Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments/Logo contest/Submissions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to the Wiki Loves Monuments Logo contest submission page. Before you list your logo, make sure that you have read the general information and rules about this contest on the presentation page.

Submissions are closed, thanks for participating!

Voting has stopped, Thank you for your participation.

And the winner is...
Piece of puzzle monument 2
by User:Lusitana
LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg


Voting rules[edit]

  • You can vote for as many submissions as you wish.
  • You can, of course, vote for your own submission.
  • Please vote with '''{{support}}''' and '''{{oppose}}''' templates to allow for easy counting.
  • Voting starts on the 19th of April 2011 at 0:00 UTC and closes on the 27th of April at 23:59 UTC.

Contents

Current Submissions[edit]

[edit]

(you can vote to keep the old logo)

Wikilovesmonuments logo.svg

Comments[edit]

  • straightforward and simple, but in my opinion too "academic" and too close to the Wikiversity logo. notafish }<';> 20:19, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Note: as is, this logo is copyrighted and should not even be able to enter the competition. Since I made the rules, I'm allowed to bend them, and I'll leave it because it's only fair to allow people who have grown fond of it to keep it. notafish }<';> 20:43, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
    • See my note below. I would happily waive copyright if this is chosen. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 10:46, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
      • Ah, this is cool. But...hmmm. It's not your copyright anymore, is it? ;) notafish }<';> 21:24, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
        • I've never signed anything, just added the template because i thought it made sense. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 22:07, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support odder (talk) 09:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Mafoso (talk) 09:46, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol support vote.svg Support - ArjanH (talk) 10:14, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol support vote.svg Support it was not so ugly after all. Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 10:15, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol support vote.svg Support - sorry, just grew attached to it :D Effeietsanders (talk) 10:17, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol support vote.svg Support - My own logo. I would happily waive copyright on this if it is chosen. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 10:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol support vote.svg Support Adeliine (talk) 13:51, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol support vote.svg Support WooteleF (talk)
  9. Symbol support vote.svg Support Fine.--KRLS (talk) 15:59, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol support vote.svg Support Simple, but I like it.--Cirdan (talk) 16:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  11. Symbol support vote.svg Support Marinna (talk) 16:49, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  12. Symbol support vote.svg Support as fallback, worked last year. Multichill (talk) 18:47, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  13. GA candidate.svg Weak support simple and clean but I would like to see more colour. --CristianCantoro (talk) 18:48, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  14. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- smial (talk) 21:06, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  15. Symbol support vote.svg Support see cirdan --Ziko (talk) 21:43, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  16. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Davidpar (disc.) 07:20, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  17. Symbol support vote.svg Support Aleposta (talk) 14:09, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  18. Symbol support vote.svg Support Ssgreporter (talk) 22:04, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  19. Symbol support vote.svg Support Just change the font to Wikipedia’s version of Linux Libertine. Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose amateurish: stairs don't culminate nicely, roof is bit bland. Ugly typography. Zanaq (talk) 10:26, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too simple: IMHO it has a low impact when people look at it. --Giac83 11:14, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose grey, austere, too academic Symac (talk) 11:22, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's boring in compating with others. Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 12:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 17:55, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. BA candidate.svg Weak oppose As stated in the comments. Too academic, too close to Wikisource logo, and somehow it makes me a bit sad everytime I look at it. notafish }<';> 21:27, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose Austere, concrete style, not very warm and friendly. Trizek here or on fr:wp 22:43, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sympathethic to all attachments to it, but it emits too little impact. We need something vibrant, I'd say. -- Nuno Tavares PT 23:06, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As many said above, too serious, not enough color or attention-grabbing elements. --Waldir talk 00:07, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose slightly boring. --Elya (talk) 17:57, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  11. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think the temple is a bit strange (maybe the proportions can be improved with this or this) --Leovilok (talk) 20:21, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  12. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Bland and unappealing. ?fetchcomms 22:16, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  13. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Text is to hard to read (contrast). // Sertion 11:05, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  14. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like the font and its contrast. --AleXXw talk!•me@de.wp 11:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  15. BA candidate.svg Weak oppose as per Notafish. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  16. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Arnaugir (talk) 11:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
  17. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Vibhijain (talk) 15:09, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  18. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 16:41, 27 April 2011 (UTC) Because it looks like the wikiversity one.

Vote Summary[edit]

  • 19 support
  • 18 oppose

Shutter with gothic window[edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 e.svg

Comments[edit]

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Pakeha (talk) 10:16, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support VIGNERON * discut. 10:20, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support Elegant. This is explicit and the one which respect the most the visual identity guidelines (simplicity, geometrical figure). Maybe with more Wikimedia's colors? O2 (talk) 11:21, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol support vote.svg Support I am a stained glass window fan, and this one reminds me of the big blue rosette windows of Chartres. It could also be a photo of mosaics at Granada, so it's very open for interpretation. I also like the idea of the shutter diaphragm of a camera. Very original, very low-key as an image, and the emphasis is not on 'whole building', but detail - I like that the most! Jane023 (talk) 13:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol support vote.svg Support Marinna (talk) 14:26, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. GA candidate.svg Weak support Great colors (keep it like that, please) and I like the text. But maybe it's not obvious enough?--Cirdan (talk) 16:41, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:20, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the idea a lot. I find it's one of the only "finished logos" that actually gives a good hint at "photography". I'm thinking the gothic window could even be changed to fit whatever people think they want to promote. notafish }<';> 21:19, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol support vote.svg Support--Ziko (talk) 22:02, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Maxi big Symbol support vote.svg Support Trizek here or on fr:wp 22:40, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  11. GA candidate.svg Weak support Looks great, but not terribly obvious, I'm afraid. I don't like the typography very much, but that can be worked on. And notafish's idea of replacing the Gothic window with other stuff might work great (but then again it might not...) --Waldir talk 00:50, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  12. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Davidpar (disc.) 09:37, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  13. Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it, but Gothic windows could use some friends (other buildings?), and the WIKI word is too tall. ?fetchcomms 22:38, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  14. Symbol support vote.svg Support --WikedKentaur (talk) 06:22, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
  15. Symbol support vote.svg Support The real thing. --Pequod76(talk) 23:42, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  16. Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support Awesome! But perhaps a little more defined? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.15.115.142 (talk • contribs)
  17. Symbol support vote.svg Support, subtle but effective. Actually looks like a Wikimedia logo, which is a definite plus. Lankiveil (talk) 23:51, 25 April 2011 (UTC).
  18. Symbol support vote.svg Support Vibhijain (talk) 15:09, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  19. GA candidate.svg Weak support Beside the fonts, it looks great. But remains me rather of Picasa loves monuments than Wikipedia loves monuments. Weak link to Wikipedia project. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  20. Symbol support vote.svg Support Liesel (talk) 16:22, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not compact. unclear what it means. Zanaq (talk) 10:31, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. BA candidate.svg Weak oppose not obvious enough, to quote Cirdan -- CristianCantoro (talk) 18:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Anthere (talk)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I don't get it. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 12:09, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like it, but I think its to hard to get. --AleXXw talk!•me@de.wp 11:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unclear. HenkvD (talk) 18:59, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I don't get it either. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. oh, so it's gothic windows, not a snowflake! Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 10:06, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose doesn't show what WLM is --Arnaugir (talk) 11:04, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 16:56, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

summary[edit]

  • 20 support
  • 10 oppose

Castle towers and banner[edit]

WLM 2011 Orionist 1.svg

Comments[edit]

  • I chose blue and silver because it's a classy combination, but other color combinations would also look good. There are several places available for the year: on banner, above banner, and under text with the towers extended along with it. -- Orionisttalk 10:07, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
  • ...

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Nice and playful. I like it! Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 10:44, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Chic, sobre, simple, clair et plaisant. --Wikinade (talk) 11:10, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol support vote.svg Support quote Wikinade -- CristianCantoro (talk) 18:44, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. GA candidate.svg Weak support Looks great, but maybe the flag could be smaller. --Waldir talk 01:05, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Davidpar (disc.) 09:38, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. GA candidate.svg Weak support don't like the banner, but nice footprint, trustworthy and classy. Zanaq (talk) 10:27, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it! --AleXXw talk!•me@de.wp 11:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol support vote.svg Support Vibhijain (talk) 15:10, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stepro (talk) 16:57, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. BA candidate.svg Weak oppose The banner seems quite random. But everything else is good.--Cirdan (talk) 16:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Ziko (talk) 21:58, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--I don't know the english word for the french "nian-nian" O2 (talk) 22:22, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
    Apparently it's written gnangnan and means something like wishy-washy or namby-pamby. --Waldir talk 01:05, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Marinna (talk) 00:37, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too medieval looking. ?fetchcomms 22:39, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as O2^^. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Don't like this design. Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 10:08, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose don't like it --Arnaugir (talk) 11:04, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It’s the banner, sorry. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Vote summary[edit]

  • 10 support
  • 9 oppose

Minigolf proposal - As simple as possible[edit]

  • by Collectif minigolf

Minigolf-wlm logo proposal.svg

Comments[edit]

  • The pictograms are home made, the WIKILOVES typo is Deja vu sans and the MONUMENTS one is Sorts Mill Goudy, both are available under a free license. You can see variations with other colors and black brackground on this pdf and some examples of usage (cap, mug) on this other pdf. Symac (talk) 15:13, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
  • And here is an example of how a poster based on this logo should look : File:WLM-minigolf-poster.jpg Symac (talk) 15:33, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
  • ...

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support VIGNERON * discut. 10:21, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the simplicity of this one (disclaimer: I have contributed to its elaboration) Symac (talk) 11:20, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol support vote.svg Support simple, yet elegant. Lankiveil (talk) 11:59, 19 April 2011 (UTC).
  4. GA candidate.svg Weak support I really like the text, but the monuments are too small. If they were bigger, this would definitely be one of my favorites.--Cirdan (talk) 16:36, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:16, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol support vote.svg Support I like this one. I think the tiddledoos on top could be better, but I find it clean and it would live well on swag, as the provided pdfs show. notafish }<';> 21:14, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. GA candidate.svg Weak support Looks nice. I agree with Cirdan that maybe bigger monuments would be better. Also, some space between "wiki" and "loves" would be nice, so it does look like a single word. --Waldir talk 00:39, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Davidpar (disc.) 09:02, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol support vote.svg Support idea, but buildings need more integration. Also, space needed between WIKI and LOVES. ?fetchcomms 22:35, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol support vote.svg Support Great idea. --AleXXw talk!•me@de.wp 11:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  11. Symbol support vote.svg Support --19:52, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
  12. Symbol support vote.svg Support Vibhijain (talk) 15:13, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  13. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  14. Symbol support vote.svg Support The idea looks really vivid to me, but I hope to see slightly amended pictograms above the text.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:41, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like this icons. Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 12:23, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Ziko (talk) 21:53, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too simple --Arnaugir (talk) 11:05, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 16:57, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 13 support before the deadline
  • 4 oppose

Piece of puzzle monument[edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 b.svg

Comments[edit]

  • Like! I am not sure how this works out in greyscale, maybe good to make a seperate version for that when we would continue with it :) (also like the red one, but slight preference for blue) Effeietsanders (talk) 16:03, 9 April 2011 (UTC) (p.s. I do prefer the other version's text)
  • Thanks! The one bellow can also work with the blue background :). Here is the grayscale version of this logo. Lusitana (talk) 18:54, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Really nice. Love the integration of the puzzle piece into a castle. GoEThe (talk) 15:22, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
  • I’m not sure if the 3D effect works for everyone. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  • ...

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support - Edoderoo (talk) 10:14, 19 April 2011 (UTC) - nice, simple and straightforward
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support, I slightly prefer the blue. VIGNERON * discut. 10:22, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol support vote.svg Support Can't actually make up my mind (red pill or blue pill)? -- Nuno Tavares PT 11:24, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:14, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. GA candidate.svg Weak support I prefer the red one. Blue doesn't mix as well with grey here, which is more of a cold color than a warm one; so the whole feel is not very attention-grabbing, dynamic, etc. I also prefer the typography layout in the red version. --Waldir talk 00:32, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Davidpar (disc.) 08:58, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol support vote.svg Support Font needs to match and blue color is out of place (replace with Wikimedia green or red?), but design integrates castle and puzzle piece well. ?fetchcomms 22:33, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. GA candidate.svg Weak support--Arnaugir (talk) 11:05, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol support vote.svg Support Vibhijain (talk) 15:13, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Homely. Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 12:22, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like/get the puzzle-shape.--Cirdan (talk) 16:33, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Marinna (talk) 17:12, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like logos where you don't see the main image in front and the puzzle/shape is unclear. -- CristianCantoro (talk) 18:50, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the text is just too long and unbalanced, I like the other one better. notafish }<';> 21:13, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like the idea, but not the 3D-style. --AleXXw talk!•me@de.wp 11:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 16:43, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 9 support
  • 7 oppose

Piece of puzzle monument 2[edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

Comments[edit]

  • Grayscale version of this logo. Lusitana (talk) 18:50, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
  • great combination, like it! --Elya (talk) 21:14, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Absolutely awesome. The castle frontside is very very clever. -- Nuno Tavares PT 22:52, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
  • I agree w/ Nuno, this was brilliant :) I like the layout of the text in this one better than the top one (where it was too small), but the red is too dark for the shadowed parts of the castle to stand out well. I'd like to see a variant of this with the background in semi-dark gray (not as dark as in the grayscale version), and some white lines spiraling to the center, resembling a diaphragm shutter. Then, IMO, this would be perfect, as it would combine all the required elements (photography, wiki, monuments) in a way that doesn't look forced :) --Waldir talk 02:49, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support--Mafoso (talk) 09:48, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support--Kippelboy (talk) 09:50, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol support vote.svg Support smart design --Pakeha (talk) 10:14, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- nicer text alignment, although I have a slight preference for blue over red. Effeietsanders (talk) 10:15, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Although i would change the font. It's a hodgepodge of different fonts. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 10:43, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol support vote.svg Support Can't actually make up my mind (red pill or blue pill)? -- Nuno Tavares PT 11:24, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol support vote.svg Support, I prefer the red one --Hoo man (talk) 12:28, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol support vote.svg Support, I take the red pill ;-) / modern and clear design --Elya (talk) 12:58, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol support vote.svg Support-- ---antonio- (talk) 13:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol support vote.svg Support as Effeietsanders said, text is good, blue would be better. Adeliine (talk) 14:12, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  11. Symbol support vote.svg Support Manuel de Sousa (talk) 15:15, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  12. Symbol support vote.svg Support Awesome!--KRLS (talk) 16:08, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  13. Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice and effective: I take the red pill. I like the puzzle/castle shape. - εΔω 17:14, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  14. Symbol support vote.svg Support I like this one a lot, but I'd prefer it in blue. --ecelan (talk) 17:29, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  15. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:15, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  16. Symbol support vote.svg Support, like the design. Manoillon (talk) 18:39, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  17. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- smial (talk) 21:07, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  18. Symbol support vote.svg Support Simple, clean, to the point. I agree with Husky though, the fonts might bear being all just "one font". notafish }<';> 21:10, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  19. Symbol support vote.svg Support Trizek here or on fr:wp 22:39, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  20. Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support Probably my favorite. Would like to see a different font though, and a single one at that. The red is a bit too dark for my taste. Also, something related to photography is missing. Maybe adding some spiraling curves to the large red circle? Similar to #Shutter with gothic window but with lines, not colors. --Waldir talk 00:37, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  21. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Davidpar (disc.) 08:42, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  22. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Justass (talk) 22:24, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  23. Symbol support vote.svg Support Anthere (talk) 22:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC) yup, good stuff
  24. Symbol support vote.svg Support Better color than the blue version above, but would prefer the WIKI font to match the sans-serif also used. ?fetchcomms 22:34, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  25. Symbol support vote.svg Support --WikedKentaur (talk) 06:24, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
  26. Symbol support vote.svg Support not perfect but does the job imho. I prefer this one to the previous one (colour, font balance etc) Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  27. Symbol support vote.svg Support Geonarva (talk) 19:27, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  28. Symbol support vote.svg Support like it! --Arnaugir (talk) 11:06, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
  29. Symbol support vote.svg Support Vibhijain (talk) 15:13, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  30. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- ClemensFranz (talk) 18:58, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  31. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 07:03, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like/get the puzzle-shape.--Cirdan (talk) 16:33, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Marinna (talk) 17:09, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Iyou don't see the whole logo in front and the puzzle/shape is unclear -- CristianCantoro (talk) 18:46, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like the idea, but not the 3D-style. --AleXXw talk!•me@de.wp 11:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, sorry, it just looks ugly to me. Lankiveil (talk) 23:52, 25 April 2011 (UTC).
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 16:43, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Neutral[edit]

  1. Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral I like the idea of the puzzle combined with monument, but I don't really like the 3D style. But as it seems I'm the only one I won't oppose :) Symac (talk) 08:21, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 30 support before the deadline
  • 6 oppose

[edit]

Wiki loves monuments logo contest elya.svg

Comments[edit]

  • Ooh, I love this one! But is there a reason for the red border around the green and blue boxes? // Sertion 20:11, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
not exactly ;-) I fixed this. --Elya (talk) 05:29, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
  • I like this one too. Good idea! Are you thinking of making different versions of this one? --ecelan (talk) 07:33, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
not really. A puzzle instead of the lens would be an option, but it would focus too much on Wikipedia, imho. --Elya (talk) 20:48, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
  • I like this one. Much better than mine! GoEThe (talk) 11:24, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Big smile. --Ziko (talk) 19:47, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Very nice, indeed!! -- Nuno Tavares PT 22:44, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
  • It looks great, but for some reason every time I look at the numbers I think of technical info (exposure, focal lenght, etc) that would show up in a digital camera's screen or something like that :P --Waldir talk 02:54, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Maybe that's intentional ;-) --Elya (talk) 08:47, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
  • If you removed the 2011 and the period at the end of the title, this would be my favourite 2-d logo. --99of9 (talk) 00:27, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support My favourite. odder (talk) 09:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Mafoso (talk) 09:45, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Manuel Schneider(bla) (+/-) 09:59, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Giac83 11:10, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol support vote.svg Support Simple, contextualized. It's funny how the "20 11" look like film printings... -- Nuno Tavares PT 11:22, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol support vote.svg Support Although I think I don't like/get the full stop (period). --Elitre (talk) 12:10, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol support vote.svg Support Good. Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 12:18, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol support vote.svg Support unusual, like a meteor among stars! --Das steinerne Herz (talk) 12:24, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol support vote.svg Support - Hoo man (talk) 12:27, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol support vote.svg Support Raymond 12:29, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  11. Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the way it mixes both concepts: photoraphy and monuments. --ecelan (talk) 17:21, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  12. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:13, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  13. Symbol support vote.svg Support probably the most original -- CristianCantoro (talk) 18:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  14. GA candidate.svg Weak support I like the idea a lot (one of the ones which includes photography) but it's a bit too stout for my taste. I would take the full stop in the text away though. Oh, and I simply love its name ;) notafish }<';> 21:32, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  15. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ziko (talk) 21:51, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  16. GA candidate.svg Weak support Misses a representation for wiki, but looks nice. The numbers add a nice touch, though it won't be immediately evident that they're a date. Also, I think the full stop should be removed, it feels a bit.. dunno, patronizing? Like "Wiki loves monuments -- end of conversation. Don't question me." --Waldir talk 00:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  17. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Davidpar (disc.) 08:25, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  18. Symbol support vote.svg Support Aleposta (talk) 16:43, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  19. Symbol support vote.svg Support if the date and period are removed, and something better is done with the camera shutter cutout. The last looks especially awkward. ?fetchcomms 22:31, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  20. Symbol support vote.svg Support --WikedKentaur (talk) 06:23, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
  21. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Prolineserver (talk) 17:42, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
  22. Symbol support vote.svg Support--HOWI (talk) 19:20, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
  23. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Superbass (talk) 19:51, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
  24. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Regiomontanus (talk) 05:59, 24 April 2011 (UTC) because of the combination of photography and monunuments.
  25. Symbol support vote.svg Support Vibhijain (talk) 15:13, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  26. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stepro (talk) 16:49, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, maybe I'm being a bit crude here, but I'm just reminded of the goatse.cx man by this logo. Not something I want to be reminded of. Lankiveil (talk) 10:02, 19 April 2011 (UTC).
    LOL! Indeed, now that you mention it, I can see it... but come on, I don't think most people would see that when they look at this logo :) --Waldir talk 00:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose intensely ugly. Zanaq (talk) 10:27, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ---antonio- (talk) 13:50, 19 April 2011 (UTC) it´s nice and a good logo but do not remind me monuments, just castles, maybe it can be improved
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Simply don't like it. --WooteleF (talk) 15:00, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I find It too heavy :/ Kyro (talk) 15:33, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As a non-photographer, at first I didn't understand the "weird circle inside the castle". Personally I don't believe that this logo gets the message to the people looking at it.--Cirdan (talk) 16:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Marinna (talk) 17:07, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. I agree with the comment that it's too heavy and dark. Manoillon (talk) 18:44, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose ugly, there are much better ones. --Pakeha (talk) 20:22, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Too many elements and not very noticable, although i like the idea of doing something with a shutter. - Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 22:08, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  11. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't realy understand it ... maybe too many elements.--Leovilok (talk) 18:47, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  12. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's too much for me, perhaps without the shutter and not in black i'd like it more. --AleXXw talk!•me@de.wp 11:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  13. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too busy. Without "2011", it'd be slightly better. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  14. BA candidate.svg Weak oppose LOL at the first comment in this section --Arnaugir (talk) 11:06, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
  15. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Trizek here or on fr:wp 07:59, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Neutral[edit]

  1. Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Nice idea, but it has such a brutal charisma to me (can’t tell why). --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 26 support
  • 14 oppose before the deadline

Puzzle monument picture[edit]

WLM logo - Waldir 4.svg WLM logo - Waldir 4b.svg
  • by User:Waldir
  • For more information about this logo, see Commons talk:Wiki Loves Monuments/Logo contest/Submissions#Several drafts
    • To clarify some voters' concerns: the name is not included in the logo precisely so it can be added with text below it, in various languages. I will add a sample directly in the image so you can see how it would look. --Waldir talk 17:26, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
      • I would suggest adding it here too. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 22:04, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
        • Ok, added above. --Waldir talk 23:57, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Seems like some people don't like the colors. Care to share some suggestions? :) --Waldir talk 23:15, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
    • The colors seem a bit bland (unsaturated), especially the green. I would either go with more saturation (maybe a bit like            ) or more pastel (maybe a bit like            ). I think the WikiMedia Colors would work well too: (blue sky, red grass or red sky and blue grass) Zanaq (talk) 08:57, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support Cool! Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 12:13, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Strong support x2 i was mistaken. This one is the best. Béria Lima msg 12:32, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol support vote.svg Support- Hoo man (talk) 12:59, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol support vote.svg Support I think this logo can still grow. As is, it may be a bit too "linear" (I'm not sure how to express the fact that the lines are very straight and maybe too thin, which makes the whole design not 'flow' as I would like), but it's one of the best in avoiding translation issues, allowing for derivatives (who knows, you could have the Eiffel Tower for France, and a Windmill for the Netherlands) if need arises, as well as allowing for pieces to be used in different material. I like it as is though, and find it clean and easy. notafish }<';> 21:06, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- smial (talk) 21:14, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol support vote.svg Support I like notafish's idea of replacing the monument according to the country, that'd be a nice touch indeed! --Waldir talk 00:21, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:04, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Davidpar (disc.) 08:00, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol support vote.svg Support Aleposta (talk) 16:37, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Justass (talk) 22:25, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  11. Symbol support vote.svg Support, but not my first choice. It looks too much like a postcard or stamp; definitely could be used for other things, though. ?fetchcomms 22:28, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  12. Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice one. odder (talk) 06:54, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
  13. Symbol support vote.svg Support - I like the concept, but it doesn't include the name of the project. - Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 22:04, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
    please see the note above. --Waldir talk 17:26, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
    Moved from oppose to support after the addition of the example with the project name. Nice one! Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 12:08, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
  14. Symbol support vote.svg Support - doesn't look like our usual visual identity, but nice and recognizable. Don't really like the colors though. Zanaq (talk) 10:25, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
    Would you add your thoughts regarding the colors in the comment section above? I'm interested in hearing your ideas :) --Waldir talk 23:15, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  15. Symbol support vote.svg Support With the text added, it's now clear what the logo is for.--Cirdan (talk) 06:26, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
  16. Symbol support vote.svg Support Vibhijain (talk) 15:14, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  17. GA candidate.svg Weak support Note that the small thumbnails are rendered too much like a stamp though. --AVRS (talk) 11:06, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Marinna (talk) 16:58, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The colours are uninteresting IMO. --99of9 (talk) 01:49, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
    So, what would be interesting colors in your opinion? Please share your opinion in the comment section above. --Waldir talk 23:15, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Great idea! I don't like the colors and its too detailed for a Logo --AleXXw talk!•me@de.wp 11:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
    Fair enough, but would you mind to expand on which colors you think would work best? Please add your thoughts to the comment section above :) --Waldir talk 23:15, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Arnaugir (talk) 11:07, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Can’t tell why, but it looks to childish to me. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 16:50, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 17 support
  • 6 oppose

Somewhat hand drawn heartish - Compact[edit]

Sertion - WikiLoves Monuments - Compact.svg

Comments[edit]

  • Definitely my favorite of your three proposals. I would try and play a bit with different hand-drawn fonts for the "Wiki" part. I have this thing against dots on i's that are circles. But then, it's just me ;). notafish }<';> 10:33, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Same as Delphine: best of three :) Good contrast, simple design. Effeietsanders (talk) 10:41, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Maybe try to do something with the "Monuments" (but not to much, just a little thing to make it jump out a bit more). Mvg, Basvb (talk) 10:47, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
  • I think that the heart is a little more 'chic' in the first proposal. What about a new proposal with this shape, and changing it's heart by the heart of the previous proposal, resizing it to fit?. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 12:13, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
    It's the same heart in both hand drawn versions. The only difference is that this version has a wider stroke. // Sertion 21:29, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
  • I am sorry to say that we shouldn't use hearts in logos because of translation issues. For example, the Polish part of the WLM initiative is named 'Wiki Lubi Zabytki', which translates literally into English as 'Wiki Likes Monuments'. We couldn't use the word 'love' because it has a different meaning from the English original; hence, a logo with a heart shape wouldn't be acceptable for the Polish WLM ;(. odder (talk) 22:22, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
    Very good point, Odder, in German and other languages there is the same problem. It also looks cheap, it reminds me of t-shirts or bumper stickers saying 'I [heart] NY'.--Ziko (talk) 22:51, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
    At first I also thought it looked similar to the "I?NY"-logo, but then I acctually took a hard look at it and it's not that similar. I do agree with the no heart comment. // Sertion 23:17, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Definitely my favorite, so far. -- Nuno Tavares PT 21:55, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
  • I like it very much, although the first (leftmost) line of the “W” in “Wiki” seems too small/short/pale --Church of emacs (talk) 22:10, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Most catching of all designs, might need a bit of polishing. Multichill (talk) 08:12, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
  • This logo contest submission entry has been updated as of now. The changes made were some minor touches to the heart, the ring of the second I and widening of the first line in the W and the K. // Sertion 16:18, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support Because, for me, a heart means Love. This is the classic approach, nothing new, but very well accomplished. -- Nuno Tavares PT 11:21, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
    The argument made is not that heart does not mean love in other cultures, but that some chapters have translated the word Love to other words such as like. // Sertion 18:27, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
    In any case, why should the heart be translated as "love"? If we want to be literal, it should be read "Wiki Heart Monuments". So I see no translation problems here. --Waldir talk 00:12, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
    Should it really? See I Love New York as an example. odder (talk) 19:39, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
    That's why I said "If we want to be literal". Reading "love" when one sees a heart is just as arbitrary as reading "like" or any other cultural convention. --Waldir talk 02:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support It's pretty, neat, bright. Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 12:08, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol support vote.svg weak support I like it, but could create problems in some languages. Béria Lima msg 12:14, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol support vote.svg Support It looks really good. I believe that meaning of ♥ would be clear enough for every reader. --Синдар (talk) 12:44, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol support vote.svg Support Kinda like it. Kyro (talk) 15:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 17:57, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol support vote.svg Support simple and clean, I don't see how the heart for "love" can be a translation issue (seriously, can somebody explain that?) sorry I wasn't logged -- CristianCantoro (talk) 18:35, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
    See my comment in the section just above and below notafish's vote. odder (talk) 19:39, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol support vote.svg Support, like the design. Manoillon (talk) 18:36, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol support vote.svg Support, simple at catching. Multichill (talk) 18:47, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol support vote.svg Support I'm not sure what exactly the "translation" issues are with the heart thing, without wanting to translate, the "heart" has a life of its own in many languages to say "like, love, appreciate" whatever. In any case, this is the only (almost) all text logo of the bunch that really has something to it. notafish }<';> 21:35, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
    Maybe in the English (US, British, any others?) culture/language the word love has more than one meaning. In the Polish language, on the other hand (and as far as I see, in some other languages as well), the word love has a very strict meaning and it is very rare for anybody to love anything else than a person. You can be crazy about something, be keen on something but very rarely you love something. You can't really say that you love monuments; saying I like monuments is much more common and acceptable. odder (talk) 19:39, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
    I understand that. But why can't the heart be translated as "Likes"? In popular culture, I am pretty sure that the I love New York campaign has become so known that it has been "translated" with whatever word fits the fact (of "loving" a city). notafish }<';> 20:18, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  11. Symbol support vote.svg Support A graphical representation for the "monuments" part is missing, but apart from that it's very nice: simple, effective, catchy. --Waldir talk 00:12, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  12. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Davidpar (disc.) 07:32, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  13. Symbol support vote.svg Support Aleposta (talk) 14:22, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  14. Symbol support vote.svg Support straightforward. Anthere (talk)
  15. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Prolineserver (talk) 17:41, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
  16. Symbol support vote.svg Support theMONO 04:27, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  17. Symbol support vote.svg Support My favorite --Serein (talk) 22:58, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  18. Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice! Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  19. GA candidate.svg Weak support --Arnaugir (talk) 11:07, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
  20. Symbol support vote.svg Support Vibhijain (talk) 15:14, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  21. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Millars (talk) 18:42, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose Strongly opposing all logos with a hearth shape because of translation issues. odder (talk) 09:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose From all the ones with a heart, I like this the most. But still it reminds me of older advertisements for Sparkasse (a german bank) and Ein Herz für Kinder (a german charity organization).--Cirdan (talk) 16:14, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg weak oppose - I like the logo on itself, but i doubt it's very 'monumental'. It would be more fitting for a travel photo contest or something.
  4. Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose I don´t like the source and heart I do not see monument Marinna (talk) 16:49, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose a logo featuring a monument is more appropriate --Pakeha (talk) 20:36, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- smial (talk) 21:08, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Ziko (talk) 21:44, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Hearts are cheesy, no engaging images. ?fetchcomms 22:22, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose good, but agree with all above. Zanaq (talk) 22:21, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good work, but the heart problem... --AleXXw talk!•me@de.wp 11:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  11. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cirdan above. Nicely done, but slightly worn out. --Elya (talk) 05:43, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  12. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  13. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 16:50, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 21 support
  • 13 oppose

I love London[edit]

Wlm1 - M0tty.svg

Comments[edit]

  • Principal vote against all logo's with a big red heart - sorry folks! Also not enough contrast between text and image. Effeietsanders (talk) 10:38, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 17:55, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose Strongly opposing all logos with a hearth shape because of translation issues. odder (talk) 09:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Don't like it. Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 12:06, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like either. Béria Lima msg 12:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No hearts, please.--Cirdan (talk) 16:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- smial (talk) 21:07, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Ziko (talk) 21:44, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- No heart, please. O2 (talk) 22:15, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Davidpar (disc.) 07:22, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Hearts are cheesy. ?fetchcomms 22:20, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Anthere (talk) 22:21, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  11. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good work, but the heart problem... --AleXXw talk!•me@de.wp 11:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  12. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unbalance between heart and arch. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  13. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too similar to current --Arnaugir (talk) 11:07, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
  14. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Vibhijain (talk) 15:14, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  15. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  16. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 16:52, 27 April 2011 (UTC) Because of the similary to the Wikiversity logo, not 'cause of the heart. ;-)
  17. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Heart (per odder), and also text is over gray horizontal lines (can be a problem with letters like “e”). --AVRS (talk) 11:11, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 1 support
  • 17 oppose

Triumphal Arche[edit]

Wlm3 - M0tty.svg

Comments[edit]

  • too parisian ;) notafish }<';> 20:20, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
    Triumphal Arches are not only reserved for Paris... ;-) see Arc de Triomphe --M0tty (talk) 21:07, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
    I know, but as a French, it's easy to make the "amalgame" ;) notafish }<';> 10:31, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
    The text should be centered. Nice image, and I can't see a special link to Paris. --Ziko (talk) 22:15, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
    Right ! --M0tty (talk) 20:36, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
  • I like the idea and everyone should get what it's about on first sight. Suggestion: Smaller arch, bigger text?--Cirdan (talk) 20:42, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
  • ....

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ziko (talk) 21:45, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stepro (talk) 16:53, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose how to say it ... too little of love. Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 12:07, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as Notafish say: Too parisian... Béria Lima msg 12:13, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose As I said already: The text is too small.--Cirdan (talk) 16:12, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 17:56, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- smial (talk) 21:08, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Too academic and not enough love. O2 (talk) 22:18, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Davidpar (disc.) 07:30, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not particularly engaging or appealing. ?fetchcomms 22:20, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Anthere (talk) not engaging
  10. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I just don't like it, sorry. --AleXXw talk!•me@de.wp 11:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  11. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose don't like it either. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  12. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose don't like it --Arnaugir (talk) 11:08, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
  13. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Vibhijain (talk) 15:15, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  14. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 2 support
  • 14 oppose

Wlm Horizontal variable 1[edit]

Wlm6 - M0tty.svg

Comments[edit]

  • add your comment here
  • ....

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 17:57, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support Vibhijain (talk) 15:16, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose Strongly opposing all logos with a hearth shape because of translation issues. odder (talk) 09:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's unreadable. Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 12:09, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose AS Lvova says, is (almost) unreadable. Béria Lima msg 12:17, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose See Lvova.--Cirdan (talk) 16:15, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- smial (talk) 21:09, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose +1 Анастасия Львова -- O2 (talk) 22:24, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Davidpar (disc.) 07:33, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Hard to read, hearts are cheesy, no appealing imagery. ?fetchcomms 22:22, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good work, but the heart problem... --AleXXw talk!•me@de.wp 11:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not easy to read. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  11. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too unclear --Arnaugir (talk) 11:08, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
  12. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  13. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 16:54, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
  14. BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Per odder; it seems to me that its translation could be a very different logo… --AVRS (talk) 11:17, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 2 support
  • 14 oppose

[edit]

Wlm8 - M0tty.svg

Comments[edit]

  • Is there any meaning behind the three circles? (I might be missing something) Effeietsanders (talk) 18:24, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
  • It evokes three basic colors in photography... --M0tty (talk) 20:33, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
  • I like the three circles but don't know how to link them to the monuments. But keep them for another logo please. --Ziko (talk) 18:40, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 17:59, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's untranslating. And "WikiL Monuments" seems bad. Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 12:10, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, not sure why is the reason behind that circles. And in black and white or gray there are no meaning. Plus, is not translateble. Béria Lima msg 12:19, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- smial (talk) 21:09, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Ziko (talk) 21:46, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Davidpar (disc.) 07:37, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like the circles, but they don't mean anything as far as I can tell. ?fetchcomms 22:23, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Anthere (talk) 22:24, 20 April 2011 (UTC) not meaningful enough
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I like the usage of teh WM-colors, but see #1. --AleXXw talk!•me@de.wp 11:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not clear. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Arnaugir (talk) 11:08, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
  11. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  12. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 16:54, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 1 support
  • 12 oppose

Colorful temple[edit]

WLM - AleXXw.svg

Comments[edit]

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support, nice and simple, uses the WMF colours well, and generally nice to look at. Well done! Lankiveil (talk) 09:34, 19 April 2011 (UTC).
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Manuel Schneider(bla) (+/-) 09:58, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol support vote.svg Support more stylish than the current logo, but still continuing the recoginizable brand, with a nod to the Wikimedia colors. Zanaq (talk) 10:18, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol support vote.svg Support - I agree with Zanaq. --Giac83 11:15, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol support vote.svg Support, nice and simple --Hoo man (talk) 12:32, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the use of WMF colors, it is simple but maybe the text could be centered better -- CristianCantoro (talk) 18:35, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ziko (talk) 21:47, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Zimin.V.G. (talk) 14:12, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol support vote.svg Support Anthere (talk) 22:25, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Magnus Manske (talk) 14:16, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
  11. Symbol support vote.svg Support --AleXXw talk!•me@de.wp 11:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  12. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- HenkvD (talk) 18:48, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  13. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Bjs (talk) 14:12, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
  14. GA candidate.svg Weak support Like current logo, albeit rather Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. loves Monuments than Wikipedia loves monuments. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - It is a more colorful version of the current logo, but I prefer then a grey scale version :) This comes compared to that across as a bit more amateuristic. Effeietsanders (talk) 10:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, it easier to use the current logo (on internet site or T-shirt for example). Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 10:17, 19 April 2011
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Concept ok, but execution is not very well aligned. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 10:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - the colours form a flag (of some unknown imaginary country) for me, it is confusing. Adeliine (talk) 14:04, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the colors seem quite random, I think the description "amateuristic" fits as well.--Cirdan (talk) 16:16, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
    Your opinion at perfect liberty, but the colors are not random. They are from the Wikimedia visual identity guidelines ;) --AleXXw talk!•me@de.wp 16:39, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose-- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:00, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- smial (talk) 21:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. BA candidate.svg Weak oppose It's not that bad, and better than the current logo, but much better options have been presented. --Waldir talk 00:15, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. BA candidate.svg Weak oppose This has a nice feel and good visual impact. Unfortunately the wide colourful columns remind me of a flag, so it gives the impression that it is connected to a country. --99of9 (talk) 01:52, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Davidpar (disc.) 07:39, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  11. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Wikiversity much? ?fetchcomms 22:23, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  12. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose what's new here?? --Arnaugir (talk) 11:09, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
  13. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Vibhijain (talk) 15:16, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  14. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 16:55, 27 April 2011 (UTC) Wikiversity....

Votes summary[edit]

  • 14 support
  • 14 oppose

With reflected hearts[edit]

Wikilovesmonument Leovilok01.svg

Comments[edit]

  • Sorry for the gradient (it can be easily removed) ; all the text is rendered in (free DejaVu) font (not vectors). The monument is international as it can represent a mosque, the Taj Mahal, an Orthodox church, ... --Leovilok (talk) 20:18, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
  • add your comment here

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. GA candidate.svg Weak support I don't really like it very much, but want to give kudos to the author for the attention to using free fonts rather than unfree ones converted to paths :) --Waldir talk 01:16, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose Strongly opposing all logos with a heart shape because of translation issues. odder (talk) 09:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose, is it me or the inverted hearts looks like asses? Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 10:19, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, same as User:VIGNERON - I thought they looked a little phallic (Freud would have a field day with me). Lankiveil (talk) 11:57, 19 April 2011 (UTC).
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the inverted hearts are so strange. Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 12:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Don't reminds me of monuments, don't reminds of wiki. Béria Lima msg 12:24, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Vigneron, I noticed it too. WooteleF (talk) 14:55, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The logo has too many elements and details.--Cirdan (talk) 16:18, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:07, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose really doesn't look good --Pakeha (talk) 20:43, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- smial (talk) 21:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  11. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- No heart, please. O2 (talk) 22:15, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  12. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Davidpar (disc.) 07:40, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  13. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Hearts are cheesy. ?fetchcomms 22:24, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  14. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Anthere (talk)
  15. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose everything said... --AleXXw talk!•me@de.wp 11:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  16. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose not working to me, sorry. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  17. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Arnaugir (talk) 11:09, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
  18. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Vibhijain (talk) 15:17, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  19. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  20. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 16:58, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 1 support
  • 20 oppose

Monument Love[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo contest - Jorge Barrios.svg

Comments[edit]

  • I like this one, but could you submit a version with slightly larger text and no heart?--Cirdan (talk) 20:38, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
  • The obelisk is a nice idea; I agree about the heart (what Cirdan said).--Ziko (talk) 18:42, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Done. --Jorge Barrios (talk) 22:05, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
  • ....

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support I don't think it looks like a penis, but rather like an obelisk ;) Maybe the text could be a little bigger (should be easy to change), but this is one of my favorites, since it's simple, has an object with a clear meaning (at least I thought so ;) ) and no fancy text effects.--Cirdan (talk) 16:21, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - {{nopenis}} ;-) Nicely designed, but afraid it gives wrong associations... Effeietsanders (talk) 10:13, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - {{nopenis}} ;-) 2 Béria Lima msg 12:26, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - {{nopenis}} :D - Hoo man (talk) 12:33, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose-- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:01, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The obelisk reminds me of a monument to the fallen. As such, I find the message to be a bit depressing. notafish }<';> 21:01, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
    Lol, This almost looks like another... phallic joke :P --Waldir talk 02:45, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- smial (talk) 21:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Davidpar (disc.) 07:42, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No penis-like structures. ?fetchcomms 22:26, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose why obelisk?? --Arnaugir (talk) 11:09, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Vibhijain (talk) 15:17, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  11. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 16:59, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Neutral[edit]

  1. Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Can’t really say, maybe it’s the phallus. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 1 support
  • 11 oppose

Heart as monument in wiki colors[edit]

Heartaswikimonument.svg

Comments[edit]

  • The heart looks rather weird. Could you submit a version with just one color?--Cirdan (talk) 20:40, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Ice cream cone. :-) --Ziko (talk) 19:06, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:03, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose Strongly opposing all logos with a hearth shape because of translation issues. odder (talk) 09:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose This heart isn't alive, I think. Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 12:13, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose this heart looks like a icecream. Béria Lima msg 12:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- smial (talk) 21:12, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Davidpar (disc.) 07:50, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice font, but hearts are cheesy and vaguely heart-shaped things are ... vague. ?fetchcomms 22:26, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not the best way to represent this, I think. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Arnaugir (talk) 11:10, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Vibhijain (talk) 15:17, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  11. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 16:59, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 1 support
  • 11 oppose

Greek temple as M[edit]

WLM logo - Waldir 2.svg

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support seems good. Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 12:12, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support, best one so far. Béria Lima msg 12:31, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. GA candidate.svg Weak support, nice and simple, but probably not translatable - Hoo man (talk) 12:35, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:04, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol support vote.svg Support Handwritten style matches "Wiki", red heart matches "Love", roman font + greek temple as M matches "Monuments" --> fits the bill, has all the needed elements. And I think it looks nice. --Waldir talk 00:20, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Davidpar (disc.) 07:58, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol support vote.svg Support Aleposta (talk) 16:37, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose Strongly opposing all logos with a hearth shape because of translation issues. odder (talk) 09:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - too different fonts and colours, eyes don't rest looking this. Adeliine (talk) 14:06, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Marinna (talk) 14:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too many different styles and objects.--Cirdan (talk) 16:23, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- smial (talk) 21:13, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Ziko (talk) 21:49, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Hearts are cheesy, rather bland. ?fetchcomms 22:27, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Lacks simplicity. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Arnaugir (talk) 11:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Vibhijain (talk) 15:17, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  11. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  12. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 17:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 7 support
  • 12 oppose

Wiki Amor Monuments[edit]

Wiki Amor Monuments.svg

Comments[edit]

  • A simple logo with Cupid shooting an arrow at the "loves" word. Could play around with the fonts. GoEThe (talk) 15:45, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
  • add your comment here
  • ...

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg weak support I don't really love the cupid there, because of translations issues. but is a very good logo. Béria Lima msg 12:33, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support-- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 17:54, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Looks very simple, just as if someone had started Word and typed a few lines.--Cirdan (talk) 16:26, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Marinna (talk) 17:02, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- smial (talk) 21:15, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Ziko (talk) 21:50, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Davidpar (disc.) 08:02, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Cupid is irrelevant. ?fetchcomms 22:28, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not sure that we want to show that kind of love^^ Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 17:01, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 2 support
  • 9 oppose

Heart with monuments cutted out[edit]

Heartaswikimonumentver3.svg

Comments[edit]

  • one color, like Cirdan asked. added small shapes Byrek (talk) 22:36, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
  • ...

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:43, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose Strongly opposing all logos with a hearth shape because of translation issues. odder (talk) 09:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The symbols in the heart are too abstract, I can't recognized one of them. Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 12:16, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose isn't it clear? it's a rocket, a cellphone and a toupet. Zanaq (talk) 12:32, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Better than the original, but I don't get the shapes inside the heart!?--Cirdan (talk) 16:27, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like the randomly oriented monuments in the heart shape. -- CristianCantoro (talk) 18:38, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- smial (talk) 21:19, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Davidpar (disc.) 08:14, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice font, but silhouettes are hard to make out and hearts are cheesy. ?fetchcomms 22:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not clear, sorry. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Vibhijain (talk) 15:17, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  11. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  12. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 17:01, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 1 support
  • 12 oppose

Colorful temple 2[edit]

WLM - AleXXw Nr. 2.svg

Comments[edit]

  • Slightly different version of #Colorful temple
  • Good for different use (small logo and big logos, easy to print and simple, in my opinion good compromise)
  • add your comment here
  • ...

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Manuel Schneider(bla) (+/-) 09:58, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support nice and simple, uses the WMF colours well, and generally nice to look at. Lankiveil (talk) 10:12, 19 April 2011 (UTC).
  3. Symbol support vote.svg Support Marinna (talk) 14:26, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Mazbln (talk) 19:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Magnus Manske (talk) 14:16, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol support vote.svg Support Like #Colorful temple, would prefer this one to Version 1. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It is a more colorful version of the current logo, but I prefer then a grey scale version :) This comes compared to that across as a bit more amateuristic. -- Effeietsanders (talk) 10:14, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Weaker statement than #Colorful temple. Though the stairs culminate nicely, the colors are hardly noticable, and the columns look flimsy. Zanaq (talk) 10:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Not very well aligned. Doesn't pop. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 10:41, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. BA candidate.svg Weak oppose For the same reasons I presented for #Colorful temple. --Waldir talk 00:22, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Davidpar (disc.) 08:23, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Wikiversity much? Also, colors do not stand out enough. ?fetchcomms 22:30, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- smial (talk) 15:21, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Vibhijain (talk) 15:17, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 17:02, 27 April 2011 (UTC) Wikiversity...

Votes summary[edit]

  • 6 support
  • 10 oppose

Wikicardiogram through lens[edit]

WLM ECG to monument via lens.svg

Comments[edit]

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support It's interesting. Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 12:17, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't get it and I doubt that many people will.--Cirdan (talk) 16:28, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:12, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- smial (talk) 21:10, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Davidpar (disc.) 08:24, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very confusing. ?fetchcomms 22:30, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not clear, sorry. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 17:03, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 1 support
  • 7 oppose

Monument in a picture frame[edit]

WLM - HenkvD.png

Comments[edit]

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support Much better than the original, it connects monuments, photography, Wikimedia and the slogan very well.--Cirdan (talk) 16:32, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:13, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like that one doesn't see the logo in "front" -- CristianCantoro (talk) 18:40, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Davidpar (disc.) 08:30, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Awkward angle, too postcard-like. Could be used elsewhere, though. ?fetchcomms 22:32, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- smial (talk) 15:22, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I prefer it flat, sorry. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Vibhijain (talk) 15:18, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 17:03, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 1 support
  • 9 oppose

Wiki IDEM[edit]

WLM-7-Althiphika.svg

  • NB: User has been asked to choose one version as final submission to the context. Too many logos to choose from! :) notafish }<';> 06:42, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments[edit]

  • ...

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:16, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support Vibhijain (talk) 15:18, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose Strongly opposing all logos with a hearth shape because of translation issues. odder (talk) 09:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Good idea, but I fear that the "WIKI" is too difficult to read. Also, I don't like the idea to have a heart in the logo.--Cirdan (talk) 16:34, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Davidpar (disc.) 09:04, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Hearts are cheesy, buildings are cheesy, too (and hard to make out). ?fetchcomms 22:35, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- smial (talk) 15:23, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice idea but too complicated, sorry. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 17:04, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 2 support
  • 9 oppose

Parthenon with WLM colored as frontal columns[edit]

Mafoso-WLM-03.svg Version 2 as its suggested by Przykuta: Partenó amb wml-v2.svg

Comments[edit]

  • Parthenon with WLM colored as frontal columns
  • I like this style - look on my 'image notes' Przykuta[edit] 18:15, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Very nice! -- Nuno Tavares PT 22:46, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
  • ...

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support version 2, probably my favourite. --Elitre (talk) 12:12, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support It's a great "revival" of the orginal logo, I find. It addresses the static part of the original logo which made me want to change in the first place. notafish }<';> 21:23, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Davidpar (disc.) 09:03, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Friedel Völker (talk) 18:11, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose How to translate it? Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 12:23, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Good job, but it might be too difficult to read/understand.--Cirdan (talk) 16:36, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:17, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't understand the message of this logo. O2 (talk) 22:17, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Kinda too much on the messy side, as Cirdan said. I think this would be a good candidate with a slightly cleaner (but still hand-drawn-like) design. --Waldir talk 00:41, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Anthere (talk) 22:30, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Font hard to read in the first one, building less easy to make out in second one. Like the brush strokes but it makes it harder to read. ?fetchcomms 22:36, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice idea but too complicated, sorry. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 17:05, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 4 support
  • 10 oppose

building blocks[edit]

WLM2Trizek.svg

Comments[edit]

  • add your comment here
  • ...

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the idea, it's quite different from the others in the competition. But something has to happen with the "11", it somehow seems lost up there in the corner ;) --Cirdan (talk) 16:38, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:19, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol support vote.svg Support I find it fun. It gives lots of opportunities for declinations (using the little icons as stand alone on various material). I don't like the 11 though, it does not stand out and should be 2011. I find that although the icons may seem a bit too busy, they help make the text stand out and actually give the event its whole scope. notafish }<';> 21:17, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. GA candidate.svg Weak support I don't think it's too busy or hard to understand; the red stands out well from the black shapes. I do agree with Cirdan, the "11" needs to be removed, or made red and placed in the end (and perhaps as "2011" instead, as notafish said). --Waldir talk 00:45, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol support vote.svg Support I like it! The 11 should be changed in 2011. --AleXXw talk!•me@de.wp 11:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- smial (talk) 15:18, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Too busy, too many shapes. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 10:44, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Ziko (talk) 21:52, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Davidpar (disc.) 09:32, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too small, too much stuff, font quite boring. ?fetchcomms 22:37, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too small to distinguish. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Vibhijain (talk) 15:19, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 17:06, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 6 support
  • 8 oppose

Bavarian castle[edit]

WLM 2011 Orionist 2.svg

Comments[edit]

  • A Bavarian castle in the distance, or through the fog. Gradient was used to strengthen the effect, but it can be substituted with a solid color when needed, and a negative version is also possible. The year can be added above or in the place of the heart. -- Orionisttalk 10:15, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
  • ...

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support looks like Neuschwanstein to me, which isn't a bad thing. Lankiveil (talk) 12:01, 19 April 2011 (UTC).
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stepro (talk) 17:06, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Looks like Disneyland to me. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 10:45, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Idem Husky. O2 (talk) 11:22, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose +1 looks to much l'île disneyland .... Kyro (talk) 15:29, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote oversat.svg Strong oppose Welcome to Disneyland, eh? --Cirdan (talk) 16:43, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Marinna (talk) 20:39, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Davidpar (disc.) 09:39, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose More fantasy than monument, subtle heart is cheesy. ?fetchcomms 22:39, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too linked to one monument, sorry. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Vibhijain (talk) 15:21, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 3 support
  • 10 oppose

Lettering as monuments with lens in the back[edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 f.svg

Comments[edit]

  • add your comment here
  • ...

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:38, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ziko (talk) 21:59, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. BA candidate.svg Weak oppose It does look great, but it's really not obvious at all the meanings for monuments and the lens (I only figured that much 'cause it's in the title). --Waldir talk 01:08, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose See one above.--Cirdan (talk) 06:47, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Davidpar (disc.) 09:41, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Hard to read, no monument imagery. ?fetchcomms 22:41, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Not obvious. O2 (talk) 13:54, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Tough to read, sorry. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Vibhijain (talk) 15:21, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 17:08, 27 April 2011 (UTC) Sorry, I see a WIM instead of WLM.

Votes summary[edit]

  • 2 support
  • 9 oppose

The Flame of Heart[edit]

Ak WIKI 1.svg

Comments[edit]

  • A little upgrade of the existing logo with the heart of fire on top and the title at the bottom with a shutter opening
  • The fire serves as passionate love for the theme
  • The shutter is off-course depicting photography of the monument
  • note: I'm leaving this one in because it lives "without" the text, but be aware that the size of the text does not scale at small sizes. notafish }<';> 20:14, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:40, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. GA candidate.svg Weak support Very nice-looking, but I don't see a "heart of fire", only fire (and one with too much detail at that), which honestly doesn't give me the feel of "passionate love" as mentioned in the comments above. Without a clear representation for "wiki" or "loves", this leaves the "monuments" and "photography" parts (and the good looks) as the only strengths of this proposal. --Waldir talk 01:12, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol support vote.svg Support I simply loved the idea of the "passionate love", which is controlled with ambiguity of spirit and energy which has been depicted using symbol of fire, I felt this logo quite different from the others because of the composition of the idea. The text could have been a little more bigger. --User:Unitop Sap Nation 11:23, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Ziko (talk) 22:02, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. BA candidate.svg Weak oppose I like the idea to have a larger box with both monument and text inside, but the text is far too small in this one. And you should probably get rid of the flames, they're too much detail and imho not necessary.--Cirdan (talk) 06:50, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Davidpar (disc.) 09:43, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Words too small, flame not aligned with other icons that evoke a Wikimedia sense. ?fetchcomms 22:42, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice idea but too complicated, sorry. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 17:08, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 3 support
  • 7 oppose

Colorful photos disk[edit]

Wikilovesmonument Leovilok04.svg

Comments[edit]

  • With Trizek's monuments (and one or two more). Maybe a bit colorful lol--Leovilok (talk) 19:06, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Colours are not the problem, but the items are a little small. Consider that the logo will often appear anywhere small and has to be recognizable. But I find the idea very charming, in fact, I thought about those old disks in photo cameras of the 1980s. --Ziko (talk) 19:16, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
  • A smaller version : Wikilovesmonument Leovilok04-2.svg and Wikilovesmonument Leovilok04-2.svg --Leovilok (talk) 19:51, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
    • Unfortunately, I think it is obvious from the images above that this doesn't work well in smaller sizes... --Waldir talk 03:21, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support really nice and effective for spreading the messageChandres (talk) 12:16, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support I agree with this logo and am the same opinion as Chandres. Coyote du 86 (talk) 12:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:40, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol support vote.svg Support I really like the idea and everybody should get what the contest is about. The concept also allows to have smaller logos with fewer (and therefore bigger) photographs inside. Definitely one of my favorites!--Cirdan (talk) 06:51, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol support vote.svg Support I love the small version! --AleXXw talk!•me@de.wp 11:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol support vote.svg Support Vibhijain (talk) 15:21, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose too much details to be used. Manoillon (talk) 18:48, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose--Ziko (talk) 21:58, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Very chaotic and too many elements. Won't work on small resolutions. - Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 12:10, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It looks relatively nice, but I think it's too busy, with many very small elements that wouldn't work in small sizes and would complicate its reproduction. --Waldir talk 01:14, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Davidpar (disc.) 09:45, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too cluttered. ?fetchcomms 22:42, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Chaotic O2 (talk)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice idea but way too busy, sorry. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 17:10, 27 April 2011 (UTC) Not practical in smaller versions, I'm afraid.

Votes summary[edit]

  • 6 support
  • 10 oppose

monumental WLM[edit]

Wlm.svg

Comments[edit]

  • tried to create a shadow monument
  • ...

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support Vibhijain (talk) 15:22, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - Too busy, unclear typography. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 10:45, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sloppy. Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 12:24, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose +1 Husky.--KRLS (talk) 16:01, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:39, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose +1 Husky O2 (talk) 22:23, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Cirdan (talk) 06:48, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Davidpar (disc.) 09:41, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Illegible. ?fetchcomms 22:41, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice idea but way too complicated, sorry. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  11. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 17:11, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 1 support
  • 11 oppose

film with different monuments[edit]

Mafoso-WLM-02.svg

Comments[edit]

  • film with diferent monuments
  • ...

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Doesn't respect Wikimedia's graphics standards. O2 (talk) 11:25, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose looks too much like a microsoft clipart Symac (talk) 11:28, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too many elements and details, doesn't get the message across.--Cirdan (talk) 16:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:18, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Davidpar (disc.) 09:25, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose No words, hard to understand. ?fetchcomms 22:37, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Does not really convey the idea. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 17:11, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 0 support
  • 9 oppose

[edit]

Camera logo WLM.svg

Comments[edit]

  • A little off the beaten track, but looks appropriate for a photo competition. Camera lens logo, based on 38094-canon.svg. GoEThe (talk) 11:35, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
  • The lense could work in combination with something monument-related, I guess, but not like that.--Cirdan (talk) 20:37, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
I agree, but couldn't think of a monument-related something that would keep it international. GoEThe (talk) 09:42, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
  • ...

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, a really really nice graphic, but I don't see what it has to do with monuments... Lankiveil (talk) 11:58, 19 April 2011 (UTC).
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Lankiveil. Анастасия Львоваru (ru-n, en-2) 12:14, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose But this is a very nice graphic that I should support for another more appropriate logo.-- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:10, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- smial (talk) 21:18, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Davidpar (disc.) 08:10, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Pretty, but irrelevant. ?fetchcomms 22:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Very good picture but not for this project. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Stepro (talk) 17:12, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 0 support
  • 9 oppose

Pise Tower[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments Barbetorte 1.svg

Comments[edit]

  • Pise tower
  • Needs text improvement...
  • I think in any case it would be good to improve contrast between image and text. Very nice idea, too bad Italy doesn't participate! :( Effeietsanders (talk) 15:09, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. I improved text contrast. --Barbetorte (talk) 16:18, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Really nice idea. --Ziko (talk) 19:03, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Yeah, nice try. Really bad colors though. Zanaq (talk) 10:29, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  • I think this one is really cute! Yes, very nice idea! Though, I would have prefered the red text below the image. --77.110.20.135 11:59, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Votes[edit]

(votes must be cast with the templates {{support}} or {{oppose}}. All votes should give a reason why they go one way or the other, so as to allow submitters to learn :))

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Stepro (talk) 17:13, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, good effort, but looks like an advertising mascot for a brand of children's bubblebath. Lankiveil (talk) 11:56, 19 April 2011 (UTC).
  2. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose, I agree with Lankiveil. Béria Lima msg 12:28, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It looks too childish indeed. Also the text is very difficult to read due to the strange contrast.--Cirdan (talk) 16:22, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (Talk) 18:02, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose -- smial (talk) 21:12, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose --Davidpar (disc.) 07:45, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It does remind of a bubble bath label ... the tower has a face, for heaven's sake. ?fetchcomms 22:25, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Too childish to convey the message, sorry. Erdrokan (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, no. --Alex (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Votes summary[edit]

  • 1 support
  • 9 oppose

Votes are closed, thanks for participating!