File:One rock on top of another rock (10412789814).jpg
Original file (2,600 × 2,600 pixels, file size: 1.33 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary[edit]
DescriptionOne rock on top of another rock (10412789814).jpg |
Sculpture/installation by Peter Fischli and the late David Weiss|. One of a series of sculptures arranged through the nearby Serpentine Gallery. The two women and the boy in the photo were other visitors to the Gardens.
This rock-on-rock installation will stay in Kensington Gardens until 6 March 2014. Many people who view my Flickr pages won't have a chance to visit London and see this sculpture. But please don't be too disappointed. Because these are fake rocks. As I will explain. In any case, I recommend the far better photos, very detailed information, and a video interview with Peter Fischli on the Serpentine Gallery website. I saw this and other websites after my visit on 16 July. And then began to wonder if I'd have appreciated the sculpture more by visiting the websites first. Or would it have been the opposite: to lessen the impact? I also viewed the Arup website. This explains that the company: “working in close collaboration with The Serpentine Gallery and Peter Fischli … made the installation possible by using state of the art LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) surveying technology on the rocks at their original location in North Wales. 3D printing technology was then used to produce exact physical models at one twentieth of the scale to explore different balanced configurations of the two rocks.” In other words, these are not original balanced rocks but a highly accurate and technically sophisticated small-scale model - or larger than usual maquette - of the North Wales originals. Putting it another way, they are a mechanical reproduction. And therefore no more original than a tea-towel* with a picture of the rocks printed on it. Anyway, who cares? It was a lovely day and I was exploring London with my niece, visiting from abroad. So a walk in Kensington Gardens was a pleasure. But had I been on my own, perhaps I should have skipped a trip to the reproduction boulders. Instead I could have just read the newspaper articles; and enjoyed viewing the websites giving the engineering details. And especially the photos, information and video interview with the artist on the Serpentine Gallery's site. Plainly these are now the reality of Art. _________________________________ § The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. Walter Benjamin's essay in Wikipedia.
§ * The tea-towel analogy is "found art" (objet trouvé) from Grayson Perry's Reith Lectures. |
Date | |
Source | One rock on top of another rock #1 |
Author | Alan Stanton |
Licensing[edit]
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by Alan Stanton at https://www.flickr.com/photos/53921762@N00/10412789814. It was reviewed on 4 October 2014 by FlickreviewR and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-sa-2.0. |
4 October 2014
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 08:47, 4 October 2014 | 2,600 × 2,600 (1.33 MB) | Benzoyl (talk | contribs) | Transferred from Flickr via Flickr2commons |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | Canon |
---|---|
Camera model | Canon PowerShot S95 |
Exposure time | 1/500 sec (0.002) |
F-number | f/4 |
ISO speed rating | 160 |
Date and time of data generation | 18:08, 16 July 2013 |
Lens focal length | 7.493 mm |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 180 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 180 dpi |
Software used | Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385 |
File change date and time | 01:13, 22 October 2013 |
Y and C positioning | Co-sited |
Exif version | 2.3 |
Date and time of digitizing | 18:08, 16 July 2013 |
Meaning of each component |
|
Image compression mode | 3 |
APEX shutter speed | 8.96875 |
APEX aperture | 4 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 2.65625 APEX (f/2.51) |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Flash | Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
Focal plane X resolution | 12,493.150684932 |
Focal plane Y resolution | 12,493.150684932 |
Focal plane resolution unit | inches |
Sensing method | One-chip color area sensor |
File source | Digital still camera |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Digital zoom ratio | 0.013725018059234 |
Scene capture type | Standard |
IIM version | 2 |