Commons talk:Administrator permission for statistics

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

I think it's a good thing that we have the page - i think it's problematic however that it does not clearly state what type of statistics may be published. For example, some people may be perfectly ok with numer of blocks/protections/etc per month or week, but not per time of day... So, what am I actually agreeing to here? Is this a blanket waver to allow anyone to publish any statistics?

Note that i'm not personally very concerned about this. But I can already hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth... -- Duesentrieb(?!) 17:58, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Well the wailing and teeth-gnashing people won't sign at all, I suppose.
Since I wrote the statement in a very broad way, I guess it is a blanket waiver to allow anyone to publish any statistics from the logs which are already publicly available. So they can choose to break up the stats however they like. Why, OTOH, we would care how many deletions any person did at any hour of the morning, is a whole other matter. :) Per month is about the most fine-grained I personally could get interested in. pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:35, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Not that this makes much sense, but for the fun of it, here's the top 50 of admins acc. to the number of deletions. And where is the real statistics page?

user no. of deletions
(15.11.2006)
1  Thuresson  10910 
2  Shizhao  7658 
3  Nilfanion  7444 
4  Samulili  4803 
5  Zirland  4464 
6  Raymond_de  3893 
7  Pfctdayelise  3024 
8  EugeneZelenko  2259 
9  AndreasPraefcke  2226 
10  WarX  1777 
11  Rüdiger_Wölk  1672 
12  Bastique  1666 
13  Fred_Chess  1647 
14  JeremyA  1560 
15  Barcex  1500 
16  Dodo  1412 
17  Arnomane  1393 
18  Eloquence  1352 
19  Angr  1210 
20  Sanbec  1201 
21  Mormegil  1105 
22  Crux  1078 
23  Darkone  1037 
24  Klemen_Kocjancic  978 
25  Kjetil_r  964 
26  Saperaud  851 
27  Panther  840 
28  Anna  808 
29  Cnyborg  785 
30  Duesentrieb  731 
31  Avatar  724 
32  Stan_Shebs  710 
33  Matt314  623 
34  Ejdzej  563 
35  Drini  558 
36  Lmbuga  525 
37  Bouncey2k  504 
38  Jcornelius  504 
39  Lumijaguaari  479 
40  Lestath  437 
41  Odder  415 
42  Spangineer  343 
43  Franz_Xaver  340 
44  Raul654  327 
45  Tsca  299 
46  UED77  274 
47  Martorell  253 
48  Alphax  236 
49  Yug  235 
50  Zscout370  217 

That's so cool! It was a good idea to only list to top 50. Maybe top 40 would suffice.

I am mainly interested in, who is doing the core work of Commons here. Some admins do a lot of work without getting any recognition whatsoever only a lot of complaints.

So I'm only 20 deletions after Bastique? Hmmm... that's not too bad...

Fred Chess 20:29, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

What do you mean, "real statistics" page?
This is cool, but some people have been admins longer than others, so it's a bit unfair. We really need a rate. :)
But anyway congrats to Nilfanion, amazing result!!! --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 04:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Umm thanks I guess.--Nilfanion 15:21, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

as some ppl have been admins longer than others...[edit]

(Ppl who have been admins for less than 5 weeks or have less than 200 deletions aren't counted).

* user del.per week weeks dels
1 Nilfanion 715.64 11 7872
5 Samulili 228.90 21 4807
6 Zirland 187.62 24 4503
7 Shizhao 182.38 42 7660
11 Thuresson 129.88 84 10910
13 Dodo 74.84 19 1422
14 Pfctdayelise 70.33 43 3024
16 Barcex 63.33 24 1520
17 Cnyborg 61.85 13 804
18 Panther 57.07 15 856
20 Drini 50.73 11 558
21 Angr 50.42 24 1210
22 WarX 49.13 38 1867
23 JeremyA 47.42 33 1565
25 Bastique 39.69 42 1667

I don't think it makes sense to remove nicks from this chart, as this information is publicly available at editcounter and Special:Logs/Rights anyway... / tsca @ 22:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Tsca, the whole point of this page is that some people aren't comfortable with such information being collected and collated about them. Please remove any people who haven't signed. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 01:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
They've already been removed by Fred. / tsca @ 02:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
I have to agree that I don't see any problem with a list that simply lists admins by total deletions. The arguments were against listing them by deletions during a specific period of time, which is what the second list here does. I can also see that people might object to having the full list posted if they are listed at the bottom of it. However, a list of the 40 admins with most deletions on Commons is not something I can see anyone object to. On what grounds? I'd appreciate if someone showed me on what grounds.
If I could, I would recreate the first list on this page to include the top 40 admins regardsless whether they signed or not.
Fred Chess 15:34, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Actually I'm a little surprised that I even made the list (#48). A good incentive to delete more images! Alphax (talk) 00:53, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Category:Commons maintenance[edit]

{{editprotected}}

Please remove Category:Commons maintenance. The page is just clutter there. Rd232 (talk) 00:26, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

✓ Done! Killiondude (talk) 16:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC)