Commons talk:Licensing
| Important discussion pages (index) |
|---|
|
Contents |
Archived discussions[edit]
By date[edit]
|
|
(the dates are very approximate because some debates dragged on for months, while others became inactive very shortly)
- Commons_talk:Licensing/Archive Ancient (Up to October 2004)
- Commons_talk:Licensing/Archive 1 (Oct. 2004 – March 2006)
- Commons_talk:Licensing/Archive 2 (March 2006 – June 2006 )
- Commons_talk:Licensing/Archive 3 (May 2006 – June 2006)
- Commons_talk:Licensing/Archive 4 (July 2006 – August 2006)
- Commons_talk:Licensing/Archive 5 (September 2006 – March 2007 )
- Commons_talk:Licensing/Archive_6 (March 2007 – May 2007)
- Commons_talk:Licensing/Archive_7 (May 2007 – July 2007)
- Commons_talk:Licensing/Archive_8 (July 2007 – October 2007)
- Commons_talk:Licensing/Archive_9 (October 2007 – February 2008)
- Commons_talk:Licensing/Archive_10 (February 2008 – March 2008)
- Commons_talk:Licensing/Archive_11 (March 2008 – May 2008)
- Commons_talk:Licensing/Archive_12 (May 2008 – July 2008)
- Commons_talk:Licensing/Archive_13 (July 2008 – August 2008)
- Commons_talk:Licensing/Archive_14 (August 2008 – September 2008)
- Commons_talk:Licensing/Archive_15 (October 2008 – November 2008)
- Commons_talk:Licensing/Archive_16 (November 2008 – January 2009)
- ...
- Some principally important discussions are archived in separate pages. There is no point in arguing on the archived pages, because few people will read it. If you wish to dispute an archived page, you should begin a new discussion on this page and provide a link to the archive in question.
(these headers are preserved in case someone has linked to them)
Against DRM 1.0[edit]
- archived as Commons_talk:Licensing/ADRM
Review of license templates[edit]
U.S. patents[edit]
- archived as Commons_talk:Licensing/U.S. patents
Ecoport copyleft[edit]
- archived as Commons_talk:Licensing/Ecoport copyleft
Museums Bilder[edit]
- archived as Commons_talk:Licensing/Museums Bilder (in German)
Explaining why Derivative Work and Commercial Use must be allowed[edit]
- archived as Commons_talk:Licensing/Explaining why Derivative Work and Commercial Use must be allowed
Which countries' copyright laws determine copyright status?[edit]
Still active discussions[edit]
Template protection after review[edit]
There are many country specific copyright templates on commons that need review and should be protected thereafter. Many images on commons use these templates and changing something in the template like accidentally adding a hot cat category would affect all of these and would require mass purging for all images. We should have a review department reviewing each available template and after discussion protecting it. We should discuss the layout of PD templates: Should they include why they are PD in the USA or should this be handled in another template like {{PD-Egypt}} and {{PD-Egypt-1996}}. With the URAA laws the copyright laws of a country doesn't mean that much without an explanation on why they are PD in USA. Something like {{PD-China}} doesn't work for commons because it doesn't specify why it's PD USA. And should there be templates for country specific templates for each case like found in Category:Egypt-related tags? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Diaa abdelmoneim (talk • contribs) 14:06, 2009 April 23 (UTC)
"No Known Restrictions" Question[edit]
Merged to Commons:Help_desk#License_Question, now archived here
Question[edit]
Moved to Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Question, now archived here
Folklore art does not have copyright?[edit]
Moved to Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Folklore art does not have copyright? now archived here
German PD help[edit]
Moved to Commons:Village pump/Copyright#German PD help
Overly hasty marked for translation[edit]
Please, can we establish a process of proofreading before marking something important like that for translation? -- Rillke(q?) 15:14, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- It'd be nice if people used the preview function or at least checked the result of their edits to core policies. Or is the external links section really supposed to look like that now? —LX (talk, contribs) 17:21, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Appropriately Licensed[edit]
Please comment at Commons:Requests for comment/AppropriatelyLicensed. This is a proposal to amend this licence policy to disallow future uploads where the sole licence is inappropriate for the media (e.g., GFDL). Please read the FAQ. Thanks -- Colin (talk) 22:32, 15 June 2013 (UTC)