User:Fma12/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello Fma12/Archive 1!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Fma12!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Contents

Please link images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Archiving

¡Hola Fma12! Please archive your talk page rather than simply delete the notifications. --Saibo (Δ) 17:12, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Hola Saibo, thanks for the advice! I did not know how to keep the talk archived. I' ll keep in mind, regards ! Adios Fma12 (talk) 13:33, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Platense 1976.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:54, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011

Please do not remove problem tags

Čeština | Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Svenska | +/−


Nuvola apps important.svg Hi! It has come to my attention that you have removed a warning which says that a file doesn't have enough information about the source or license conditions. Nevertheless, it seems to me that this information is still missing and I have restored the tag. You may either add the required information or, if you think that required information is already given, put the image up for a deletion request so that it won't automatically be deleted. Thank you.

Coekon (talk) 04:57, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Fma12!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Deletion requests

Hello,

Please do not reopen deletion requests, unless you have new information or argument. This is disruptive. Admins have already too much work. Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:14, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello, ok. Fma12 (talk) 14:16, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Like the template says: It only consists of simple geometric shapes and/or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection. That's a recent assessement. It was uploaded before in English Wikipedia. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:44, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

category removed?

Hallo Fma12, why did you remove the category of the club? I have put it back in again. Was this an accident? Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 15:01, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi Saibo, indeed I removed the category by accident. In fact, I have added some images to "Boca Juniors" and other Argentine football and rugby union clubs. If there was a mistake, it not was my intention, sorry. Fma12 (talk) 15:05, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Okay, fine - no problem. :-) Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 15:10, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi...

Why did you remove these categorizations? Lobo (howl?) 06:54, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Hola, te respondo en Español porque es mi lengua de origen también (soy Argentino). Te comento, removí esa categoría porque en el caso de Saviola, él aparecía listado en Players of River Plate, aunque no había una sola foto de ese jugador con la camiseta de River. Entonces me pareció poco apropiado que Saviola aparezca en esa página siendo que sus imágenes son solamente de clubes de Europa. Con Esteban Cambiasso pasa exactamente lo mismo.
No sé si estarás de acuerdo con este criterio, yo al menos considero que incluír múltiples categorías de un jugador de fútbol cuando hay imágenes de éste solamente con la camiseta de uno o dos equipos, sólo contribuye a crear confusión entre los usuarios. Me gustaría conocer tu opinión al respecto... Saludos. Fma12 (talk) 12:33, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Pensé en un principio que habías eliminado las categorías por ese criterio, pero luego vi que quitaste

[[Category:Association football players from Argentina]] de Esteban Cambiasso, y a eso no le veo sentido que lo elimines (además de que hay una foto suya con la selección argentina). Por otra parte, yo no estoy de acuerdo con aquello de eliminar solo las categorías de los clubes en donde ha estado el jugador pero no aparezca vestido de ese club. En primer lugar, en la página de ayuda sobre categorías se indica esto:

"Pages (including category pages) are categorized according to their subject, and not to their contents, because the contents are generally not a permanent feature of the category page; in particular, you can momentarily find inappropriate contents in a category page."

El sujeto de estas categorías es el propio jugador. Además, ten en cuenta que las fotos sin estar jugando para el club no se pueden categorizar en ningún equipo; si un jugador solo ha jugado en un club, y solo aparece vestido de paisano, entonces ¿cómo vamos a poder categorizar con precisión la imagen? También, si se incluyen las categorías de solo los equipos en los que estuviera cuando se realizaron las imágenes tenemos el mismo problema que se intenta solucionar, pues no todas las imágenes estarán bien categorizadas en todas las categorías. Por esto, creo que la mejor solución es la de categorizar en general los jugadores en todos los clubes en que hayan jugado. Lobo (howl?) 16:53, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

¿Tienes alguna objeción a lo que dije? Lobo (howl?) 03:58, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
No, no tengo mucho que agregar, aunque creo que no todos los casos merecen tratarse igual, porque no todas las carreras de futbolistas lo son. Buscaré algun ejemplo y te lo daré. Fma12 (talk) 04:20, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
No podría estar más en desacuerdo con eso, creo que se ha de buscar coherencia y una homogeneidad en la categorización para que sea lo más concreta y correcta posible, si se trata cada caso de forma distinta lo que tendremos es un caos. Volviendo a lo primero que mencionaste, no podemos categorizar basándonos en las fotos que en un momento determinado existan en una categoría, sino que son las categorías las que deben acotar qué contenido alojan, porque ese contenido va variando con el tiempo. Y te pongo un ejemplo análogo: imagina un político que haya militado en diversos partidos políticos: el partido A, el B y el C. Pero resulta que por el momento no existen fotografías de todas las épocas de cuando militaba en cada partido ¿Crees entonces que es correcto sólo categorizarlo como militante de solo esos partidos en que aparece en las fotos mientras no se añadan más? Pues en mi opinión rotundamente no, porque en el momento en que se mezclan varios partidos las imágenes ya no están clasificadas de forma precisa siguiendo el criterio de que las imágenes pertenezcan a todas las categorías (o bien representará a un partido, o bien al otro, o quizá a ninguno). Esa persona ha sido parte de esos partidos políticos, y es útil tenerla categorizada en ellos aunque no exista ninguna fotografía de esa época en concreto, porque entonces nuevas imágenes podrán añadirse sin que se produzca ningún desajuste. Por eso, no veo un error que esas fotografías se incluyan en subcategorías de personas militantes de determinado partido (o en nuestro caso como jugadores de determinado club), porque lo único que implica esque la persona que aparece en la foto en algún momento de su vida fue miembro del partido político, y no necesariamente que en las fotos de esa subcategoría esa persona estuviera militando especificamente en ese partido. Y si hiciera falta hacer esa distinción, sería sencillo por ejemplo crear una categoría de 'Personas militando en el partido A' y categorizar las fotos correspondientes de cualquiera dentro (o incluso crear otra subcategoría 'Fulano militando en el partido A'). Básicamente, lo que se categoriza de esa forma es por una parte a una persona y por otra parte si hiciera falta subcategorías de fotos de esa persona. Y es esto lo que se hace mayoritariamente en las categorías de deportistas, es al parecer práctico y sencillo. Sin embargo tiene el inconveniente de que el concepto de categoría parte de que las imágenes deben estar contenidas en el tema de las categorías superiores cada vez más específicamente, y esto puede considerarse que no se cumple en el sentido en que en la categoría Players of Club Nosecual habrá acertadamente fotografías de jugadores de ese club, pero no necesariamente de jugadores jugando para ese club. Creo que ese es el principal problema. Una opción opuesta sería descategorizar la categoría de la persona completamente de todos los clubes en que haya participado, y solo categorizar las imágenes atendiendo a sus particularidades en concreto, es decir, que en las categorías de 'Players of Club Nosecual' solo aparecieran imágenes de jugadores vistiendo o estando en activo en ese momento en el club en cuestión. El caso, de nuevo, es ser coherentes en la categorización, y dejar solo unas categorías mientras se eliminan otras no lo veo nada correcto. Lobo (howl?) 21:19, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Huracan 1973celebrating.jpg

Hi ! You state that this file is in the public domain in the US. Was it published without a copyright notice ? --Claritas (talk) 23:11, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi! No, this file is already in the public domain in Argentina, not US. The point is that I could not find the tag (I use the upload wizard) when uploading the file so I have to provide the image first and then editing this in order to modify the information about the licence. My question is: is there any way to indicate that an image is under the Argentine public domain while I'm uploading it to commons? Thanks, Fma12 (talk) 01:24, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
You can add Template:PD-AR-Photo to the permissions field of the summary template, and fill in the license as "other" on the standard upload form. The file was PD in source country in 1996, so there shouldn't be a problem with the US copyright, but it's important to add the licensing tag for the source country. Thanks. --Claritas (talk) 06:20, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Wait. This photo is created in 1973. Unless proof that it was created on or before 1970, this is not PD in USA. --George Ho (talk) 22:07, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
(Edit conflict) To assure you, under Argeninta law, a photo must be both published for more than 20 years and created for more than 25 years to be out of copyright. --George Ho (talk) 22:16, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Pedroochoa 1925.jpeg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:19, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Basile_1966rac.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Basile_1966rac.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Ho (talk) 05:49, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

I have left my reasons on the nomination page. The discussion is closed for me so I won't reply anything here. Thanks Fma12 (talk) 23:49, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
I know you left, but read Articles 31 and 35. Well, I can't find laws about photos and periodicals. However, consent of this person is beneficial. He did give permission to the magazine and the photographer to be photographed and to be publicized. I wonder if the pictured person gave permission to upload this image. --George Ho (talk) 00:21, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
The discussion is closed and the community reached a consensus to keep the image uploaded. You can wonder anything you want now.... Fma12 (talk) 20:45, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Violación de copyright

Estimado Fma12: hola, mi nombre es Senko, el autor de dos de las fotografías de barreras automáticas que has subido a la página de Wikipedia "paso a nivel", diciendo que son de tu creación. Sé que no lo son porque esas fotos las saqué yo (y tengo los originales conmigo como prueba), y sé donde las has encontrado: www.rxrsignals.net Haz el favor de no usar mis fotos de nuevo sin darme crédito por ellas. Atentamente, Senko

Estimado Senko: Te comento algo brevemente, esas fotografías las tenía guardadas en mi disco rígido y ni me acordaba de dónde las había sacado, de hecho no tenía la menor idea de quién había tomado esas imágenes. Subí la de la estación Padilla porque de hecho, me venía muy bien para ilustrar el articulo de "GRS" de Wikipedia con una señalización ensamblada en Argentina como es el caso.
Las puse como autoría propia porque: 1) las fotos no estaban colgadas en ningún sitio web que pudiera arrogarse su autoría (de hecho, hoy estuve buscando en rxrsignals y no encontré esas imágenes....); 2) no sabía quién las había sacado (ahora me entero que fuiste vos, aunque veo que no tenés cuenta en commons para siquiera citarte), ¿o sí tenés? pregunto porque este mensaje sale sin tu firma.
Para finalizar, y si te parece bien, modifico la información de esas imágenes dándote el crédito como corresponde, no me interesa arrogarme la facultad de nada ni violar copyrights, no es mi estilo, espero hayas entendido las razones que te detallé.

Aguardo tu respuesta, cuando gustes, saludos Fma12 (talk) 03:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

URAA on Argentinian images

Images created more than 25 years ago are still copyrighted, even if published more than 20 years ago. 1973+25=1998; 1973+20=1993. Argentina images are protected by Berne Convention and, also, Argentine law for overseas distribution. Look at {{PD-AR-Photo}}. --George Ho (talk) 03:07, 5 February 2012 (UTC)


template layout (PD-because)

Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Српски / srpski | Svenska | +/−

Public domain This file is in the public domain in Argentina because it is a work of the Dirección Nacional de Vialidad, under the terms of Law 24.449 promulgated by the Argentine National Congress.
Flag of Argentina

Do not remove DR tags

You should not be removing DR tags, especially not to add a copyvio tag. If someone disagrees with a copyvio tag, it goes to DR. Period.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:23, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

It's okay to remove copyvio tags if you disagree with them. It's not okay to remove DR tags. You do not edit war over copyvio tags; if someone takes it off, you take it to DR.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:34, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

File:David wallace kicking.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:David wallace kicking.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Prosfilaes (talk) 01:30, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Middx v NZ 1905.jpg

I simply love how you can't use edit summaries, how it should be evident to everyone else how you are self-evidently right.--Prosfilaes (talk) 21:05, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Let's see; you started this by trying to short-circuit discussion by putting a copyvio on a file that was up for discussion at DR. When I write out a full explanation of why a free license may help people who aren't covered by the public domain, and you didn't even try to respond in your edit summary. I fail to see how I'm the one not being collaborative.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:13, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:10, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Codra-logo.jpg

Hi Fma 12, You've supported the PD Text aspect of the above file in the DR. I respect your view and I would like to know your view in respect of the DR Gents Toilet Signboard in Hindi. It was marked for DR once, DR decided in favour of "keep" but deletion requester gain marked it for DR. Regards, Hindustanilanguage (talk) 15:07, 18 April 2012 (UTC).

If you check the file carefully, you'll find renomination for deletion after the closure of the first DR debate ended in "keep" decision. Regards, Hindustanilanguage (talk) 19:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC).
Thank you for the opinion on the DR. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 02:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC).

Some interesting / weird findings about user: Ices2Csharp

Dear Fma12, I just checked the toolserver report of Ices2Csharp. To my surprise, although he joined commons on 06 November 2011, he has surpassed 14OOO edits. Yet, he never uploaded a single image (only 5 reuploads - which were also just reverts). He acquired filemover status much before me, yet so far he moved only 69 pages whereas I am reaching nearly 300 file moves in less than a month. he has only two category edits. That means he's involved in DR filings, DR debates, etc. Will such a person contribute anything worthwhile for Commons? Hindustanilanguage (talk) 11:52, 22 April 2012 (UTC).

Friend Hindustanilanguage, those statistics sound really weird! Where that person obtained such status from, is a mystery for me. I'm in Commons much before him, I have uploaded a lot of files more, but I'm far from reaching 14.000 edits, that's clear attending to I created my account some years before him. Unfortunately I have always problems to see my number of edits at toolservers so I can't specify you my activities on Commons... Fma12 (talk) 15:43, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Your Tool Server Statistics:
Username
Fma12
User ID
436776
Registration date
13:27, 09 November 2008
First edit
13:29, 09 November 2008
Total editcount
3506
Distinct page edits
2304
Page/edits (avg)
1.52
Edit count per namespaces
Namespace-Edit count-%
User - 5 - 0.14%
User talk - 86 - 2.45%
Commons - 192 - 5.48%
Commons talk - 2 - 0.06%
File - 3198 - 91.22%
Category - 145 - 4.14%

Log actions
Action type-Action count
Edit patroling 106
Image reuploads 122
Image uploads 632

Hindustanilanguage (talk) 18:13, 22 April 2012 (UTC).

Average Edits

Hi FMA12, you have 584 edits in the last 30 days. Our common friend has had 4,152 edits in the last 30 days. But this shoot up is mostly the result of filing DRs on his own and participating in others DRs. With each DR, edit-1 is the "Starting deletion request" page edit, then comes "Listing Commons:Deletion requests" page edit and then user talk page notification edit - 3 edit count increases with one DR! Next comes your participation in DRs filed by others - just types Symbol delete vote.svg Delete or Symbol keep vote.svg Keep, and your edit count increase by 1. There is another method of boosting edit count on the Wikis followed by Ices' friend SpacemanSpiff - he goes in search for PD files on Flickr.com Filmitadka.com,etc, saves it on his hard disk and then uploads these second hand files on Commons - his edit counts will shoot up like anything. The choice of method of boosting edit counts is up to you. Meanwhile, I've questioned the moral right of Ices to file DRs, re-DRs and may be re-re-DRs on the Hindi Toilet file DR page. I've even notified him by leaving a Talkback on his user talk. But so far he has remained silent on the question. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 07:50, 23 April 2012 (UTC).

Hi, Hindustanilanguage, I was really surprised withe the number of edits that I made within 30 days. But nothing compares to our friend, who has achieved a mark that is impossible to surpass or even reach (at least for me). I wonder how many time does this user spend on Commons by day? Fma12 (talk) 15:44, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
I've no idea. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 16:19, 25 April 2012 (UTC).

Logos

About this edition of yours, I had no idea, Im giving you some more kits that should then be fixed: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6].--Nuno93 (talk) 21:18, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

trademark law is NOT copyright law

Dear Fma12,

please note: trademark law is NOT copyright law!

You can NOT change license tags due to the provisions in Argentine Law 22362, article 3, section f because this law is about registered trademarks and NOT about copyright. So please review all your changes due to this law and undo them.

Best regards

--ALE! ¿…? 07:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

I have answered on my talk page. --ALE! ¿…? 21:50, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
(reproduction): Dear Fma12,
sorry to contradict you, but you mix up copyright law and trademark law.
The law you are citing, Law 22362, is a trademark law. Trademark laws are something totally different from copyright laws, because e.g. copyright law might apply but trademark law not and vice versa.
Commons bases its decision ONLY on copyright law.
Regards --ALE! ¿…? 21:49, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Escribo acerca del comentario en el patrón de la camiseta titular del Club Atlético River Plate, yo soy el responsable de haber colocado el logo, y si viola las leyes de Wikipedia me retracto. Lo que sí quería aclarar, es que hay muchos diseños de patrones de camisetas donde se está empezando a incluir el logo del sponsor, y en algunos casos se coloca hasta el logo del/los patrocinador/es. Un claro ejemplo son los diseños de los templates que aparecen en el artículo en español sobre el mismo Club Atlético Boca Juniors, donde el escudo del patrocinador aparece en contraste con el color de fondo donde está ubicado. Si es que hay una regla que indica que no se debe incluir sponsors invitaría a colaborar en removerlos. Desde ya, muchas gracias.

--PM07 (talk) 19:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)


File:Kit body river1112a.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kit body river1112a.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 22:13, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for completing the request I had started before. I strongly support the request. Fma12 (talk) 12:24, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Template camiseta River Suplente 2012/13

Hola de nuevo. Escribo para avisarle que arme un template mas adecuado de la camiseta del CA River Plate, siguiendo el modelo de la camiseta. Debido a que el modelo de la camiseta seguira siendo ClimaCool, la banda roja de la camiseta suplente es similar a la banda estampada en la camiseta titular de la temporada 2010/12 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/32/Kit_body_river_1214a.png http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/ba/Kit_body_river_1012_h.png Subo los enlaces crudos porque no tengo mucho tiempo para poder armar la visualización ahora. Un Saludo. --PM07 (talk) 00:08, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Independiente fc crest.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Independiente fc crest.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bulwersator (talk) 11:18, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Maradona1986copa.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Maradona1986copa.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 13:36, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

The requirement for "PD-AR-Photo" is not "shows Argentinian player" or "has something to do with Argentina", the requirement is strictly: first published in Argentina. For photos grabbed from random websites you can hardly provide evidence for this. For photos of international events it is also highly unlikely that first publication of the photo was in Argentina. --Martin H. (talk) 13:38, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Maradona1986 hq.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Maradona1986 hq.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 13:40, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

I got the point, thanks for clearing me about that. I have recently uploaded this free image, published in July 1986 and scanned by me directly from El Gráfico magazine to replace the files deleted. Fma12 (talk) 15:28, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

HI

Thanks. But first you commented with delete with no reasonable reason, I did all possible to confirm my work, i changed flicker account to some rights reserved to prove it. Do you mean I still keep the picture to all rights reserved in flicker and keep it here with CC?

At last, will you ask any admin to close the discussion because there no more to add.--Neogeolegend (talk) 05:10, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Final warning for edit warring in football kit images

Hello there.

This is a final warning to all editors involved in the upload war over football kits. Pages like File:Kit body rmcf1213a.png, with over a dozen back and forth uploads, are disruptive.I have seen this same type of edit war on several pages, and going back several months. It does not matter if you think you're right or not, it has to end. If you are on the side advocating for logos, and the image has no logos, upload the version with logos as a separate image, and add the version with no logos to the other versions section of the file description page. The same goes for if you are on the side advocating for no logos and the current version has logos already. It is better to have two stable versions than to have one very unstable one.

Also, since at least one party has already started this, I am explicity forbidding you from putting each other's versions up for deletion at DR. This is an extension of the edit warring, and is, like the edit warring, highly disruptive.

Because of the length and severity of this mess, the minimum block length I would consider for continued violations after a final warning is one month. Repeated infractions will quickly scale up in block length. I do not consider myself too involved to take admin action here. It has to end, and repeated pleas for you all to talk it out have fallen on deaf ears.

Sven Manguard Wha? 16:24, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Douglas Haig badge.png

Pay attention to copyright
File:Douglas Haig badge.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sonsaz (talk) 10:02, 18 September 2012 (UTC)


File tagging File:Nygiants uniforms12.PNG

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nygiants uniforms12.PNG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nygiants uniforms12.PNG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Stefan4 (talk) 09:31, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely Stefan4 (talk) 09:38, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Reusch textlogo.png

Pay attention to copyright
File:Reusch textlogo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sonsaz (talk) 10:12, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Bike athletic logo.png

Pay attention to copyright
File:Bike athletic logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sonsaz (talk) 10:12, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Pony sports logo.png

Pay attention to copyright
File:Pony sports logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sonsaz (talk) 10:12, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Bike athletic logo.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bike athletic logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sreejith K (talk) 10:15, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Reusch textlogo.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Reusch textlogo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sreejith K (talk) 10:15, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Pony sports logo.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pony sports logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sreejith K (talk) 10:22, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: Deletion request

No exactamente. Los logos están regidos Text-Logo cuando son interpretaciones del original y no guardan una exactitud. Por lo general, los logotipos tienen autor y tienen protegidos sus derechos. Y máxime cuando están copiados directamente de otro sitio de Internet son plagios. Un saludo, Sonsaz (talk) 23:09, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Ud. mismo lo ha dicho, si tienen autor tienen sus derechos protegidos, por lo que son plagios. Y más si los ha recogido directamente de otros sitios de Internet. Sonsaz (talk) 23:35, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Ud. las a plagiado de otro website. Creo que eso es plagio pese a que las modifique para quitarles el fondo. Sonsaz (talk) 23:44, 11 October 2012 (UTC)


File:CA Douglas Haig logo.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:CA Douglas Haig logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Funfood 23:33, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Source File:Direct tv channel.svg

Hi Fma12,

Could you elaborate on the source for File:Direct tv channel.svg? I can't find that SVG anywhere on the website. –Krinkletalk 18:08, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

I've just uploaded the source information, giving credits for the SVG to the user who uploaded it on WP so I suppose he made the vector graphics image. Fma12 (talk) 18:49, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
I don't see anything there that suggests the following:
  • That he released it in the public-domain
  • (Or) That it is too simple for copyright
Which is strange, because you uploading it to Commons does imply that. Are you sure it shouldn't be deleted in favour of a low-resolution fair use upload to Wikipedia instead? –Krinkletalk 18:54, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
The decision to upload it to Commons was mine, so there are many files in WP that are too simple to be copyrighted, therefore moved to Commons (in fact, I moved many files here from Wiki). I'm strongly convinced that DirecTV logo is simple enough to be placed here, but if you think different, you can nominate it for deletion and an administrator will decide about the issue. Fma12 (talk) 19:36, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
As an administrator I'm familiar with the nomination process. I've extended (edit) the file description to include the original upload log (optional for PD files, but recommended anyway) and corrected the source/author (Wikipedia is not a source, and Koman90 was the author of the SVG XML source code in this case, not DirecTV). Could you make sure the old file is deleted on English Wikipedia (by placing the NowCommons template)? Thanks, –Krinkletalk 22:28, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
There's no problem, I'll put a "NowCommons" template on the logo from Wikipedia. Regards, Fma12 (talk) 23:23, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token b0ff5c0f80760825ada91186d47decca

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Better source request for File:Weight Watchers logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Weight Watchers logo.png. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the file because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the file, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the file itself. Please update the file description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the help desk or me at my talkpage. Thank you. Senator2029 03:53, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Uniforms withs copyrighted logos

Hello, can yu see this Delete requests similars to Kit body ARGH11.png and Kit body ARGV11.png

All are nominated for the same reason.

Bye. --AleMaster23 (talk) 04:34, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I've supporting your nominations. Unfortunately there are many jerseys with copyrighted logos at Commons, and some times administrators do not pay much attention to this. I hope my vote helps. Regards, Fma12 (talk) 13:20, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I believe that this image should be removed immediately. AleMaster23 (talk) 20:16, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

FYI

I posed a question at Commons:Village_pump#Threshold_of_originality_question related to a file you uploaded.--Sphilbrick (talk) 18:24, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I've just left my point of view there. Fma12 (talk) 22:13, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Aviva premierleague logo.svg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Aviva premierleague logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:03, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Cornhuskers footb uniforms.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cornhuskers footb uniforms.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 10:38, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

File:San Francisco ruins sign.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:San Francisco ruins sign.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 10:40, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Tastic Film Logo.png

You recently closed the deletion request on this file as keep. At the time this was a decision one could not quarrel with except perhaps on trivial grounds. Today I believe the file is out of scope. There is no use made of the file, and it was uploaded as a part of a promotion campaign on enWikipedia for a non notable organisation whose article has now been deleted. It is also not realistically useful for education purposes. The rules suggest I need to talk to you prior to my making a decision on renomination for deletion. Please reply ether here or on my own talk page, but let me know you have replied since I visit Commons rarely. You can find me at this user ID on en Wikipedia. My signature there is different, however. Timtrent (talk) 17:18, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

You are wrong, I have just left my opinion there but I did not close the deletion request so I'm not an administrator. The deletion request was closed by Yann. I think you should write him for any doubt or questions you have. Regards, Fma12 (talk) 19:02, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
My apologies. I must have misread. Timtrent (talk) 14:37, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Surreal Barnstar Hires.png The Surreal Barnstar
(Y) xD Buen Trabajo0 Maik Gustavo Ovando (talk) 05:16, 27 March 2013 (UTC)


File:Oregon ducks football 1916.jpg

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Indonesia | മലയാളം | svenska | 中文 | +/−


Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:Oregon ducks football 1916.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:22, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Caniggia 1986.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Caniggia 1986.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jespinos (talk) 16:12, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Se podría mudar esa y todas las fotos argentinas que no son aceptables (todas las que van entre 1971 y 1988) a wikipedia en español, si las aceptasen. Pero hasta donde sé ya se discutió eso algunas veces, y no se consiguió consenso. Y no es un tema en donde se pueda "ser valiente", para poder hacer eso hay que cambiar varias cosas por allá. Habilitar la subida de archivos, escribir o actualizar las políticas aplicables, las páginas de ayuda, los bots, los aspectos técnicos... o sea, un quilombo. Cambalachero (talk) 02:53, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Lomas ac logo.svg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lomas ac logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:55, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Domino pizza logo.svg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Domino pizza logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Andy Dingley (talk) 23:51, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

File:ALBO.jpg

[removing automatic copyvio template]. Gunnex (talk) 21:44, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi --> [7]. I know :-) And for this I removed the automatic copyvio template from your talk page (the script automatically notifies also the last editor of the file). Gunnex (talk) 21:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Atletico rosario logo.svg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Atletico rosario logo.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ray Garraty (talk) 06:33, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

This was wrongly marked as "copyright violation" so the file was rendered by me, apart of being not elegible for copyright, according to template:PD-textlogo. I uploaded another version of the file, if you consider it still infringes copyright laws, nominate it for deletion therefore it will be able to be discussed before deleting or not.- Fma12 (talk) 14:53, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Atlet rosario logo.svg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Atlet rosario logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ray Garraty (talk) 14:57, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Copa-argentina-logo.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Copa-argentina-logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:54, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Wolverines football uniform.png

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wolverines football uniform.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Wolverines football uniform.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Stefan4 (talk) 22:56, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Boca jrs logo 1912.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Boca jrs logo 1912.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 23:24, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

New York Giants Uniform

I'm glad to see someone taking on the NFL uniforms since Jonny Souel left us. I have one change, if you could find the time. The Giants alternate uniform is not a red jersey. It will be the same home blue jersey with white pants, with a similar stripe partern to the current home greys. If you don't have the time to make the changes, could you at least remove the red jersey, since they have not had that available since 2005? thanks.

Hi, thanks for the recognition. Don´t worry about the red jersey, I'll remove it from the image. By the way, I have new uniform in progress, coming soon. Thanks again, Fma12 (talk) 12:43, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Dallas Cowboys Uniform

The pants for the Cowboys white unis are inaccurate. The Cowboys wear metallic silver-blue color pants with the white jerseys seen here which is a different shade of silver from the pants worn with the blue jerseys seen here. Richiekim (talk) 00:15, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Well, I'll change the tone editing the image. Fma12 (talk) 01:38, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Saopaulo ac football 1904.jpg

Emblem-date unknown.svg

Please verify the date of this photograph. Is it 1902 (as stated in the description) or 1904 (as stated in the file name)? Senator2029 21:08, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Done. By the way, either 1902 or 1904, it does not seem relevant so it is PD anyway. - Fma12 (talk) 11:55, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Deleting the AR-Gov template by mistake

Got your message. Very sorry about that. I think I only clicked on it to get some info on how templates worked (Argentina being more or less at the top of the list), and I did not realize I mistakenly deleted that template!----Lubiesque (talk) 14:43, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Fluminense fc logo.svg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fluminense fc logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:46, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

DR

Another DR affecting many probably PD files has been initiated because of the Aboriginal flag case. I would appreciate if you add your voice to the DR as you did with the Australian road signs one. Fry1989 eh? 04:16, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Dep quevedo logo.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Dep quevedo logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:35, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:BA city legislat logo.png

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:BA city legislat logo.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 08:41, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Mall of america logo13.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mall of america logo13.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

188.33.57.177 01:21, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Allboys 1972.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Allboys 1972.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 22:02, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Almagro 1971.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Almagro 1971.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 22:11, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Billiken 1971bala.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Billiken 1971bala.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 21:47, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Category:Coats of arms of Córdoba Province

Hola. Te borré la categoría que creaste ayer, porque ya existía Category:Coats of arms of Córdoba Province (Argentina), que era para diferenciarla de las ciudades de Colombia y España, y de la provincia de España. Un fuerte abrazo. Allforrous (talk) 04:34, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

No hay problema alguno, yo no conocía la existencia de esa categoría específica para Córdoba (Argentina). Te agradezco por la deferencia. Otro abrazo ;) - Fma12 (talk) 22:16, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Melbourne Evening Herald flag (red).svg

This DR may be of interest to you. Fry1989 eh? 19:35, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

It is of course understandable you wish to read everything regarding the flag in question, the previous DR is here, and there is also relevant stuff here. As for the road signs, I've opened a unDR but LGA opposed it and it's been ignored by everyone else since. I'm keeping it open until I get some sort of conclusion, and if it isn't resolved before I have to leave on the 16th for vacation, I will re-open it when I return in January. Fry1989 eh? 22:33, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Atl chascomus logo.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Atl chascomus logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:31, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Campeón Argentino Nacional 1974.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Campeón Argentino Nacional 1974.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 22:24, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Cruyff perfumo 1974.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cruyff perfumo 1974.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 21:50, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Defensores belg 1972.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Defensores belg 1972.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 22:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Real madrid logo 41.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Real madrid logo 41.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tbhotch 00:49, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Ariz Cardinals uniforms.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ariz Cardinals uniforms.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tbhotch 01:13, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

URAA DRs

Hi, thx again for your help with the URAA related DRs. But I like to ask you to fix another 2 things:

  • Pls. include the date parameters on the file description pages like I corrected it i.e. here.
  • Pls. calculate the undeletion year correctly like I corrected it i.e. here. Copyright protected until end of i.e. 2066 means undelet it beginning of 2067 (not 2066).

I today corrected about 100 DR of you. Please try to do it correctly in future. Thx. and regards --JuTa 22:29, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for the recognition. I'll do it as you indicated me, thanks also for the information. Regards, Fma12 (talk) 22:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC)


Hello I received more than six emails with connection to F1 Carlos Reutemann and Niki Lauda, etc. However I cannot find your questions on my 'Talk' page? gillfoto

Gillfoto 21:32, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi, sorry but it was my mistake, I was just nominating some files with URAA problems, but it was not your case because the photos were clearly taken by you, so I withdrew all the requests immediately. Sorry for the misunderstood - Fma12 (talk) 23:16, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Funes 1987.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Funes 1987.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 14:09, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Copyright tag removal

I assume the part of this edit that removed the copyright tag was a mistake, for the image I found in Category:Media without a license: needs history check today. Please be more careful when editing such image details because it could well have been deleted for lack of a licence except that I reviewed the history, found the problem and fixed it. If you intentionally removed the licence then please tag it for deletion as missing a licence. You may want to review it. Ww2censor (talk) 10:57, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. I considered the OTRS permission a valid license itself (Then I realised of my mistake). Nevertheless I'll ask in the OTRS noticeboard about this license so I want to know how "strong" that permission is. Thanks again. - Fma12 (talk) 11:52, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Borrados

Hola. Vi que solicitaste el borrado de varias imágenes tomadas en Argentina que subí. La verdad es que no entiendo del todo lo del URAA y mi inglés no es lo suficientemente fuerte. Si me pudieses hacer un pequeño resumen sobre tema (para no volver a subir imágenes con problemas) te lo agradecería. Saludos. --Pablo 6213 (talk) 17:52, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Camp77.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Camp77.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gunnex (talk) 19:02, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Taringa Logo.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Taringa Logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Cube00 (talk) 06:11, 18 January 2014 (UTC)


problemas con nuevas categorias de estacion de trenes

Hola! vi que creaste las categorias "FFCC San Martin/Roca etc train stations". Me parece bien. Pero al mover fotos a estas categorias, en algunos casos se perdio informacion. Tal es el caso aca: File:Estación-Vedia-FCGSM.jpg. Esta foto ya no esta en la categoria "train stations in Buenos Aires Province" ni el subcategorias. En un caso del FFCC Roca tambien lo vi; pero no me acuerdo ahora, en cual. Saludos!--Geogast (talk) 21:54, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Hola, gracias por contactarte. La categoría de "rail transport in Argentina" era un gran desorden, lleno de archivos desparramados, y empecé a ordenar un poco, quedó mucho más prolijo pero aún no terminé de ordenar. Puede ser que entre la gran cantidad de archivos modificados, haya quedado (por error, claro) alguno afuera de la categoría "train stations ...". Saludos! - Fma12 (talk) 04:20, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Lo del desorden es cierto. Yo trabajé un montón en esto, también, principalmente para dejar cuantos mas archivos y categorias en las categorias "train stations in XY province" y "Ferrocarril General XY". Saludos entonces y buen trabajo ;-) --Geogast (talk) 08:27, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Image Source

Source

The source listed for Acdc_backinblack_cover.jpgimage is listed as http://m.ztopics.com/Back%20in%20Black/ which has links to a number of images. The source provided doesn't support free use. Can you please specify which source you copied the image from;

File:Acdc backinblack cover.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Acdc backinblack cover.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Flatoitlikealizarddrinking (talk) 04:51, 30 January 2014 (UTC)