the exact category, if it can't be populated. But the scope must match the topic of the candidate.
        But four distinct objects would be worth a category, wouldn't they? So the category could be waysidecrosses of Niederkassel, and the scope of this set waysidecrosses of Mondorf.
--Ikar.us (talk) 10:12, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done --Caecilius Mauß (talk) 13:14, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
    • The scope is still the same!? I take the liberty to adjust it. --Ikar.us (talk) 19:56, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
    • Thanks, I´m not experienced in commons-taxonomy and editing. But it´s nice to learn something new every day. :) --Caecilius Mauß (talk) 06:47, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ikar.us (talk) 20:53, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --VT98Fan (talk) 21:29, 31 August 2013 (UTC)--