Template talk:OTRS received

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Wording of template[edit]

As I understand it this template is used when a permission IS received but not yet approver for one of these reasons

1) it can be missing something and someone can be in contact with sender to fix the problems or 2) it can be simply just not be checked yet (example if it is in a language that the person that "found" the permission can not understand or if it is added by the sender who do not want to approve own mails).

As I read it the wording ("However, the message was not sufficient to confirm permission for this file.") only covers option one. So I suggest that we add some text to cover option two. For example "However, the message was not yet checked or it was not sufficient to confirm permission for this file." --MGA73 (talk) 08:38, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Sure. Or even we could add a parameter such as {{OTRS received|reason=1}} giving "the email is awaiting processing by a volunteer", ...reason=2 giving "the permission was not under a free license", ...reason=3 giving "the email address that the permission came from is not associated with the location where the content was originally published", and defaulting to what already exists. Stifle (talk) 10:40, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Created Template:OTRS received/sandbox for testing. Stifle (talk) 20:45, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
I just added some examples for easy "review". It looks good to me. If default is how it is now then we can implement this feature with no risk. I support implementation when others have had some time to see this and perhaps suggest improvements. --MGA73 (talk) 20:54, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Adding link[edit]

{{editprotect}} 1. As information in the template. A link to {{PermissionOTRS}} like this: If the email contains sufficient confirmation of the validity of the license, please replace this template with {{PermissionOTRS|id=xxxxxx}}
If the permission provided is not acceptable, nominate the file for deletion or delete it.

2. Under See also add

3. Add {{documentation}} to the template so others than admins can edit the template documentation.

Nsaa (talk) 15:10, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

1 and 2 are done, although I would think OTRS volunteers don't need instructions on how to add permissionOTRS tags. So is 3. Stifle (talk) 20:20, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Sorry for adding the request. I did it myself, since it was not a fully protected page. I've not used it very much, and I was looking for the exact name of the permissionOTRS template before I could do this edit Nsaa (talk) 21:58, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

i18n[edit]

Is there any specifiic reason why we apparently have translated versions but the template is not autotranslated? Just not done? Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 13:43, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Because it's a bit difficult? Let's invent a capable solution. -- RE rillke questions? 18:36, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Hope this works as expected. We should notify translators to change their translations accordingly. -- RE rillke questions? 09:37, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, I was too busy. Looks good - without checking it in depth - I trust you. :) Did you already notify them (if active)? Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 01:00, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
No, I didn't. -- RE rillke questions? 09:25, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Wow, this template really has a complicated structure. Just curious: the translations were not displayed at all before, right?
I have converted the remaining translations (ca, es, mk, nl). Let's track the completeness below. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 15:16, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
No, the the translations were not in use before using autotranslate. I listed this at Template:Requested translations -- RE rillke questions? 20:53, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Checked[edit]

the translation is → 1. completely translated and → 2. works correctly