User talk:A.Axel.Kirch-Bonn

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, A.Axel.Kirch-Bonn!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 17:24, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, A.Axel.Kirch-Bonn!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:43, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

• Image:SEEHUNDE Nr2 längsseits.jpg was uncategorized on 4 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:43, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
• Image:SEEHUNDE Nr3 und 2.jpg was uncategorized on 4 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:43, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
• Image:SEEHUNDE Formation.jpg was uncategorized on 4 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:43, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
• Image:SEEHUNDE Nr2.jpg was uncategorized on 4 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:43, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Vilich-mueldorf-wegekreuz-am-herrengarten-02.jpg

Hallo P340017, ich bin gerade dabei, deine jüngst hochgeladenen Bilder von Wegekreuzen und Bildstöcken in Beuel (danke dafür!) zu kategorisieren. Mir fiel auf, dass in dem in der Überschrift verlinkten Bild die in der Dateibeschreibung angegebene Jahreszahl nicht mit der Inschrift übereinstimmt und stattdessen dieses Kreuz das 1841 errichtete an der Kreuzung Am Herrengarten/Beueler Straße sein müsste. Könntest du nachprüfen, welches Wegekreuz gemeint ist? Gruß--Leit (talk) 16:02, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Leit, Du hast recht ich werde es gleich korrigieren. --P340017 (talk) 16:19, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Rheindorf-bildstock-vilicherstrasse-grabenstrasse-03.jpg

Hallo P340017, die Skulptur sieht absolut nicht so aus als wäre sie von 17xx. Könnte es nicht sein, dass der Bildstock aus diesem Jahr ist, die Skulptur aber neueren Datums? --Túrelio (talk) 16:31, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, das ist bestimmt so --P340017 (talk) 16:42, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Category:Grabkreuzgarten St. Cäcilia (Oberkassel)

Hallo P340017, ich habe versucht so weit möglich die Jahreszahlen in der Inschrift der Kreuze zu entziffern und die jeweilige Datei in die entsprechende Jahres-Kategorie (Category:1666 crosses) eingeordnet. Falls dir weitere Baujahre der Kreuze bekannt sind, kannst du sie gerne hinzufügen. Ich hoffe, hier ist eine 5 und keine 6 gemeint, sonst müsste die Kategorie geändert werden. Gruß--Leit (talk) 17:34, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Leit, super! Vielen Dank --P340017 (talk) 06:58, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Category:Fritz-Schröder-Ufer (Bonn)

Hallo P340017, der Nepomuk-Platz liegt laut Bonner Stadtplan wohl am Übergang zwischen Hans-Steger-Ufer und Johannes-Bücher-Ufer. Ein Fritz-Schroeder-Ufer gibt es auf der Bonner Rheinseite auf Höhe der Beethovenhalle (Category:Fritz-Schroeder-Ufer). Ein Fritz-Schröder-Ufer auf der Beueler Rheinseite kann ich in keinem Kartenwerk entdecken, auch das Straßenkataster weist kein solches aus. Vielleicht handelt es sich um eine Verwechslung? Gruß--Leit (talk) 09:12, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Leit, ich habe die Angabe aus der aktuelle Denkmalliste der Stadt Bonn: "Fritz-Schröder-Ufer 37 (einschließlich Sandsteinfigur "Hl. Nepomuk", A 462);" aber Du hast Recht. Auf dem Stadtplan der Stadt Bonn findet man das Hans-Steger-Ufer, dem Nepomuk-Platz und dann kommt das Johannes-Bücher-Ufer. Gruß --P340017 (talk) 13:57, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Fritz-Schroeder-Ufer 37 ist dieses Gebäude, vor dem sich die in der Denkmalliste gemeinte Sandsteinfigur befindet. Der Bildstock am Beueler Nepomuk-Platz steht demnach nicht unter Denkmalschutz. Gruß--Leit (talk) 15:55, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Leit, eigentlich schade! Du hast ja schon alles korrigiert, Danke! --P340017 (talk) 06:52, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Bonn-stadthaus-18112014-05.JPG

Hallo Axel, die EXIF-Daten und das Datum im Dateinamen passen jetzt nicht mehr zu dem in der Infobox angegebenen Datum 23. April 2013. Könntest du mal drübersehen und gegebenfalls die Angaben korrigieren? Gruß--Leit (talk) 21:50, 26 November 2014 (UTC) Ich glaube, das hat sich schon erledigt. Ich habe die entsprechenden Korrekturen gerade selbst durchgeführt, da ich gesehen habe, dass es sich nur um einen Übertragungsfehler gehandelt hat.--Leit (talk) 21:55, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Da war doch ein falsches Datum drin, ich habe es korrigiert. --AKirch-Bonn (talk) 06:05, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

User categories

Hallo AKirch-Bonn, bitte mal Commons:User-specific_galleries,_templates_and_categories_policy#Categories beachten, kurze Info steht auch oben in der Kategorie „Unterkategorien mit {{User category|cat=Oberkategorie}}.“ Gruß --Jean11 (talk) 02:26, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Der "Ein-Mann-Bunker" am Beueler Finkenberg

Hallo Axel, besten Dank für Deine Fotos von der Splitterschutzzelle am Finkenberg. Bei diesem Foto führen mich die Geo-Koordinaten nach Berlin; kannst Du bitte mal nachsehen, wo da der Fehler liegt? Leider passt auch die Verlinkung im Bildbeschreibungstext nicht mehr genau. Man kann nicht nachvollziehen, dass und wann er an seinen jetzigen Standort gebracht wurde. Besten Dank & Gruß --Sir James (talk) 09:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Erledigt --Axel Kirch 15:36, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Prima! --Sir James (talk) 19:30, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bonn-brunnen-rosenstrasse-2016-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:06, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puetzchens-markt-2011-105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and very good composition of the "three" circular lights (moon included)! --W.carter 22:35, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigswinter-drachenfels-plateau-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collegium-albertinum-roemische-badeanlage-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontainen-obelisk-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The cut heads in the lower left corner should be cloned out. --Code 05:25, 6 September 2016 (UTC)  New version uploaded --AKirch-Bonn 14:35, 7 September 2016 (UTC)  Support Ok. --Code 21:54, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtbahnhaltestelle-ramersdorf-2016-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me now. --Hubertl 17:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bonn-altstadt-brunnen-2016-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment CA has to be removed and the perspective corrected--Ermell 19:43, 1 September 2016 (UTC)  New version uploaded --AKirch-Bonn 16:14, 8 September 2016 (UTC)  Comment The image is leaning in. --XRay 04:59, 10 September 2016 (UTC)  New version uploaded--AKirch-Bonn 15:27, 10 September 2016 (UTC) Weak  Support Acceptable, but it'S leaning out on the left now. A little bit. It would be nice if you check your image again. --XRay 16:29, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Erlauchter Kreis?

Nicht wirklich. Die von mir monierten CAs sind relativ gut sichbar und - was das Wichtigste ist - auch mit den entsprechenden Programmen leicht entfernbar. Quasi auf Knopfdruck.

Was in QI passiert ist das Einmahnen handwerklicher Grundlagen, etwas "erlauchter" gehts dann bei den Featured Images zu. Wenn ich zurückblicke, dann kann ich für mich feststellen (und ich kann dir einige Leute nennen, die das genau so sehen), dass ich ohne QI wahrscheinlich immer noch ohne Kontrolle über meine fotografischen Tätigkeiten arbeiten würde. Und mich über jedes Bild freuen würde, welches ich dann doch einigermaßen zustandegebracht habe. Ohne genau zu wissen, warum. Ich habe es einmal so formuliert: Wenn man die ersten dreihundert durchgebracht hat, dann ist jedes weitere QI kein Zufall mehr, sondern der Fotograf weiß genau, was er tut.

Was die CAs betrifft: Du hast mit dem 18-135mm kein schlechtes Objektiv (ich habe es selbst für meine Crop-Kamera), allerdings wirst du, wenn du, wie im Fall des Bildes des akademischen Kunstmuseums, hier an die Grenzen des Zooms gehst, auch automatisch die optischen Grenzen vorfinden. In diesem Fall eben die CAs. Deshalb mein Tipp - den ich auch bei meinen L-Objektiven anwende: Niemals die Grenzen versuchen, sondern Zooming by foot. Dein Objektiv ist mit einem hochentwickelten und entsprechend teurem L-Objektiv nicht vergleichbar, der Fehler wird sofort sichbar. Wenn du dann dem nicht entgegenarbeiten kannst, indem du eben mit Lightroom die CAs entfernst (es ist wirklich leicht, dafür gibts eine eigene Funktion), dann bleibt das eben als Fehler übrig. Ob ACD S dazu gleichermaßen in der Lage ist, das kann ich nicht beurteilen.

Aber genau das ist es, was eben QIs ausmachen: Die Grenzen des eigenen (oder des ausgeborgten) Equipments erkennen und den logischen Auswirkungen dieser Grenzen so gut wie möglich entgegenarbeiten. Dann kann man auch mit einer nichtprofessionellen Ausrüstung gute Bilder machen. Und denke daran: Am Zoom drehen ist immer sehr heikel, speziell dann, wenn man bei 18 oder 135mm ansteht! Dieses Problem stellt sich auch bei mir, wo ich fast durchgehend mit L-Linsen arbeite. Halt auf einem anderen Niveau. Wir, die wir halt etwas besseres Zeugs haben, werden daran beurteilt, was wir aus genau dieser, etwas besseren Ausrüstung rausholen und was nicht. Diese Fehler werden von den Kollegen deutlich strenger geahndet, oft genug auch hinter dem Vorhang, weil man sich zT persönlich kennt! --Hubertl 07:00, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Ich habe zwar gesehen, dass ACD S im Rahmen der Objektivvorgaben auch CAs zu reparieren imstande ist, wie genau das aber passiert, kann ich nicht beurteilen. --Hubertl 07:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Ein kleiner Hinweis noch: Es ist mir aus meiner Sammlung nur ein Zoom-Objektiv bekannt (jetzt von den Standard-Zooms), welches auch in den Grenzbereichen noch wirklich gut ist: Das ist das Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 II IS. Dieses Glas ist jeden Euro wert. Und zwar von 70mm bis aufwärts zu 200mm. Mir scheint allerdings, dass grundsätzlich alles, was jenseits von 50mm beginnt, weit unproblematischer ist als alles, was unter 50mm ist. Verzichtet man allerdings auf Gummilinsen, dann schleppt man wiederum endlos Festbrennweiten herum. Außer, man verzichtet darauf und sagt: 35mm (Crop) oder 50mm (Kleinbildformat), das muss reichen. Das ist auch eine Philosophie. --Hubertl 07:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Hubertl, vielen Dank für die Hinweise! Beste Grüße --Axel Kirch 08:45, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blumenmarkt-cragg-24062014-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pincushion distortion. --King of Hearts 02:41, 14 September 2016 (UTC)  New version uploaded--AKirch-Bonn 07:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)  Support --King of Hearts 04:19, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martins-relief-bonn-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:50, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bonn-puetzchens-markt-2016-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture, motion blur only where you expect to find it, but please add a better description. --W.carter 09:55, 1 October 2016 (UTC) Done--AKirch-Bonn 12:45, 1 October 2016 (UTC) Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 13:03, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bonn-puetzchens-markt-2016-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp enough, a little bit of motion blur where this could be expected so that's ok. There is however a bit of CA on the Octopuss sign, please remove it. The description also needs to be much better, like include what kind of ride it is, town and so on. W.carter 10:23, 25 September 2016 (UTC) Done--AKirch-Bonn 13:19, 1 October 2016 (UTC) Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 09:54, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Deutschlandfest-2011-045.jpg

File:Deutschlandfest-2011-045.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(t) Josve05a (c) 13:15, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bonn-bundeskunsthalle-parkomanie-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:02, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Wikivoyage

Hallo Axel Kirch, ich wollte nur mitteilen, daß ich Bilder von dir in den Artikel wikivoyage:de:Bonn/Beuel unseres Reiseführerprojektes eingebunden habe. Hättes du Lust dich bei uns zu beteiligen? und mehr deiner Bilder einzugeben? Gruß --Zaunkönig (talk) 07:17, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arp-museum-2017-38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:18, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bonn-helmut-schmidt-platz-arc-98-082017-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 13:00, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beuel-vilich-mueldorf-fussgaengerbruecke-20170917-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 20:48, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20170926-Bonn-Bad-Godesberg-Botschaft-der-VR-China-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20170926-Bonn-Bad-Godesberg-Redoute-Nymphe-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:38, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20170926-Bonn-Bad-Godesberg-Redoute-Faun-und-Nymphe-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 21:18, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Deutschland!

Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland

Hallo AKirch-Bonn!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2017! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über mehr als 20.000 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 15. Oktober die Gelegenheit, Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu sichten und zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst, die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Gern kannst Du auch deine und andere Bilder in Wikipedia einbinden.

Fotos bewerten »

Bilder in die Wikipedia einbinden »

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an infowikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(Martin Rulsch (WMDE) im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 9. Oktober 2017)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20170924-Bonn-Münsterbasilika-Innenansicht-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check your image. CAs at the windows left. --XRay 16:27, 4 October 2017 (UTC)  Done --AKirch-Bonn 09:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)  Support It'S better, but not fixed. It's a minor problem, so it's OK for QI. --XRay 18:36, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-17-bruessel-atomium-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image is nice and good but please check: there's at least one dust spot to remove. --Basotxerri 15:13, 18 October 2017 (UTC); Done --AKirch-Bonn 16:49, 20 October 2017 (UTC)  Oppose Dust spot is still there (easy to fix) --Capricorn4049 16:06, 20 October 2017 (UTC) ; Done --AKirch-Bonn 13:55, 21 October 2017 (UTC)  Support Good now --Capricorn4049 15:59, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-08-22-bonn-landesmuseum-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 13:27, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-08-22-bonn-kunstautomat-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-10-beuel-puetzchens-markt-014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:14, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-10-beuel-puetzchens-markt-004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments On the dark side but o.k. --Ermell 16:13, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-10-beuel-puetzchens-markt-044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:03, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-10-beuel-puetzchens-markt-046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:07, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-10-beuel-puetzchens-markt-079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-10-beuel-puetzchens-markt-078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --JiriMatejicek 09:16, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-10-beuel-puetzchens-markt-055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --JiriMatejicek 09:16, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-10-beuel-puetzchens-markt-094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:27, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-10-beuel-puetzchens-markt-105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 10:56, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-bonn-cop23-rheinaue-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 17:14, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-bonn-cop23-bonn-zone-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 08:35, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Deine Fotos; u.a. vom Bundesrechnungshof

Hallo Axel! Einfach mal so: herzlichen Dank für Deine vielen guten Fotos aus Bonn! Aktuell habe ich mich sehr an Deinen Aufnahmen des Bundesrechnungshofes erfreut, die Du gestern hochgeladen hast. Viele Grüße aus Beuel --Sir James (talk) 06:27, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Danke --AKirch-Bonn (talk) 18:15, 15 Januar 2018 (UTC)

File:Vilich-stiftskirche-st-peter-07.jpg

File:Vilich-stiftskirche-st-peter-07.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Vilich-stiftskirche-st-peter-32.jpg

File:Vilich-stiftskirche-st-peter-32.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-26-Bonn-Hochwasser-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would tone up the shadows a bit. Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016-10-18-bonn-muensterbasilika-innenansicht-reliquien-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-02-12-bonn-rosenmontag-2018-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 15:51, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

File:2018-04-11-bonn-josef-thiebes-strasse-05.jpg und File:2018-04-11-bonn-siegburger-strasse-40-40a-04.jpg

Hallo AKirch-Bonn, die beiden Dateien müssen zunächst aus ihrer Nutzung auf :de entfernt werden. Sonst können sie nicht gelöscht werden. --Túrelio (talk) 15:30, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

erledigt --AKirch-Bonn 18:08, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Hallo AKirch, warum handelt es sich hierbei denn um falsche Dateien? Das zweite Bild zeigt dem Anschein nach dasselbe bzw. dieselben Häuser wie File:2018-04-11-bonn-siegburger-strasse-40-40a-03.jpg und das erste wie File:2018-04-11-bonn-josef-thiebes-strasse-08.jpg. Gruß--Leit (talk) 16:20, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Ich habe den Schnelllöschantrag erstmal entfernt.--Leit (talk) 17:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Eigentlich wollte ich nur die Autokennzeichen unleserlich machen und dann die Bilder wieder hochladen :-) --AKirch-Bonn (talk) 17:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Das ist zwar eigentlich unnötig, aber bitte sehr. Dann lade einfach die "zensierte" Bildfassung als neue Version desselben Bildes hoch und gib mir oder einem anderen Admin Bescheid, dass er die 1. Fassung löscht oder versteckt. So müssen keine Nutzungen wiederhergestellt werden. --Túrelio (talk) 16:49, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Danke für die Info, dann bleibt es so wie es ist :-) --AKirch-Bonn (talk) 11:07, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2017-11-21-Bonn-Bundesrechnungshof-05.jpg

And also:

• File:2017-11-21-Bonn-Bundesrechnungshof-07.jpg
• File:2017-11-21-Bonn-Bundesrechnungshof-09.jpg
• File:2017-11-21-Bonn-Bundesrechnungshof-10.jpg
• File:2017-11-21-Bonn-Bundesrechnungshof-11.jpg
• File:2017-11-21-Bonn-Bundesrechnungshof-12.jpg

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 14:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

For your information

I made several edits like this one. Please consider it in future. Thank u, --Arnd (talk) 13:39, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2017-06-12-bonn-koenigswinterer-strasse-kirchstrasse-friedensdenkmal-kuedinghoven-26.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2017-06-12-bonn-koenigswinterer-strasse-kirchstrasse-friedensdenkmal-kuedinghoven-26.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:56, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Adelheidiskirche-puetzchen-05032016-08.jpg

File:Adelheidiskirche-puetzchen-05032016-08.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 17:52, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Adelheidiskirche-puetzchen-05032016-28.jpg

File:Adelheidiskirche-puetzchen-05032016-28.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 17:53, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

File:2017-08-20-mechernich-bruder-klaus-kapelle-02.jpg

File:2017-08-20-mechernich-bruder-klaus-kapelle-02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 15:51, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019

Hallo AKirch-Bonn,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:27, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Tischfrauen

Hallo AKirch, wo genau steht diese Skulptur (Category:Tischfrauen)? Sind die Bedingungen der Panoramafreiheit n. dt. Recht erfüllt? --Túrelio (talk) 15:09, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

im T2, öffentlicher Bereich --AKirch-Bonn 17:20, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

North Rhine-Westphalia photographs taken on 2019-12-21

North Rhine-Westphalia photographs taken on 2019-12-21 is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: GA1: Gallery without images or other media files If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

CptViraj (📧) 07:46, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

File:2019-09-05-bonn-glueckstraße-33-01.jpg

File:2019-09-05-bonn-glueckstraße-33-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

165.225.26.116 07:56, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2018-bonn-schwarzrheindorf-sankt-maria-und-clemens-innenansicht-27.jpg

And also:

• File:2018-bonn-schwarzrheindorf-sankt-maria-und-clemens-innenansicht-28.jpg
• File:2018-bonn-schwarzrheindorf-sankt-maria-und-clemens-innenansicht-29.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 22:56, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Folklore Postcard

Greetings! Thank you for your contribution in Wiki Loves Folklore 2020 Commons photography contest. The world is richer with your contributions today. Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, we are sharing a digital postcard as a token of appreciation. Please fill this form before 10 July 2020 to recieve your digital postcard from us.

Looking forward to welcome you next year in February 2021.

Wikilove and Gratitude

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:55, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020

Hallo AKirch-Bonn,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:08, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear AKirch-Bonn,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2017-09-24-Bonn-Münsterbasilika-Innenansicht-Fenster-St-Martin-01.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 18:35, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 is on!

You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.

You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.

Kind regards,

Wiki loves Folklore International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2021

Hallo AKirch-Bonn,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2021 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist zum achten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2020
• 
  Südliche Mosaikjungfer (Aeshna affinis) am Westufer des Gülper Sees
• 
  Bienenfresser im FFH-Gebiet Kaiserstuhl
• 
  Röhrling mit Fliege im Bruderwald in Bamberg
• 
  Strand im Nationalpark Boddenlandschaft
• 
  Neuntöter im Geo-Naturpark Bergstraße-Odenwald

Wie du bei den Top 5 des vergangenen Jahres siehst, sind vor allem Tiere unter den Siegerbildern. Aus diesem Grund setzen wir den Fokus dieses Jahr stärker auf Landschaftsaufnahmen. Aber natürlich haben auch Tierbilder eine Chance zu gewinnen.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen. Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2021 - Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung. Falls du im Moment nicht wie sonst in die Natur fahren kannst, findest du vielleicht in den Tiefen deiner Festplatte oder auf dem Smartphone noch interessante Fotos.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 11:31, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Beuel-sankt-josef-innenansicht-04.jpg

And also:

• File:Beuel-sankt-josef-innenansicht-05.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 19:19, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Vilich-stiftskirche-st-peter-45.jpg

And also:

• File:Vilich-stiftskirche-st-peter-53.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:43, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021

Hallo AKirch-Bonn,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2021 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit über zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Im Herzen Deutschlands in Thüringen und in Niedersachsen sind neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die auf Fotos warten. Übrigens in der Hauptstadt Thüringens in Erfurt findet dieses Jahr die WikiCon vom 1. bis 3. Oktober statt. Dies könnte man mit einem Foto-Kurzurlaub vor der WikiCon in Thüringen verbinden …

Vor dem Hintergrund der Flutkatastrophe 2021 haben wir auch drei Sonderpreise ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die Kulturdenkmale zeigen, die zerstört wurden. Das Foto kann das Objekt vor oder nach der Zerstörung zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 18:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2018-bonn-schwarzrheindorf-sankt-maria-und-clemens-innenansicht-33.jpg

And also:

• File:2018-bonn-schwarzrheindorf-sankt-maria-und-clemens-innenansicht-35.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:16, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2019-10-04-bonn-eupener-strasse-26-sankt-bernhard-wachet-auf-01.jpg

And also:

• File:2019-10-04-bonn-eupener-strasse-26-sankt-bernhard-wachet-auf-02.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:33, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

File:2019-10-04-bonn-eupener-strasse-26-sankt-bernhard-ite-missa-est-01.jpg

File:2019-10-04-bonn-eupener-strasse-26-sankt-bernhard-ite-missa-est-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2019-10-04-bonn-kurfuerstenallee-7a-kurfuerstenbad-09.jpg

And also:

• File:2019-10-04-bonn-kurfuerstenallee-7a-kurfuerstenbad-14.jpg
• File:2019-10-04-bonn-kurfuerstenallee-7a-kurfuerstenbad-15.jpg
• File:2019-10-04-bonn-kurfuerstenallee-7a-kurfuerstenbad-16.jpg
• File:2019-10-04-bonn-kurfuerstenallee-7a-kurfuerstenbad-17.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2019-10-04-bonn-cheruskerstrasse-11-heilig-kreuz-kirche-magar-01.jpg

And also:

• File:2019-10-04-bonn-cheruskerstrasse-11-heilig-kreuz-kirche-magar-02.jpg
• File:2019-10-04-bonn-cheruskerstrasse-11-heilig-kreuz-kirche-magar-03.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:35, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 is on!

You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2022 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.

You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.

Kind regards,

Wiki loves Folklore International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:14, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Category:V1-Feuerstellung Nr. 328

Hallo AKirchBonn,
Die Benennung “V1-Feuerstellung Nr. 328, Asberg” hat mit dem V1-Stellungsraum am Asberg (Westerwald) zu tun, nicht mit dem Gemeindegebiet Erpel. Das sollte auch aus dem Kategorie-Namen hervorgehen. --Хрюша ^?? 10:50, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Хрюша, danke für den Hinweis. Es steht Dir frei das zu ändern. Axel Kirch 08:10, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2022 - Deutschland

Hallo A.Axel.Kirch-Bonn,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 30. Juni 2024 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth (kurz: WLE) statt. Dabei können wie immer Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler oder andere Schutzgebiete fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2023 – Landschaft
• 
  Ramsach, ein linker Zufluss zur Loisach im oberbayerischen FFH-Gebiet Murnauer Moos
• 
  Naturdenkmal Sankt-Anna-Linde, eine ca. 300 Jahre alte Winterlinde (Tilia cordata) auf einer Anhöhe südöstlich des Heilbronner Ortsteils Kirchhausen
• 
  Buchenwald im Nationalpark Jasmund nach einem Regenschauer

• Sieger WLE 2023 – Detail
• 
  Großer Blaupfeil (Orthetrum cancellatum) im Naturschutzgebiet Gülper See
• 
  Blüte des Knöllchen-Steinbrechs (Saxifraga granulata) im Naturschutzgebiet Dattenbachtal zwischen Kröftel und Vockenhausen (Taunus)
• 
  männliche Rohrweihe (Circus aeruginosus) beim Jagdflug im Osten Spiekeroogs, Nationalpark Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer

Der Wettbewerb ist zweigeteilt, das heißt wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Wettbewerbskategorien Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zu Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. In der Wettbewerbskategorie Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze in den Schutzgebieten bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen – zum Beispiel in Bayern die Liste der Naturdenkmäler im Landkreis Landshut oder die Liste der geschützten Landschaftsbestandteile in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern mit ihren Unterlisten oder gar einzelne Artikel wie die Landschaftsschutzgebiete Sommerschafweide an Buchhalden und Sommerschafweide auf Hilbertswiese in Baden-Württemberg.

Wir vergeben in diesem Jahr drei Sonderpreise für Fotos von Feldraine und Feldgehölze in geschützten Gebieten.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2024 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

Damit es ab 1. Mai mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos for WLE 

Außerdem laden wir dich ein, vom 15. Mai bis Mitte Juli 2024 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb 2024 wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --~~~~

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022

Hallo AKirch-Bonn,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2022 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Sieger 2021 – Schloss Langenburg

Vergangenes Jahr hat Matthias Süßen mit einer Drohnenaufnahme von Schloss Langenburg im Morgennebel gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf wird dieses Jahr sein Nachfolger?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Cloppenburg oder in Oldenburg.

Wir haben dieses Jahr unter dem Motto „Klein aber Oho“ drei Sonderpreise für Kleindenkmale ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die die unterschätzten Kleindenkmale wie Grenzsteine oder Bildstöcke zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 06:08, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Haltestellen Dransdorf und Robert-Kirchhoff-Straße

Hallo AKirch-Bonn, hast du in deinem Archiv vielleicht aktuelle oder auch ältere Fotos der beiden Stadtbahnhaltestellen Dransdorf und Robert-Kirchhoff-Straße? Leider mussten die beiden kurzzeitig hier verfügbaren Haltestellen-Fotos bereits vor Monaten wegen Urheberrechtsverletzung gelöscht werden, sodass die Kategorien nun leer sind und eigentlich ebenfalls gelöscht werden müssten. Nachdem ich kürzlich Fotos von Limperich Nord hochgeladen habe, sind dies nun die letzten Bonner Stadtbahnhaltestellen ohne Bebilderung, obwohl die anderen doch überwiegend gut dokumentiert sind und Dransdorf sogar früher ein Bahnhof war. Im Bonner Nordwesten komme ich selbst nur selten vorbei. Gruß--2003:E5:1727:B697:79EB:1479:40D:2CAF 15:26, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Ich bin nun doch dazu gekommen, ein paar Fotos der beiden Haltestellen zu machen, sodass sich meine Anfrage erledigt hat. Gruß--Image-Improver Bonn (talk) 18:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Category:Beethoven-Rundgang (Bonn) (erl.)

Hallo AKirch-Bonn, ich habe die von dir angelegten Kategorien zum Bonner Beethoven-Rundgang überarbeitet. Erst während der Bearbeitung ist mir aufgefallen, dass die alten Stationen des Rundgangs nicht eins zu eins mit den neuen übereinstimmen. Der alte Rundgang umfasste innerhalb Bonns 16 Stationen, der neue zwar insgesamt 22, aber nur 11 in Bonn. Ein paar Stationen sind also weggefallen, z.B. im Bonner Zentrum die Station Dreieck 6 und in Bonn-Oberkassel die Station Lippesches Palais. Ich kann mir aber kaum vorstellen, dass diese Stationen ersatzlos entfernt bzw. die Tafeln demontiert wurden (was ich noch nicht nachprüfen konnte). Demnach würde der alte Rundgang ggf. noch in Teilen fortbestehen. Gruß--Image-Improver Bonn (talk) 14:07, 3 October 2022 (UTC) Wie ich heute gesehen habe, ist zumindest am Lippeschen Palais die Stationstafel von 2013 noch vorhanden. Demnach bestehen also derzeit teilweise zwei Beethoven-Rundgänge nebeneinander. Aus meiner Sicht ist das Thema erledigt.--Image-Improver Bonn (talk) 13:44, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2018-06-08-luxemburg-schengen-04.jpg

And also:

• File:2018-06-08-luxemburg-schengen-05.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:57, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2009-09-20-bonn-beethovenhalle-innenansicht-grosses-foyer-wandbild-fassbender-6.jpg

And also:

• File:2009-09-20-bonn-beethovenhalle-innenansicht-grosses-foyer-wandbild-fassbender-7.jpg
• File:2009-09-20-bonn-beethovenhalle-innenansicht-grosses-foyer-wandbild-fassbender-4.jpg
• File:2009-09-20-bonn-beethovenhalle-innenansicht-grosses-foyer-wandbild-fassbender-2.jpg
• File:2009-09-20-bonn-beethovenhalle-innenansicht-grosses-foyer-wandbild-fassbender-5.jpg
• File:2009-09-20-bonn-beethovenhalle-innenansicht-grosses-foyer-wandbild-fassbender-1.jpg
• File:2009-09-20-bonn-beethovenhalle-innenansicht-grosses-foyer-wandbild-fassbender-3.jpg
• File:2009-09-20-bonn-beethovenhalle-innenansicht-kleines-raucherfoyer-wandbild-vihaminazhera-01.jpg
• File:2009-09-20-bonn-beethovenhalle-innenansicht-kleines-raucherfoyer-wandbild-vihaminazhera-02.jpg

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 13:56, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Folklore 2023 has started, Join us!

Hello A.Axel.Kirch-Bonn,

Greetings from Wiki Loves Folklore International Team!

Wiki Loves Folklore is an international photography contest hosted on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from around the world, such as folk festivals, folk dances, folk music, folk activities, folk games, folk cuisine, folk wear, folktales, folk games, folk religion, mythology, and many more.

The campaign invites participants to document photographs, videos, and audios linked to folk culture and fit within the contest's theme. Through this campaign, you may become a part of a community dedicated to preserving our intangible culture, which has been brought and passed down for thousands of years.

How to Contribute?

The dates for the submission in the photography contest on Wikimedia Commons are from 1 February to 31 March 2023. Probably you are wondering how you can take part. It’s simple: grab a camera, record an image, video or audio under the folklore theme and start uploading ! To learn more about the rules, check out our Project page on Wikimedia Common. Here are the exciting prizes which you can win internationally.

International Prizes

• 1st prize: 500 USD
• 2nd prize: 400 USD
• 3rd prize: 300 USD
• Top 10 consolation prizes: 40 USD Each
• Best Video prize and best Audio prize: 150 USD & 150 USD
• Top uploader prize for images: First Prize: 100 USD, Second prize: 50 USD
• Wiki Loves Folklore Postcards to top 100 Uploaders
• Certificates and postcards to Local Organizers.

(Disclaimer : The above prizes will only be disbursed in form of gift card or voucher format only)

You can win both International prizes and your local Prizes simultaneously !

If you are interested in participating in the photography campaign, start photographing and collecting media of your local culture and get ready for the photo campaign happening on Wikimedia Commons. For more information about rules and prizes of the contest, refer here. For any questions, email us or join our telegram group

Warm regards,

Rockpeterson

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team.

File:Koeln-sankt-maria-im-kapitol-07.jpg

File:Koeln-sankt-maria-im-kapitol-07.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 06:31, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2023 - Deutschland

Hallo AKirch-Bonn,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2023 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2022 – Landschaft
• 
  Hohes Ufer zwischen Ahrenshoop und Wustrow, Fischland
• 
  Biotop Nördliche Lothdorfer Wiese
• 
  Aisch bei Willersdorf im FFH Aischgrund

• Sieger WLE 2022 – Detail
• 
  Gemeine Goldwespe im NSG Wittenberge Rühstädter Elbniederung
• 
  Libellen-Schmetterlingshaft im Naturschutzgebiet Badberg (Kaiserstuhl)
• 
  Blüte eines Schmalblättrigen Weidenröschens im Naturpark Taunus

Der Wettbewerb ist zweigeteilt, das heißt wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Wettbewerbskategorien Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zu Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. In der Wettbewerbskategorie Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen – zum Beispiel in Sachsen die Liste der Naturdenkmale in Wurzen.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2023 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

Damit der Upload für dich einfacher ist, haben wir in diesem Jahr die einzelnen Hochladeseiten für die Bundesländer abgeschafft, alle Fotos werden über dasselbe Formular hochgeladen. Außerdem haben wir das Layout unserer WLE-Seiten geändert.

Damit es ab 1. Mai mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos for WLE 

Außerdem laden wir dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2023 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2023 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb 2023 wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 16:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 - Deutschland

Hallo AKirch-Bonn,

Sieger 2022 – Kloster Paulinzella

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2023 findet zum dreizehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Vergangenes Jahr hat Radomianin mit einer Gesamtansicht von Kloster Paulinzella gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf oder welche Fotografin tritt dieses Jahr die Nachfolge an?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Waltershausen in Thüringen oder in Fulda.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Für das einfache Auffinden haben wir eine Upload-Karte erstellt, in der viele aber leider noch nicht alle Kulturdenkmale angezeigt werden können. Das Laden der Objekte dauert dort etwas.

Wir haben dieses Jahr „drei Sonderpreise für Bilder von Friedhöfen“ ausgelobt. Zugelassen sind für den Sonderpreis auch Fotos von Friedhöfen, die nicht denkmalgeschützt sind.

Damit es ab 1. September mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos via the new Upload-Map 

Upload your photos for the special price 

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2023 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 12:19, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Arp-museum-2017-10.jpg

File:Arp-museum-2017-10.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: copyright violation; artist died in 1986; no freedom of panorama. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Arp-museum-2017-12.jpg

And also:

• File:Arp-museum-2017-13.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 12:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Arp-museum-2017-14.jpg

And also:

• File:Arp-museum-2017-15.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 12:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

File:Arp-museum-2017-16.jpg

File:Arp-museum-2017-16.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Arp-museum-2017-11.jpg

And also:

• File:Arp-museum-2017-22.jpg
• File:Arp-museum-2017-36.jpg
• File:Arp-museum-2017-37.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 12:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

File:Arp-museum-2017-31.jpg

File:Arp-museum-2017-31.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

File:Arp-museum-2017-10.jpg

File:Arp-museum-2017-10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 13:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)