Commons talk:Valued image candidates/candidate list

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 60 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps are not archived.


Commons:Valued image candidates/Ascalaphus sinister[edit]

May I close this myself? I forget the procedures as I've no other nomination recently (except the unreviewed one below). :( Jee 12:19, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

I abandoned this path because it is too complex and redundantly with all the classical pathway. These two images could be promoted each separately. I know only one person who can help you is : user:Myrabella. That said you can close the vote yourself without problem. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. I will make a try and remember this (to avoid sets) in future. Jee 14:20, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done. @Archaeodontosaurus: and Myrabella: please check for any mistakes from my side. Glad to see {{Assessments}} now incorporates VI scope and subpages. Jee 15:31, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
@Jkadavoor: Thank you, everything seems OK for me. Glad too to see {{Assessments}} now incorporates VI scope and subpages, it is useful: [1].
Concerning VI sets, I propose to freeze this section, saying that it is currently inoperative. Before that, we need to close the present VI sets candidates—as undecided. If nobody opposes, I can take care of this. @Archaeodontosaurus: What do you think of this suggestion? --Myrabella (talk) 08:31, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
I highly approve. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:36, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
+1. I withdraw my other nom and hope Godot13 also has also no complaints. I asked Dschwen to consider {{Assessments}} for QI and VI too as it saves much of our manual editing time, and simplify the appearance of file description page. Jee 12:00, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
No complaints. My apologies- I used to get in and do the manual promotion a few times per month. I have forgotten to do so. I have no problem doing it a few times a month if it will make things run more smoothly...-Godot13 (talk) 15:48, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done VI sets have been desactivated. --Myrabella (talk) 10:56, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Well done. That's why I did not nominate recently my two "Nardo di Cione" panels as a set, but separately.--Jebulon (talk) 14:44, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued image sets?[edit]

What happened to these? I have a set: en:Urania's_Mirror#Gallery, which has been the main focus of my work since the start of the year, and could not be promoted individually under the most sensible category. Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:50, 6 June 2014 (UTC)*

  • You seriously expect me to nominate 32 images as Urinias Mirror Plate 1 through Plate 32? Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:02, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
  • I'm pretty sure I have done that for every set I have ever had. Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:36, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Then I've no objections. Jee 05:52, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
  • You're wrong. I closed some of your past sets (exemple : [2], [3]—I don't put the whole sequence]. I will not do it again, for sure. --Myrabella (talk) 07:04, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
  • My apologies, but I certainly have closed a few sets. Perhaps I'm thinking featured pictures, as there's less indication of a problem here. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:11, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
  • FP set issue is resolved. Now we consider a set as a single candidate in POTY too. Jee 17:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/Allemagne,Aufseß-02.JPG[edit]

Hello,

Unless I'm mistaken, it seems that the application has evaporated? is it a bug because after various comments it had been validated ...
Sincerely, --Wayne77 (talk) 20:15, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:50, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/Gemeindeamt Aspang Markt-DSC 5972w.jpg[edit]

Seems there is a problem with the bot again. This image was promoted VI and removed from the list but got no VI seal. --P e z i (talk) 19:38, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

  • ✓ Done One of us has closed, the nomminations, a little too quickly. But it is a mistake I made in the past also. You have to start one day. Thank you all for your participation and for the good atmosphere that reigns in this label. Smile--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Seems the same happend here: Commons:Valued image candidates/Amalfi BW 2013-05-15 11-18-51 DxO.jpg, what is to do now? --91.45.65.70 15:37, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

And there is another one (also closed a bit too early). I've tried to edit the VI seal manually; hope this is correct. --P e z i (talk) 09:01, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Perfect I see you know how to do! Smile --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:18, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for feedback! --P e z i (talk) 09:21, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Shell Museum, Les Sables-d'Olonne , entrance, East view[edit]

Hello,
It seems that this application is passed to the door! (hopefully for some time, I want a tracking applications ...)
Thank you in advance for regularization. Best regards. --Wayne77 (talk) 08:38, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done tu avais un retour chariot dans le scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:19, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Merci, je vais y veiller .--Wayne77 (talk) 11:25, 3 July 2014 (UTC)