Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
14,377 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
12,151 (84.5%) 
Undecided
  
866 (6%) 
Declined
  
1,360 (9.5%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Structure 5-formamidoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribotide.svg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Medium69 You wanted talk to me? on 2015-01-19 12:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Structure of 5-formamidoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribotide.
Used in:
w:5-Formamidoimidazole-4-carboxamide_ribotide

Pictogram voting question.svg Question I'd feel more comfortable with the, e.g., wikiproject verified (E)-3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)acrylic acid 200.svg, and almost 40 years ago there were no arrows and OH-thingies in formulae, what does that mean? –Be..anyone (talk) 08:39, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

To be honest, I do not understand the formula. My years of chemistry are far away. I have reproduced the drawing in PNG.--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 10:54, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
See en:Natta projection for the arrows. Sorry, I don't feel qualified to judge this – most of what I knew about organic chemistry is buried somewhere deep down in a dark corner … --El Grafo (talk) 23:03, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 22:38, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Structure lysophosphatidylcholine.svg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Medium69 You wanted talk to me? on 2015-01-19 12:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Structure of lysophosphatidylcholines.

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment, no clue why it would be "better" or "worse" in this category, but it's certainly a nice minimalistic (40 lines) SVG and QI. –Be..anyone (talk) 09:10, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 22:38, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Krenkeltal Rothaarsteig in Sauerland, Aquedukt 04.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2015-01-20 06:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Aqueducts in Germany Aqueduct in Krenkeltal Rothaarsteig in Germany.

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:48, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment More technical details on #9 (no QI), but if the photographer insists on #4 (QI), at least it's an ambitious scope. –Be..anyone (talk) 21:36, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I have your comments translated by Google Translate, but I understand the purpose of your story is not good.--Famberhorst (talk) 10:19, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment No, the photo is good (maybe better than #9), only less representative. Nevermind, translate is too convoluted, unless you could read German.Smile fasdfdsfoiueire.svgBe..anyone (talk) 13:52, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thank you for your explanation.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:29, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
GreatWindmillOfSkerries.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2015-01-20 14:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Great Windmill of Skerries
Reason:
This windmill is not only an Irish National Monument, but has a novel arrangement of five sails. -- Martinvl (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support, best in this scope. –Be..anyone (talk) 21:44, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting question.svg Question The windmill is indeed worthy, but this review should be about this photo, not the windmill itself. This is one of several in the category Category:Skerries Windmill, what differentiates this one do you think?. -- PlasmaBall (talk) 15:34, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think it is wrong to put it in both the Category:Skerries Mills category and its child category Category:Skerries Windmill. The latter is the more specific, and the one where other similar photos exist. -- PlasmaBall (talk) 15:34, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment True: there is an over-categorization specifically. Correction made. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 22:38, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Łężycach, 09.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-22 12:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of St. Mary Magdalene in Łężyce, view from SE
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:25, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2014 Kamienica, kościół św. Jerzego 01.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-22 12:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint George church in Kamienica, view from ESE

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:27, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2014 Kamienica, kościół św. Jerzego 04.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-22 12:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint George church in Kamienica, view from N

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:29, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Paczków, mury obronne, 09.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-22 12:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Defensive walls in Paczków

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good choice --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:21, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:31, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2014 Paczków Brama Wrocławska, 01.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-22 12:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Wrocławska Gate in Paczków, view from SW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:22, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:37, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Aloxe-corton entre vignes.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-01-22 13:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Aloxe-Corton, France, the village surrounded by its vineyards
Used in:
en:Aloxe-Corton de:Aloxe-Corton fr:Aloxe-Corton

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Lack geocoding. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting info.svg Info Done! -- Palauenc05 (talk) 22:50, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your geokoding is wrong, this place isn't in Africa. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:23, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Sorry, my mistake. It should be correct now. --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:45, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:38, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
2014 Suchum, Kolumnada (02).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2015-01-22 22:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Colonnade in Sukhumi, Abkhazia. View from North.

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:25, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 22:38, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Météorite de Phnom Penh MHNT.MIN.2011.0.1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-01-23 06:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Pnompehn-Meteorit
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --P e z i (talk) 09:56, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Hôtel du Vieux-Raisin.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-01-23 06:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Hôtel du Vieux-Raisin in Toulouse. Facade, on rue du Languedoc.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 09:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Antieke hooischudder.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2015-01-23 06:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Horse-drawn hay tedders Tedder

Symbol support vote.svg Support, best in scope until somebody finds a horse to show it in action. –Be..anyone (talk) 00:26, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Paczków, Brama Ząbkowicka.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-23 11:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Ząbkowicka Gate In Paczków, view from SE

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 12:43, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Paczków, Brama Kłodzka.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-23 11:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Kłodzka Gate In Paczków, wiev from NE

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Paczków, Rynek 3 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-23 12:10 (UTC)
Scope:
3 Market Square in Paczków

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 12:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Paczków, Rynek 4 i 5.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-23 12:27 (UTC)
Scope:
5 Market Square in Paczków

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Not a good candidate. There are 2 tenement houses, and there should be only one. --Halavar (talk) 12:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:26, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support OK now. P.S. Na przyszłość polecam załatwić taką sytuację w inny sposób. Poprzednie zdjęcie było dobre i na pewno by się komuś przydało. Wystarczyło stworzyć pracę pochodną i załadować ją jako nowy plik. I wtedy nazwa pliku byłaby zgodna z tym co przedstawia zdjęcie, a tak teraz nie jest... --Halavar (talk) 11:17, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
2014 Paczków, Rynek 8 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-23 12:32 (UTC)
Scope:
8 Market Square in Paczków
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg OpposeNondescript car before an ugly shop; no idea why that's a monument. –Be..anyone (talk) 00:31, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
@Be..anyone - Look here: [1], [2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7]. Besides all these pictures are QI. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:37, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Damage to the car parked in front. The building is perfectly recognizable. If one day we have a picture without the car it will replace this one. I found insulting qualifier ugly, and I'm sure the Polish service classification of historical monuements are competents. We are here to judge the encyclopedic value images.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:34, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg CommentI can see everybody's point of view. I have made a small amendment to the text by wikilinking to en:Paczków and to pl:Paczków. Maybe the text could also be expanded a little. Suggested text is "The entire market square was declared a national monument in 2012" (in both English and Polish). I would have added this myself, but I do not read or write Polish. Martinvl (talk) 15:59, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

@Martinvl Im the list of monuments from Paczków no position "market square", but this house is. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for info, that explains a boring shop among some nice old houses. Doubtlessly another good photo by Jacek could represent the entire market square. –Be..anyone (talk) 18:01, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry Jacek, but I must agree with Be..anyone. We all here must remember that there is something called: Commons:Valued image criteria. In the requirements 3.2 we read: "No distracting, irrelevant elements". In this case, that car is too big, it is in the center of the image and clearly it is "irrelevant element". I remember, that Archaeodontosaurus and other users of VI project told me, that we shouldn't promote images only because there is no better at this moment. Promoted Valued Images should be good in every aspect and fully meet the criterias. Composition and (non)existance of distracting, irrelevant elements is one of them. --Halavar (talk) 22:11, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Rometsch beeskow3.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-01-23 10:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Rometsch Beeskow (Volkswagen) coachwork: type Beeskow Holywood Car
Used in:
de:Rometsch

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It would be better to make an appointment for each of the models. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:38, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment That is easy to do. But, on the other hand, Rometsch cars are very rare. There are not many occasions on which both models can be photographed together. That's why I entered this photo as representative for the scope of coachbuilder Rometsch. --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:15, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

  • It is precisely because they are rare that both models should be promoted separately. It is difficult to see, the second car. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:47, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:47, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Banyuls-aspres3.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-01-22 13:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Banyuls-dels-Aspres, Roussillon, France, general view of the village
Used in:
en:Banyuls-dels-Aspres, fr:Banyuls-dels-Aspres, de:Banyuls-dels-Aspres

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment It lacks a caption in English on image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:40, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:58, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 22:38, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Brephulopsis bidens theodosianus 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-01-23 21:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Brephulopsis bidens ssp. theodosianus, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:06, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Fringilla montifringilla - Kajaani Finlande 222.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-01-24 06:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Fringilla montifringilla (Brambling) eggs

Pictogram voting question.svg : There are no other eggs in this category, and the FP is fine, is that as it should be? –Be..anyone (talk) 09:42, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

I do not quite understand the question. You're not in a category but in a gallery. There is no other image, for the moment, for the eggs of this species. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:35, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Mondonville - Mairie.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-01-24 06:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Mondonville, Haute-Garonne, France - Facade of town hall

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:38, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Schola levantina.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-01-24 06:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Scola levantina , In the ghetto of Venice, Northwest exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support, the best at featuring the representative window. –Be..anyone (talk) 11:08, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Paczków, Rynek 9 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-24 11:09 (UTC)
Scope:
9 Market Square in Paczków

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:14, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Paczków, Rynek 10 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-24 11:16 (UTC)
Scope:
10 Market Square in Paczków
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, worst in scope due to the irrelevant car. –Be..anyone (talk) 01:04, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
@Be..anyone - Look here: [8], [9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14]. Besides all these pictures are QI. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:38, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:15, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry Jacek, but I must agree with Be..anyone about that car issue. We all here must remember that there is something called: Commons:Valued image criteria. In the requirements 3.2 we read: "No distracting, irrelevant elements". In this case, that car is too big, it is in the center of the image and clearly it is "irrelevant element". I remember, that Archaeodontosaurus and other users of VI project told me, that we shouldn't promote images only because there is no better at this moment. Promoted Valued Images should be good in every aspect and fully meet the criterias. Composition and (non)existance of distracting, irrelevant elements is one of them. --Halavar (talk) 22:16, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Structure of the magnetosphere numbered.svg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Medium69 You wanted talk to me? on 2015-01-24 13:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Diagram of the Earth's magnetosphere

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:52, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Paczków, Rynek 16 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-24 14:34 (UTC)
Scope:
16 Market Square in Paczków

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 17:50, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Paczków, Rynek 17 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-24 14:40 (UTC)
Scope:
17 Market Square in Paczków

Symbol support vote.svg Support, best POV. –Be..anyone (talk) 01:07, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Paczków, Rynek 19.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-24 14:45 (UTC)
Scope:
19 Market Square in Paczków

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, better (not talking about the quality) photo without car exists. –Be..anyone (talk) 01:14, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

@Be..anyone - Look here: [15], [16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21]. Besides all these pictures are QI. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:40, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg okay, some very good despite of cars, some very good as photo (but not for scope=house), and one pizzeria. The VIC pages told me to ignore quality, and look for a photo representing the scope. –Be..anyone (talk) 17:05, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
@Be..anyone If you think the second picture is better and you do not see the low quality (resolution, sharpness, tilt, perspective, overexposed sky, underexposed shadows), I believe that you are not qualified to evaluate the pictures. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:31, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry Jacek, but I must agree with Be..anyone about that car issue. We all here must remember that there is something called: Commons:Valued image criteria. In the requirements 3.2 we read: "No distracting, irrelevant elements". In this case, that car is too big, it is in the center of the image and clearly it is "irrelevant element". I remember, that Archaeodontosaurus and other users of VI project told me, that we shouldn't promote images only because there is no better at this moment. Promoted Valued Images should be good in every aspect and fully meet the criterias. Composition and (non)existance of distracting, irrelevant elements is one of them. --Halavar (talk) 22:11, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Stefano Quintarelli - Blogfest 2012.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2015-01-24 15:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Stefano Quintarelli
Used in:
en:Stefano Quintarelli, it:Stefano Quintarelli, ru:Квинтарелли, Стефано

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:52, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Rometsch lawrence2.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-01-24 18:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Rometsch (Volkswagen) coachwork: model Lawrence Cabriolet
Used in:
de:Rometsch

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:18, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Rissoina cerithiiformis 01.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-01-24 21:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Rissoina cerithiiformis, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:27, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Suchum Małpiarnia, Pomnik małp (01).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Halavar (talk) on 2015-01-24 23:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument of monkeys in the apery. Research Institute of Experimental Pathology and Therapy, Academy of Sciences of Abkhazia. Sukhumi, Abkhazia.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:32, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Amerikaanse windmolen.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2015-01-25 06:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Wind wheels in De Alde Feanen

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Problem of scope, this wind turbine can not represent all of the wind turbines in Netherlands. We must add the place. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:31, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done I hope you meant it as.

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment [[:Category:Wind wheels in the Netherlands|Wind wheels in De Alde Feanen]] it seems to me sufficient scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Thank you.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:06, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:28, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Bruniquel Victor Brun Pointe de sagaie MHNT PRE 2013 0 162.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-01-25 06:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Archaeological Site of the four rock shelters, Bruniquel's castle - Magalenien Javelin head

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:55, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Scala Contarini del Bovolo (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-01-25 07:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Palace Contarini del Bovolo, Venice – staircase
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope. --Code (talk) 08:08, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Fête des Vendanges de Banyuls sur Mer (2).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-01-25 09:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Banyuls-sur-Mer, Roussillon, France: Vintage festival on the beach, each year in October
Used in:
en:Banyuls-sur-Mer, de:Banyuls-sur-Mer, fr:Banyuls-sur-Mer

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The "grape harvest festival" is not Thanksgiving. The scope and caption should be changed. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I change it to "vintage festival" --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:44, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Ciągnik New Holland TS135A.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-25 11:32 (UTC)
Scope:
New Holland TS135A

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Paczków, Rynek 20 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-25 11:47 (UTC)
Scope:
20 Market Square in Paczków

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
ALSEP Solar Wind Spectrometer numbered.svg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Medium69 You wanted talk to me? on 2015-01-25 12:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Diagram of a part of the ALSEP

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:27, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Paczków, Rynek 22.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-25 12:46 (UTC)
Scope:
22 Market Square in Paczków

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope.--Jebulon (talk) 16:42, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Paczków, Rynek 23.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-25 12:53 (UTC)
Scope:
23 Market Square in Paczków

Maybe I've added "facade" or "exterior" in the scope, but Symbol support vote.svg Support best in scope.--Jebulon (talk) 16:43, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Paczków, Rynek 27 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-25 13:04 (UTC)
Scope:
27 Market Square in Paczków

Maybe "facade" or "exterior" could give a better scope, but Symbol support vote.svg Support as best in scope.--Jebulon (talk) 16:45, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Paczków, Rynek 28 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-25 13:17 (UTC)
Scope:
28 Market Square in Paczków

Symbol support vote.svg Support, but unsure about the crop, more, less? –Be..anyone (talk) 17:40, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Etienne MONIER Bande à Bonnot.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2015-01-25 16:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Étienne Monier, photograph
Used in:
fr:Étienne Monier
Reason:
Exceptional source. New in "Commons". Only picture we have of Étienne Monier, one of the members of the en:Bande à Bonnot, an anarchist and very violent gang of the beginning of the 20th-century. This guy was involved in many bloody bank robberies or attacks. With two other accomplices, he was executed by guillotine in april 1913. Picture taken by en:Alphonse Bertillon. Restored by me. One can find the original picture as first upload of this file. No geocode, it is a studio shot. -- Jebulon (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:30, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Wien Westbahnhof Stellwerk 2.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Linie29 (talk) on 2015-01-25 17:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Westbahnhof, Vienna, Signal box No. 2

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:18, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Roberto Giacobbo - Lucca Comics & Games 2014 2.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2015-01-25 18:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Roberto Giacobbo
Used in:
en:Roberto Giacobbo, it:Roberto Giacobbo, it:q:Roberto Giacobbo, la:Robertus Giacobbo

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
CALLEMIN attitude trois-quarts casquette.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2015-01-25 20:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Raymond Callemin, photograph.
Used in:
fr:Raymond Callemin
Reason:
Again a rare picture. I have a "classical" mugshot of Raymond-la-Science, but I find this one more interesting. Raymond Callemin was a so important member of the Bande à Bonnot (in fact, the chief, after Bonnot's death), that en:Alphonse Bertillon decided to take some various other "attitude" pictures of Callemin, for the preparation of the trial and the whitnesses. I like the cap very much. Callemin, fr:Étienne Monier, fr:André Soudy and fr:Eugène Dieudonné were sentenced to death. Callemin, Soudy, and Monier were executed by guillotine together on april 21, 1913. You have had the three here now. Dieudonné was pardoned, due to the declarations of Callemin, who testified of his innocence of murders. Uploaded and restored by me. No geocode for this studio shot. -- Jebulon (talk)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good work. Yann (talk) 21:35, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Open for review.
Port vendres vue generale.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-01-25 21:25 (UTC)
Scope:
General view of Port-Vendres, Roussillon, France
Used in:
de:Port-Vendres, fr:Port-Vendres

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Zaden rijpen aan Cyclaam Coum 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2015-01-26 06:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Cyclamen coum Fruit.

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:28, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Nepa cinerea MHNT Ventre.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-01-26 06:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Nepa cinerea (Water scorpio) Ventral side

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:29, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bourdelle Herakles Stèle Mayssonie.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-01-26 06:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument to the memory of Alfred Mayssonié, in Toulouse by Bourdelle

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Molino Stucky (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2015-01-26 06:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Molino Stucky, Guidecca Venice - Northeast exposure

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:21, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Preveli World War II Memorial.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Uoaei1 (talk) on 2015-01-26 10:04 (UTC)
Scope:
World War II memorial of Preveli, Crete

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:22, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2015 Kaczka krzyżowka w wodzie (samiec).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-26 10:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Anas platyrhynchos swimming (male), side view

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment, ambitious scope, good. But together with this or that, what's the best? –Be..anyone (talk) 21:06, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Both images are focus problems (too small DOF). --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:25, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support, at modem speed I can't do a FPC review, and this is VIC. –Be..anyone (talk) 21:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Paczków, Rynek 29 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-26 10:33 (UTC)
Scope:
29 Market Square in Paczków

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 19:49, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Paczków, Rynek 31 02.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-26 10:42 (UTC)
Scope:
31 Market Square in Paczków

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 22:35, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
2014 Paczków, Rynek 36 07.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2015-01-26 10:56 (UTC)
Scope:
36 Market Square in Paczków

Symbol support vote.svg Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 19:51, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Sword parts numbered.svg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Medium69 You wanted talk to me? on 2015-01-26 11:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Diagram of the sword parts

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:06, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Federal-Territory-Mosque-03.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) on 2015-01-26 11:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Federal Territory Mosque, Kuala Lumpur

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 22:34, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Provenzano DJ-1.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2015-01-26 11:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Provenzano DJ
Used in:
de:Provenzano DJ, fr:Provenzano DJ, it:Amerigo Provenzano

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:44, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Yashica 635withTelelense.JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2015-01-26 12:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Twin lens reflex (TLR) camera with telephoto lens in situ.
Used in:
:fr:Wikibooks/Photographie/Fabricants/Yashica/Yashica_635
Reason:
It was rare for a TLR camera to be used in conjunction with auxiliary lenses as this necessitated two lenses whereas a single lens reflex camera only needed a single lens. The promoter of this image believes that this is the best example of the use of auxiliary lenses on any TLR camera in Wikimedia Commons. -- Martinvl (talk)
Open for review.
Collioure - La Tour de l' Etoile.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2015-01-26 13:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Fortification Tour de l'étoile in Collioure, France
Used in:
de:Collioure, fr:Collioure
Open for review.
Rissoina rosea 02.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2015-01-26 19:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Rissoina rosea spotted form, Shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:17, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Open for review.
Schelmenturm (Monheim am Rhein).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Anıl Ö. (talk) on 2015-01-26 22:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Category:Schelmenturm Monheim
Open for review.


Closed valued image candidates[edit]

Most valued reviews[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR has to be in the discussed state, while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.