the Relative tenses
Throughout this document, the following conventions are used:
- Inflection is used as a shorthand for time-deixis; That is, it is used as inflection or it's equivalent.
mnemonic: Inflection in this document is the parent-class of inflection.
- Grammatical tense is the inflective remedy in a language which relates the situational point in time in the sentence. Along with other time-diexises (which are highly theoretical ), it is a member of the classical grammatical tense:
mnemonic: Grammatical tense in this document is the child-class of grammatical tense.
- A particular Category of tenses, the X tenses, is a category of inflexive remedies (i.e., a general means of time-diaxis, including null inflection) used to express sentences across situational points.
- Individual Tenses within the X tenses relate a general inflective remedy used for a specific situational point.
- A language's actual Specific Tenses are members of these sub-categories.
- A language has a specific tense if there is a proper remedy to demark the tense which is uniform across all regular sentences and is not simply a compound form of other tenses.
- 1 the General Model
- 2 Meet the Tenses
- 3 the Absolute Tenses
- 4 the Absolute-Relative Tenses
- 5 the Relative Tenses
- 6 References
the General Model
|the Absolute tenses|
|the Relative tenses|
Grammatical tenses instantiate in a sentence a situational point in time from which the action occurs. The Absolute tenses are deictic; the center of deixis may be either the moment of discourse or narration or the moment under discussion. Through its verb, an absolute tense reflects the relative situational point to the context.
All languages have either absolute tenses, or they are tenseless. A language with the Absolute tenses (as opposed to tenseless languages) may use the Absolute tenses relative to the point of context, the Relative tenses, or it may use both, in order to express action in a context relative but distinct to the present moment.
* from here forward, tenseless languages are not part of the coverage.
The Relative tenses are anaphoric; the center of time is determined contextually. A Relative tense keeps the tense of the action.
Both forms (the Relative tenses and the Absolute tenses) can fully, or at least nearly, express any time appropriate for an action. The following illustration (from ) should make clear the difference.
In absolute tense languages the time will be made to agree with the context: Here the expression of the lemma to go changes relative to the context, such that the context word is redundant to the inflection of the verb.
“ Yesterday by 3:00, they had gone to the supermarket. ”
“ Tomorrow at 3:00, they will have gone to the supermarket. ”
In relative tensed languages the expression of to go does not change, but it's interpretation changes relative to the context:
“ Yesterday by 3:00, they to gopast to the supermarket. ”
“ Tomorrow at 3:00, they to gopast to the supermarket. ”
Most major languages will be found to be of the Absolute tenses (incorporating and defaulting to some tenses that are absolute). Less are of the Relative tenses, and arguably some languages incorporate both without overly favoring the one over the other (v.g., Russian).
The Absolute-Relative tenses are the absolute tenses only used to describe the moment under discussion when it is separate from the current moment or the narrative now. If a language does not synthesize these references through multiple simpler forms, than it is said to have tenses that are of the Absolute-Relative tenses.
Next to the tenses from the Absolute-Relative and the Relative, the tenses from the Absolute might be mnemonically thought of as the Simple tenses for two reasons. One need not a contextual inference, nor a second verb, nor even a relative context to state things in these tenses. Secondly, the Relative tenses and often the Absolute-Relative tenses require a verb conjugated in a Simple tense.
Meet the Tenses
the Absolute Tenses
transcluded from User:Robbiemuffin/The tenses/The Absolute tenses
|Any time, and all time, before now.
|Now, and habitually or repetitively or by necessity of state, religion or fact.
Note that this is distinguished (not only from english in the formal sense but) from the everyday english sense where the near-future is now (and even farther from the spanish version where now is basically indeterminate).
|Strictly after the current moment.
|From now on. The opposite of the past. In english, past tense typically have verbs conjugated like "swore" or "travelled". The other tense is this tense: "swear" or "travel".
Language with a NonPast (by inflection) English
|At or before now. The opposite of the future.
Note this is a fairly rare tense, linguists had hypothesized languages might have this tense but they had to actually discover examples.
|The not-yet tense expresses when something has not happened in present or past (nonfuture), but often with the implication that it is expected to happen in the future. (As such, is both a tense and a modality). In English, it is expressed with "not yet", hence its name..
Language with a Not-Yet (by inflection) Luganda
|Indicates a situation held to be the case, at or immediately before the utterance.
Language with a Still (by inflection) Luganda
the Absolute-Relative Tenses
Any tensed language is sufficient to express almost any state-full relation, and so there is always a way to address a relative state from a language with "Simple" tenses, but usually this is done through auxiliaries, for example: in english, the Future Perfect. Other languages incorporated the auxiliaries into their inflections directly, becoming true tenses of the language. These are the Absolute-Relative tenses.
transcluded from User:Robbiemuffin/The tenses/The Absolute-Relative tenses
* note there is no future in the future tense. That is because no natural language has one. Internet memes die hard.
|The future perfect tense is used to describe an event that has not yet happened but which is expected or planned to happen before another stated occurrence.
|The pluperfect tense (from Latin plus quam perfectum more than perfect), also called past perfect in English, is a perfective tense that exists in most Indo-European languages, used to refer to an event that has completed before another past action.
Language with a Past Perfect (by inflection) Galician
Future in the Past
|Refers to a time located in the future, relative to a contextually determined temporal reference point that itself must be located in the past relative to the moment of utterance.
Future Perfect in the Past
|Expresses a past action which is future with respect to a past action which itself is prior to another past action. An example might help: John left for the front; by the time he should return, the field would have been burnt to stubble.
the Relative Tenses
The simple absolute tenses determine the different types of relative tenses. Eg, if English could be found to be of the Relative tenses, then it would have a relative-past, and a relative-nonpast tense. (In other words, the context point can be anywhere in time, but how that context point's point of insertion looks from within the language depends upon the language's native simple tenses.)
- tenseless system
- Theories of Time
- Generative grammar
- http://www.humnet.ucla.edu/humnet/aflang/Hausa/Hausa_online_grammar/Tenses/tenses.html Meaning and Marking of Hausa Tenses