User talk:とある白い猫/Archive/2007/04

とある白い猫 A Certain White Cat Bilinen Bir Beyaz Kedi User Page | Office | Talk Page | Bot edits | Sandbox #1 | #2 EN JA TR Meta Hello this is an Archive. Please do not edit. You are welcome to post comments regarding material here at my user talk page. Always believe in yourserf and your dreams, you have a wing!

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2006 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2012 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2007 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2013 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2008 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2014 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2009 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2015 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2010 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2016 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2011 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 2017 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12

——————————————— Archive, April 2007 ——————————————— help was deleted supposedly for copyvio. This is my bat and i took the picture but it is being said that since the design is said to be copyrighted it was deleted without even having a discussion 1st. And I don't think falls into Commons:Derivative works because its not a 3d object. Can you please correct this.--Thugchildz 20:54, 31 March 2007 (UTC) It was speedy deleted for the reasons given on the user's talk page. --MichaelMaggs 21:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Hi, I am inclined to agree with MichaelMaggs, the pattern on the bat may be considered a derivative work. You are welcome to appeal at Commons:Undeletion requests. -- Cat chi? 22:13, 31 March 2007 (UTC) How would it be considered derivative work? Its a 2d object.--Thugchildz 22:16, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Copyright is a complicated thing. The photographed object is a 3d object (the bat), the logo itself is 2d. You are replicating the copyrighted logo with a camera. -- Cat chi? 22:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Then, I don't think any sports or other stuff would have been here, because most balls bats etc have logos on it. The object isn't copyrighted so how is that derivative work? The logo is but it isn't a picture of the logo.--Thugchildz 22:23, 31 March 2007 (UTC) My comment isn't absolute. Your best bet would be at Commons:Undeletion requests. I cannot undelete the image even if I agree with you. MichaelMaggs or some other person could simply redelete it. That is why an undeletion request discussion saves everyone time. -- Cat chi? 22:28, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Can you take a look now at the Commons:Undeletion_requests#Image:Cricket_bat.jpg, and please undelete it. Because I don't think it would be re-deleted. He suggested that i take of the sticker of the bat, but that would ruin the looks of my bat and plus there are other pictures just like this but those are not deleted. And so please undeleted it now.--Thugchildz 17:14, 1 April 2007 (UTC) The castle in Podhorce images Hello. I ask you to block the user Ejdzej for some time and to get accustomed with the history of the files and the information provided by me (Riva72, the photos uploader --213.199.192.60 23:07, 31 March 2007 (UTC)). I am free to modify the photos as the licence informs. It is not spoiling - it is modyfing (for me, it is very artistic). Besides, I inform that Oksana (the author of this photo)and Riva72 (the authorized uploader) do not wish the Polish wikipedia to use the original photos. I ask you, the administrator, to unblock my acces (as the user Riva72) to the Commons project. The images in question: Image:Caspod1.gif Image:Caspod2.gif Image:Caspod3.gif Image:Caspod4.gif Image:Caspod5.gif Image:Caspod6.gif Image:Caspod7.gif Image:Caspod8.gif --213.199.192.60 23:07, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Hello! Have you seen that "modification"? It's very "artistic" indeed, but this particular images are used in pl:Zamek w Podhorcach and other articles not for artism, but for information. This article was written mainly by Riva72, who put a dedication into it and engaged in edit war and useless deletion request when it was removed according to Wikipedia rules. He tried trolling and other disruptive activities later on pl:Wiki. That's why I'm sure that his reasons are false and this "artistic" modification of those photos are part of his revenge campaign. Please consult some other Polish admins on Commons:Bar if you want to verify my words. Cheers! A.J. 06:21, 1 April 2007 (UTC) en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flags of ethnic groups Hi. Left you a note on your en.wikipedia talk page: en:User talk:Cool Cat. --A. B. 10 (talk) 15:06, 3 April 2007 (UTC) (en:User:A. B. on en.wikipedia) User talk:Cem323 He's probably Turkish so I was hoping you could help me out. Thanks, Yonatan talk 07:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC) I posted a message to the user. -- Cat chi? 20:00, 7 April 2007 (UTC) "Obvious" socks I sure you looked but User:Mappase was contributing in a small way before any of the others arrived on the scene --Herby talk thyme 17:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC) Two image moves, yes I noticed. I also collected info here: Commons:Deletion requests/Private scouting and school images (2007-04-04) -- Cat chi? 17:36, 4 April 2007 (UTC) Heads up Someone was playing silly games with Image:Kurdistana Sor.jpeg and the deletion request. Reverted both and warned the named user but thought you might want to know --Herby talk thyme 12:59, 7 April 2007 (UTC) See: this link. Users were sockpuppets of a soon-to-be-blocked user from en.wikipedia (PD 1, PD 2) -- Cat chi? 17:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC) İyi Günler Commonsa yüklediğiniz bazı resimler (Image:Zidane222.JPG,Image:Duyguasena.JPG gibi) tarayicidan cıkmışa benzıyor. Dergideki ve gazetedeki resimlerin kopyasını çıkarmak (fotoğraf makınası ile olsa bıle) dergi/gazete sahibinin telif haklarını ihlal eder. Commonsa yüklediğiniz resimler telifli olmamalıdır. -- Cat chi? 19:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC) Merhaba, eskiden yüklediğim flu Zidane ve Duygu Asena fotoğraflar tarafımdan gazeteden çekilmişti ve onların silinmesi için deneyimli bir kullanıcıdan bu konuda yardım isteyecektim. Evet, şimdi ne yapmalıyım? Şimdiden teşekkür ederim, tr:Kullanıcı_mesaj:Bahar101 --Bahar101 20:39, 7 April 2007 (UTC) Bunları ben silebilirim. Anlayışınız için teşekkurler. -- Cat chi? 20:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC) To finish what I've started I asked you for your opinion a few days ago. I have chosen you to express a few words because you are the Commons administrator. OK - I have got your response in the case at the English Wikipedia.. Anyway, I think it is not rude on my part to finish exchanging any ideas with you (this time with my IP-signature) by placing this invitation: Cool Cat, I invite you to read the message and to voice your opinion at: [1], if you please.. If you feel like writing a commment, please do it.. I think this may also put the end to our disputes here.. I will not bother you again. Thank you. --213.199.192.60 11:24, 8 April 2007 (UTC) Help with turkish site Hello Cool Cat, can you check the copyright status on http://www.tcdd.gov.tr/genel/istatistik.htm please? It is the source of Image:Turkish State Railways Annual Statistics 2001-2005.pdf. Thank you. --GeorgHH 12:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC) TCDD Genel Müdürlüğü © BYHİM Web ve İnteraktif Hizmetler Bürosu tarafından hazırlanıp, güncelleştirilmektedir. Site is a full copyright, I have deleted the image. -- Cat chi? 15:45, 16 April 2007 (UTC) Thanks for your help! --GeorgHH 15:48, 16 April 2007 (UTC) X_X Stupit bots! anyway bot you are wrong in my saikano logo! ITS ON WIKIPEDIA.ORG!!! I can upload wilirelated s***! So you Mecha Bot? GO GET YOUR OWNER AND TELL HIM/HER/IT TO FIX YOU!!!KANPAI!!!--Chris Hansen Fan 16:26, 18 April 2007 (UTC) Greetings, what seems to be the matter? User:Editor at Large is a commons administrator and not a bot. -- Cat chi? 16:30, 18 April 2007 (UTC) THAT STUPIT MECHA THING WANTS MY NONCOPYRIGHTED INAGE GONE!!! Can you please tell it to F*** OFF?!!! Most of the images i use has no tag on the site!!! this image can from the saikano section of saikano on WIKIPEDIA!!! KANPAI!!!--Chris Hansen Fan 16:33, 18 April 2007 (UTC) That "stupid mecha" happens to be a commons administrator. You are required to be civil to all users (including administrators) or you risk getting yourself blocked. As for the images in question it is only natural to tag images as "unlicensed" if you do not license them. -- Cat chi? 20:11, 18 April 2007 (UTC) Starcraft You've persecuted us for generations... And now you beg us to aid you? We will do what we must... But we do it for Aiur, not you! "We do it for Aiur" - that's from Starcraft, isn't it? --Sven 20:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC) Entire phrase is from starcraft yes. -- Cat chi? 22:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC) Image:Schneider Trophy 2006-08-10.jpg deletion Hi, I have just found out you deleted my photo Image:Schneider Trophy 2006-08-10.jpg. I haven't been online for a while (technical difficulties) and missed the debate. I understand the reason you deleted the file was Commons Derivative works policy. However, on the "Commons:Freedom of panorama" page it states: United Kingdom Section 62 of the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, allows photographers to take pictures of (a) buildings, and (b) sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship (if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public) without breaching copyright. Such photographs may be published in any way. This would mean that my photo of the Schneider cup trophy should be fine as regards Commons Derivative works policy. —the preceding unsigned comment was added by Trounce (talk • contribs) Thank you for pointing that out, I have undeleted the image. Sorry for any stress I might have caused. -- Cat chi? 13:18, 25 April 2007 (UTC) No problem, Thanks for restoring it.Cheers.--Trounce 13:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)