Commons:Valued image candidates/Wayside Cross Villenstraße Bonn-Dottendorf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Wayside Cross Villenstraße Bonn-Dottendorf

promoted to Valued image set: Wayside Cross Villenstraße, Bonn-Dottendorf, Germany
Images
Description
Deutsch: Steinwegkreuz Bonn-Dottendorf, Hausdorff-/Villenstraße, Baudenkmalnummer A 661, errichtet 1733, (Inschrift/Inscription: 1733__(?)TOM__ARD*BART__HOLOMÆUS__WASSERFASs__CANONICUS__BONNENSIS - Ohne Gewähr/Without guarantee for the correctness)
English: Wayside Cross in Bonn-Dottendorf, Hausdorff-/Villenstraße, Germany, cultural heritage monument # A661, built 1733
Nominated by Caecilius Mauß (talk) on 13:11, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued set of images on Wikimedia Commons within the scope:
:Wayside Cross Villenstraße, Bonn-Dottendorf
Review
(criteria)
Some fixes ✓ Done. --Ikar.us (talk) 08:35, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

On images of inscriptions, I prefer to have their text in the description. --Ikar.us (talk) 21:45, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Me too. I ´ve been searching several sources for further information, but found nothing yet. (E.g. Landschaftverband Rheinland, Monument Conservation Office, Land Registry Office, Deutsche Inschriften Online, Urban Administration of Bonn). I could do it myself, but that would be without profound scientific knowledge. So i pass on for scientific reasons. --Caecilius Mauß (talk) 12:00, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Do we need scientific knowledge to copy latin letters? --Ikar.us (talk) 21:55, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done --Caecilius Mauß (talk) 14:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ikar.us (talk) 21:50, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The scope is not valid (it does not lead to a live scope page, or any page). The set cannot be promoted until a valid scope exists.-Godot13 (talk) 17:39, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I have created a new (sub)category, but this is marked as "empty". I don´t know, wether this is the right way. (The former category has been deleted, I don´t know why. Maybe because it was marked as "empty" too. As far as I remember, I created the former category the same way like today.) --Caecilius Mauß (talk) 18:36, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
      • ✓ Done some fixes, including VALID SCOPE. --Caecilius Mauß (talk) 16:53, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --VT98Fan (talk) 21:30, 31 August 2013 (UTC)--