User talk:Андрей Романенко

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Freedom of Panorama in Italy[edit]

Unfortunately, the Italian law does now allow the "freedom of panorama" clause you invoke: please read here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_panorama#Italy Please take note: Russia seems to have such a right http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_panorama#Commonwealth_of_Independent_States (so what you say is correct, as per Russia), but only for non-commercial uses, whereas Commons allows commercial use of its pictures, therefore uploading pictures might be a problem also for copyrighted works of art (i.e. whose author has not been dead for at least 60 years) in Russia too. I am sorry, I had to delete a lot of pictures of mine too :-( --User:G.dallorto 10:54, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Ubaidi Zokoni.jpg[edit]

Hi Andrei, thanks for your comments that you left in my user talk page about image Tagging. I tried to find out Immodinova C. but could not find her. As you see her name is clearly included. If Commons decides to delete Immodinova C. works, for now I cannot do anything. --Ibrahimjon 03:10, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello Andrei, I just have found out Immodinova. Look here, the information about Immodinova is in Russian.--Ibrahimjon (talk) 13:19, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Image:Layans-project.jpg[edit]

Hi. I put the template into the image description page because the policy you linked me states: "In the United States...". So, in others jurisdictions, publication of photographs taken in a public place may be a personality rights violation (IANAL, I only read that page :). However, {{Personality rights}} is only a warning for reusers, like {{Trademarked}}, {{FOP}} and so on. Bye--Trixt (talk) 23:48, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token d2407d69fd78108f5c8800fee1e95042[edit]

I am now owner of a TUSC account. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 13:49, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Victory Day[edit]

Hello Andrej!

Do you live in Moscow? If yes: Are you in Moscow on May 9th, 2009. In that the Victory Day military parade takes place in Moscow. If you have time, could you please take some photos of the vehicles and upload them to Commons? After you have uploaded them, you can contact me, I help you to categorize the photos. Would be great, if it works! Best regards --High Contrast (talk) 07:52, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry but I would be pretty far from Moscow on May 9th, 2009. I asked my collegues from ru.wiki Project for War Technics. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:03, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
OK, thank you! --High Contrast (talk) 07:48, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Sajo-rus.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sajo-rus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--sугсго 08:07, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Photos you want deleted[edit]

I've recently disagreed with you on a bunch of photos you want deleted, so I thought I'd drop by and talk more directly.

In general, Commons does not require the same level of notability as Wikipedia. In general, anything "instructional or informative" can be on Commons. You might look at Commons:Scope#Examples for some good examples of what would be out of scope. It seems to me that most of what you are tagging is of considerably more value/relevance than the examples given. - Jmabel ! talk 04:28, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

This list of unproper images includes "advertising or self-promotion". Actually, these photos are self-promotion of a certain local political group (and the article about this group is deleted from ru.wiki). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 18:55, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

(1) You didn't mention anything about self-promotion on your various deletion requests, you just raised non-notability. (2) It seems to me that for political groups self-promotion is a tricky thing to determine: who that is not at least sympathetic to a particular political group/rally/action is likely ever to upload photos of them? (3) Perhaps we should consider consolidating discussion of these, if they are all related to one organization? - Jmabel ! talk 22:54, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

You are right, it is quite reasonable that the pictures of some political group (or any other institution - rock band, let's say) usually are uploaded by a partisan of this group. And as far as this group is notable, we would not object. But if we decided that the group itself is not notable, it seems quite reasonable to treat the pictures of this group as advertising and self-promotion and therefore subject for deletion. If you suppose that some of these pictures could be used to illustrate something other than an article about this group, - maybe it would be possible to keep them; but without exact description of the photos keeping them would be rather sensless, I guess. (I don't know if it is reasonable to consolidate discussion; please do it if you feel like this.) Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:13, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
I'll set up a place for consolidated discussion. - Jmabel ! talk 05:32, 13 October 2009 (UTC)


File tagging File:Bernstein with TV Camera.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bernstein with TV Camera.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Infrogmation (talk) 14:47, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Пожалуйста[edit]

Простите меня пожалуйста. Я брльше не буду вандализировать. Только пожалуста разблокируйте меня. Daniil0299

File:Stolibottle.PNG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Stolibottle.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kelly (talk) 00:15, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Lenin_and_hotel.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lenin_and_hotel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PereslavlFoto (talk) 23:34, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Про перевод[edit]

Дело в том, что я переводил по смыслу. Слово "жиды" в просторечии давно потеряло национальный оттенок, вспомните анекдот про китайский конфликт, когда после лекции об ошибках Мао Цзедуна рабочий видит на улице казаха с характерными чертами лица и шипит ему в спину: «Уууу, жидовская морда». Вот поэтому kikes, на мой взгляд, не передаёт смысла «алчных и коварных заграничных людей». Новый вариант перевода сводит эту многослойную политику к одному шовинизму.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:14, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Английская википедия сводит kikes к 1904 году, к переезду восточноевропейских евреев в США. Поэтому слово напрочь не передаёт польского заимствования "жидов", возникшего на сотни лет раньше (в XVI или XVII веке). Впрочем, главное здесь то, что "жиды" в русском языке давно уже не означают евреев, точно как и "власть жидов" не означает правительства Израиля, а скорее слияние крупных предпринимателей с министрами и правительством.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:19, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Это Ваша личная точка зрения, а вовсе не то, что написано на доске. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 18:33, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Так ведь слово kikes на доске тоже не написано. Оно обозначает тех восточноевропейских евреев, которые выехали после 1904 года в США, то есть напрочь другой смысл.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:50, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Слово "kike" является наиболее употребительным оскорбительным наименованием евреев в современном английском языке, с чего и начинается статья en:Kike: "a derogatory slur used to refer to a Jew"; см. также, например, определения авторитетных английских словарей (например, [1]). О том, что это слово является наиболее распространённым аналогом русского слова "жид", можно узнать из статьи ru:Жид. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:16, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Так ведь на лозунге речь не про евреев, а про «жидов», про ZOG то есть. В статье русской википедии в разделе «Переносные (не национальные) значения» буквально повторяют мою мысль — «жадный или коварный человек». Похоже, что для большей ясности нужен и смысловой перевод (мой), и буквальный (ваш). Спасибо за дополнение перевода!--PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:36, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Английская википедия вашей ссылки на словарь не даёт, впрочем, тут интереснее другое. В вашей ссылке на словарь написано, что словом этим пользоваться не следует, потому что оно весьма оскорбительное. А тут, получается, оскорбляем попусту.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:39, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
В русском языке это слово тоже оскорбительное и не рекомендовано в употреблению. Ваши собственные интерпретации оставьте при себе. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:26, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Это не просто собственные интерпретации. Делая фотоснимок, автор фотографии счёл, что здесь политический лозунг. Поэтому я буду и впредь исправлять сделанное вами описание так, чтобы подчеркнуть авторскую мысль, заложенную в фотоснимке. Сейчас я записал и ваше, и авторское мнение.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:59, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Скажите пожалуйста, зачем же повторять оскорбительный контекст, если тут чистой воды социальный протест?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 21:09, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Я вернул версию Андрея Романенко в соответствии с русско-английским словарем. Автор фотографии не имеет специальных прав по интерпретации изображенного на фотографии, если интерпретация основана не на достоверном знании (условно, "я снимал этот канализационный люк в Москве, а не в Париже"), а на догадках ("Я думаю, тут имелись в виду иностранцы"). P.S. Пожалуйста, не ведите войну правок дальше. --Blacklake (talk) 13:05, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Do not delete relevant useful information from file description pages[edit]

My Russian is rather minimal, and I'm not really taking a side on the whole controversy, but the following information is necessary for non-Russian speakers to even begin to understand the controversy, and should NOT be removed from the image description page: -- AnonMoos (talk) 18:48, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Grafitti reads: «Долой власть жидов», where the literal meaning of the word «жид» is a derogatory term for «Jew». (The non-derogatory Russian word for «Jew» is «еврей».)

File:Yizhakevych.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Yizhakevych.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ymblanter (talk) 15:28, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Felix Dzerzhinskiy bust in Cheboksary.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Felix Dzerzhinskiy bust in Cheboksary.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:10, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Memorial belfry in Norilsk.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Memorial belfry in Norilsk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:12, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Abay Opera House in winter.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Abay Opera House in winter.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:14, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Inner square between Yaroslavsky and Leningradsky stations.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Inner square between Yaroslavsky and Leningradsky stations.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:18, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Almaty Hotel in Almaty.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Almaty Hotel in Almaty.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:19, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Popov monument in Kronstadt.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Popov monument in Kronstadt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:22, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Organ-Concert-Hall-in-Perm.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Organ-Concert-Hall-in-Perm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:32, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Vtorov.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vtorov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:38, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Novosibirsk-puppet-theatre.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Novosibirsk-puppet-theatre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:40, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Мелкие правки[edit]

Просьба помечать такие правки как мелкие (minor edit) (в противном случае за каждую правку на пчоту приходи письмо).Anatoliy (talk) 14:04, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Teodors Reiters.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Teodors Reiters.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Edgars2007 (talk) 07:16, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Вікі любить Землю, 1–31 травня / Wiki Loves Earth, May 1–31, 2014[edit]

WLE Austria Logo (no text).svg

Вітаємо!

З 1 по 31 травня 2014 буде проходити конкурс «Вікі любить Землю», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Цього року конкурс став міжнародним. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in english) 20:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

File:The lion in front of administrative building in Monrepos park, Vyborg.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:The lion in front of administrative building in Monrepos park, Vyborg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Apalsola tc 14:13, 23 July 2014 (UTC)