Template talk:Watermark

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Info non-talk.svg Template:Watermark has been protected indefinitely because it is a highly-used or visible template. Use {{Edit request}} on this page to request an edit.

Top[edit]

This is an unfortunate template, because the removal of watermark information could itself be a copyright violation under U.S. law (17 U.S.C. 1202).

It's not the template, it's our policy. And modifying free images is not against the law. It is for some, but they're not allowed here anyway. - Rocket000 09:41, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Does this apply to steganography[edit]

Does this apply to steganography? Say, I put in a cc-by-sa and name note in the image? Nichalp (talk) 08:19, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

No, as long as no one can tell. Metadata really belongs elsewhere, though. Rocket000 (talk) 18:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

category...[edit]

This template places images in the hidden category: Category:Images with watermarks. J.smith (talk) 17:05, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Template:Metadata from image[edit]

Perhaps a link to {{Metadata from image}} in the docs somewhere?

Adding parameter[edit]

{{Edit protected}} Please, replace:

[[Category:Images with watermarks|{{PAGENAME}}]]

with

[[Category:Images with {{#ifeq:{{{1|}}}|timestamp|timestamp watermarks|watermarks}}|{{PAGENAME}}]]

Then images will be automatically added to subcategory of Category:Images with watermarks, Category:Images with timestamp watermarks, by adding firt parameter "timestamp".

And also please remove

----
Images bearing this template are automatically added to [[:Category:Images with watermarks]], a subcategory of [[:Category:Images for cleanup]].

I'll add this information to documentation. Thanks--Sevela.p 12:30, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done -- Common Good (talk) 19:34, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Images using { {watermark} } incorrectly marked as public domain[edit]

Applying this template to any image appears to incorrectly mark the image as public domain!

Here for example is a randomly chosen watermarked image from http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Images_with_watermarks: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Acharia_stimulea_1225185.jpg

Note that the only license is creative commons, which requires attribution. However, clicking the "Use this file on the web" link on the brings up a box saying "Attribution not legally required". Wrong! Looking in the HTML source code, we see, preceding the contents of the watermark template:

<table class="licensetpl" style="display:none"> <tr> <td><span class="licensetpl_short" style="display:none;">Public domain</span><span class="licensetpl_long" style="display:none;">Public domain</span><span class="licensetpl_link_req" style="display:none;">false</span><span class="licensetpl_attr_req" style="display:none;">false</span></td> </tr> </table>

These tags are, to my limited knowledge, used to generate the box that appears when users click "Use this file on the web" link.

So where did they come from? Here is the clincher: Create a new empty test page, containing only an instance of this template. Preview, then view source. The tags are there. I have no idea why.

✓ Done, Template:Watermark/layout changed. --Martin H. (talk) 10:26, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Edit request: instructions to replace this template[edit]

{{Editprotected}} Could someone with sufficient editing rights add the instruction "After removing a watermark, please replace this template with {{Attribution metadata from licensed image}} or {{Metadata from image}}, whichever is appropriate to the image." in one form or another to the template? Thanks. —Quibik (talk) 19:53, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Added to the English text. Other native speakers will need to update the text in the other languages. Logan Talk Contributions 04:38, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit request: Merge Template:Remove caption[edit]

Could someone correctly merge this template (description and instruction), as User:Cwbm (commons) has only made an redirect. -- πϵρήλιο 17:56, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Legality of removing watermarks[edit]

Please see Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Commons:watermarks. Rd232 (talk) 11:41, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Edit request: incorrect terminology[edit]

As per the linked Wikipedia article, "digital watermarks are only perceptible under certain conditions, i.e. after using some algorithm, and imperceptible anytime else". COM:Watermarks says that those types of watermarks are acceptable, so I think this template is referring to only to visible watermarks. The term "digital watermarking" should thus be removed. InverseHypercube 09:48, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Promotional watermarks[edit]

There inclusion of Category:Images with promotional watermarks. 1=promotional should be also be put into this category as well. Technophant (talk) 08:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)