User talk:80686

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

{{SOFTREDIRECT|de:Benutzer Diskussion:80686]]

Image:Chanalratt.jpg[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello 80686!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. 85.182.126.61 16:10, 10 March 2008 (UTC)


Image:Schriftzug_Kanal_Ratte.png[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Schriftzug_Kanal_Ratte.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

abf /talk to me/ 17:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Monitoring of the request[edit]

Good night, sorry to bother you, but advised me to speak with an OTRS volunteer, so that you do not care, do the follow-up request. The request concerns the following images: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Agarra_que_%C3%A9_honesto.png and http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vai_de_Email_a_pior.png

Thanks, Shania Twain Portugal (talk) 20:06, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Béria has taken care of it while I was in the weekend. --Manuel Schneider(bla) (+/-) 09:29, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Ok, thanks. Sílvia Gomes (talk) 11:32, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikidata logo proposal[edit]

Hey :)

Thank you a lot for your Wikidata logo submissions. We will start the voting next week. Each logo can have a short text next to it on the voting page to explain the idea behind the logo. If you want to have that for your logo please add it to the logo's page and I'll then add it to the voting page.

Good luck! --Lydia Pintscher (WMDE) (talk) 10:16, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, I have added a small text: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AWIKIDATA-80686-RGB.svg&diff=73641921&oldid=72412273 --Manuel Schneider(bla) (+/-) 11:32, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

File:2012 Wikimania 2012-07-13 19-30-11.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2012 Wikimania 2012-07-13 19-30-11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Isderion (talk) 20:41, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Notification of Wikivoyage logo contest[edit]

Hello 80686. You are receiving this message because you contributed one or more proposal(s) to the Wikidata logo contest held a few months ago. Please be aware that a new competition is being held to design a logo for the Wikimedia Foundation's newest project, Wikivoyage, a free travel guide wiki. Suggestions for designs have already begun, and will run through until about 1 November when voting will begin. The contest is described in more detail here. Feel free to enter any designs into the contest that abide by the guidelines listed at the top of the page. All the best, JamesA (talk) 08:23, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

File:2013-08-08 12-01-29 Wikimania.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:2013-08-08 12-01-29 Wikimania.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

SMUconlaw (talk) 16:09, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

File:2013-08-06 03-31-29 Wikimania.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:2013-08-06 03-31-29 Wikimania.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 18:04, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

File:2013-08-06 00-43-42 Wikimania.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:2013-08-06 00-43-42 Wikimania.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 18:04, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Bildbeschreibungen[edit]

Hallo Manuel! Bei den Beschreibungen hast Dich ein paarmal vertan, darum an der Stelle mal kurz paar Hinweise zusammengefasst:

  • [1] ist für Kalbsfond, frz. Fond blanc
  • [2] sind Rinderknoche für eine "Einfache Fleischbrühe" oder "Bouillon", fzr. Consommé blanc
  • [3] das war dann das Ergebnis, nach dem Kochen von Fleisch darin in Deutschland eine echte Fleischbrühe, in Österreich weiterhin eher ein Fond, oder die Flüssigkeit für eine Rindersuppe.
  • [4] angebratene Schweineknochen für "Großer brauner Fond", frz. Grandjus
  • [5] ist diese Grandjus beim Durchkochen und leichtem Reduzieren
  • [6] auch hier, Grandjus aus Schweineknochen
  • [7] Auffüllen der Paprikasauce mit Grandjus

Sei mir bitte nicht böse, aber wenn das jemand mit Fachkenntnisse liest, fällt ihm die falsche Tierart sicher auf ^^. Cu Oliver 85.178.64.215 08:53, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Herzlichen Dank, habe sowohl die Beschreibungen als auch die Beschriftungen im Bilder Review (de:wp-Disk) entsprechend aktualisiert.
Da gibt es nichts böse zu sein, im Gegenteil, ich bin froh, dass Du meine Fehler korrigierst. Ist doch peinlich, was falsches hier einzustellen. Grüsse, --Manuel Schneider(bla) (+/-) 18:27, 4 September 2013 (UTC)


Help.[edit]

Hello. Be so kind. confirm the license of those pictures. Here's license from the author. <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><img alt="Лицензия Creative Commons" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" /></a>
Произведение «Drawings of the artist Tatarnikov Alexander (diezelsun)» созданное автором по имени <a xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" href="http://vk.com/technoglamour_man" property="cc:attributionName" rel="cc:attributionURL">Tatarnikov Alexander (diezelsun)</a>, публикуется на условиях <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Весь мир (в т.ч. Россия и др.)</a>.
Основано на произведении с <a xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" href="http://vk.com/technoglamour_man" rel="dct:source">http://vk.com/technoglamour_man</a>.
Разрешения, выходящие за рамки данной лицензии, могут быть доступны на странице <a xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" href="http://vk.com/technoglamour_man" rel="cc:morePermissions">http://vk.com/technoglamour_man</a>.


Could you please sign license, if not difficult. File:DiezelSun..jpg, File:DiezelSun.jpg, File:Натюрморт DiezelSun.JPG, File:Sasha Grey - DiezelSun.jpg, File:DiezelSun - Св. Валентин.png, File:DiezelSun - Michael Jackson.jpg, File:Artdiezelsun2.jpg, File:DiezelSun2.jpg, File:DiezelSun15.jpg, File:Artdiezelsun.jpg, File:DiezelSunLove.jpg, File:DiezelsunUFO.jpg, File:DiezelSunAvrilLavigne.jpg, File:DiezelSun3.jpg, File:DiezelSunUFO.jpg, File:DiezelSun10.jpg, File:ДизельлайкDiezelSun.jpg, File:Ufostyle.jpg, File:Lucy Lawless7.jpg...


The author gave permission for email, but it was not enough. Now granted a license from him. Thank you very much.

File:Benutzer 80686 1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Benutzer 80686 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

A.Savin 23:50, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

File:2013-09-02 08-43-22 Wien Westbahnhof.jpg[edit]

2013-09-02 08-43-22 Wien Westbahnhof.jpg
Ziehen Sie diesen Vergleich der beiden Baureihen heran

Ich hab mir erlaubt, die Beschreibung von Ihrem links gezeigten Foto zu korrigieren, und auch die Kategorie von ICE-403/406 auf ICE T zu ändern. In der Mitte sieht man nicht einen ICE-3, sondern einen ICE-T. Wenn man das Bild vergrößert, erkennt man, daß die Seitenfenster zum Bug hin spitz zulaufen, und daß die Spitze nicht abgeschnitten ist. Auch die rote Bauchbinde ist nicht um den Bug herumgezogen. Außerdem weiß man, daß Wien regelmäßig (6 x täglich) per ICE-T bedient wird, aber nicht per ICE-3. MfG, --L.Willms (talk) 22:12, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Alles klar, ich danke Dir! --Manuel Schneider(bla) 22:18, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Marked this version for translation[edit]

Hi, Bitte die Doku lesen, du hast die Seiten falsch markiert. Bitte die TA-tags richtig verwenden, tvar & Special:MyLanguage verwenden... --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:16, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Von welcher Seite sprichst Du? --Manuel Schneider(bla) 11:31, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
von allen, bitte unbedingt die doku lesen. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:08, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Habe nun die Seiten etwas korrigiert und Navigationsbar übersetzbar gemacht. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:21, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Caspary, Daniel (de).webm[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Caspary, Daniel (de).webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Steinsplitter (talk) 13:38, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Request for feedback on my GSoC'14 proposal[edit]

Hi 80686,

I am planning to work on the project titled "Tools for mass migration of legacy translated wiki content" this summer under Google Summer of Code. I have drafted a proposal for the same over the past few weeks. This project is going to help the translation adminstrators like you in a great way, as it would completely automate the tedious manual task of preparing a page for translation and then importing the translations into the Translate extension. You can check the proposal page for detailed information on how I plan to accomplish this.

As you would be an end user of this tool, it would be great if you could go through the proposal and provide feedback/suggestions. Your feedback would definitely help me improve the proposal as well help in creating an even better tool. You can do the same on the discussion page of the proposal or reply here, whichever is convenient for you. I look forward to hearing from you! Thank you!

P.S: I need to submit the proposal to Google by March 19, 2014.

BPositive (talk) 13:47, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Please test the new feature Special:PageMigration[edit]

As a Google Summer of Code Intern, I have been working on the Mass Migration tools project for Wikimedia. We are now ready with a minimal working product. The tool helps translators and translation administrators import the old translations into the Translate Extension.

An instance of the same has been set up on labs. You can find some useful instructions on the main page.

Please test the tool and report bugs/suggestions using the link provided on the main page itself. You can have a look at the tracking bug to check already reported bugs.

Looking forward to hearing from you! Cheers. BPositive (talk) 15:01, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

[edit]

Hallo, Bitte opt-ot für Commons für diesen CN banner und lokale WatchlistNotice beantragen. Danke --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:11, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Du kannst den Banner einfach wegklicken, dann bleibt er weg. --Manuel Schneider(bla) 12:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Dann muss das jeder user mit &uselang=de. Bitte schalte ihn ab und Beantrage auf commons eine Beobachtunglisten notice. Sonst muss ich ihn über das lokal MediaWiki: abschalten und das ist ein unschöner hack. lg :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:22, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Es war eine bewusste Entscheidung des VWA-Teams (ich war anwesend), dass dieser Banner auf Commons laufen soll, da er vorallem Commons betrifft. Das Banner wurde so auch vor einigen Wochen bereits beantragt und im CN-Kalender auf Meta eingetragen. Dass der Designer des Banners einen CSS-Fehler gemacht hat ist bedauerlich, beim Test war dieser nicht zu sehen. Wurde aber auch umgehend behoben.
Ansonsten hast Du nicht zu entscheiden, was andere Benutzer auf Commons zu sehen bekommen. Die CentralNotice ist für genau solche Projekte gedacht - es geht schliesslich darum, für Commons neues, qualitativ besseres Material durch geschulte Benutzer zu bekommen und den Videoschnittserver umzusetzen. Das wurde wie gesagt im Projektteam gemeinsam mit allen Beteiligten so besprochen, und an diese Abmachungen halte ich mich.
Wenn Dich oder andere Benutzer die Banner stören können sie mit einem Klick unsichtbar gemacht werden, das muss ich Dir ja nun nicht erklären. Aber die anderen Benutzer möchten wir erreichen. --Manuel Schneider(bla) 12:26, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Das VWA-Teams hat hier nichts zu sagen, zudem bist du kein Commons-admin. Ich bitte dich also ernet sonst schalte ich es über die MediaWiki: lokal ab. Bitte respektiere die Commosn Richtlinien. Danke. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:30, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Entschuldige, das ist eine CentralNotice, absolut korrekt beantragt. --Manuel Schneider(bla) 12:31, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Ich sehe leider kein einziges Argument, ausser, dass Du persönlich VWA nicht magst. Ok, Deine Sache. Aber ich muss weder Commons-Admin sein, um ein Banner zu beantragen oder zu schalten, noch sehe ich irgendwelche Richtlinien, ausser diejenigen der Central Notice - an die ich mich gehalten habe. --Manuel Schneider(bla) 12:33, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Ist nun local abgeschaltet. Liebe grüße. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:38, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Tut mir leid - dagegen muss ich Widerspruch einlegen. Du hast keinerlei Begründung geliefert, trotz meiner Nachfrage. --Manuel Schneider(bla) 12:43, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Video Projekt[edit]

Moin, moin! Commons:Help desk#Contributing media as a film archive Evtl. kann jemand vom Projekt mal Kontakt mit User:T.werlen aufnehmen? Damit das nicht in die Hose geht.... Face-smile.svg --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:16, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Moin Hedwig in Washington, Danke für den Hinweis. Das hat sich ja schnell geklärt ;-) --79.250.14.247 12:21, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Manchmal funktionieren Dinge hier. :) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:15, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

File:2011-12-11 ORF-Zentrum 012.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:2011-12-11 ORF-Zentrum 012.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

   FDMS  4    02:33, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Wikimedia Approval for Publication.de.pdf[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wikimedia Approval for Publication.de.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 19:44, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

BTP-Videos[edit]

Ganz, ganz herzlichen Dank für die Bearbeitung und das Hochladen der vielen tollen Videos! Eine echte Bereicherung für die ganzen Wikipedia-Artikel. :-) Großen Dank auch an Marc Rudnick! Beim Einbinden der Videos in die Wikipedia-Artikel sind mir zwei Dopplungen aufgefallen, die ich lieber hier erst mal nenne, bevor ich da irgendwas dran mache: File:De Ridder, Daniela.webm und File:De Ridder, Daniel.webm sowie File:Engelmeier, Michaela.webm und File:Engelmeier-Heite, Michaela.webm. Sind die Videos tatsächlich identisch? Soll eines von ihnen gelöscht werden? Oder einfach so belassen. Liebe Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 01:40, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Martin, die ersten Videos hatte ich noch aus dem Bundestag manuell hochgeladen, der Rest kam automatisch per Bot, mit allen Daten generiert aus der Excel-Liste von Olaf. Die Falsch-Schreibungen, also File:De Ridder, Daniel.webm und File:Engelmeier, Michaela.webm müssen gelöscht werden als Duplikate. Kannst Du das direkt erledigen oder soll ich einen Löschantrag stellen?
Grüsse, --Manuel Schneider(bla) 07:28, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done -- Rillke(q?) 14:33, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

VWA 2014 - Lizenzschwierigkeiten[edit]

Mit der File:DotBERLIN.webm gibt es auch Probleme. Vielleicht magst Du die Autoren anschreiben. -- Rillke(q?) 14:23, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Das Internet der Dinge für VWA.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Das Internet der Dinge für VWA.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ALi (VWA) (talk) 08:38, 27 November 2014 (UTC)