Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

Three Brothers Fountain in Cieszyn, Poland[edit]

   
Studnia Trzech Braci 2.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2013-10-03 09:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Three Brothers Fountain in Cieszyn, Poland.
Reason:
Best in scope. -- Halavar (talk)

Previous reviews

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened for MVR, because 10 days ago image within the same scope was unfortunately promoted. --Halavar (talk) 14:54, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support IMO this picture is better. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:37, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:20, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Cieszyn Studnia Trzech Braci 2.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Albertus teolog (talk) on 2015-05-22 20:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Three Brothers Fountain in Cieszyn

Previous reviews

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Opened for MVR, because there is image within the same scope. --Halavar (talk) 14:55, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Close race, but the composition and framing is best on this one, although the light is better on the alternative. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:30, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:20, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Sarcophagus of Agia Triada, north side[edit]

   
Sarcophagus archmus Heraklion.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2015-05-22 17:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Sarcophagus of Agia Triada, north side
Reason:
Not from a book, a real picture, taken by me in the museum. All the face is visible, even the feet. Quality is far much better than our current VI, IMO. Geocode is in the "institution template". -- Jebulon (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Are you sure about the WB? It appears to be too cold. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
    • The museum is completely renovated, and the light is very different nowadays than before. I masked the explicit (but busy) background, but as far as I can say and as I remember, yes, the wb is good, now (it was far much colder before processing). Previous pictures are wrong (too hot) before, with yellow cast. But I could correct if necessary.--Jebulon (talk) 09:27, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
      • You know best what you sawSmile. I just noticed the shadow under it has a blue tint, which is often an indication of a too cold WB, which triggered my remark. -- Slaunger (talk) 08:02, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good work. --Yann (talk) 21:03, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support other candidate has some flare and does not show whole item. Good composition, attractive photo. --Pitke (talk) 22:05, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Scores:
1. Sarcophagus archmus Heraklion.jpg: +3 <-
2. Sarcophagus from Aghia Triada.jpg: 0
=>
File:Sarcophagus archmus Heraklion.jpg: Promoted. <-
File:Sarcophagus from Aghia Triada.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former.
Slaunger (talk) 09:19, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Sarcophagus from Aghia Triada.jpg
View opposition
Nominated by:
Slaunger (talk) on 2015-05-22 20:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Sarcophagus of Agia Triada, north side

Previous reviews

Scores:
1. Sarcophagus archmus Heraklion.jpg: +3
2. Sarcophagus from Aghia Triada.jpg: 0 <-
=>
File:Sarcophagus archmus Heraklion.jpg: Promoted.
File:Sarcophagus from Aghia Triada.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-
Slaunger (talk) 09:20, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)

Viborg Katedralskole[edit]

   
Viborg Katedralskole Symmetrical.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Slaunger (talk) on 2015-05-22 19:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Viborg Katedralskole
Used in:
da:Viborg Katedralskole, en:Viborg Katedralskole, and secondary uses in three other articles
Reason:
There is an existing VI of this scope of the same view, which I took 7 years ago with a compact camera. This nomination from April 2015 is much more recent, and is a tone-mapped HDR stitch build from raws taken with a DSLR using Lightroom and PTGui. This has resulted in a much higher reolution image with better dynamic range, and quality. -- Slaunger (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Much better. --Yann (talk) 21:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Sure! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info New version uploaded: perspective corrected, dust spot, sky reworked after feedback at COM:FPC. -- Slaunger (talk) 06:53, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jebulon (talk) 09:19, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Scores: 
1. Viborg Katedralskole Symmetrical.jpg: +3 <--
2. Katedralskolen viborg 2009-04-19.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope)
=>
File:Viborg Katedralskole Symmetrical.jpg: Promoted. <--
File:Katedralskolen viborg 2009-04-19.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former.
--Slaunger (talk) 08:48, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Katedralskolen viborg 2009-04-19.jpg
View opposition
Nominated by:
Slaunger (talk) on 2015-05-22 20:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Viborg Katedralskole
Used in:
da:Viborg Katedralskole, da:Hack Kampmann, en:Viborg Katedralskole, en:Viborg, Denmark
Reason:
This is the existing VI of this scope taken by me 7 years ago with a compact camera. Now superseeded by this photo of much better quality from April 2015. -- Slaunger (talk)

Previous reviews

Scores: 
1. Viborg Katedralskole Symmetrical.jpg: +3
2. Katedralskolen viborg 2009-04-19.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
=>
File:Viborg Katedralskole Symmetrical.jpg: Promoted.
File:Katedralskolen viborg 2009-04-19.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
--Slaunger (talk) 08:48, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)