File:Cricket bat.jpg was deleted supposedly for copyvio. This is my bat and i took the picture but it is being said that since the design is said to be copyrighted it was deleted without even having a discussion 1st. And I don't think falls into Commons:Derivative works because its not a 3d object. Can you please correct this.--Thugchildz 20:54, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Then, I don't think any sports or other stuff would have been here, because most balls bats etc have logos on it. The object isn't copyrighted so how is that derivative work? The logo is but it isn't a picture of the logo.--Thugchildz 22:23, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Can you take a look now at the Commons:Undeletion_requests#Image:Cricket_bat.jpg, and please undelete it. Because I don't think it would be re-deleted. He suggested that i take of the sticker of the bat, but that would ruin the looks of my bat and plus there are other pictures just like this but those are not deleted. And so please undeleted it now.--Thugchildz 17:14, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
The castle in Podhorce images
Hello. I ask you to block the user Ejdzej for some time and to get accustomed with the history of the files and the information provided by me (Riva72, the photos uploader --126.96.36.199 23:07, 31 March 2007 (UTC)). I am free to modify the photos as the licence informs. It is not spoiling - it is modyfing (for me, it is very artistic). Besides, I inform that Oksana (the author of this photo)and Riva72 (the authorized uploader) do not wish the Polish wikipedia to use the original photos. I ask you, the administrator, to unblock my acces (as the user Riva72) to the Commons project.
The images in question:
--188.8.131.52 23:07, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Someone was playing silly games with Image:Kurdistana Sor.jpeg and the deletion request. Reverted both and warned the named user but thought you might want to know --Herby talk thyme 12:59, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Commonsa yüklediğiniz bazı resimler (Image:Zidane222.JPG,Image:Duyguasena.JPG gibi) tarayicidan cıkmışa benzıyor. Dergideki ve gazetedeki resimlerin kopyasını çıkarmak (fotoğraf makınası ile olsa bıle) dergi/gazete sahibinin telif haklarını ihlal eder. Commonsa yüklediğiniz resimler telifli olmamalıdır. -- Cat chi? 19:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
To finish what I've started
I asked you for your opinion a few days ago. I have chosen you to express a few words because you are the Commons administrator. OK - I have got your response in the case at the English Wikipedia.. Anyway, I think it is not rude on my part to finish exchanging any ideas with you (this time with my IP-signature) by placing this invitation:
Help with turkish site
Hello Cool Cat, can you check the copyright status on http://www.tcdd.gov.tr/genel/istatistik.htm please? It is the source of Image:Turkish State Railways Annual Statistics 2001-2005.pdf. Thank you. --GeorgHH 12:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your help! --GeorgHH 15:48, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Stupit bots! anyway bot you are wrong in my saikano logo! ITS ON WIKIPEDIA.ORG!!! I can upload wilirelated s***! So you Mecha Bot? GO GET YOUR OWNER AND TELL HIM/HER/IT TO FIX YOU!!!KANPAI!!!--Chris Hansen Fan 16:26, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
You've persecuted us for generations... And now you beg us to aid you?
"We do it for Aiur" - that's from Starcraft, isn't it? --Sven 20:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Image:Schneider Trophy 2006-08-10.jpg deletion
Hi, I have just found out you deleted my photo Image:Schneider Trophy 2006-08-10.jpg. I haven't been online for a while (technical difficulties) and missed the debate. I understand the reason you deleted the file was Commons Derivative works policy. However, on the "Commons:Freedom of panorama" page it states:
United Kingdom Section 62 of the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, allows photographers to take pictures of (a) buildings, and (b) sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship (if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public) without breaching copyright. Such photographs may be published in any way.
This would mean that my photo of the Schneider cup trophy should be fine as regards Commons Derivative works policy.