User talk:-jkb-

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archiv

Gelaber, Dummschwatz, Sockenedits und sonstiges dieser Art wird hier nicht beachtet bzw. umgehend entfernt

Anfrage ohne Überschrift[edit]

Wärss nicht besser dies descriptions alphabetisch zu ordnen? So jedenfalls ist das editieren mehrerer Internationaler Tags bei Bedarf erheblich einfacher. Weiterhin würde mich interessieren, warum dich der Hinweis auf Cottbus so gestört hat - das ist ja eine ex-Cottbusser Bahn. Der Hinweis war speziell deshalb angedacht, da dieser Triebwagen bereits in diversen lokalen Wikiartikeln falsch typisiert war.Sandmann4u (talk) 20:59, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bei Bildbeschreibungen ist es wohl angebrachter, die meist verbreiteten Sprachen zuerst lesen zu können. Sanskrit, Bosnisch oder Tschechisch kann ruhig nach hinten rücken. Das die Bahn (wirklich eben diese?) irgendwann in Cottbus fuhr ist eine Tatsache, die irgendwo in Artikeln sein kann, hier ist es irrelevant und verwirrend (das könnte man schließlich über zig Bahnen, Fugzeuge usw. schreiben, die irgendwann verkauft wurden). Grüsse -jkb- (talk) 14:00, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RfCU[edit]

Thank you for your support.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:04, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

my pleasure :-) -jkb- (talk) 01:23, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Udo Voigt, Stefan Rochow, Bernd Rabehl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

87.170.196.173 19:24, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meine Sperre auf de.wp[edit]

Hallo jkb,

ich wüsste gerne, warum genau du meine Frage in der Auskunft entfernt und mich gesperrt hast? Die Frage von mir hat mich wirklich interessiert und wir haben hier auch genügend Artikel zu den Emmanuelle-Filmen. Wie du an meinem Screenshot erkennen kannst, lief dieser Film sogar auf VOX. Zudem habe ich extra einen jugendfreien Screenshot gewählt, damit s keine Probleme gibt. Ich bin wirklich kein Troll, sondern die Sockenpuppe einer Benutzerin, die die Frage in der Auskunft wirklich interessiert hätte.

Zudem habe ich durchaus schon enzyklopädische Mitarbeit geleistet, vgl. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ButterflyToy1.jpg

Falls du meine Frage nach wie vor für sperrwürdig hältst: Könntest du meine Sperre vielleicht wenigstens auf eine Woche o.Ä. zu reduzieren, damit ich bei Bedarf wieder eingesetzt werden kann, um für meine Eigentümerin problematische Bilder hochzuladen?

Danke und Gruß, --MasteredSockPuppet (talk) 16:04, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aha. Enzyklopädische Arbeit durchaus geleistet. Das hervorragende Ergebnis kannst du sicherlich auch mit anderen Socken fortsetzen. Lieben Gruß -jkb- (talk) 10:16, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wie soll ich denn eine neue Socke "erschaffen", wenn ich keine neuen Benutzerkonten anlegen darf? Zudem brauche ich dann doch wieder eine neue Mailadresse :(
Was genau war denn mein Vergehen, das eine infinite Sperre rechtfertigt? --MasteredSockPuppet (talk) 17:37, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ota Filip wiki de[edit]

Hallo, ich brauche Hilfe mit der Info ueber meinen Vater. Ich habe auch an

info-de@wikimedia.org

Re: "Sie haben gravierende Fehler in einem Artikel über eine lebende Person (etwa Sie selbst) entdeckt".

Ich finde es laecherlich, dass jemand denkt, dass meine Grossmutter eine polnische Opernsaengerin war, und da gibt es auch andere falsche Angaben. Ich habe eine Quelle angegeben und nun hat "Dandelo" - wiki administrator meine Veränderungen bis zum 3.November gesperrt.

Was kann man da tun?

Gruesse, Hana F.

Tak ještě jednou zdravím; na stránce User talk:-jkb-/Gallery jsme komunikovali česky, takže snad pokračuji i zde; ale přirozeně mohu pokračovat i německy.
Já se na celou věc podívám podrobněji zítra (tedy dnes, když se dívám na hodinky). Faktem je, že je nutno dodržet jisté formálie, s těmi ovšem mohu pomoci a poradit, takže bych to viděl jako asi neproblematickou akci. Zítra se tedy ozvu, přičemž je možno komunikovat jak zde tak i na německé wikipedii. Dobrou noc přeje -jkb- (talk) 23:21, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Taky zdravim, dekuji, ze jste se tak rychle ozval. Muzeme komunikovat zde. Jsem uplne nove na Wiki, takze pomoc a radu potrebuji. Dobrou noc, Evanville.


Dobře, udělám to pokud možno srozumitelně v jednotlivých bodech:
  1. bylo to očividně moc změn bez udání zdroje nebo důvodu změny, navíc uděláno zcela novým uživatelským účtem; hlavně ale neudělalo dobrý dojem odstranění onoho odstavce o problémech jakési spolupráce s StB, která je více méně pravdivá a snad i dobře formulovaná (dá se jistě ještě pozměnit), viz interview s OF zde
  2. já jsem dnes něco málo úprav zase vrátil zpět, s údajem o zdroji, který tam tedy je; mrkněte se na to, popř. tam dodejte / přeformulujte další maličkosti. Já tu stránku dnes opět odemknu, takže ji budete moci editovat
  3. Onu zmínku o StB tam ovšem nechte - je na to zdroj, a pan Filip to sám připustil (a není se za co stydět, ten tlak režimu znám sám)
  4. závěrem ještě jednu důležitou věc: očividně jste si založila více uživatelských účtů (dva tady, v historii stránky OF tam vidím ještě další). Rozhodněte se prosím pro jeden a ty ostatní nepoužívejte, na to je Wikipedie dost choulostivá a reaguje blokováním.
Ještě jednou: rád pomohu i dál, rychle mohu reagovat, když se ozvete na mé stránce německé Wikipedii, kde jsem více méně denně. Pozdravujte prosím pana Filipa, asi jednou dvakrát jsme se někde setkali na slezinách Listů Jirky Pelikána blahé paměti. -jkb- (talk) 16:08, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dekuji za rychlou pomoc. Ano, rozumim, ze jsem ty opravy delala nesikovne, proste jsem reagovala emocialne, nez rationalne a logicky. A otce budu rada pozdravovat, i kdyz anonymne. Pekne Vas zdravim.

V mnoha případech, to musím přiznat, je Wikipedie pro nováčky značně zmatečná a nesrozumitelná. Normálně se s tím vypořádáme, německá Wikipedie má i takový program pro nováčky - zprostředkuje mentory, ale nefunguje to vždy, m. j. i proto, že neustále se nějaké skupiny snaží provoz nějak zatížit, ovlivnit, manipulovat ap. To pak vede k tomu, že takové ty obranné prostředky někdy říznou i do živého - tedy vedle. Ale více méně se snažíme se s tím vypořádat.
A i pro příští hodiny/dny/týdny... : Jsem k dispozici a rád pomohu. Zdravím, -jkb- (talk) 00:21, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:RAF310Sq.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cloudbound (talk) 19:10, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:RAF311Sq.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cloudbound (talk) 19:10, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:RAF312Sq.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cloudbound (talk) 19:11, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:RAF313Sq.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cloudbound (talk) 19:13, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Hi...
Rehan Khan2050 (talk) 10:18, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Convent of the Sisters of Zion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mahane Yehuda Market sales 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:44, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ehm[edit]

Ehm, @De728631 and Ralf Roleček: , was ist nun da passiert? Ist der Ausschnitt falsch oder etwas anderes? Im Prinzip dachte ich, dass ich die Ratschläge auf Commons:Forum#Upload alter Zeitschriften befolgt habe... - ?

@De728631 and Ralf Roletschek: ping noch einmal, funktionierte nicht. -jkb- (talk) 09:36, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Es ist immer wieder erstaunlich, was hier gelöscht werden soll. Absurd. --Ralf Roleček  11:01, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Editaton Prachatice 2[edit]

Wir bereiten Editaton Prachatice (1. - 3. 11. 2019) vor. Herzliche Einladung. cs:Wikipedie:Editaton/Prachatice 2/Deutsch --Gampe (talk) 11:13, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gampe: nazdar a mnohý dík za pozvání, měním ale momentálně své priority a v důsledku toho škrtám část času, který jsem dosud věnoval Wikipedii; takže jistě bych rád, ale bohužel svou účast přislíbit nemohu. Ještě jednou dík, mnoho úspěchu, čau -jkb- (talk) 12:39, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@-jkb-: dík za info, :-(. Pokud by se našla skulina, můžeš se zúčastnit i vzdáleně. Ať se ti daří. --Gampe (talk) 15:44, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi jkb, meintest du eine Feinrotation, wie ich es jetzt mal gemacht habe? Andernfalls gerne zurücksetzen. --Túrelio (talk) 13:24, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

>Nein, es kam zuerst immer mit einer 90-Grad-Drehung nach links. In dem letzten BNild war dann alles gerade. Keine Ahnung wo es happerte... Danke, -jkb- (talk) 13:29, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

-jkb-,[edit]

Es ist besser, wenn du dich nicht in fremde Angelegenheiten einmischst und von AGF ausgehst. Unnötige VMs bringen niemandem etwas, außerdem wurde ja gerade alles mit Haeferl geklärt. Wir halten uns bitte in Zukunft beide aus den Angelegenheiten des anderen raus, dankeIntelTesla (talk) 14:09, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Přihlaste své fotky do Czech Wiki Photo 2020![edit]

Czech Wiki Photo
Czech Wiki Photo

Milí fotografové a editoři projektů Wikimedia,

každý rok společně nahrajete na Commons tisíce svobodných fotografií. Chceme vám všem poděkovat a také vás ocenit. Vyberte ty nejlepší z vašich fotek a přihlaste je do 30. 10. 2020 do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo 2020! Soutěž je otevřená i úplným nováčkům. Autoři tří nejlepších fotek si odnesou vouchery do Foto Škoda a speciální wiki-odznaky. Přihlášené fotky bude hodnotit i Honza Rybář, držitel Czech Press Photo.

Baví vás focení pro Commons i mimo soutěže? Staňte se fotografem Wikimedie, půjčujeme fototechniku a proplácíme cesty - více na Fotíme Česko.

Těšíme se na vaše snímky!
Za spolek Wikimedia Česká republika
Jakub Holzer
jakub.holzer@wikimedia.cz -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prague Clock with Hebrew letters[edit]

The image has left/right reversed, for example the Hebrew letter Gimmel is on the left, should be on the right in the 3:00 position. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hohe_Synagoge_Prag_1.jpg NealWalters (talk) 23:58, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

... but the photo is correct, see e.g. https://www.viewprague.cz/cs/vysoka-synagoga, -jkb- (talk) 17:55, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Nov 2019 Venezia ghetto 3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Italy has no freedom of panorama (work is by Arbit Blatas, d. 1999)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

DS (talk) 17:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Nov 2019 Venezia ghetto 4.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Italy has no freedom of panorama (work is by Arbit Blatas, d. 1999)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

DS (talk) 17:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]