Commons talk:Flickr files/reviewers
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
| Archives |
| Requests for Flickr review status 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 |
| Discussion 1, 2 |
Contents |
[edit] Discussion
[edit] Backlog forming
A rather large backlog seems to be forming at Category:Flickr images needing human review which is going to need a lot of effort to clear. All help available would be appreciated. Camaron · Christopher · talk 11:19, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- The backlog has now cleared. Camaron · Christopher · talk 11:01, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Major problem with flickrreview script
I've been checking through all the flickr pics I've uploaded, and noticed a serious problem with this script, sometimes when used, it inadvertently deletes the license tag, leaving the file apparently unlicensed, e.g. here, here. The problem is happening with review edits by several reviewers, so I deduce it is the script software, not the individual reviewer's fault. With my own pics (for which my gallery page shows up "unlicensed" files with a red tag) I'm restoring the licenses (e.g. here), but I've no idea how many more files may be affected. Can someone with knowledge of the script look into this, please? - MPF (talk) 18:10, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
- I've noticed this problem, the JavaScript strips the entire line (everything after flickr revew template). The bot that recently tagged a bunch of derivative flickr works for review put the flickr review template right before the license template on the same line, so using the flickr pass button deleted the license template! I had to fix each one manually to put the license template back. Apparently not everyone noticed it was doing this. There is obviously a problem with the script for that then... — raeky (talk | edits) 18:23, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Pace of flickr reviewer request
I´ve openned a flickr revier request on 3 of November as can be seen here and was closed less than 24 hours after i´ve openned it, but i´am having doubts as to if i passed the request (that had 5 votes in favor and nill against), as as stated on this page "1. Requests stay for a minimum of two days", i asking if this request wasnt this request closed one day sooner than it should be, and the request wanst closed as others with a approval or repproval. So i ask in what pace is this request? If it is already closed, as aproved, or if it as to be reopened? Tm (talk) 10:26, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- Flickr review isn't really a big deal, so while a few days is preferable, I don't think it's necessary to have a strict deadline. In your case, it was extremely probable that you would have passed after two days, so I think it's fine. Regards, –Juliancolton | Talk 14:42, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Requests for Flickr review status
- 1. Requests stay for a minimum of two days.
- 2. Please submit your request below this section, with the below format.
== [[User:YourUsername]] == Why you should be a Flickr reviewer. ~~~~
