Commons:Visszaállítási kérések

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Undeletion requests and the translation is 40% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted though Commons:Undeletion requests and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Shortcut: COM:UNDEL · COM:UR · COM:UD · COM:DRV

Other languages:
Deutsch 8% • ‎English 100% • ‎español 98% • ‎français 21% • ‎magyar 40% • ‎日本語 6% • ‎português 29% • ‎中文 54%

On this page, users can ask for a deleted page or file (hereafter, "file") to be restored. Users can comment on requests by leaving remarks such as keep deleted or undelete along with their reasoning.

This page is not part of Wikipedia. This page is about the content of Wikimedia Commons, a repository of free media files used by Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. Wikimedia Commons does not host encyclopedia articles. To request undeletion of an article or other content which was deleted from the English Wikipedia edition, see the deletion review page on that project.

Finding out why a file was deleted[edit]

Először is nézd meg a törlési naplót, hogy miért törölték a fájlt. Ha a Commonson a képhez találsz egy piros linket, és arra kattintasz, akkor megnyílik egy szerkesztési ablak, de a baloldali navigációs menü Mi hivatkozik erre pontjából utánajárhatsz, hogy hol említették meg a fájlt (például egy törlési vitában). Másodsorban pedig olvasd el a Commons feltételeit, a licencfeltételeket és a Commons: Törlési irányelveket.

Ha a törlésre adott indoklás nem érthető, vagy ha nem értesz vele egyet, akkor felveheted a kapcsolatot a képet törlő adminisztrátorral. Magyarázatot kérhetsz tõle vagy akár új bizonyítékot is benyújthatsz be a törlés indoka ellen. Felveheted továbbá a kapcsolatot egy másik adminisztrátorral is - a magyarul beszélő adminisztrátorok ebben a listában vannak. Ha a törlés hibás volt, akkor a fájlt visszaállítják.

Fellebbezés[edit]

Ha a törlés a jelenlegi Commons feltételek és licencfeltételek szerint indokolt volt, akkor az adott feltétel vitalapján emelhetsz panaszt a feltétel ellen.

Ha úgy gondolod, hogy a kép nem sértette a szerzői jogokat és a Commons feltételeinek is megfelel:

  • Először a vitát lezáró adminnal lenne érdemes kapcsolatba lépnin. Megkérheted, hogy a bővebben fejtse ki az indoklását, vagy hogy mutasson be bizonyítékokat.
  • Ha nem szeretnél senkivel se közvetlenül kapcsolatba lépni, vagy ha egy adminisztrátor megtagadta a visszaállítást, esetleg több embert szeretnél bevonni a vitába, akkor a lentiek szerint ezen az oldalon kérvényezheted a visszaállítást.
  • If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers.

Átmeneti visszaállítás Files may be temporarily undeleted either to assist an undeletion discussion of that file or to allow transfer to a project that permits fair use. Use the template {{Request temporary undeletion}} in the relevant undeletion request, and provide an explanation.

  1. if the temporary undeletion is to assist discussion, explain why it would be useful for the discussion to undelete the file temporarily, or
  2. if the temporary undeletion is to allow transfer to a fair use project, state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

To assist discussion[edit]

Files may be temporarily undeleted to assist discussion if it is difficult for users to decide on whether an undeletion request should be granted without having access to the file. Where a description of the file or quotation from the file description page is sufficient, an administrator may provide this instead of granting the temporary undeletion request. Requests may be rejected if it is felt that the usefulness to the discussion is outweighed by other factors (such as restoring, even temporarily, files where there are substantial concerns relating to Commons:Photographs of identifiable people). Files temporarily undeleted to assist discussion will be deleted again after thirty days, or when the undeletion request is closed (whichever is sooner).

To allow transfer of fair use content to another project[edit]

A fair use elvet engedélyező projektek felhasználói kérvényezhetnek egy két napos átmeneti visszaállítást, hogy a letörölt fájlt átvihessék a saját projektjükbe. A szerkesztőnek meg kell mondania, hogy melyik projektbe szeretné a fájlt átvinni, és be kell linkelni az adott projekt fair use állásfoglalását. A magyar Wikipédia nem fogad be fair use fájlokat. If a deleted file meets the fair use requirements of another Wikimedia project, users can request temporary undeletion in order to transfer the file there. These requests can usually be handled speedily (without discussion). Files temporarily undeleted for transfer purposes will be deleted again after two days. When requesting temporary undeletion, please state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

Új kérés beadása[edit]

Kattints ide, és megnyílik az az oldal, ahova a visszaállítási kérésedet írhatod be. Ugyanezt kézzel is megcsinálhatod, ha a mai dátum melletti "szerkesztés" hivatkozásra bököl. A kérésedet a lap aljára írd be, és ne feledkezz meg az alábbiakról:

  • A Subject/headline: mezőbe írj be egy megfelelő témát. Ha csak egyetlen egy fájl visszaállítását kéred, akkor melegen ajánlott az [[:Image:TöröltFájl.jpg]]. (Ne feledkezz meg az első kettőspontról, az hivatkozik a képre.)
  • Sorold fel a fájlt vagy fájlokat amire a visszaállítási kérésed vonatkozik, és mindegyik képhez adj meg egy hivatkozást (lásd feljebb). Ha nem emlékszel a fájl nevére, akkor a lehető legtöbb mindent adj meg. Ha egy kérésből nem derül ki, hogy mit is kellene visszaállítani, akkor az a kérés nagyon hamar archiválásra kerülhet.
  • Sorold fel indokaidat a visszaállításra.
  • Írd alá a kérésedet négy hullámvonallal(~~~~). Ha a Commonsban van felhasználói fiókod, akkor jelentkezz be. Ha te töltötted fel a képet, akkor így az adminok sokkal hamarabb megtalálják.

Add the request to the bottom of the page. Click here to open the page where you should add your request. Alternatively, you can click the "edit" link next to the current date below.

Archives[edit]

Closed undeletion debates are archived daily.

Nyitott visszaállítási kérések[edit]

Watch Edit

File:British Steel Logo.svg[edit]

I' believe now I found another possible reason for keeping this file. I found completely random another registred trademark with exactly the same logo S: hr:File:STV.PNG This logo seems registered and used over 10 years, so there can't be a copyright by the British Steel author anymore!? If not, there is also an act on customary law!? (The deleting admin has me encouraged to an UDR.) User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?)21:20, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The logo will remain copyright in the UK regardless of what someone else does. It can be uploaded to enwp as {{PD-ineligible-USonly}} but can't be hosted here. LGA talkedits 22:55, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Resaca a València - 19.jpeg[edit]

It's from a previous undelete request, but despite having some files restored, this very file, which was in use at :ca, has not been restored. I understand that quality may not be the best, but the files that were at Category:Presentació de Resaca a València are the only portaits of this comic-book artist We have at Commons, so, were the only way I had to illustrate the article. I must insist: the 19.jpeg file was in use when deleted. Also, File:Mamen Moreu signant - 1.jpeg and File:Mamen Moreu signant - 2.jpeg had more quality that the other deleted files. Please, restore at least those three files with a delettion consult, like the other files before deleting a whole set with some files in use (and not substituble) in wikipedia.--Coentor (talk) 10:24, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Мемориальный знак.jpg[edit]

The deleted file was uploaded by me according to a permission from its author Alexander Brodsky, and on 22-nd of July he sent a formal letter to OTRS with confirmation of his agreement. Please let me know what can I do now to keep the file in Wikimedia? Thank you. Mlarisa (talk) 15:05, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The message sent 5 days ago by Alexander Brodsky does not mention any image, and seems related to something else. May be somebody speaking Russian will have more clue. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:57, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
This must be my fault as I instructed him: instead of image name, Brodsly's letter contained an external link to the page where the image was referenced: Последний адрес. Could you please look into the page history? Sorry for that mistake. Mlarisa (talk) 06:10, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Flag of the Lugansk People's Republic.svg [edit]

Simple geometric shapes are public domain as {{PD-trivial}}. Eagle came from File:Coat of Arms of the Russian Federation.svg - this image is public domain as {{PD-RU-exempt}}. Coats of arms of Luhansk is public domain as {{PD-UA-exempt}} As was pointed out in the original DR by Butko.

This same rationale lead to a keep of File:Flag of the Donetsk Republic (Organisation).svg. How is one ok and the other not? Pro-Kiev nominations and delete votes aren't policy. Policy is what should decide the matter. Rosario Berganza 20:40, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Why this was deleted, and the others kept? It seems completely arbitrary. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:48, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose at this time as Ankry pointed out at the DR "Derivative work of PD symbols is another work and can be copyrighted" so this needs permission is send to COM:OTRS before we can host it. As an aside anything that is {{PD-RU-exempt}} is not necessarily PD in either the Ukraine or US. LGA talkedits 21:12, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • This is a very simple derivative combination of PD elements. The idea that it would make a new copyright is wrong. It's a simple PD flag.
Flag of the Donetsk Republic (Organisation).svg
LNR flag.png
They're almost identical! But one is ok and the other isn't? There's no more creativity or originality in the one than in the other. Simple. OK for Commons. Shouldn't have been deleted. Also, we have all keep votes for the PNG... Rosario Berganza 00:30, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
You may feel it is wrong, but sadly it is true, if anyone uses pre-existing works to create a new work, that "new" work has it's own copyright which is separate and distinct from any copyright attached to the pre-existing works. If the pre-existing works used are PD then the new author is free to licence the new work how they see fit; if the pre-existing works are still in copyright the righsholders of the pre-existing works used need to consent to their work being used in the "new" work. LGA talkedits 08:21, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support What user LGA & Ankry is telling is clear and simply copyfraud (there is no legislative basis for this) User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?)09:22, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Restored: as per Perhelion and Berganza. Yann (talk) 15:26, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Wikimedia_Metrics_Meeting_-_June_2014_-_Photo_11.jpg[edit]

@JuTa, Natuur12, Peteforsyth, Fabrice Florin (WMF): I've temporarily restored the image after reading Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wikimedia Metrics Meeting - June 2014 - Photo 11.jpg in order to add source images in the description. However, I'd prefer to have opinion of the COM:UDR active admins in order to decided whether the file should be restored or not.

PS: I don't understand why the image was deleted in the first place and not the description improved. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:07, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks @PierreSelim:. But if you found and documented all the sources, why did you re-delete? Weren't they freely licensed? -Pete F (talk) 07:54, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
If the sources are fixed the file can be undeleted. What worries me more is that WMF-staff doesn't give proper atribution to the photographers. The reason why it was deleted and not fixed, everyone had more than 7 days to find the sources. I am not going to do other people's homework and without those sources the image is a violation of the cc-license. Natuur12 (talk) 09:16, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Selline kevade algus 2010.jpg [edit]

My rationale here for keeping this photo was that the building on the background on the left and behind the trees is unlikely the main building. Jim replied that the building is the only important thing there and hence the main subject. This is hard to agree about that the streets, a junction or generic town view aren't important. This can be illustration of specific street or town (important as subjects on, say, Wikipedia). What other opinions do we have on this?

Judging on the main subject in the sense of the copyright act of Estonia in my opinion is similar to judging on threshold of originality or de minimis where reasons are never absolutely solid and where we often yet don't rush apply restrictions that are unlikely to be there. Pikne 13:44, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

I think my closure of the DR was correct, so I should Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose this. With that said, I think it is a close call, and would be happy with whatever our colleagues decide. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Mexican_Coins_after_1958[edit]

Mexican Coins after 1958

   File:50 pesos de México de 1984 (reverso)(moneda con troquel descentrado).jpg
   File:50 centavos de México de 1979 (reverso)(moneda de troquel descantillado).jpg
   File:50 centavos de México de 1975 (reverso)(moneda con troquel descentrado).jpg
   File:5 pesos de México de 1976 (reverso)(moneda con clipet).jpg
   File:5 centavos de México de 1970 (reverso)(moneda con troquel descentrado).jpg
   File:5 centavos de México de 1968 (reverso)(moneda con clipet).jpg
   File:20 pesos de México de 1982 (reverso)(moneda con troquel descentrado).JPG
   File:20 centavos de México de 1977 (reverso)(moneda de fin de riel).jpg
   File:10 pesos de México de 1982 (reverso)(moneda con troquel rotado).JPG
   File:10 pesos de México de 1982 (reverso)(moneda con clipet).jpg
   File:10 pesos de México de 1974 (reverso)(moneda con troquel descentrado).jpg
   File:10 centavos de México de 1979 (reverso)(moneda de troquel erosionado).jpg

Se argumenta que no deben estar por ser objetos tridimensionales con derecho de autor, sin embargo a pesar de ser monedas ostentan el escudo nacional mexicano el cual no tiene derechos de autor por ser emblema nacional. Otros ejemplos de archivos de objetos tridimensionales con escudos: Fijos (además libertad de panorama) File:UNAM Rectoria Escudo.jpg File:Escudo_Nacional_Mexicano.jpg

No fijos File:Estandarte de UPIICSA.jpg File:Bandera de México ondeando en el Zócalo.JPG File:Cuauhtemoc Escudo.jpg

Esa es la lista.--Inri (talk) 15:54, 28 July 2014 (UTC)