User:ComputerHotline/Archive 20

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-11-03 13-30-00 rosemontoise-eloie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Halicki 23:35, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-11-09 11-34-53 savoureuse-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A little unsharp but very nice --Halicki 21:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-11-09 11-21-27 savoureuse-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:32, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-11-09 11-04-59 savoureuse-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:32, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-11-03 13-23-42 arc-en-ciel-eloie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Halicki 23:50, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-11-05 12-35-24 Impatiens-glandulifera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:19, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-11-11 15-17-53 savoureuse-lepuix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:08, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-11-11 15-15-17 savoureuse-lepuix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:08, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-11-11 14-42-46 savoureuse-lepuix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:08, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-11-17 21-17-30 veronne clair-de-lune.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, very good.--Jebulon 20:16, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-10-30 14-37-58 cascade-saut-de-la-truite-savoureuse-lepuix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems unreal. --Pleclown 12:15, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-11-19 12-01-27 goutte-rosee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:50, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-11-19 11-50-31 gouttes-rosee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:50, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-11-17 20-39-19 malsaucy clair-de-lune.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good proof of the earth rotation, but not necessarily QI. --NorbertNagel 21:37, 18 November 2013 (UTC) OK I think. Mattbuck 11:15, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-11-17 20-53-24 malsaucy clair-de-lune.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 11:15, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-11-17 21-25-09 veronne clair-de-lune.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 11:15, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-11-21 21-59-16 moisissure-85f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think I'm going to be sick. Mattbuck 22:59, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-11-27 17-13-17 chataigne 24f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --EpsilonEridani 20:48, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-11-21 22-09-04 moisissure-145f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Absolutely disgusting, but could you increase the brightness please? Mattbuck 22:59, 29 November 2013 (UTC) For me it's great! --Stepro 10:33, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-11-21 22-04-48 moisissure-118f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Absolutely disgusting, but could you increase the brightness please? Mattbuck 22:59, 29 November 2013 (UTC) For me it's great! --Stepro 10:33, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-12-02 13-04-24-etang-champey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like the moving gras in foreground. The sharpness is acceptable. --XRay 06:23, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-12-12 18-37-41 lumieres-noel-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:43, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-12-10 21-37-35 veronne-moonlight.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 11:11, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-12-10 21-15-12 veronne-moonlight.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. You do know cameras can take exposures of under a second, they don't have to be hours? --Mattbuck 11:11, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-12-17 21-56-36 salbert-clair-de-lune.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Minor CA, but ok --Poco a poco 20:24, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-12-13 08-02-39 givre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 12:17, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-12-13 08-04-07 givre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 12:17, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-12-13 08-01-43 givre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:31, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-12-13 08-06-07 givre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:24, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-12-13 08-51-21 givre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:28, 20 December 2013 (UTC)