User talk:Óðinn

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to the Commons, Óðinn!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.


Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Contents

Narada Falls[edit]

Good job with the stitching together the files, even though it was tough. I knew those 4 images would be hard to assemble because the x and y orientation of the camera was changing, and in panoramas, only one of those axes is supposed to change. Also, the viewpoint was from a bridge and not from the bottom of the waterfall which made stitching even harder. But an overall good job!

Deathgleaner (talk) 03:28, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Please link images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello Óðinn!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:25, 3 December 2008 (UTC)


Category:Patriarch Alexius II[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Patriarch Alexius II has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

--russavia (talk) 05:22, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Changhe Ideal.jpg[edit]

Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

{{Nordic Council}}[edit]

Hi, I've deleted this template as it was a duplicate of the previously deleted {{Norden.org}} template (see the reason here).
I'll also nominate the following images for deletion, as they now have no valid licence: File:Gediminas_Kirkilas.jpg, File:Ålands lagting.jpg, File:Aigars Kalvītis.jpg, File:Urmas Paet.jpg, File:Juhan Parts.jpg and File:Anders Borg.jpg.
Best regards from France,
-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 09:03, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Calico Hills - panorama.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calico Hills - panorama.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Flickr request[edit]

Hello Óðinn, and thank you for your application to be a flickr reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. Congratulations! Please see Commons:Flickr images if you haven't done so already, and the backlogs at Category:Flickr images needing human review and Category:Flickr review needed. A helpful script for easy-tagging flickr images is at importScript('User:Patstuart/Flickrreview.js'); (which you can add to your monobook.js), and you can add {{user reviewer}} or {{user trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your work on Commons! :) PeterSymonds (talk) 11:52, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Category:Flickr review needed[edit]

Hey! Nice that you want to help us. In case you did not know this category is checked by a bot. The bot also uploads a larger version of the image if it excists. Thats why many of us let the bot do the job and only look in the subcats. --MGA73 (talk) 18:59, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Please check this license again File:Frank Sinclair 2.jpg. Should it not be a "by-sa"? --MGA73 (talk) 19:08, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Last thing. How do you get acces to File:Edward Paul Reyes Flight Deck.jpg? I'm told its private. If you can see private photos then you might be able to check some of the images in Category:Flickr images not found-old. Would be super if you could :-) --MGA73 (talk) 19:14, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Óðinn. You have new messages at MGA73's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bracebridge Falls.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bracebridge Falls.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Artwork by Danny Sillada[edit]

Hi, I am nominating for deletion several flicker images reviewed by you, please comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bandage of Faith, 2009, oil on canvas by Danny Sillada.JPG. --Jarekt (talk) 14:06, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Kremlin photos[edit]

Hi Odinn, I know that you often upload photos from Kremlin.ru, I am just pointing you to something in case you haven't noticed it. The Russian site has undergone a redevelopment and photos on the Russian site are now available in larger sizes, e.g. File:Dmitry Medvedev in Turkmenistan 13 September 2009-1.jpg. The English site is still the same as the old format, and photos on the English site are still only in the earlier smaller size. So if adding photos from Kremlin.ru it may be advisable to check the Russian site for the photos first...but I think you do this anyway.

I would have left this message for you on en:wiki, however, according to en:User:Sandstein I am just a disruptive user, and has basically banned me from even mentioning the word Russia or any Russian name, etc on English WP. It's true, tedious and ridiculous I know. Read en:User_talk:Russavia/Archive_12#Topic_ban and all of that below, and the AN/I discussion.

Anyway, hope the info above helps in case you are adding photos from Kremlin.ru in future. --russavia (talk) 13:11, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

MGA73bot2 stuff[edit]

I saw you review these images, including one I uploaded. Thanks for doing that but my advice would be: since the bot is clearly doing nonsense tagging derivative work I made the decision to simply revert the bot actions for such cases, it saves time. Hekerui (talk) 23:37, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Don't agree that it is "nonsense" but apart from that images should not fail if original is reviewed. It is also a good idea to check file history before marking as copyvio. I found some images like File:NPU Dragoman01-Kiew.jpg where it is own work. --MGA73 (talk) 16:20, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

{{Nordic_Council}}[edit]

Please comment this. --MGA73 (talk) 19:15, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Mistake[edit]

Hello, thank you for reviewing my uploads in Commons. Now I made a mistake in THIS file by calling the author: Garibulo. His real name is however: Gabirulo. Could you please change this? I looked quite a long time but I cant see how it should be done. Thank you. Beetjedwars (talk) 10:06, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I found it already, it's allright now. Regards, Beetjedwars (talk) 12:10, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Flickr images[edit]

Hi. You marked a lot of images for speedy deletion because of their licensing on flickr, although they were uploaded under a free license to by the author. There’s nothing wrong with that (we can keep these images), just the bots won't recognize it … Regards, --Polarlys (talk) 10:39, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Yonge-University-Spadina extenstion map.png[edit]

The word "Finch" has got the "i" missing. -- 113.255.74.94 04:56, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

File:2555451906 9266de66sfb s.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:41, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

PMPR[edit]

Hello Óðinn! Can you help me in the article PMPR in Russian (Военная жандармерия Парана)? Grateful. --Guilmann (talk) 16:58, 16 December 2009 (UTC)


File tagging File:Sergei Bagapsh.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sergei Bagapsh.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sergei Bagapsh.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

George M. (talk) 05:17, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Please fix[edit]

Hello,


Could you place fix your vector.js file, its showing up in the Category:Copyright Violations


Thnks, Huib talk Abigor @ meta 07:17, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Review[edit]

Could you mind reviewing this image? Thank-you! LunaHunting (talk) 14:28, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

You're now a filemover[edit]

Hi Óðinn, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, like InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • For guideline when to rename a file, please see Commons:File renaming and Commons:File naming.

Geagea (talk) 20:06, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hilton Falls and mill ruins.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hilton Falls and mill ruins.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Clarington, Ontario till 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clarington, Ontario till 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Unnamed lake - Killarney Provincial Park.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unnamed lake - Killarney Provincial Park.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Scarborough Bluffs panorama.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scarborough Bluffs panorama.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Road cut fault - Red Rock Canyon.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Road cut fault - Red Rock Canyon.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Clarington, Ontario Till 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clarington, Ontario Till 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


File:Suicide bag.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Suicide bag.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dcoetzee (talk) 17:05, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Rimskiy Korsakov.jpg[edit]

Укажите ссылку на разрешение к использованию либо поместите разрешение ORTS, иначе это считается нарушением авторских прав, и файл будет удалён. Odessey (talk) 14:58, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Boris_Berezovsky.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Boris_Berezovsky.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Off2riorob (talk) 14:18, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Che Guevara in Gaza[edit]

Hi there. Sorry to bother you but I have a little problem and I thought you could help me. See, even tho the picture is licensed under "All Rights Reserved", we still can you it because its copyright has expired in Cuba, Palestine and world wild because the picture was taken in 1959 Over 50 years ago. I hope this clears the problem here. -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 06:22, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

I fixed the PD problem and I believe that PD-Egypt applies to this photo. It has been published on other site as well: [1] [2] and [3] so I think now maybe you could remove it from the "criteria for speedy deletion" unless there are more problems I am not aware of. -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 18:07, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Beaver Valley Nuclear Generating Station.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Beaver Valley Nuclear Generating Station.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 18:34, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Óðinn,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:15, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Здравствуйте[edit]

Здравствуйте, я обратился к вам с одной просьбой. Вы создавали SVG флаг-карты, а я не знаю SVG графику, поэтому прошу вас, пожалуйста, создать SVG флаг-карту Нагорного Карабаха. Дмитрий-5-Аверин (talk) 16:56, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

  • Снова здравствуйте, извините что снова обращаюсь к вам, но, не могли бы вы, пожалуйста, создать ещё один файл: SVG флаг-карту Сомалиенда. Дмитрий-5-Аверин (talk) 14:43, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
  • Спасибо большое! Дмитрий-5-Аверин (talk) 08:48, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Flag-map[edit]

Hello, I want to appeal to you, happened to notice a theme from the top, where a party requests that you flag SVG map. I also love the SVG flag map. And so could you please create SVG flag map Azad Jammu and Kashmir, flag map Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (with this flag Flag of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (1996-2007).svg), and Flag-map of the Republic of Srpska. If you agree, thanks in advance. Regards, Dmitry. (talk) 09:38, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

  • I have not thought about it. And could you make two flag-mapS: Bosnian flag, and in other? Regards, Dmitry. (talk) 15:47, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Krai of Russia[edit]

Good time of day, I want to ask you to create a flag-map the edges of Russia (except for the Primorsky, Khabarovsk and Zabaykalsky Krai) and Flag-map of St. Petersburg and Moscow. If you agree, thank you very much! DIano (talk) 17:08, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Trametes versicolor stump.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trametes versicolor stump.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Desert varnish - Valley of Fire State Park.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Desert varnish - Valley of Fire State Park.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Valerian Kuybyshev.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Valerian Kuybyshev.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sreejith K (talk) 18:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

San Francisco Peaks - Bonito Park.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Francisco Peaks - Bonito Park.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Petrified dune - Valley of Fire.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petrified dune - Valley of Fire.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Overlook trail view - Zion Canyon.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Overlook trail view - Zion Canyon.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Horse carcass - Moccasin Mountain Dinosaur Tracksite.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horse carcass - Moccasin Mountain Dinosaur Tracksite.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

View from the Overlook Trail.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from the Overlook Trail.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

East Temple - Overlook Trail.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! East Temple - Overlook Trail.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mount Spry and the East Temple.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Spry and the East Temple.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Angels Landing and the Great White Throne.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angels Landing and the Great White Throne.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bleached sandstone - Valley of Fire.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bleached sandstone - Valley of Fire.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Aztec Sandstone - Valley of Fire.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aztec Sandstone - Valley of Fire.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Conchoidal fracture - Aztec Sandstone.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Conchoidal fracture - Aztec Sandstone.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sunrise in the Valley of Fire.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunrise in the Valley of Fire.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Angels Landing - Zion Canyon.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angels Landing - Zion Canyon.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Aztec Sandstone - Valley of Fire1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aztec Sandstone - Valley of Fire1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Aztec Sandstone - Valley of Fire2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aztec Sandstone - Valley of Fire2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Badwater, Death Valley.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Badwater, Death Valley.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sunset Crater1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset Crater1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Soft sediment deformation.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soft sediment deformation.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Copyright[edit]

It says you reviewed this as CC generic. The image's licence appears to be very clearly CC ND NC. Would you care to comment? Fifelfoo (talk) 15:10, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

St George panorama.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St George panorama.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Building 20.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building 20.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Petit Champlain and MS Maasdam.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petit Champlain and MS Maasdam.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Navajo Sandstone1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Navajo 1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Pine Valley Mountains.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pine Valley Mountains.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Staff Headquarters of the Royal 22 Regiment.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Staff Headquarters of the Royal 22 Regiment.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Invitation - Featured picture voting[edit]

Dear Óðinn,

Thank you very much for your last participating in a featured picture voting about a musical instrument. I would kindly ask you if you would like to give your vote (and comments) in this featured picture voting about an upright piano of mahogany "Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Steinway & Sons upright piano, model K-52 (mahogany finish), manufactured at Steinway's factory in New York City.jpg" before it ends on 23 Jun 2012 at 08:07:03 (UTC). The rules says that there has to be at least 7 supporting votes and a ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority).[4]

Thanks!

Yours sincerely, --Hereiamfriends (talk) 08:45, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Glacial pothole.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glacial pothole.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Victoria Falls, Black River.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victoria Falls, Black River.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Black River panorama.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Black River panorama.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Karl Island, Reykjanes.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karl Island, Reykjanes.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Skaftafellsjökull panorama.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skaftafellsjökull panorama.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Skaftafellsjökull panorama1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skaftafellsjökull panorama1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Skeiðarárjökull and Morsárdalur.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skeiðarárjökull and Morsárdalur.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Magni and Goðahraun.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magni and Goðahraun.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Aztec Sandstone - Red Rock Canyon.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aztec Sandstone - Red Rock Canyon.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Eldhraun.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eldhraun.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Núpsa and Súla1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Núpsa and Súla1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fjaðrárgljúfur.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fjaðrárgljúfur.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Magni and Goðahraun1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magni and Goðahraun1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Suomenlinna visitor centre.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suomenlinna visitor centre.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Light on a French church[edit]

Hi, Óðinn ! Thanks for your vote concerning my file "Exterior view of Church of Villars-en-Pons (XIIth and XVth centuries)", but I nominated it yesterday evening without correcting the light properly. So, this morning, I've uploaded a new file which is a bit better in my opinion. -- I just wanted to make you know this change : tell me, please, if you disagree. Thanks in advance. Best regards. JLPC (talk) 09:09, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Suomenlinna Church1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suomenlinna Church1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Suomenlinna Church.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suomenlinna Church.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Flag on the license[edit]

Sorry to disturb, I have one little question. How do you add the Canadian flag to the license? --Ivar (talk) 15:02, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Meritullintori 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meritullintori 1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Pietarin kalansaalis.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pietarin kalansaalis.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MS Silja Symphony.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS Silja Symphony.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Voima icebreaker.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Voima icebreaker.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Meritullintori and Pohjoisranta.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meritullintori and Pohjoisranta.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Miltary Museum Manege.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Miltary Museum Manege.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

University of Helsinki, Faculty of Behavioural Sciences.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! University of Helsinki, Faculty of Behavioural Sciences.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hotel Grand Marina.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Grand Marina.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Vaasa Barracks.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vaasa Barracks.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bastion Bielke and Curtain Building.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bastion Bielke and Curtain Building.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Majakkalaiva Relandersgrund.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Majakkalaiva Relandersgrund.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MS Suokki.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS Suokki.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MS Mariella.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS Mariella.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

East wing (Noah's Ark).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! East wing (Noah's Ark).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Andrew Gray (talk) 20:49, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Uspenski Cathedral 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uspenski Cathedral 2.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:40, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hull Marina, Jacques-Cartier Park.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hull Marina, Jacques-Cartier Park.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Canadian Museum of Civilization panorama.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canadian Museum of Civilization panorama.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pont Alexandra.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Alexandra.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Portage III.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portage III.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gatineau paper mill effluent treatment plant.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gatineau paper mill effluent treatment plant.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ottawa skyline panorama1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ottawa skyline panorama1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#March_7.2C_2013[edit]

Thank you for your feedback. I have fixed the image the way you suggested. --Godot13 (talk) 05:21, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

The Rideau Falls.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Rideau Falls.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

The Rideau Falls and the John G. Diefenbaker Building.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Rideau Falls and the John G. Diefenbaker Building.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tobolsk Kremlin panorama1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tobolsk Kremlin panorama1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

The East Square Tower and the Bishop's Stable.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The East Square Tower and the Bishop's Stable.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

The Gubernatorial Museum.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Gubernatorial Museum.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

The Northern Holy Gates.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Northern Holy Gates.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Invite to a discussion[edit]

Hi Óðinn, I noted a lot of contribution of good images from you and a flickr review of this file. I'm just a new user with few or none knowledge about copyright, so I would invite you on this discussion because probably you could give a good opinion. It's an important discussion since it would be applicable to thousands of similar files. The basic question is: a picture of a car is under copyright? Thank you very much, -- Fulvio 314 18:17, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Talk closed, file removed. Have a nice weekend, -- Fulvio 314 12:09, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Don't be afraid, anyway, may be next time... :) -- Fulvio 314 05:19, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

The Monks' Building2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Monks' Building2.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

The Bishop's Stable.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Bishop's Stable.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

The Northeastern Corner Round Tower and the Monks' Building.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Northeastern Corner Round Tower and the Monks' Building.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

The Northeastern Corner Round Tower.1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Northeastern Corner Round Tower.1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

The Southern Round Tower.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Southern Round Tower.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

The Bishop's Lodge.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Bishop's Lodge.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

The Southern Round Tower2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Southern Round Tower2.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

The Southern Round Tower1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Southern Round Tower1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

The Southeastern Quadrangular Tower.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Southeastern Quadrangular Tower.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

The Monks' Building and the East Square Tower.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Monks' Building and the East Square Tower.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

The Southeastern Corner Round Tower.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Southeastern Corner Round Tower.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

The Southeastern Corner Round Tower1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Southeastern Corner Round Tower1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

The East Square Tower.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The East Square Tower.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Archangel Michael Cathedral.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Archangel Michael Cathedral.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Zachary and Elizabeth Church.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zachary and Elizabeth Church.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Commercial-industrial building, 1 Mir St..JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Commercial-industrial building, 1 Mir St..JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

The Treasury, Tobolsk Kremlin1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Treasury, Tobolsk Kremlin1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

The Bishop's House2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Bishop's House2.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sophia Courtyard.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sophia Courtyard.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

The Bishop's Lodge1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Bishop's Lodge1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

The water tower on Remezov Square1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The water tower on Remezov Square1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Óðinn,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Óðinn,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Las Cuevas trailhead.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Las Cuevas trailhead.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Pilón Formation.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pilón Formation.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hotel Club Amigo Farallon del Caribe.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Club Amigo Farallon del Caribe.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sierra Maestra near Marea del Portillo.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sierra Maestra near Marea del Portillo.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Carretera Granma1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carretera Granma1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Pico Cuba.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pico Cuba.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sierra Maestra panorama.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sierra Maestra panorama.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Carretera Granma.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carretera Granma.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sierra Maestra panorama1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sierra Maestra panorama1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:2014 Crimean referendum ballot.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2014 Crimean referendum ballot.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Максим Підліснюк (talk) 11:38, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Donetsk status referendum ballot.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Donetsk status referendum ballot.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

176.14.102.90 08:38, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Herbert McLuhan reading newspaper.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Herbert McLuhan reading newspaper.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Asclepias (talk) 00:32, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Marshall McLuhan holding a mirror.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Marshall McLuhan holding a mirror.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Asclepias (talk) 00:52, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Birth of a City.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Birth of a City.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

The Ural Mining School building.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Ural Mining School building.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Assumption Cathedral, Omsk1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption Cathedral, Omsk1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Assumption Cathedral, Omsk.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption Cathedral, Omsk.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sevastyanov's Mansion.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastyanov's Mansion.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tobolsk Gate.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tobolsk Gate.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tobolsk Gate1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tobolsk Gate1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tobolsk Gate2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tobolsk Gate2.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Red Way.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Way.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

View from the Tukhachevskiy's Quay.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from the Tukhachevskiy's Quay.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Water tower at the City Pond, Yekaterinburg.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water tower at the City Pond, Yekaterinburg.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Battle of Svensksund memorial.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Battle of Svensksund memorial.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Laivastokatu 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laivastokatu 3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hostel Suomenlinna.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hostel Suomenlinna.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Artillery arsenal.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Artillery arsenal.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Crownwork Ehrensvärd - east wing.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crownwork Ehrensvärd - east wing.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Irtysh Gate.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Irtysh Gate.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Uspenski Cathedral plaque.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uspenski Cathedral plaque.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Suomenlinnakeskus.jpeg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suomenlinnakeskus.jpeg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kruunuvuorenkatu 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kruunuvuorenkatu 11.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kruunuvuorenkatu.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kruunuvuorenkatu.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kruunuvuorenkatu 5.jpeg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kruunuvuorenkatu 5.jpeg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kuninkaanportti.jpeg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuninkaanportti.jpeg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pohjoisesplanadi.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pohjoisesplanadi.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MS King.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS King.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Katajanokanlaituri.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katajanokanlaituri.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Pohjoisesplanadi1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pohjoisesplanadi1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bastioni Stromberg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bastioni Stromberg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.