User:Frank C. Müller/Discussion 2010
Category:People looking left[edit]
Hallo Frank C. Müller, die abgebildeten Personen der Dateien File:AntoinetteMiggiani.jpg und File:Cornelia Froboess.jpg schauen in die entgegengesetzte Richtung wie die anderen Bilder in der Category:People looking left. War das so beabsichtigt? (Vielleicht interessiert dich in dem Zusammenhang auch Category talk:Looking right) --Diwas (talk) 20:29, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Hallo Diwas! Das war keine Absicht. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis! gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 06:48, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Black and white photographs[edit]
Hello. I think this edit was not needed, since the image was already in "Category:Black and white photographs of families", which is a subcategory of the category you added. I therefore removed the addition. Thank you for your work. Cheers, -- 18:18, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello Infrogmation!
The description in Category:Black and white photographs says: "The category should be applied to in addition to any topical (sub-) categories." So I guess, this is an exeption from the non-overcategorization-rule.
Regards fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 19:14, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- Interesting, thank you. I don't understand why this needs to be used contrary to the rules of other categories; I have asked at Category talk:Black and white photographs. Cheers, Infrogmation (talk) 00:11, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Category:Animals facing left[edit]
| Category discussion notification | Category:Animals facing left has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. |
Category:Animals facing right[edit]
| Category discussion notification | Category:Animals facing right has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. |
- MPF (talk) 22:09, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Vandalism[edit]
IF I make a Category, that have a meaning, do not remove important information!haabet 16:20, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, but You created the category at 2010-05-16T18:15:23, two days after adding this category to several pictures and after I had removed this category from some of these pictures. So, that's no vandalism! Regards fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 16:28, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Watermark tags[edit]
Hi Frank, I noticed you added Category:Images with watermarks to File:Dinizulu.jpg. This is a cleanup category and User:Martin H. seems to think that the photographer company should not be removed from this photo - generally it's a good idea to avoid putting watermark tags on images where the watermark was not recently added, without explanation. Thanks! Dcoetzee (talk) 18:31, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Dcoetzee!
Ok, thanks for the hint. But what do you mean with "avoid putting watermark tags on images where the watermark was not recently added, without explanation"? May I put a watermark tag, if the watermark was recently added, or if the watermark was added with an explanation? The text of the category says: "watermarks or credits in the image itself" (in german: "Wasserzeichen oder Quellenangaben im Bild selbst"). Perhaps you or someone else may specify the text of the category to clarify a bit more what is meant and what not.
Regards, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 06:05, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, I was unclear - there's some debate over whether captions or signatures should be removed from works when those captions or signatures were added a long time ago (the markings themselves may have historic value). Maybe the best solution is to upload under a different name. It's not your fault, I should have been more careful. :-) Dcoetzee (talk) 08:53, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Ok, I think, now I've got it! So long, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 09:11, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Bonjour[edit]
En effet, je souhaite la suppression des images que j'ai importées dans la mesure ou elles ne sont pas les miennes. C'est dans ce but que j'ai retiré des informations. J'en avais d'ailleurs parlé à User:Jean-Frédéric, sans succès. Je ne connait pas la procédure pour supprimer ces images. Peut-etre pourriez-vous m'aider? Merci --Toubabmaster (talk) 22:39, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Ok. D'abord je vais transférer cette réponse a ta page de discussion, parceque c'est le bon usage ici, dans le monde wiki, de répondre au lieu, ou une discussion a étée commencée, pour tenir ensemble le fil de discussion. Et puis le reste là. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 15:54, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Spitzmaulnashorn fcm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|