Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
< Commons:Featured picture candidates(Redirected from Template:Featured pictures candidates)
[edit] Image:Kraków - Wawel Cathedral 01.jpg
Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2008 at 22:04:47
Info: created, uploaded and nominated by Lestat -- Lestat (talk) 22:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Support -- Lestat (talk) 22:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Elizabeth I Rainbow Portrait.jpg
Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2008 at 17:19:21
- Info: created by Unknown, possibly Marcus Gheeraerts the Younger - uploaded by Yann - nominated by Tseno Maximov
- Support – Tseno Maximov (talk) 17:19, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 |
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because the image is badly cropped. | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing FPX to FPX contested and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If no contrary views are expressed within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
Lycaon (talk) 17:48, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Calocera viscosa LC0123.jpg
Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2008 at 12:13:20
- Info: Yellow slagshorn fungus; created, uploaded & nominated by -- LC-de (talk) 12:13, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- LC-de (talk) 12:13, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Neutral Nice. The mushrooms look a little bit flat and could have more grip (texture) and plasticity (lighting) 4 my taste --Richard Bartz (talk) 12:43, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your opinion. Actually the mushrooms have a smooth surface without any visible texture. Maybe I could show more plasticity by more direct lighting, but I like this dimmed light on the forest soil. Btw. Unlike the pic in the Makro-Forum it was a dry day. Normally they aren't as slimy as seen on the pic there. --LC-de (talk) 13:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Neutral I think the depth of field is not optimal, the top of the mushrooms is a bit blurred. I like the leaf at the left, so we can compare the mushrooms' size, but you should have chosen an aperture a little bit bigger. Diti (talk to the penguin) 14:32, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Looks ok to me --JY Rehby (talk) 17:37, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:StAugustinesächsischeWand.jpg
Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2008 at 11:27:01
- Info: created by Agnete - uploaded by Agnete - nominated by Tseno Maximov
- Support – Tseno Maximov (talk) 11:27, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Insufficient quality such as grain/noise & contrast. --Richard Bartz (talk) 12:06, 22 November 2008 (UTC)- Oppose per previous voter --JY Rehby (talk) 17:34, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Acer platanoides in autumn colors.JPG
Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2008 at 08:09:44
- Info: created by Kosiarz-PL - uploaded by Kosiarz-PL - nominated by Kosiarz-PL -- Kosiarz-PL 08:09, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- Kosiarz-PL 08:09, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose It is overexposed I am afraid. Both the red and blue channels are badly clipped. Also, it is not that sharp, given the rather small image size. I would suggest using a tripod for a 1/60 second exposure. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:22, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Overall impression is neat but it's 2 blurry --Richard Bartz (talk) 12:02, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose per previous voter. A nice picture of an automn tree, not sharp enough though for FP, i think. --JY Rehby (talk) 17:39, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Air conditioning unit.svg
Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2008 at 02:08:01
- Info: created by Pbroks13 - uploaded by Pbroks13 - nominated by Pbroks13 -- Pbroks13 (talk) 02:08, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- Pbroks13 (talk) 02:08, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Very well done. Diti (talk to the penguin) 09:13, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose as is ; first, the "expansion valve" tag is not pointing to the proper item. Furthermore, it might be useful to indicate the direction of travel for the cooling fluid. --JY Rehby (talk) 17:43, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Tu-95MS and F-15C.jpg
Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2008 at 18:54:23
- Info: created by USAF - uploaded by Nova13 - nominated by Tseno Maximov
- Support – Tseno Maximov (talk) 18:54, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Compression artifacts and posterized sky. /Daniel78 (talk) 23:34, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Avala (talk) 00:01, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose The quality is very bad, heavily compressed. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 01:23, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special. Diti (talk to the penguin) 09:37, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Bouguereau-Linnocence.jpg
Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2008 at 18:44:16
- Info: created by William-Adolphe Bouguereau - uploaded by Stevertigo - nominated by Tseno Maximov
- Support – Tseno Maximov (talk) 18:44, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
|
|
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because it is too small | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing FPX to FPX contested and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If no contrary views are expressed within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:13, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Blue Angels NAS Jacksonville Air Show 2452.JPG
Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2008 at 16:02:23
- Info: created, uploaded, and nominated by Digon3 --Digon3 talk 16:02, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Digon3 talk 16:02, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support – Tseno Maximov (talk) 16:18, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support A perfect shot. Diti (talk to the penguin) 14:33, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Struthio camelus (Kunene).jpg
Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2008 at 13:33:08
.jpg)
- Info: created, uploaded and nominated by Lycaon (talk) 13:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Mind the dip! Picture taken while driving (don't tell). -- Lycaon (talk) 13:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Funny but nothing for higher encyclopedic use. --Herrick (talk) 15:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Comment A featured picture doesn't need to be encyclopedic. It just needs to fall within the scope. Diti (talk to the penguin) 17:58, 21 November 2008 (UTC)- Comment Beats any zoo picture though ;-) Lycaon (talk) 23:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Back side of the ostrich and road in bad composition. --Jagro (talk) 17:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support I think this picture's good! --Mr. Mario (talk) 23:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support One of my favorite images -- the first time I saw this not only did I laugh but I also said "Wow". (I so support this that I have to sit on my hands to not log in from some of the other ips I have access to and vote....) -- carol (talk) 06:33, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Upsampled. Flying Freddy (talk) 06:53, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- If you look at the upload log, you will find that Lycaon just uploaded the original version, not an upsampled version. --Digon3 talk 15:09, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- I think he was making a joke :) Noodle snacks (talk) 22:21, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support 4 given cirumstances and under strictly abidance 4 traffic regulations it's a great shot. --Richard Bartz (talk) 12:31, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Might be reframed later if necessary ; composition is interesting, the neck falls exactly between 2 road signs. Maybe a little bit too much road on the right hand side, but then the ostrich would be too centered... oh well, i think it's very good for a picture taken while drivin of a running ostrich. --JY Rehby (talk) 17:48, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Too bad composition for my taste. Manuel R. (talk) 20:53, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Maybe not the best quality, but the feeling is good. Calandrella (talk) 21:24, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Simonizer (talk) 22:36, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
[edit] Image:Bödele Bregenzerwald Panorama.jpg
Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2008 at 12:58:09
- Info: created, uploaded and nominated by -- Böhringer (talk) 12:58, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- Böhringer (talk) 12:58, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose, lens flare (even *two*) equals obvious non-FP, in my eyes. --Aqwis (talk) 13:15, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Great panorama. --Kosiarz-PL 14:02, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support That is one great panorama. --Mr. Mario (talk) 15:26, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support. I like it. – Tseno Maximov (talk) 16:04, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Georgez (talk) 16:25, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose The lens flares ruin it for me. Es tut mir leid. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 17:05, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Nice panorama. --Jagro (talk) 20:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support no question. nice work --Simonizer (talk) 21:04, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose - I don't like the symmetry of the composition -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:31, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Richard Bartz (talk) 12:58, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support weakly, great panorama, sharpness, colors, rendition of atmosphere are great. Lens flare a little too present, unfortunately. --JY Rehby (talk) 17:51, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support My first reaction to this image was "wow". Calandrella (talk) 21:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Lestat (talk) 22:02, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Parthenocissus quinquefolia on wall, November 1, 2008.jpg
Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2008 at 00:56:04
- Info: Created and uploaded by Ragesoss - nominated by Ram-Man 00:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support I think this is simple, beautiful, and a little different. As a bonus, it nicely illustrates its Wikipedia article. -- Ram-Man 00:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support per previous voter. Lighting and color palette are very expressive. --JY Rehby (talk) 02:32, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support – Tseno Maximov (talk) 09:39, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose - I don't like the composition. Was the image rotated? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:28, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't think this is FP material. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 01:24, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Neutral Somehow i like it --Richard Bartz (talk) 12:24, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Elephas Maximus Eye Closeup cropped.jpg
Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2008 at 22:26:21
- Info: taken by AlexanderKlink (cropped by Lycaon) - uploaded by Lycaon - nominated by D-Kuru -- D-Kuru (talk) 22:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support It's very hard to switch to something different if you had a close look at the eye --D-Kuru (talk) 22:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment, "switch to something different"? --Aqwis (talk) 22:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- I don't know that phrase in english. In german it's "die Augen abwenden" but I don't think that "the eyes averted"per google translate is much better than my expression ^^ --D-Kuru (talk) 12:42, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support mesmerizing, to say the least. --JY Rehby (talk) 02:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support DOF seems a bit short; perhaps a crop of the eye would be better. Still, a good picture Muhammad 03:53, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support – Tseno Maximov (talk) 09:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 12:24, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Yes, surprisingly eye catching ! Benh (talk) 22:15, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Touching. --Laveol (talk) 23:45, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Aye! -- Lycaon (talk) 00:19, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:15, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support --SvonHalenbach (talk) 11:19, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Richard Bartz (talk) 12:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Luc Viatour (talk) 14:14, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Amazing. --Podzemnik (talk) 15:44, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Lestat (talk) 22:05, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Jovan Kaneo.jpg
Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2008 at 13:30:53
- Info: created by Vanjagenije - uploaded by Ori~ - nominated by Tseno Maximov
- Support – Tseno Maximov (talk) 13:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Georgez (talk) 14:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Rather flat, and the pink umbrella distracts. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 23:05, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Neutral is it me, or it is even so slightly out of focus ? --JY Rehby (talk) 02:38, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:60163 Tornado connecting rods.jpg
Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2008 at 22:20:45
- Info: created, uploaded and nominated by -- Ultra7 (talk) 22:20, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- Ultra7 (talk) 22:20, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Nice detail. --Jagro (talk) 23:22, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Mbdortmund (talk) 01:04, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Technically nice image, but for FP? It is just part of railway wheel, isn´t it? --Karelj (talk) 17:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Technically illustrative --Twdragon (talk) 18:04, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Technically very good ; for FP, yes for sure, since there aren't that many technical pictures in there. --JY Rehby (talk) 02:43, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't like the composition. It looks too much like a casual shot to me. Benh (talk) 22:10, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above, you should have a very nice background with picture like these. This isn't the case here. It doesn't amplify the subject. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 01:25, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Its meant as a detail shot, if it had a background it would be a completely different shot, of a wheel or a locomotive. Personally, I think if I had nominated Image:60163 Tornado wheel.JPG people would rightly oppose, as it shows nothing but a wheel with no discernable quality other than showing a wheel. (A very significant wheel, but as above, this is maybe not enough to have it qualify as a significant picture). Ultra7 (talk) 17:05, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Václav Havel.jpg
Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2008 at 21:58:16
- Info: created, uploaded and nominated by Martin Kozák -- Martin Kozák (talk) 21:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- Martin Kozák (talk) 21:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Georgez (talk) 14:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Composition, parts of face missing, especially part if chin. --Karelj (talk) 17:39, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Oh, i get it, it's not a picture of his features, it's a featured picture... Well, seriously, i don't think it makes the cut. --JY Rehby (talk) 03:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Fagus sylvatica JPG2a.jpg
Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2008 at 20:19:53
- Info: created by Jean-Pol GRANDMONT - uploaded by Jean-Pol GRANDMONT - nominated by Tseno Maximov
- Support – Tseno Maximov (talk) 20:19, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Not bad. --Karelj (talk) 17:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Not bad, but also not so illustrative for FI --Twdragon (talk) 18:06, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Neutral Not bad, but not astounding either. Maybe the highlights are just a bit too present ; maybe the sharpness is just a bit too low... --JY Rehby (talk) 03:14, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support good composition and illustration for autumn. --Herrick (talk) 15:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Avala (talk) 00:02, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice try, but this is not a FP I'm looking at. The quality isn't very good. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 01:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Good, but missing something, maybe light or the car on the right --Pom² (talk) 09:07, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Inachis io LC0131.jpg
Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2008 at 16:27:57
- Info: European Peacock, created, uploaded and nominated by -- LC-de (talk) 16:27, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- LC-de (talk) 16:27, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Mantis Hymenopus coronatus 4 Luc Viatour.jpg
Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2008 at 07:22:34
- Info: created by Luc Viatour (talk) - uploaded by Luc Viatour (talk) - nominated by -- Luc Viatour (talk) 07:22, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support New proposal more DOF -- Luc Viatour (talk) 07:22, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose I prefer the other shot of the mantis as in this photo the crop is really too tight for me. Sorry... --AngMoKio (talk) 07:39, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful --Twdragon (talk) 18:06, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 12:34, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Crop --Richard Bartz (talk) 12:11, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Biological and technological scales compared-en.svg
Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2008 at 01:08:00
- Info: created by Guillaume Paumier, Philip Ronan, NIH, Artur Jan Fijałkowski, Jerome Walker, Michael David Jones, Tyler Heal, Mariana Ruiz, Science Primer (National Center for Biotechnology Information), Liquid_2003, Arne Nordmann & The Tango! Desktop Project - uploaded by Guillom - nominated by Mdd -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 01:08, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 01:08, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose It is a bit of a mishmash of drawing techniques, but what is worse, there are also spelling mistakes! (e.g. crystalline). Lycaon (talk) 10:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Techniques used for representation are very different. Some very complex and very simple. I do not think that is the best way to represent --libertad0 ॐ (talk) 16:20, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't know what is meant by the illustration that says that "electromechanical ... microsystems" are between 2 and 40 micrometres. The text is very unclear. What systems are being referred to? --MichaelMaggs (talk) 23:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Utah State Route 12 MC.jpg
Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2008 at 21:47:08
- Info: created by Chmehl - uploaded by Chmehl - nominated by diego_pmc -- diego_pmc (talk) 21:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- diego_pmc (talk) 21:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful photo, the sky is a bit dark but it doesn't matter. Diti (talk to the penguin) 22:10, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Simply a good picture, without much to nitpick on --JY Rehby (talk) 22:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Aqwis (talk) 22:31, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for nominating, btw the dark sky is a side effect of the polarization filter which makes also the contrast of the clouds stronger. --Chmehl (talk) 22:31, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Beautiful weather, place, and sky but I don't feel like I'd hang up this picture in my room... Maybe the composition isn't appealing to me. sorry. Benh (talk) 22:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose As Benh. --Karelj (talk) 22:58, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Composition --Richard Bartz (talk) 23:28, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Composition. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:27, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Great photo. --Kosiarz-PL 15:29, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support I like it, even the composition --LC-de (talk) 16:30, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support I like the radius effect. :)) --Manco Capac (talk) 21:38, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support It looks very vell. --Jagro (talk) 23:13, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Composition -- Lycaon (talk) 13:43, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Georgez (talk) 14:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Benh --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 14:46, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose – Tseno Maximov (talk) 16:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support /Daniel78 (talk) 19:14, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Cambronne - buste.jpg
Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2008 at 15:34:44
- Info: created by Eusebius - uploaded by Eusebius - nominated by Eusebius -- Eusebius (talk) 15:34, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- Eusebius (talk) 15:34, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose CA (large bands of magenta around the statue) --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 17:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Neutral Despite chromatic aberration, the photo is quite clear and gives a nice look of the statue. Diti (talk to the penguin) 19:58, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support weakly ; no tremendous "wow" factor ; otoh, a large, sharp, well lit, well framed, well backgrounded (is that a verb ?) picture of this statue. And chromatic aberration doesn't ruin it, imho. --JY Rehby (talk) 22:35, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose I haven't look closely, but I don't like the low point of view. IMO it should have been taken from farther with longer focal (to achieve same framing from higher point of view). Benh (talk) 22:45, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Georgez (talk) 14:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose – Tseno Maximov (talk) 16:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support Albertus teolog (talk) 20:14, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
