Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list

Pending Most valued review candidates

Portrait of Vicente Guerrero

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) on 2021-01-21 17:47 (UTC) Scope: Retrato Vicente Guerrero por Anacleto Escutia en Palacio Nacional (Mexico) (Portrait of Vicente Guerrero by Anacleto Escutia in Palacio Nacional (Mexico)) Previous reviews  Comment Good image, good caption, but the scope is too imprecise (it can be improved) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC) @Archaeodontosaurus:  Done the scope has changed--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk)  Support Ok now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:26, 23 January 2021 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: ErickTErick (talk) on 2023-10-31 21:45 (UTC) Scope: Retrato póstumo del presidente Vicente Guerrero en el Museo Nacional de Historia, Ciudad de México (Posthumous portrait of President Vicente Guerrero in the National Museum of History, Mexico City) Reason: The version of this image which currently considered the most valuable within its scope is of much lower quality than this newer version. In addition, the name given to the scope is factually wrong about the location of the painting (it is not within Palacio Nacional) and Mexico's Spanish name is misspelled (it's México, not Mexico). -- ErickTErick (talk)  Comment There is already an image promoted in VI: you have to go to Pending Most valued review candidates --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 1 November 2023 (UTC)  Done Started MVR ErickTErick (talk) 19:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Ezarateesteban on 2023-11-26 22:02 (UTC) Scope: El Aficionado by Antonio Casanova y Estorach  Comment The original file is the .tiff : File:El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach.tiff. Everypeople can create a better processed image from this file. So what are we suposed to do ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC) I am doing it according this reccomendation Ezarateesteban 23:13, 11 December 2023 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Ezarateesteban on 2023-11-26 22:00 (UTC) Scope: El Aficionado by Antonio Casanova y Estorach  Comment The original file is the .tiff : File:El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach.tiff. Everypeople can create a better processed image from this file. So what are we suposed to do ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:37, 11 December 2023 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Anciens bains municipaux de Colmar

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Gzen92 [discuter] on 2018-01-22 12:21 (UTC) Scope: Exterior of anciens bains municipaux (Colmar)  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:18, 26 January 2018 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Gzen92 (talk) on 2023-12-29 07:22 (UTC) Scope: Exterior of anciens bains municipaux (Colmar)  Comment The light on the cable is a bit distracting. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)  Support The cable is distracing in the current VI too. The people are distracing here, but light and crop are superior. --Milseburg (talk) 18:26, 14 February 2024 (UTC)  Support per @Milseburg: . --Contributers2020Talk to me here! 07:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris)

Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-03-31 13:46 (UTC) Scope: Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-03-31 13:46 (UTC) Scope: Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

African chaffinch taxonomy change

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2019-03-31 18:20 (UTC) Scope: Fringilla coelebs africana (African Chaffinch) male  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 2 April 2019 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. --BoothSift 04:05, 5 April 2019 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-04-11 10:28 (UTC) Scope: Fringilla spodiogenys (African Chaffinch) male  Question @Charlesjsharp: Both images are looking equal. Is "Pending Most Valued Review Candidates" really the right place? --Milseburg (talk) 20:29, 14 April 2024 (UTC) They are the same image. There has been a taxonomy change since it was promoted and Archaeodontosaurus suggested I do MVR. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC)  Support Same image but nomination with different scopes. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: --Thi (talk) 18:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC) on 2024-03-23 18:48 (UTC) Scope: Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London Used in: en:Bertrand Russell, de, es  Comment This is the most valuable image in scope, but only if the scope does not include the base. If the scope includes the base, we have to consider whether the dark File:Bust of Bernard Russell in Red Lion Square (01).jpg is better than File:I feel I almost know this guy - geograph.org.uk - 1656321.jpg, which is fenced off. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC) I opened the most valued review. 1656321.jpg seems to be taken before the restoration. --Thi (talk) 11:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: --Thi (talk) 11:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC) on 2024-04-12 11:27 (UTC) Scope: Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London  Comment Ok for the base, but wa can't really see the face. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Mavathoor Kere (lake) - correction of scope

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: iMahesh (talk) on 2020-12-16 02:34 (UTC) Scope: Mavathuru lake at Kotagiri, Karnataka Used in: Kotagiri  Question This is an Instagram picture. Do we know that it has a Creative Commons Copyleft? If so, how do we know? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:44, 16 December 2020 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: It was was written in Instagram post description that Available on Wikimedia commons under CC BY-SA 4.0. The watermarked version was reviewed by User:MB-one for the same license on 8 May 2020, link for original version is available at Other versions.--iMahesh (talk) 03:00, 16 December 2020 (UTC)  Support OK. Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:46, 16 December 2020 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 20 December 2020 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Tagooty (talk) on 2024-04-19 04:34 (UTC) Scope: Mavathoor Kere (lake) near Kanakapura, Karnataka Used in: wikidata:Q124841427 Reason: In 2020, this image was wrongly labelled as being in Kotagiri (Tamil Nadu), it did not have a geotag, and it was promoted to VI based on this incorrect information. The lake is actually in the neighbouring state of Karnataka. The file name and description have been corrected, and geotag added. I am nominating it for the correct scope, to replace the wrong VI scope. --Tagooty (talk) 04:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC) -- Tagooty (talk) The bad appointment must be invalidated. You have to go throughPending Most valued review candidates --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 21 April 2024 (UTC) Moving to MVR --Tagooty (talk) 09:20, 21 April 2024 (UTC)  Support Ok for this correction of scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Open for review.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.