Commons talk:Flickr images/reviewers/archive 1

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Enricopedia (talk · contributions)

Not much activity here lately, but I try to revive it. I would like to nominate Enricopedia as Flickr reviewer, per . He/she has been long enough here to be trusted with the Flickr images. I will create a list a list of Flickr reviewers, with Enricopedia as first member and change the {{flickrreview}} template such that it includes trusted users, if no objections are raised within a reasonable time. (I think 7 days is too long, so I would say something from 3-5 days). -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC) It's “he” and he is a bit proud now :) Enricopedia ⇄ 21:00, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

• No objections, so you are now the first official non admin Flickr reviewer. I will create the subpage and correct the templates later this evening or tomorrow. Good luck with reviewing! Side note: If you see images tagged with some cc-xx-2.5 license; this is not the same as a cc-xx-2.0 license. Please change the tag accordingly then. -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:39, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Edub (talk · contributions)

es wikipedia sysop, es wikinews sysop Edub 10:26, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

• No objections. You can now start reviewing Flickr images. Be sure to read the instructions on Commons:Flickr images/reviewers. -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:44, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Coelacan (talk · contributions)

I would love to help with Category:Flickr images needing human review. The backlog there drives me crazy sometimes! Of course I would only review images I didn't upload. I have only 250–300 edits here but I know my way around (quiz me if necessary). I am Wikipedia:User:Coelacan on the English wiki where I have something near 5000 edits, and zero block, rfc, mediation, or arbcom history. — coelacan — 18:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Sure. Please carefully read the instructions and the Commons licensing policy. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Vayaka (talk · contributions)

I would like to participate in Flickr images reviews. Don't have much edits here. But I watch the images in RuWiki ru:Участник:Vayaka contribs in RuWiki.--Vaya 21:43, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know you and I don't speak Russian, so there is no way for me to confirm anything about you. If you know a Russian Commons regular, feel free to ask him to post here. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

 Support. I know this user in ru-wiki and I think he will be a good reviewer here. --Panther 13:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

 Support. Per Panther ;) --Kaganer 18:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome on board. Please be sure to read all relevant instructions before you start reviewing. -- Bryan (talk to me) 11:17, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Husky (talk · contributions)

My fingers are simply itching to review all the non-automated Flickr images. I'm an administrator on the Dutch Wikipedia, and a regular contributor on the English Wikipedia and here on Commons. Husky 16:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

• Welcome on board. Please be sure to read all relevant instructions before you start reviewing. -- Bryan (talk to me) 11:17, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] WikiLeon (talk · contributions)

I've been a contributer for the commons for quite a while, and I'm also an admin by the same name at the English Wikipedia. --w^{L <speak·creatively>} 08:06, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

That's fine, please carefully read the instructions and all relevant Commons policies and you can start reviewing. -- Bryan (talk to me) 22:01, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Grenavitar (talk · contributions)

I've done a bunch of work a while back with the Yorck project and I have transferred Flickr images myself and occasionally am linked to them and would enjoy helping reviewing. My main reason for this request is actually a clarification: are admins from other projects trusted? I am an admin on EN so 1) am I a "trusted user" automatically and 2) if I am how can I show that I am the same user? (although, my EN page links to my commons page so it's pretty clear). gren 04:34, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

• Please read all relevant instructions and the licensing policy. You can then start reviewing Flickr images -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Andrew Levine (talk · contributions)

I've been on Commons for a long time. I'm an admin on EN (en:User:Andrew Levine). I think thay qualifies me as "trusted." Andrew Levine 16:50, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

• Please read all relevant instructions and the licensing policy. You can then start reviewing Flickr images -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Lokal_Profil (talk · contributions)

I've been contributing to Commons for about a year and I am an admin on the Swedish Wikipedia. My activities on sv.wiki are mainly image-copyright related and uploading files from sv.wiki to Commons. /Lokal_Profil 01:04, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

• Please read all relevant instructions and the licensing policy. You can then start reviewing Flickr images -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Sandstein (talk · contributions)

You'll find me uploading a lot of Flickr images, so I might just as well review some. I was TheBernFiles (talk · contributions) before I usurped my new username, Sandstein. This is also my en.wiki username, where I'm an administrator. Sandstein 21:29, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

• Please read all relevant instructions and the licensing policy. You can then start reviewing Flickr images -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Nmajdan (talk · contributions)

I'd love to help clear the current backlog. I'm not the most experienced editor on the Commons, but I am a frequent contributor on en.wiki.Nmajdan 19:41, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

I have some worries about the fact that

1. You do not have much activity at Commons
2. You recently uploaded Image:BOK Center-BothRenditions.jpg, which was deleted being a copyright violation.

Summarizing, I have no evidence that you understand copyrights correctly. I'm sorry, but maybe later. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Yarnalgo (talk · contributions)

I have been on Commons for 3 or 4 months now and I'd like to help clear out the massive backlog of images. I'm definetly a trusted user on EN Wiki with 3000+ edits. Hope I can help! --Yarnalgo 20:26, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Two images uploaded by you on enwiki have been deleted because of copyright problems: [1], [2]. Why would that be? Sandstein 21:36, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

The first, was an edit of another image that the uploader claimed to be in the public domain but it was found to not be. The second was fair use and was being used, but was taken out of an article and was orphaned, so it was deleted. --Yarnalgo 03:02, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

 Support :) -- Bryan (talk to me) 13:14, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

It has been a week and I have gotten no opposition, only support. So, can I start reviewing Flickr images now? Not to be impatient or anything... :) --Yarnalgo 04:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for being this late. Go ahead, start reading the relevant policies: Commons:Flickr images and {{flickrreview}} and start reviewing. -- Bryan (talk to me) 08:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. --Yarnalgo 02:18, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] MECU (talk · contributions)

I've been on commons for awhile, but mainly I'm on en.wiki. I've moved quite a bit of images from en.wiki to commons (250?) and I've put up a few images here that I've found and a few images of my own. I'm quite familiar with copyright status and licensing and sourcing and have been very active on en.wiki with image patrolling. It may appear (via my talk page on en.wiki or otherwise) that I've uploaded images that have no source or are otherwise bad (orphaned fair use), but it's mainly because I go through a category there called "Fair use reduction requests" that reduce the images that are fair used from the oversized (sometimes 2100x1400+!) to a more appropriate (~300x200) size. Once that is done, the previous versions are removed making it appear I am the only uploader of the image for which I am really not. I definately think flickr reviewing it important as I've had images that have changed licenses on me and the flickr reviewing has "saved" me before, or not having the flickr review has made me regret it. You can ask several folks that are involved with images on en.wiki if I'm a regular (like BigDT) with images. I'm also typically available in the IRC channel from 2200-0300 UTC. I've got over 15k edits. I am not an admin, but had a failed RFA on en.wiki in Jan/Feb. --MECU 01:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, we know you are involved with images on en.wiki. ;) I  Support you. Yonatan ^talk 19:21, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

 Support -- Bryan (talk to me) 13:14, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

You can now start reviewing. Read Commons:Flickr images and {{flickrreview}} and go ahead. -- Bryan (talk to me) 08:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

 Support, I know I'm late and you have the power... but, I think you're trustworthy... if anything too copyright paranoid with fair use--which means you'll be good for this job :) --gren 12:56, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Jon Harald Søby (talk · contributions)

Any objections to User:Jon Harald Søby, steward and former Commons admin? Kjetil r 02:21, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

• No objections -- Bryan (talk to me) 07:50, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
• None --Iamunknown 18:34, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

---

Ok, he can start. -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Iamunknown (talk · contributions)

I've been at Commons for a while. In addition I am an administrator at the English-language Wikibooks (c.f. Special:Listusers) and am a contributor to the English-language Wikipedia. I regularly do image-related maintenance including tagging or listing unlicensed or unfree images for deletion, cycling through Special:Uncategorizedcategories, or whatever else I feel up to doing. I'd like to be able to help out with the Flickreview backlogs and separate the freely licensed images from the unfree images. I understand that users can choose a variety of licenses — even different version numbers (2.0 and 2.5 for example) of Creative Commons licenses — and that, even if the image license on Flickr indicates that it is freely licensed, the uploader may not necessarily be the rights holder. With this knowledge and the knowledge in general that I have acquired from regular Wikipedia and Commons editing, I feel that I can help out and would enjoy doing so. Regards, Iamunknown 04:37, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

•  Support Mr. Unknown can be trusted. Kjetil r 06:06, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
•  Support -- Bryan (talk to me) 08:07, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Yonatan ^talk 09:45, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Frequent contributor at Media copyright questions, definitely knows what (s)he's doing. ShadowHalo 00:15, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
•  Support, based on en: activities. Jkelly 20:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

---

The community has shown no objections. Please read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{flickrreview}}. You can then start reviewing Flickr images. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Yummifruitbat (talk · contributions)

I'd like permission to act as a flickr reviewer. Most of my contributions are image-related and I'm active at en-FPC amongst other places. I've come across a few images of late which have been brought across from flickr with incomplete licencing details and/or with statements like "permission obtained" when in fact the image is CC-BY. There don't seem to be that many people doing this and I'm probably as qualified as anyone else to help out. --Yummifruitbat 15:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

•  Support, we can always need more help. By the way, I love your panorama photos! Kjetil r 16:11, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

• Thanks very much! --Yummifruitbat 14:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

• Question: what experience do you have with copyrights, maintenance or Flickr? (I ask this upon looking at your contributions.) --Iamunknown 18:40, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

• I can't point to any specific on-wiki experience in copyrights, and I don't have a Flickr account, but I'm familiar with the workings of the site and its tagging system. I've done a bit of identifying probably-unfree-images on en along with assorted other maintenance tasks (e.g. feature picture promotions, moving the odd image across to Commons). I admit that my contributions to the Commons to date have been image uploads, rather than maintenance. I have a good understanding of image copyright issues - you'll have to take my word for that, I'm afraid. I'm a reasonably experienced amateur photographer so I expect to be able to identify dubious licencing by comparing EXIF data, photographic style, etc. Basically I'm offering to help out where and when I can with this; maybe I've underestimated the requirements for 'trustedness' - I'm not running for adminship! I think my contribution history at en supports the fact that I'm a sensible, good-faith editor with a solid understanding of image matters (Howcheng has seen quite a bit of me at en-FPC from time to time; perhaps he'd vouch for me?). If I haven't demonstrated enough experience to be considered trustworthy then I guess I'll concentrate on other things. --Yummifruitbat 14:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the long reply. I'm leaning towards objecting based on a lack of image- and copyright-related edits I can judge by. Please know, however, that there is always room for help! I have four links on my userpage at User:Iamunknown that might be of help. Also the links at Special:Recentchanges allow for endless maintenance! Regards, Iamunknown 23:56, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
    • As a reasonably experienced photographer, Yummifruitbat should be able to spot dubious licencing. Come on, being a trusted user is not a big deal. Kjetil r 00:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
      • I don't think I am making it a big deal. I think that trusted users should have at least one or two image taggings under his or her belt, which I don't see here. (Well I can't see deleted edits, but I don't see talk page notifications, which I would assume would go along with said deleted edits.) --Iamunknown 00:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
        • Deleted edits can be seen here. Only one though /Lokal_Profil 00:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
          • I've done a section of odder's Es. The deleted edit was a picture edit I uploaded at EN-FPC which was promoted and overwrote the original; the duplicate (which I created) was deleted. --Yummifruitbat 03:54, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

(outdent) Ping - I've done some tagging as requested. Please review my contributions and indicate whether I appear more trustworthy as a result. --Yummifruitbat 03:30, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Excuse me, I take issue with being characterised as not trusting you. It is not true; if I trusted or distrusted you, I would be making a judgement, but I have no history of edits by which to make such a judgement. Your only contributions prior to 01:43, 11 April 2007 were to image description pages of images you uploaded, to your user page, to five user's talk pages, to a couple of project-space pages and to this page. I thank you for wanting to help out. I am, however, left wondering how well you are familiarised with the project and with the intricacies of copyrights and licensing. I maintain my objection and would eagerly point you to the Clean the Commons! project (I know you have already been there, having reviewed your contributions) from which there are many images licensing issues to resolve whenever you feel the need or have the time to help out. --Iamunknown 06:26, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

• I'm sorry if that came across the wrong way. I'm not characterising you as thinking me untrustworthy, merely indicating that I have now undertaken to illustrate through my contributions that I am familiar with Commons copyright policies, as you asked. You said "I think trusted users should have at least one or two image taggings under his or her belt, which I don't see here." Well, I now have 60+ image taggings under my belt and you still object. With all due respect, I am not interested in spending hours resolving missing licence issues and placing tags where the user has forgotten to do so otherwise I would just have gone straight there and done it without troubling to ask anybody. I have offered to review the licence tags on Flickr images and identify mis-tagged, erroneously uploaded or dubious-provenance images and to indicate where images obtained from Flickr appear to be genuinely acceptable to the Commons. I believe I would do a good job of this because I have extensive experience (which you have ignored) of image-related work on the English Wikipedia; because I am familiar with copyright policy (as I have now demonstrated); because I am a photographer myself and can spot inconsistencies in style, quality, EXIF data, etc. which might indicate false licencing; and because I can read and am capable of crosschecking the Commons tag against the Flickr one. I was under the impression that assumption of good faith was a policy here as much as on any other Wikimedia project, so I'd appreciate it if I was not asked to jump over ever-rising hurdles just to help out where I have offered. I'd be happy for someone to review my Flickr review work for a short while if others genuinely shared your concern that I might not be capable of applying policy correctly. --Yummifruitbat 12:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

 Support I think the user has shown that they understand the copyright system and Commons' tagging policy. -- Bryan (talk to me) 08:52, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

 Support --GeorgHH 20:13, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

---

Please read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{flickrreview}}. You can then start reviewing Flickr images. -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Spundun (talk · contributions)

Hi all, I'm self nominating myself as a reviewer. I'm an administrator on Indian language wikipedias of gu: and hi: . I really like to keep wikipedias free of copyvio images and I have found that the collection of indian images is really lacking, so I'm turning to Flickr now and I've already got hold of a few images. I believe I understand the process and policies of wikipedias and commons reasonably well, and when in doubt, I'm not afraid to ask. Thanks --Spundun 04:10, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

•  Support Spundun seems to be well-intentioned and to be familiar with image policies here and, in view of the professed reticence to act whereof he does not know and of two communities' having reposed trust in him, seems altogether unlikely to act inappropriately. Jahiegel 04:57, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

---

I'm closing this one as the user seems to be hardly active lately. Feel free to open it (anybody) when you're back. -- Bryan (talk to me) 17:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] ShadowHalo (talk · contributions)

I'm an admin on English Wikipedia, and I spend a decent amount of time dealing with copyright issues at w:Wikipedia:Media copyright questions and tagging images. I'm not as active on Commons, but I'm sure I could help reduce the backlog at Category:Flickr images needing human review. ShadowHalo 23:09, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

 SupportMECU≈talk 03:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

---

Our guidelines state that admins from other project can speedily apply for Flickr review status. You are hereby a reviewer. Please make sure you have read all relevant guidelines on Commons:Flickr images, Commons:Licensing and {{Flickrreview}}. -- Bryan (talk to me) 17:29, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Riana_dzasta (talk · contributions)

I would love to help with Category:Flickr images needing human review - it seems to be an area which could always do with an extra pair of eyes and a willing pair of hands. I don't have many edits here, but I know my way around. I am Riana on en-WP, where I am an admin, and often help out with image-related deletions, and answer licensing/copyright questions for new people. riana_dzasta 01:39, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

 Support - Riana seems highly clueful on the English Wikipedia. I doubt my vote carries much weight since I've not had time to help out much at all since I got my Trusted ticket, but I have no doubt that Riana would be a great help. --Yummifruitbat 04:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Why not?  :-) Riana has always been helpful at en.WP and, in my interactions, definitely "gets" image licensing; she'll do just fine. --Iamunknown 03:40, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

 Support Although she may be speedily made a reviewer in view of her admin status at en.wiki, I note that I would join in Iam's comments and would surely support even were this not a formality. Jahiegel 05:00, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

---

Correct. You can start reviewing. Please read the instructions mentioned above before reviewing. -- Bryan (talk to me) 08:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Kameraad Pjotr (talk · contributions)

Hello,
I saw the Review category, and I think you can use a helping hand, so I'm nominating myself as a reviewer. I'm not that active on commons, but I'm quite busy on the Dutch wikipedia on the image requested for deletion-page, with nominating and deleting images. I'm also an admin on the Dutch wikipedia. Kameraad Pjotr 20:24, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

---

As an administrator of another wiki, you are hereby allowed to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{flickrreview}} -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:35, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Adambro (talk · contributions)

Hi, I'd like to request permission to review Flickr images. I'm an administrator over on the English Wikipedia and spend a fair amount of time on Commons addressing issues I encounter at en. as well as uploading my own images. I'm a Flickr user and am familiar with the use of Flickr image on Commons. As per the guidelines at Commons:Flickr images, as an administrator of another Wikimedia wiki, I request speedy permission. I look forward to trying to reduce the backlog at Category:Flickr images needing human review. Thanks. Adambro 12:28, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{flickrreview}} --Iamunknown 23:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Ranveig (talk · contributions)

I am an admin on Nynorsk Wikipedia and a long-time contributor to Commons. I have uploaded a lot of pictures from Flickr myself, and would like to make myself useful by reviewing the works of others. --Ranveig 15:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{flickrreview}} MECU≈talk 01:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Trixt (talk · contributions)

I'd like permission to act as a Flickr reviewer because I would like to participate in Flickr images reviews (between other things). I don't have much edits here (I am beginning now to contribute massively) but most of my contributions as admin on Italian Wikipedia are image-copyright related (I'm very active in image patrolling). I know CC licenses (and copyright tagging in general) very well and I have an account on Flickr. Thank you--Trixt 00:50, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{flickrreview}}. riana_dzasta 07:35, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Symode09

Hi all, I'm self nominating myself as a reviewer. I'm an occational contributor and would simply like to be or more assistance to the community. I understand policies (I do admit, I have had a problem originally wiht non free images) but, have had no problems with actual maintainance etc. talk to symode09's 15:58, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

•  Oppose -- Sorry, but the user has very few edits on Commons and a history of copyvios. Half of his uploads have been deleted as copyvios. -- Bryan (talk to me) 17:07, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment -- When I began, yes, I had HEAPS of copyvio's - i have learnt from this. The only recent copyvios were virginia tech and that was simply because I could not use the wikinews upload feature for some reason. --talk to symode09's 17:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
  •  Comment - Why is your signature an external link instead of an internal one? It makes it very confusing, which is not a great thing when seeking a position that involves communication. Also, I assume that you can now or will be able to in the future access Commons through Wikimedia's secure server. For example, https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Main_Page takes you to English Wikipedia on the secure server. Having a hardlinked signature would break that functionality for anyone that accesses Commons that way. --BigDT 01:32, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
    • You can, however, use {{fullurl:User talk:Symode09}} to achieve the same functionality across servers. --Iamunknown 03:56, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- few edits, history of copyvios, history of self-promotion, sig that breaks for users of the secure server.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs|supports deadminship for inactivity) 21:00, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

---

Reviewer status declined -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Robek

Self nomination. I've been on commons for a year now, mostly uploading stuff to use on pl.wiki and until recently, I haven't really been involved with the community here, lately though I've developed peculiar interest in watching Latest files :) and because every now and again I see image from Flickr which I could review. I though I'll apply for a reviewer status. Reviewing won't be my main objective but I'm sure I'll find it useful while carrying out my normal tasks --Robek _{(talk|contribs)} 01:33, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

•  Support -- Looks like a user who knows what he is doing. -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I see nothing to suggest that Robek should be unfit for Flickr review. Jahiegel 22:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

---

After four days there seem to be no objections against you reviewing Flickr images. Please make sure that you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{flickrreview}}. You can then start reviewing images. -- Bryan (talk to me) 14:55, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Da Man2

I'm nominating myself, because I could really help with reviewing Flickr images. Da Man2 23:39, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

• Vigorously  Oppose per User talk:Da Man2#Image:Thegame2005.jpg.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 15:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment COM:AN/U#Da Man2 (talk • contribs), Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Yung6, COM:AN/V#Da Man2 -- Editor at Large • talk 15:58, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment In light of User talk:Da Man2#Image:Thegame2005.jpg it may be wise to delete Image:Rapper Ice Cube 2005.jpg and Image:BowWow April2007.jpg from the Commons, both of which came from this user's flickr account (those are just the ones I know about). riana_dzasta 16:28, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

---

Confirmation declined. Does not really need explanation, does it? -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:44, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] BanyanTree

Hi, I figure it's about time to make up for the work I've made the Flickr reviewers do with the various images I've uploaded. I have about 600 edits on Commons, have been around for about two years and am an administrator on English Wikipedia. Cheers, BanyanTree 05:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{flickrreview}}. riana_dzasta 06:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] user:Wikihermit

I'd like to help out at Commons reviewing Flickr images. I help out with simple task on Commons, and would like to help out more here by reviewing images. I understand commons policies pretty well, and haven't had any problems here. If you're curious, you may check out my more active account at the English Wikipedia. Thanks! ~ Wikihermit 17:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

You should be more familiar with some fundamental things on Commons, like putting new posts at the bottom and linking to your real userpage at English Wikipedia, w:user:Wikihermit.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 18:25, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

It's linked under Other Wikimedia Accounts —> Wikipedia. ~ Wikihermit 18:28, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

When considering your request, we are of course not just interested in whether we judge you can be "trusted", we are also looking at whether you have a good grasp of image licensing. A week ago you uploaded Image:01thecircus.jpg which had been uploaded to enwiki. The image description on enwiki says that the image was found "on the internet and edited it in photoshop" and fails to provide a source. In this circumstance it is likely the image is a copyright violation as the majority of images online are, of course, not released under the GFDL and because there is no source we are unable to verify this. Because of this I am afraid I must  Oppose your request to review Flickr images. Reviewing Flickr image is not as simple as checking the licence is the same as the image uploaded on Commons, it requires judgement as to whether the Flickr user is actually in a position to release the image under CC. Your upload of Image:01thecircus.jpg with the description as I've noted concerns me with regard to this. Adambro 21:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I used CommonsHelper tool to upload that image. When I uploaded that image I was in "autopilot" moving images from Wikimedia projects to commons (5 images were uploaded in a 15 minute timespan). I could have skipped reading the description when I uploaded the file, but I understand your reasoning completely. ~ Wikihermit 23:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

•  Oppose Although we generally avoid on one project considering one's actions on another project, most especially relative to images, inasmuch as policies differ not insignificantly across projects, but I think some of the discussion on Wikihermit's recent request for adminship on en.wiki might be valuable; a few concerns about the understanding of image issues similar to those one might encounter reviewing Flickr content arose. Whilst Wikihermit seemed well to appreciate the concerns and quickly to rectify in errors, and although he demonstrates a similar capacity for rapid growth here, I can't imagine that one could draw any firm positive conclusion as to WH's capacity and fitness for (the admittedly generally facile) Flickr review from his contribution history at present. Jahiegel 03:05, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

•  Oppose - for the reasons stated above and in my posts to your user talk page here, as well as for the image licensing understanding issues raised in your recent request for adminship on en.wiki. OTOH, this edit of yours only saw the light of day for 43 minutes.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

---

Closed, no support for promotion. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:23, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Edward

I'd like to help, I've uploaded a few hundred images, I understand copyright. I think I can spot a copyright violation. edward 20:08, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

• Looking at your uploads, you have several from this flickr user. Can I assume that this is you? If so, you may want to make that clear on the image description page. That said, I  Support - nothing in your contributions jumps out at me. --BigDT 15:58, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

---

Sorry for the delay; You can now start reviewing Flickr images. Please first read the relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:45, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Vishwin60

I've been patrolling Special:Newimages lately, and have been tagging unsourced, unlicensed, and images without permission with the appropriate templates and warning the users at the same time. While I'm at it, I would also like the privilege of reviewing flickr images to check for copyvios and license incompatibilities as well as doing regular image patrolling. (→zelzany - framed) 20:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

•  Support, trustworthy person. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:34, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

 Support I agree with Bryan. Personalguy 21:52, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Would you consider harmonizing "Vishwin60" with "→zelzany - framed"? What's wrong with {{cc-by-sa-1.0}}, {{cc-by-sa-2.0}}, and {{cc-by-sa-2.5}}, that you chose not to use them to license your images? Thanks!   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:31, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Also, how do you square this edit with your later upload of Image:I-176.svg as documented in this log (but for some reason not in this other log)?   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:44, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

---

Sorry for the delay; You can now start reviewing Flickr images. Please first read the relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{Flickrreview}}. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:44, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Personalguy

Self-nomination. I uploaded 2 images from Flickr that I found both of them under the license of CC-BY-SA-2.0 on the Flickr page, and have self-nominated myslef after reading this. Personalguy 20:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

• 反对 too unexperienced. Please try later when you have more experience. (→zelzany - framed) 20:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
  •  Comment If people oppose this, how are the images I posted gonna get reviewed? Personalguy 20:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Somebody else will review it. Please be patient. (→zelzany - framed) 20:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
      • Okay. Personalguy 20:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
        • I have reviewed both images. (For the burger, I also uploaded the larger image and cleaned it up a bit. It is usually a good idea to upload the highest resolution version available.) I think that there may be a little misunderstanding here - this page is where you seek community approval to become a reviewer yourself - all you have to do to get a review of an image you upload is tag it with {{flickrreview}}. --BigDT 21:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

---

blocked sock; no access. (→zelzany - framed) 17:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:N

I created my Wikipedia account en:User:N in 2004, but I only became very active in December 2006, although I have been reading the site sporadically since 2004. I've been active for about a month on Commons, and I've been participating in deletion requests and uploading a few score free images. I would like to help review images (of course not mine) when the bot is down. I have contributed the laws of two countries (Mexico, Guatemala) to COM:FOP and two others (Egypt and PRC) were added by others based on English translations of copyright laws that I found. -N 22:43, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

• I am familiar with N's work on Commons and en.WP and, while I may disagree him on some interpretations of copyright law, I am confident he has the knowledge to be a Flickr reviewer, and I am confident that he can be trusted to be a Flickr reviewer.  Support --Iamunknown 03:03, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

  One question (after my enthusiastic support :P): Would you please add babel (language) templates, so other editors know your language skills? --Iamunknown 03:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

  Created my user page. :) thanks for your support. -N 13:24, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

• 支持 nothing at your contribs jumps out at me (unless I'm missing something). (→zelzany - framed) 17:07, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

•  Comment - why would you want to blank your user talk page?   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 01:37, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
  • It was a generic welcome message and an incorrect warning that something was missing the source (which I failed to add in the description when I uploaded it, but which I edited in moments later). Does your talk page still contain your generic welcome message and haven't you ever blanked an incorrect warning? I even used a descriptive edit summary explaining that the error was fixed. I'm sure you are aware of en:WP:DTTR, right? -N 01:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
    • The generic welcome message contains some important links. Where else are you going to find a link to the CommonsHelper? The warning was correct when it was given. My talk page archives still contain my generic welcome messages. I don't think I have blanked even an incorrect warning, although I may have ridiculed it and/or allowed it to be archived in due course. Yes, I'm aware of the essay en:WP:DTTR (which does not necessarily apply to Commons), but you had only been contributing regularly for a few days at the time.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 05:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
      • So very true. I only found out about CH when I got the CH2 script. Incidentally, are there archivebots I could use? -N 09:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
        • User:MiszaBot. And this page could use an archiver as well. I'll create one. No objections about N's candidacy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bryan (talk • contribs) at 14:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

---

Please read the relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, {{flickrreview}} and Commons:Flickr images and you can start reviewing. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:21, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Jeff G.

Hi, all. I'm self-nominating because I see a need for more reviewers to spread the workload. I understand licensing and copyright issues and how to read the licensing from a Flickr photo page. I am concerned when "The copyright status of the image was undeterminable by the bot, and requires human attention", especially in such cases as the image I reuploaded in maximum resolution (I thought correctly) to Image:570374817 f926fc2ec2.jpg. I have made over 1,900 edits on Wikimedia Commons as User:Jeff G. since I registered here on 25 February 2007, I have made over 2,200 edits on English Wikipedia since I registered there as w:User:JeffGent on 21 December 2006 and changed my name to w:User:Jeff G. on 31 May 2007, I have participated on Wikimedia's Bugzilla since I registered there on 20 May 2007 (they don't seem to count edits), I have a Flickr Pro Account, and I have tried to make each project better with each edit, or at least to do no harm.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 23:10, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

• 支持 concise understanding of copyright. Nothing in your contribs jumps out at me (unless I'm missing something), though Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Image:NYC subway simplified map 50pct-optimized.png may trouble some people. I personally think that was a minor issue which would not affect how flickr images are reviewed. Good luck, (→O - v d e) 00:22, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

I have reversed my position on that image after reviewing Lar's thoughtful analysis and your comment above. Thank you for your wish of good luck.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

•  Support user understands copyright, and can be trusted to review images from flickr. -N 17:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment That was a bug in Flickreviewr. Should soon be fixed. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:24, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for fixing that bug, Bryan.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

•  Support - considerate, thoughtful reviewer who errs on the side of caution, and corrects mistakes when warranted, just the sort needed for reviewing license claims. ++Lar: t/c 22:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

---

Please read the relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, {{flickrreview}} and Commons:Flickr images and you can start reviewing. -- Bryan (talk to me) 12:31, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Stevenfruitsmaak

Hello everyone,

I just saw an image that needs flickr-review, so I'm requesting permission to join in on that effort. I'm an active Wikimedian since April 2006, I've uploaded quite some images on Commons and have participated in discussions here from time to time. I've learned a lot from the mistakes I've made in the past on images that I uploaded that have been deleted. I recently joined the OTRS team to deal with some requests in smaller languages too (especially Dutch). I'm mostly active on Wikinews where I am an admin.

--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 17:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{flickrreview}}. -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:16, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] James086

I'm an admin on enwiki (see my user page) and I've contributed to the backlogs so I think I'll help out by reducing them. I've read the policies on Licensing and Flickr images and I reckon I'm ready to help out. James086^{Talk | Email} 10:11, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{flickrreview}}. (→O - RLY?) 18:45, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] AnonEMouse

I gather administrators on other Wikipedias are speedily given reviewer status. I'm an admin on EN, and would appreciate reviewer status. I'm not sure if that still means I have to post here as a formality, but just in case, I am posting here. If I misunderstood something, a Commons admin should please feel free to remove my {{User trusted}} tag from my user page. --AnonEMouse 21:38, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{flickrreview}}. (→O - RLY?) 21:42, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Brian New Zealand

I have come across a couple of images that need flickr-review, and would like to 'give a hand' to commons you guys in reviewing flickr images. I am a administrator on en.wikinews, and mi.wikipedia. I am also an OTRS Agent Brian New Zealand 09:11, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{flickrreview}}. Adambro 11:24, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Aldaron

I'd like to join in the effort. I photograph a lot and post many of my photos on flickr. I'd like to make as many of these as possible available here and to ensure that they are properly licensed and integrated into the database. Aldaron 15:36, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

•  Oppose -- This user has taken some great photographs which are very welcome on Commons but I'm concerned that the comment above suggests that they intend to only review images they have uploaded. For this reason I cannot support the request as doing so would devalue the Flickr image review process. Adambro 15:55, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I missed where in the guidelines review of one's own work is prohibited. My understanding is that the flickr image review process is intended to confirm that the posted images have appropriate licenses (something the original flickr photographer is, in fact, ideally suited to do). Aldaron 16:22, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

I don't believe there is such prohibition on reviewing ones own images however I feel uncomfortable with the idea, hence my opposition to your request. Other editors may of course have other opinions on the issue and not consider it a problem. Adambro 16:43, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Certainly "reviewing" (in some abstract sense) one's own images would be a legitimate concern, but my request is directed at something quite a bit more specific: confirming a valid license. Aldaron 17:00, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Apologies for the confusion, where I say "reviewing" I am referring to the process of confirming the licence on Flickr is valid not reviewing in a checking that the image is within the Commons:Project scope sense for example. Adambro 17:07, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

In that case, I can't follow the rational of your objection. Aldaron 17:24, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Please see Commons_talk:Flickr_images#Reviewing_own_images where I have outlined my opinion on this issue in more detail. Adambro 17:30, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Discussion contiunes there. I think you have it backwards. Aldaron 18:10, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

•  Oppose for now per the discussion there. ++Lar: t/c 03:37, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment There is no need for Flickr review if the user on Commons and Flickr are the same. The whole point of the review is that images that are not from Commons users are to be reviewed. -- Bryan (talk to me) 08:42, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Given the above, I have created Template:Flickr-self.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs|supports deadminship for inactivity) 20:33, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Nice! Aldaron 20:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs|supports deadminship for inactivity) 00:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Using it. Aldaron 20:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

•  Support per Bryan's comment above.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs|supports deadminship for inactivity) 00:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

---

Not sure whether this is still relevant? -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:40, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] McLurker

I'd like to join in reviewing. I've started uploading images from flickr and had them reviewed- I'd like to do my bit in reviewing images now. McLurker 11:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

•  Oppose - Sorry, I don't think you're ready yet. The one Flickr image you uploaded, Image:Arran fields.jpg, was a copyvio (because the uploader of http://www.flickr.com/photos/ripperdoc/54314406/ is now using by-NC-sa licensing).   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 12:18, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

  Actually, that was a Wikipedia image, not uploaded directly from flickr. I didn't review it because of all the stuff above about not reviewing images you upload. The image I have uploaded from flickr passed review. McLurker 12:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

  The only thing that matters is what the original source was (in this case, flickr). I've deleted the image because the noncommercial license isn't allowed here. (→O - RLY?) 12:51, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

---

Not promoted due to lack of community support. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:41, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Greeves

I am an admin on the English Wikipedia (my RfA) and I am looking for a way to help out at the Commons, and since this is backlogged, I think this might be a good way to start. Greeves ^{(talk • contribs • Wikipedia)} 16:56, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{flickrreview}}.

And a side note: I saw on your meta page that you called this the English Wikimedia Commons. Note that there exists no such thing as an English Wikimedia Commons, and that this is a multilingual project ;) -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Miranda

Hi, I would like to join the effort, too. I look for free images all of the time on Flickr, and I have asked people around on Flickr for images to upload to the project. One was for Aretha Franklin and the other was for Seth MacFarlane. Cheers. Miranda 01:39, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

•  Support ~ Wikihermit 01:40, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Trustworthy user both on en-WP and Commons, good worker, seems to understand licensing sufficiently. ~ Riana ⁂ 01:41, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support, obviously. No problems with her on the english 'pedia, much less here. :-) --Boricuaeddie 19:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support per all of the above.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:13, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

---

With no opposition, the community has given you permission to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{flickrreview}}. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:33, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Videmus Omnia

I'd like to help out - my primary goal is to help obtain free content, and I think I have a good understanding of licenses. A gallery of images I have obtained from copyright holders can be seen here. Videmus Omnia 05:13, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

•  Support this great guy, with my last post till november. -N 10:30, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Of course ~ Riana ⁂ 10:37, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support - user is trustworthy, and has extensive experience with copyright and Wikimedia policy. Quadell (talk) 12:21, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support - frighteningly proficient at obtaining beautiful images, ruthless at pursuing questionable licences. --AnonEMouse 13:05, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support great with images. ~ Wikihermit 16:16, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support - excellent work already in obtaining free content, and ensuring that it is in fact free.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 19:36, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

---

---

With no opposition, the community has given you permission to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{flickrreview}}. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:34, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Anetode

I'm an admin at en.wiki and have been uploading flickr images for a while now. Don't know what kind of a backlog commons is looking at, but I'd be more than willing to lend a hand. ˉ^anetode╦╩ 23:25, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{flickrreview}} :) ~ Riana ⁂ 11:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Andrew c

I am an sysop at en. (Andrew c), and would like to be a Flickr reviewer. Perhaps this may be a good place for me to begin more serious contributions here at the commons. -Andrew c 00:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{flickrreview}} :) ~ Riana ⁂ 11:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] WilyD

I'm an admin on en.wikipedia, and was told I could apply to be a flickr reviewer here. WilyD 16:33, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{flickrreview}} :) ~ Riana ⁂ 11:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] AuburnPilot

I'm an admin on en.wikipedia and have been looking for ways to get more involved on Commons. I've uploaded a few images but figured this would be a good way to become more acquainted with this project and its users. auburnpilot (talk - en.wiki) 18:49, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{flickrreview}}. Cheers! --Iamunknown 12:14, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Heligoland

I'm an admin on en.wikipedia (as User:Nick) and like AuburnPilot above, I'd like to take more of an interest in Commons. I'm rather familiar with Flickr so it seems like this would be a sensible place to start. Heligoland 20:23, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

---

Our policy regarding the flickrreview system is that administrators from other wikis may speedily begin to review Flickr images. Please make sure you have read all relevant instructions on Commons:Licensing, Commons:Flickr images and {{flickrreview}} :) ~ Riana ⁂ 11:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)