File talk:Stop sign MUTCD.svg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

I have reverted the change that the image uploader made to this image, as the format I'm choosing to use is the standard image format. Rappingwonders2 16:00, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Reverted back to the way it was before the vandalism. --Ltljltlj 23:38, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

{{editprotected}}
Please revert back to my revision, Ltljltlj is actually the one vandalizing this image, not me. Rappingwonders2 00:30, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Okay, this is getting REALLY annoying. I have reverted the image again and will get extremely mad if Ltljltlj reverts it again. 71.233.232.196 19:44, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I am REALLY getting tired of this sock puppet! Whoever you call yourself, please stop reverting the image. It is just fine the way it is. --Ltljltlj 20:31, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Edits need to stop!

These stupid edit wars need to stop. Why does everyone be editing the licensing and summary all the time. I have looked at the users previous images and the user always has the summary/licensing like this, but this one person just seems to edit just the stop sign image all the time. Seems to me that this person just wants to start trouble.

I'm not trying to start trouble,I'm just making the image better. PatStuart was the last non-IP/non-bot to edit the image before this war started. Neither of us have accounts,so we should go by how a user put it. 24.147.121.145 22:39, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

then if that was the case, then the way i put it should be correct for now. that is how it was put back in '06 before the wars started. didnt you look at the history?

The reason why I changed it was because when you upload any image,you fill in the info about it in the info box,then you select the license. Then,you click to upload it,and it comes out like this:

Summary:
Whatever text you put in the info box.

Licensing:
Whatever license you chose.

However,they way that this image is formatted is like this:

Ltljltlj's template
The info about the image
Some other licenses

Therefore,in my opinion,we should have it like it appears when you upload it. 24.147.121.145 00:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

But thats just your opinion isnt it. The user that uploaded the image probably wanted it looking like what all their other images look like. Did you think of that? And why do you keep editing the stop sign image when there are many other images like this one that look the same. I really do like that you are that Rappingwonders2 person that got banned not too long ago for doing the exact same thing.

They may have wanted it to look like that,but no one ever said it was required to have it like that. 24.147.121.145 13:09, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reprotected

I have again semi-protected the image due to edit war by 2 anons, and reverted to last edit by Rocketbot (party not involved in edit war). Rather than edit waring, please explain if you think a suggested change to the image information is particularly important to be made.

Notes: Description of image above license information seems more standard, though it does not seem to be required. There is likewise no requirement that information put in non standard format by uploaders must be left as the original uploader put it. -- Infrogmation (talk) 16:24, 18 July 2008 (UTC)