I don't know what your motives are, but your invalid deletion requests are quite disruptive. See for example my comment in Commons:Categories for discussion/2011/09/Category:Euralille. Such actions inevitably obscure your legitimate requests, so I'm asking you to please think before clicking. — Yerpo Eh? 20:33, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Please experiment in the sandbox
- Nominating photographs of buildings for deletion citing freedom of panorama issues seems to be making an unnecessary fuss. Please think before doing this.--Ianmacm (talk) 19:27, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- Just for clarification. I referred to the one who did this. Of course you are allowed to nominate photographs for deletion if you are sure there is a problem (e.g. modern building exeeding the threshold of originality and no FoP). Thank you. -- RE rillke questions? 20:50, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- Judging by this photo, it appears that freedom of panorama is one of the issues that can provide employment opportunities for the legal profession in Luxembourg. In the USA, a photograph of a building is always considered to be copyright free if it is taken from a public viewing location--Ianmacm (talk) 10:17, 7 November 2011 (UTC).
| This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. If you're concerned with privacy, registering also hides your IP address.|