Plants misidentified

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

not Sedum acre[edit]

I moved this one to the unidentified plants category because it clearly is not Sedum acre. But what could it be? -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 19:37, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

User:Uleli put the Picture already in Category:Unidentified Veronica. They used to be Hebe, but I think since APG they are Veronica --Wer?Du?! (talk) 03:15, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

not Eichhornia –> Alismataceae?[edit]

I suppose it's not Eichhornia azurea

Maybe Hydrocharitaceae? There are 2 more Hydrocharis species beside Hydrocharis morsus-ranae. -- Hämbörger (talk) 20:20, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

not Anthericum[edit]

Images found in Anthericum liliago

(left picture) if the leave margins are toothed (upper left part of img), I tend to say it's Rhamnus cathartica, though the branches look too bright brownish. but there's several variations and also hybrids between Rh. cathartica and Rh. saxatilis (which has much smaller leaves, and is a rather small and compact shrub of 1, sometimes up to 1,5 m height). on the other hand there's also similarities to Cornus mas, but their leaves are not toothed, and the nodes sometimes seen in the picture are too thickened. both species have (mostly) oppostite leaves and veins running to the apex. --85.177.171.239 08:12, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

(right picture) reminds me of some species of Arabis. --85.177.171.239 08:18, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Iris, but not Iris florentina[edit]

This Picture was uploaded as Iris germanica florentina

To my knowledge Iris germanica florentina (or just Iris florentina) should be nearly white.

Rubus idaeus?[edit]

this is not! R. idaeus; maybe R. trivialis, but not quite sure

not Centrosema[edit]

not Centrosema virginianum, probably Lycium sp.


not Phaleria[edit]

not Phaleria as this species is not cauliflorous, probably any cauliflorous member of Rubiaceae (Versteegia?, Psychotria?) --Franz Xaver 09:54, 26 May 2005 (UTC)



not Rosa canina[edit]

Leptinella -> Hebe[edit]

I found the following photos in Leptinella dioica (Asteraceae). However, these photos are no Asteraceae. They show some Hebe species from Plantaginaceae, formerly Scrophulariaceae. --Franz Xaver 05:31, 16 July 2005 (UTC)

not Helichrysum petiolare[edit]

Whatever this photo is, it is not Helichrysum petiolare. --Franz Xaver 21:21, 6 August 2005 (UTC)


not Pimelea ciliolaris[edit]

Both photos certainly are not Pimelea nor any other species of Thymelaeaceae. They show some Asteraceae, Asteroideae, probably relatives of Helichrysum. --Franz Xaver 13:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Hypericum pulchrum -> Hypericum perforatum?[edit]

Especially in the second picture the sepals can be seen. In my opinion it's not H. pulchrum, but H. perforatum. --Mbc 16:17, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Yes, the "holes" can be seen in some leaves in the shadow. -- Hämbörger (talk) 09:00, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

not Sedum telephium = Spiraea betulifolia Pall.[edit]

Not Eriogonum umbellatum[edit]

Definitely not Eriogonum umbellatum. For one thing, it has no umbels. I have no idea what it is (though I have the feeling it's a standard garden perennial), but I bet a nickel it's not an Eriogonum. The site that it's from, www.biolib.de, is currently down and gives time-out messages that freeze the window. —JerryFriedman 18:53, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Heuchera? —JerryFriedman 19:42, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

This is probably Tellima grandiflora 84.217.143.1 18:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Unidentified = Bryonia alba'[edit]

Dactylis glomerata[edit]

not Sanicula europaea[edit]

not Bellis annua[edit]

In the uper part you see a rosette of a Sempervivum-species, in the lower left there isGeum reptans (Sieversia reptans) and in the lower rigtht Lotus corniculatus agg. You can conclude the picture has been taken in an alpine environment, but Bellis annua does not grow in alpine environments...

Please rename to Bellis spp.--Ixitixel (talk) 11:33, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

File is already renamed, Thank you to User:hoo. --Ixitixel (talk) 11:57, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

not Cedrus deodara[edit]

This image has been categorized as Cedrus deodara by a user with HotCat; it was transferred to Commons from Malayalam Wikipedia. What is it?--Carnby (talk) 23:53, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

not Crepis tectorum[edit]

The leafs are not typically formed. The description under the drawing says: Crepis biennis. --Danny S. (talk) 14:31, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Crepis biennis L. is a valid name --Chris.urs-o (talk) 17:23, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Benutzer:Seysi[edit]

User Seysi stated some doubts at de:Wikipedia:Redaktion Biologie/Bestimmung/Keller#Zweifel an einem Gras und zwei Nelken

Thx --Chris.urs-o (talk) 17:29, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

not Crataegus monogyna[edit]

It's a Sorbus but whitch one? Panticosa seems to be a spa town in spain.

What plant is this?[edit]

Does somebody know which plant is this, looks like sallad but it's not, and smells like peppermint? --Ivan25 (talk) 11:40, 26 October 2013 (UTC)