Commons talk:Flickr images/reviewers/archive 7

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Jacklee

• Jacklee (talk · contributions): I can usually be found organizing images at "Category:Singapore", but do upload images from Flickr now and again to illustrate articles at the English Wikipedia. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 15:25, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

 Done Per no objections raised in a 7 day period. PeterSymonds (talk) 13:48, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:トトト

• トトト (talk · contributions), Hi, I've imported about 70 or so flickr images to Commons, and wonder if I'm eligible for the reviewer status. Usually I am at ja-wiki making modest editing contributions. Thank you. --トトト (talk) 18:13, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
  •  Oppose You can get the task done using Flickr upload bot (which you are already using anyway). Also, (using Google Translate), I found that you have some image-usage disputes in ja.wiki this month, as someone contacted you on your ja user talk. [1] OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 15:47, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

     Comment I don't mind the status anyway, but as far as the "dispute" (which I am doubtful to call it a dispute) is concerned, it was unrelated to the copyright. It was purely the difference of aesthetics/artistic senses between the user and myself. The article was on "conversation" (会話）, and my edit was this. Which do you think is more beautiful and fanciful, using the image of President George Bush Jr. and or a quarreling married couple? The issue here was not even related to a violation of any rights. I hope you vote for the latter. Thank you.--トトト (talk) 23:39, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

  •  Oppose for now. Most of the photos you upload cannot be used commercially, please read Commons:Freedom of panorama#Japan.→Diti the penguin — 14:02, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Not promoted. Kwj2772 (msg) 14:05, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Matthewedwards

• Matthewedwards (talk · contributions): I've been an admin at Wikipedia for nearly a year, and I've done some work with images there. I've made a fair few file uploads both at en-wiki and here at Commons. Usually I use one of the tools, but occasionally I upload manually. It would be useful if I could approve the images myself, and I would also be able to help out with the category. Thanks Matthewedwards (talk) 03:39, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

•  Support I know ME on enwiki and he is a thoughtful user who thinks before he acts, which will transfer well to this task. MBisanz ^talk 04:46, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Support ~ ωαdεstεr16_«talk^stalk» 17:32, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Support, definitely. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:26, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Promoted. since he is an admin on English wikipedia.--Kwj2772 (msg) 12:45, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Willscrlt

• Willscrlt (talk · contributions): While I personally prefer to have the bot do the initial verification (truly impartial and incontestable), I would like to help out with images that need a human review and anytime I notice a large backlog due to the bot being down. I have made over 1400 edits here, over 4500 on en.wiki, and have rollback rights on both. I have uploaded over 50 photographs (43 from Flickr, 9 from Geograph, and 10 from en.wiki with free licenses) and have never had any of them removed for copyvio. When time permits, I participate in deletion discussions and also nominate images for deletion here and on other projects if I find them suspicious. As to image size checking, I learned that lesson years ago, and always check for maximum resolution, even on Geograph (where there appears to be no specific requirement for that). Thanks for considering my request. —Willscrlt ( “Talk” • “w:en” • “m” ) 11:53, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support Obviously. ~ ωαdεstεr16_«talk^stalk» 23:44, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Promoted.--Kwj2772 (msg) 15:17, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Bencmq

• Bencmq (talk · contributions): I am a sysop from the Chinese Wikipedia, I would like to assist in the review process. I've tagged several images for copyvio/ nominated for deletion, and I believe I am able to review images from Flickr.--Ben.MQ (talk) 10:14, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support I normally wouldn't vote on this (I won't oppose a candidate willing to take part in Flickr reviewing), but the fact that you're a sysop at the Chinese wikipedia negates the fact that you only have 255 edits here (for me, anyway). You also have uploaded 53 images here, which means you have experience. My main reason for support is your language skills. We can always use another bi-, tri-, multilingual user that is interested in taking part in the less-fun duties around here. ~ ωαdεstεr16_«talk^stalk» 23:50, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support I know his work in Chinese Wikipedia and it is fabulous. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 05:37, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support –Juliancolton | ^Talk 12:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support clear case. --High Contrast (talk) 12:38, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Promoted. Kwj2772 (msg) 13:35, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Lobo de Hokkaido (talk · contributions)

I'd like to keep helping reviewing Flickr images. I think I have a large experience on uploading from Flickr and a good knowledge of copyright issues too. Moreover, I use to check recent images for copyvios (I also have already checked and marked a few copyvios that FlickreviewR passed incorrectly) and recently I am helping with the Commons Café (the spanish Village Pump). Lobo (howl?) 01:16, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

•  Support No problem for me. →Diti the penguin — 21:23, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Promoted. Kwj2772 (msg) 13:43, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Wcam (talk · contributions)

Hi! I would like to get a reviewer permission in Wikimedia Commons. I'm a sysop in zh.wikibooks and patroller and rollbacker in zh.wikipedia and I would like to help reviewing Flickr pictures.--Wcam (talk) 13:36, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

•  Support I know Wcam from zhwp and this is a very active and reliable contributor.—Ben.MQ (talk) 22:25, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Support ok --High Contrast (talk) 14:16, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:06, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Promoted. Kwj2772 (msg) 13:16, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Frehley (talk · contributions)

Requesting permission to be a reviewer. I have not been as active here on commons as i have been on Wikipedia, but i would like to become more involved. I have good knowledge of licensing issues and would like to help out whenever possible. Frehley (talk) 06:08, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

 Oppose under 20 Edits in about three months is too little. We need active people for reviewing. --High Contrast (talk) 20:56, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

 Oppose per above, sorry. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 05:03, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

 Oppose, would like to see a bit more experience. Cirt (talk) 09:45, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Not promoted. Kwj2772 (msg) 14:13, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Ltshears (talk · contributions)

Would it be possible for me to be approved as a trusted user so i can review FlickR images? I am on here almost everyday doing what i can. Wether cleaning up categories or adding uncatagorized images to categories. --Ltshears (talk) 15:06, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

 Done I don't see any reason why not.. Keep up the good work Huib talk 16:28, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Captain-tucker

I would like to expand my contributions to Commons by becoming a Flickr reviewer. I have been contributing to Common for approx. six months with around 4000 edits and over 900 uploads. Several hundred of the uploads have been moves from en Wikipedia. I have been an editor on en Wikipedia for over a year but have been spending more and more time on Commons and so would like to expand my abilities and contributions here. I also have rollback rights on Commons. Thanks. --Captain-tucker (talk) 16:12, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

•  Support Definitely. wadester16 18:15, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
• You should be running for adminship, but  sure. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:48, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

 Done PeterSymonds (talk) 23:32, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] J.delanoy (talk · contributions)

• I've made a couple hundred edits here, and I feel that I have demonstrated that I understand copyright law fairly well from my work, and for those who know me there, on enwiki as well. Also, in the past, I had made some requests that people re-license their works on Flickr so that I could upload them to Commons. I think that shows that I know which licenses are appropriate for Commons. With this permission, I could lend a hand to clean out the category when it gets backlogged, so I would appreciate your consideration. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 03:52, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support - Positive contributor at en.wikipedia and on this project as well. The user will help us out in accordance with Commons:Flickr images, Commons:Licensing and Template:Flickrreview and perform appropriate flickr review. Thanks for offering to contribute in this added capacity. Cirt (talk) 06:25, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support duh... wadester16 06:26, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support, what wadester16 said. --Captain-tucker (talk) 10:28, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Promoted. Kwj2772 (msg) 14:09, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:LeaveSleaves

• LeaveSleaves (talk · contributions): I regularly upload images from Flickr and have good understanding of evaluating licenses. I also occasionally help out in finding copyright violations. ^LeaveSleaves 04:24, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support Sure. wadester16 06:27, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support, positive contributor to the project. Cirt (talk) 06:29, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support, Looks good, thanks for volunteering to help out in this capacity.--Captain-tucker (talk) 11:06, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support Yep. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:39, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

 Done PeterSymonds (talk) 21:25, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Dereckson

• Dereckson (talk · contributions): I red carefully the instructions for reviewers page, and I'm familiar with Creative Commons licenses. --Dereckson (talk) 20:40, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Less than 300 contributions is too low. We nedd active user to review flickr-images. --High Contrast (talk) 21:38, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support - Sysop and trusted user on another Wikimedia project, semi-active here. Good enough for me. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:40, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support Second JC. wadester16 23:58, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support I agree, and note High Contrast's concerns. However, I personally believe Dereckson is an able user, and will "grow" into it. If he is unsure, I'm certain he will ask. He will do well, and has my support. — Kanonkas // talk // CCD // 08:50, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
  •  Support I know Dereckson's work on the projects, no problem for me. →Diti the penguin — 09:55, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

 Done PeterSymonds (talk) 21:25, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Daniel Case

Why I believe I should be a Flickr reviewer.

• Active editor on enwiki since 2005.
• Sysop there since 2007
• Oversighter there since February
• Member at Commons since 2006; many many files uploaded since then.
• Lightly used Flickr account

Daniel Case (talk) 02:19, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

•  Support obviously. Trusted user at enwiki, plenty of work here as well. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:25, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support easiest vote ever. wadester16 03:33, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Trusted in multiple capacities at en.wikipedia, positive contributor here, should do fine with this added capacity of responsibility as well. Cirt (talk) 08:49, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support, without a doubt. --Captain-tucker (talk) 10:08, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Caspian blue

I've been around for a while and am very active on Commons if you look at my 3550 contributions after SUL and 9198 edits before SUL. I am very familiar with Commons licensing policies especially such as Flickr licensing, Commons:Freedom of panorama and all permission and confirmation procedures in regard to OTRS with more than 400 uploads. I created Template:PD-South Korea to sort out images that fall under the South Korean copyright policies. Before knowing of flickr2commons and Bryan's Flickr web tools, I had uploaded many images by hand perhaps over 2000 images. I've also moved many images on English and Korean Wikipedia to Commons by hand or using Commonshelper. I also helped out several editors when they had a hard time getting familiar with Commons. I'd like to help out with reviewing Flickr images for those, especially from non-English speaking worlds who have a hard time in uploading images from Flickr or need additional assistance from reviewers.--Caspian blue 15:41, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

•  Strong Support obviously. Caspian Blue has the necessary knowledge for this. Caspian would be a nice addition to have. — Kanonkas // talk // CCD // 15:59, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Sure. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:11, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Strong Support - Most definitely a benefit.Mitch32^{(Want help? See here!)} 01:37, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support of course. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:51, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

 Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 14:13, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Gage

I would very much like to expand my contributions on Wikimedia Commons. I am extremely familiar with Flickr licensing, and am very active here on Commons, with nearly 1,000 contributions, and more than 375 uploads. I have a good understanding of evaluating licenses. I also occasionally help out in finding copyright violations. My main reason for feeling the need to apply though is because of the number of times that I myself have uploaded images with free licenses from Flickr, and it will sit there in review for quite awhile before a trusted user gets around to confirming it. So, I would enjoy being able to help those other contributors out there, who upload free images from Flickr. Thank you for this opportunity, I hope you will consider me. Gage (talk) 10:02, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

•  Support –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support wadester16 14:47, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --High Contrast (talk) 18:39, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

 Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 14:30, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] UCinternational

This user is a frequent Flickr uploader who usually crops his images and so they end up in the requiring human review cat. I have personally reviewed at least over a 100 of his images all of which passed and I am very confident he knows what he's doing. I would like to nominate him so that he may review his own uploads which will keep the human review cat a lot emptier and give other images more attention. --Yarnalgo (talk) 17:55, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

•  Support as nom. --Yarnalgo (talk) 17:55, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - I am not completely sure, but I'll go on the nominator.Mitch32^{(Want help? See here!)} 17:36, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment The user hasn't requested it personally, so I unless there is a response from the user after the full week has passed, I will be closing it as not done. PeterSymonds (talk) 14:34, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Not done - The user needs to place the request himself. Huib talk 07:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Killiondude

I've become more active on this project, and would like to help out wherever needed. I came across this area, and I thought I might be of some use. Most of my image uploads are from Flickr. I would say that I have a firm grasp on what is, and is not, appropriate to upload to Commons from Flickr. Killiondude (talk) 07:17, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

•  Support wadester16 14:49, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:17, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Promoted. Kwj2772 (msg) 01:27, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Rambo's Revenge

I failed a request for this back in February. Since then I have become a PD reviewer and an en.wiki admin. The reason for trying again so soon is because I stumbled across some image additions on en.wiki which were non-free images uploaded here. I wanted to fail these images but don't have the permissions so decided it was time to try again. I'm actually not going to be around to respond to questions for a bit, but hopefully that won't matter. Rambo's Revenge (en.wiki) 09:37, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

•  Support wadester16 10:37, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

promoted Huib talk 16:00, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] Leoboudv

I was thinking of delaying my application but since the flickrreview bot is down, I've decided to apply to be a flickr reviewer now. I have uploaded many images on Wikicommons, transferred many more and some Admins know the quality of my work. I think I'm trustworthy enough and yes, I know that only cc by 2.0 and cc by sa images are acceptable for Commons. I have no intentions to be an Admin, just a flickrreviewer as I have a full time job. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:43, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

•  Support, of course. Leo really knows what he's doing, and when he's not sure, he asks around. Great work! Lupo 08:25, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support, no doubt. Doing a great job in reviewing flickr images already, so he definitely needs this. –Tryphon^☂ 09:29, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support, without a doubt. --Captain-tucker (talk) 09:36, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Strong Support finally Leo submits this. — Kanonkas // talk // CCD // 12:23, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

promoted Huib talk 16:00, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Óðinn

I am a user who's been active here for almost 3 years, routinely uploading images from Flickr. So I know very well the restrictions that apply to the CC content here. Óðinn (talk) 05:35, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

 Support - Long-term and experienced user, should be trusted to deal with Flickr uploads. Camaron · Christopher · talk 09:22, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

 Support per Camaron —Ben.MQ (talk) 08:11, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

 Support I remember marking a few of your uploads. I notice that even in this early January 2007 image, you uploaded an image with the correct free (cc by sa) license: File:Abkhazia Beach.jpg So you know Common's licensing policies. --Leoboudv (talk) 20:43, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

 Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 11:45, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Diaa abdelmoneim

Approved for image move bot, AWB and Bot flag (User:Dudubot). I got many images licensed from Flickr as cc-by-sa including three photostreams one of which is by a media company http://www.flickr.com/photos/37803129@N00/ (6,400 images). I know a lot about copyright and everything related to it including derivative works, FOP, URAA and of course the Creative Commons Licenses. --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 20:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

 Support - Talk page indicates some issues regarding Flickr in past contributions but they were long ago and you seemed to have gained the needed experience and can be trusted. Camaron · Christopher · talk 09:27, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

 Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 11:45, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Mentifisto

I've become more familiar with Flickr since I started patrolling, how its licenses interoperate with compatibility on Commons (CC-NC isn't, e.g.) and other minor intricacies I notice from others' reviewing, otherwise I'd ask if I'm in doubt. -- Mentifisto 22:47, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

 Support - I could not find any fault in your Flickr uploads and you seem to have the copyright knowledge, so you have my trust. Camaron · Christopher · talk 09:33, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

 Support - While the upload count is slightly on the small side, I trust this user. I'm sure he would ask if he is ever in doubt. It should also be noted he is an admin on enwiki. Killiondude (talk) 04:29, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

 Support Ditto Killiondude wadester16 07:29, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

 Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 11:45, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:JamieS93

I'm an en.wiki administrator, and I've been uploading BY and BY-SA images from Flickr for at least a year now. Recently I've gotten back into uploading some band/musician images, and I'm familiar with which licenses are allowed at Commons. I might not be here often, but since this area is sometimes backlogged, I thought I might offer to help. JamieS93 00:37, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

•  Endorse. Jamie is a competent and reliable English Wikipedia administrator who has my full trust. PeterSymonds (talk) 10:11, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support per above. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support User clearly knows the Flickr reviewer requirements. --Captain-tucker (talk) 10:31, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Endorse. Knows his her stuff. ···日本穣^{Talk to Nihonjoe} 16:33, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

• "Her". :) –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:08, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

•  Support Well deserving. And why are we being gender neutral here? :P - Mitch32^{(Want help? See here!)} 17:37, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

OK added, good luck with reviewing those images. Huib talk 17:38, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Blurpeace

I believe that I am informed enough of copyright law to review Flickr images. –blurpeace ^(talk) 21:13, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

•  Support, knows what he's doing. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:29, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support, knowledgeable user. No reason to distrust them after looking at their contribs and the user gallery. Killiondude (talk) 23:15, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

 Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:06, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Hekerui

Have made myself familiar with the copyright requirements of Commons and am intrigued by the topic. Hekerui (talk) 22:15, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

•  Support, user seems knowledgeable. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:34, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I don't see an issue. Seems to be good both on enWiki and commons with image licensing. --Admrboltz (talk) 15:30, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Admrboltz

I would like to become more involved here at Commons. I am a sysop over at enWiki and am active in media tagging and review there.. Admrboltz (talk) 16:52, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

•  Support upstateNYer 17:13, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support, trusted user. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:51, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Need I say why?Mitch32^{(Want help? See here!)} 14:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
  • OK reviewerstatus granted. Kwj2772 (msg) 15:21, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Kpo!09

I want to be a reviewer because I'm familiar with the creative commons licesing. --Gaston S/Kpo! 09 (talk) 15:10, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sorry, reviewing your talk page, I am not comfortable with this. --Admrboltz (talk) 15:27, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Some of your uploads, like File:Britney Spears Concert9(1).jpg (which doesn't clearly show where the file was from, as I don't see it on that page), and File:Me Against the Music.jpg (which has a license that is incompatible with Commons, and should be deleted), don't show me that you have enough knowledge to review other files. Killiondude (talk) 20:04, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

I actually did investigating of a lot of the user's uploads, and I tagged many for deletion. A lot of them had "no commercial use" as part of the licensing. I think you should review Commons:Flickr files, and ask on that talk page before you upload if you're ever unsure. Killiondude (talk) 20:24, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose per above concerns. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 23:03, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose, strong oppose, this is already your xxth account (User talk:Gaston santucho 09, User talk:Gaston Santucho 09), it is a wonder that your account is not blocked because of copyright violation and sockpuppetry. You still not even learned the very very basics and I think you still not even read Commons:First steps - sorry, but realy not. --Martin H. (talk) 03:24, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Not done. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:14, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Rodrigo.Argenton

I'm volunteer of OTRS , Wikimedia Commons since 15 January 2007. Currently I am committed to the project of the Wikimedia Brasil and Strategic Planning. I have studied free licenses. I know very well the vision of the Wikimedia Foundation. And I've already uploaded over 200 images, I know very well Flickr, and use many images coming from him. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 17:04, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

•  Support - Well-qualified.Mitch32^{(Want help? See here!)} 11:57, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Of course. --High Contrast (talk) 12:54, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Indeed - Trustworthy user. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:58, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I see no issues --Admrboltz (talk) 23:54, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Malo

I am an active en.wiki sysop with 20,000+ edits. I would like to help contribute more to Commons, because I know it can benefit wikis of all languages. I have submitted a few images from flickr in the past, some of the older ones with mistakes, but I've learned from them. I think I can be helpful in this capacity. -- malo (talk) 01:43, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

OK Reviewerstatus granted. Speedy approval: enwiki sysop. Kwj2772 (msg) 13:25, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Wysprgr2005

I've been on Flickr many years and am well versed in copyright. I have also helped revert various vandalism-related edits on enwiki. - Wysprgr2005 (talk) 19:02, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose - way to few edits here on Commons, sorry. Huib talk 20:05, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Abigor, I'd normally support, but more Commons stuff is necessary.Mitch32^{(Want help? See here!)} 22:16, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral. This is a rather tough decision. On the one hand, I have to agree that your minimal contribution history at Commons does not really inspire confidence. That said, you are obviously knowledgeable and I don't have a reason to doubt that you're trustworthy. It's good that you have experience with other projects, namely the English Wikipedia, but I'm afraid it isn't enough to push me into support. Try again in a few weeks when you have more experience. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:30, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Duly noted - Wysprgr2005 (talk) 22:46, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment You are uploading only your own works from Flickr, if you want to upload a batch of your own photographs from Flickr to Commons you should collect them in one album on Flickr, give them good headlines and some description and request batch transfer at Commons:Batch uploading. So far you are not invovled in other peoples images and you will not have use of the Flickrreview status,  Oppose for that reason. --Martin H. (talk) 01:38, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Unsuccessful. PeterSymonds (talk) 19:36, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Lasse Havelund

I've been using the Wikimedia Commons for quite a while now. I've made several contributions, albeit none from Flickr, but I still feel I could help out by reviewing uploads from Flickr by other users. I see it as another way of giving back to the community. My contributions can be found here. — Lasse Havelund ^{(p) (t)} 00:54, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

• No sorry, not enough commons experience. --Admrboltz (talk) 15:15, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Not promoted. Kwj2772 (msg) 06:25, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Raeky

I've been participating in Commons for a while now, have quite a few uploads and edits here at Commons and at the english wikipedia. I've got a firm grasp of the licencing rules for Commons and feel my participation would be an asset to the project. Raeky (talk) 00:57, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• OK - No problems with me, I see good work and nothing that raise any red flags. Huib talk 07:50, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support, net positive. Why not? –blurpeace ^(talk) 17:11, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Sure. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:15, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
•  No questions here.Mitch32^{(Want help? See here!)} 23:36, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

 Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 23:18, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Jmabel

I see that numerous Seattle Municipal Archive images I uploaded have been marked for Flickr review by a "trusted user". I hadn't realized until now that is a techincal term on Commons and something one must apply for. I certainly am familiar with the general licensing policy of Commons. I would presume that after uploading about 20,000 images (more than half of them my own photos, most of the rest public domain), participating in various category & image deletion discussions, and categorizing several thousand photos by other people I should qualify as trusted, and it really seems a waste of time for someone else to be checking my uploads because I have not been certified as trusted.

I don't do a lot of uploads from Flickr, and I'm not necessarily interested in being heavily involved in reviewing others' uploads from Flickr, but I would like to be able to do these myself without necessitating someone looking over my shoulder.

Oh, and I'm an administrator on en-wiki. - Jmabel ! talk 23:03, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

 Support Very trusted, and constructive user. Kwj2772 (msg) 11:12, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

 Done Camaron · Christopher · talk 11:27, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Snek01

Sometimes I do not use http://toolserver.org/~bryan/flickr/upload because sometimes I upload directly altered (cropped and so on...) images from Flickr. I am familiar with licenses. Snek01 (talk) 10:29, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

 Oppose for two reasons. (1) Using one's editing privileges to call a fellow contributor a pest is simply not acceptable, and I cannot endorse bestowing additional trust upon a user stretching the limits of their existing privileges in this way. (2) The way the request is worded, it sounds like your intention is to review only, or at least primarily, your own uploads. In my opinion, reviewer status is mainly intended for reviewing other users' uploads and should ideally not be used for one's own uploads. I know opinions on the appropriateness of self-policing are divided (see, for example, Commons talk:Flickr images/reviewers/archive 6#User:Privatemusings). Suffice it to say, however, that there is no clear consensus in favour of the practice, and that if it is condoned, then it places higher demands on the reviewers' diligence and propensity for record-keeping. Your practice of blanking discussions from your talk page without archiving does not inspire me with confidence in this regard. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:53, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

• Administrator note: I just blocked Snek01 for revert warring. More information can be found in his block log, and on his talk page. Tiptoety ^talk 23:19, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

I would like to have at least minimal next two days, because I was not able to respond to my voters. Thank you. --Snek01 (talk) 09:57, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for voting.

• ad 1) Assume good faith. The pest is a respected function of ice hockey player. But I have removed it to avoid misunderstanding.
• ad 2)
  • I have not known that there was an order how to organize information on own talk page. This is in conflict with guideline on English wikipedia.
  • I already have one responsible function on Commons. I am approved user for media renames Commons:MediaMoveBot/CheckPage and I use this usefully and with responsibility.
  • I am long term user at Commons since 2005 and I have uploaded over 2000 files.
  • I have even an Flickr account only for tagging images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/31382190@N05/favorites/ , that I am continuously uploading to Commmons (when I or others will determine them).
  • The rest of my reason and why I request this right now is the same as the request by Jmabel bellow. --Snek01 (talk) 09:57, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

 Oppose While I haven't been able to sort through all of the discussion and accusations the amount of conflict that Snek01 is involved in at the moment would tend to say this would not be a good thing to do for the momoentJamesofur (talk) 03:48, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

 Support I've seen User:Snek01 working hard within wikiproject gastropods, giving his best to write good articles in enWikipedia since the very first moment I started editing myself. I'm not here in wikipedia for a long time now, but I know he is a good natured, responsible person, despite his english writing limitations (It's not an easy task for me either).--Daniel Cavallari (talk) 19:48, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

 Oppose - I was not impressed by Snek01's behaviour at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Neohelix albolabris drawing shell.jpg with comments like "Keep it FOREVER if you love it so much, but there is no need to keep everything." being uncalled for, personalising the issue unnecessarily, and lacking in civility. While I do not have very high standards in general for Flickr review status, I have found Flickr reviewers do sometimes have to engage with editors over Flickr images when complications occur over tagging, licence changes e.t.c., I am not confident Snek01 will do this effectively. Camaron · Christopher · talk 20:54, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

I will not communicate with Flickr users. I wanted it, because it is very annoying, when I will upload an file, the one robot will tag it somehow, another robot will tag it in a different away and finally a reviewer will tag it definitely. Especially when these files are on Watchlist to check possible changes. I am sorry if my words touched you. I am not impressed with your intelligence. (Are's these words similar to someones words with not very high standards?) I am afraid you still did not understand the reason. Maybe I will nominate it for the second time in the future. I have learned: I have never uploaded so bad image neither before not since these days. You have written that you are occasionally very busy in your reviewer request. But now you will have much more work with such your voting. You have "Assume good faith" on your talk page. This means: Most people try to help the project, not hurt it. --Snek01 (talk) 22:40, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

I don't understand a lot of what you are trying to say; I know you are not a native English speaker and allowances should be made for that given that this is a multilingual project, but I do not think a request for more civility is unreasonable, which underpins everything we do and I think should be satisfied before additional privileges are given out. I do not think my standards are very high as I rarely oppose requests for additional rights, but I will still do it when I think it is justified. I am sorry to hear you are not impressed with my intelligence, but that will not alleviate my concerns, which are not based on the fact you disagreed with me in that deletion request, but the way it was done. As for assuming good faith, yes assuming good faith does mean most people are trying to help the project not hurt it, but the key word here is "trying", just because someone is trying to do something does not mean they are actually doing it, and sometimes editors acting in good faith will do things which will not help the project, or even hurt it, and that is why concerns raised by other editors should be listened to. Camaron · Christopher · talk 16:52, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Unsuccessful. PeterSymonds (talk) 10:02, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Neozoon

I want to help with the task of reviewing Flickr images. I am working on the de, nl and en wiki and have knowledge on photo copyright rules of commons. --Neozoon (talk) 21:53, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

 Done per no objections after sufficient time. PeterSymonds (talk) 12:14, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

This is a closed request for Flickr review status. Do not make edits to it.

[edit] User:Pmlinediter

I've not been very active, but I check commons often and would like to help. I'm a sysop on 4 projects and I've sufficient knowledge about the copyright rules of Commons. Thanks, Pmlineditor ∞ 17:58, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

•  Support, trusted user. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:28, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support OK. --High Contrast (talk) 21:26, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Seems worthy. ;) Ceranthor 12:52, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Why not. Yotcmdr (talk) 17:02, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support –blurpeace ^(talk) 20:28, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

 Done –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:36, 26 October 2009 (UTC)