Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jag är naken.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jag är naken.jpg[edit]

This file contains nude body. Thermicien (talk) 08:19, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, unused personal image Rybec (talk) 12:58, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, it is used and many other nude too — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ada Unda (talk • contribs) 07:47, 27 February 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

It's in use now, but wasn't when I first commented. diff Rybec (talk) 10:42, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use and a selfie Natuur12 (talk) 11:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New ask for deletion[edit]

I think this page had been classified too quickly ; I'm asking again it to be deleted.

Reasons :

  • The file contains explicit nude contains, as it was mentioned before
  • It depicts identifiable person, with no way to tell wether it the downloader is the person pictured or not : by what we know, it could be a stolen photo published without permission.
  • It has been objected that the file was in use on the wiki : the only page using it is User:OgreBot/Uploads by new users/2014 February 24 18:00, wich only lists new files ; it, indeed, indicates that the file is marked with a deletion request, and that the user already has a DR notice. No real page in any wiki uses it as a pertinent illustration.

I think the request has really been classified too quickly ; both Thermicien and Rybec argued against keeping it ; I think the argument that it is used can't stand, and being a selfie can't be a sufficient criter to keep it. The only person asking to keep it is the downloader itself, that, by the way, forgot to sign... -TheF (talk) 16:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Delete - As I said, unappropriate nude picture of an identifiable person ; no use on educative purpose -TheF (talk) 16:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Delete : Picture useless, too identifiable person, nothing says she is agrees. Rome2 (talk) 16:14, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Delete Consent could be shown by showing permission, which should be done because it is the only upload from that account. The photo was removed today from the "Selfie" article on the Swedish Wikipedia diff, on the grounds that there were too many images in the article. The line through my comment was meant to show that I had changed my mind because the reason I had given was no longer valid. Rybec (talk) 19:06, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Delete Useless file with nude body. In my opinion Wikimedia Commons is not a place for erotic photos. -- Thermicien (talk) 11:00, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Delete per "Low-quality pornographic images that do not contribute anything educationally useful to our existing collection of images are not needed on the Commons." However, Thermicien, your statement that "Wikimedia Commons is not a place for erotic photos" is troubling because my understanding is that Commons is NOT censored and that erotic photos in and of themselves are absolutely fine if they contribute in an educationally-useful context, no? JDanek007Talk 01:06, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unused, identifiable. Revicomplaint? 08:19, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]