User talk:Adelbrecht

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Busy desk.svg This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

العربية | Беларуская‎ | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | English | Español | Euskara | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Simple English | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Adelbrecht's Talk Page
Place general talk page messages on this page. If I have made a mistake in one of my arms, please report it here.
Please place your requests on THIS SUBPAGE.
During periods of inactivity, my talk page tends to become a very confusing mess, which is why I am splitting it up.
Graphic Designer Barnstar Hires.png The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
Congratulations for your drawings!
Madboy74 (talk) 21:05, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Graphic Designer Barnstar Hires.png The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
Very good work! You are a fantastic designer!
Edoardo Cavaleri (talk) 22:03, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Coronets[edit]

Note to self
address asap

Hello,

Just to mention, your version of the Loyalist Military coronet is not accurate.The coronet contains oak leaves, as the older image bears.

Cheers.

A UE. 70.31.4.92 23:03, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Crown of Rus-Ukraina[edit]

Can you draw crown Ukraine [[1]] as heraldic crowns of Ukraine? Let me know. Mitr4 (talk) 13:37, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

The picture is a replica of the crown of Galicia-Volhynia, situated in the west of Ukraine and once part of the Habsburg Empire. There is a crown in the Greater Coat of Arms of Ukraine https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Large_coat_of_arms_of_Ukraine_(color).png which is the medieval crown of Prince Vladimir the Great (would also be interesting to be vectorized) or http://blog.diyes.com.ua/?p=233 regards JanJC (talk) 10:48, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Humorism Image[edit]

Hi Tom, Just thought I would leave a message for you here. I'm developing a game that uses humors, and I just like to thank you for your lovely image as a source of inspiration for the game. Specifically how it is presented in a diamond shape, it has helped develop the mechanics for my game. If (I'm hoping for when) the game is released I will definitely attribute you in the credits.

Thanks again, Ashley

Help a friend against deletation request[edit]

Hi Adelbrecht, a guy named Eleassar tried to delete files from SajoR, with a "pretext" that non free media. Please can you take a look and help us to explain to him that's not non-free things to redraw a coat of arms. Thanks Mathieu C. (talk) 06:24, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Imperial Crown[edit]

Hello! It looks great and more similar to your recent crest and coronets style, really showy. Thanks. I'll change it on HRE coats of arms. Last month I had problems with some coats of arms of Northern Spain there were really difficult designs. Your recent work with different lions as supporters is really nice and original. Regards --Heralder (talk) 20:26, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Renaming requests[edit]

I posted list of my future requests here. You can oppose renaming of files with individual reasoning there or at my user talk. PS: I accept reverting of CoA of Northern Ireland. Hosmich (talk) 20:28, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

I am decided to request renaming of all files listed here, because you didn't oppose any individual renaming. On April 25th you wrote:
I see the value in a consistent naming scheme for categories. Do the files really matter, on the other hand?
They're not part of a template, and there's a lot of cruder names (CoA NAME)

Let me reply. There is no category for all current CoAs (or flags) of modern countries. Galleries are used instead. However, there is global convention for flags of countries to be named "File:Flag of ...", thus in English. This English-only convention applies for many subdivisions too, but there another language can be used (Polish in Slovakia, Dutch in the Philippines etc.) according to uploader. When a convention is set, it should be as exact as possible, in order to easily find a file and consistently name new file. I know that many convention are loose and they allow forgetting parentheses, loose capitalization or even forgetting a word (this convention should be Biskup Surname Name CoA.jpg). You can see how many countries I am not willing to decapitalize "Arms", but sometimes it is desirable IMO (Sweden, Zambia, Zimbabwe). BTW sorry for messing File:Coat of arms of Denmark.svg. User:Steinsplitter reverted it to acceptable state.

PS: I am Slovak, 23 years old engineer-to-be, user of Inkscape. I have collected symbols for languages and was willing to vectorize many images on Commons. I will be active on w:sk:Wikipédia:WikiProjekt_Erby_II. I have drawn some files, as you can see at my Commons page. First I used mainly tracing, then I discovered Inkscape possibilities more and more. Sometimes I add files to categories. I created flags for some languages. How do you see this flag? Can it represent Dutch language? Be happy! Hosmich (talk) 15:04, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Heraldic crown Ukraine[edit]

Hello, an anonynmous user's send me this message. Look it if you'd interested in, no strings attached.

Can you draw crown Ukraine [[2]] as heraldic crowns of Ukraine? Let me know. Mitr4 (talk) 13:37, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations on your strict Dutch style works Great! Regards--Heralder (talk) 13:31, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Fabiola & Paola[edit]

You may be interested in these coat's:

Fabiola

Paola

Regards --Heralder (talk) 11:19, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Heraldry & deletion: insights wanted[edit]

Hello, I have been thumbing through some deletion discussions on heraldic devices and noticed that you've made some large contributions. I am trying to put together a personal set of guidelines which will answer the basic question, "Can I load this image I have to Wikimedia Commons?" and I am interested in fleshing out the bit on heraldry. From what I can understand from the licensing guidelines, a one-sentence summary might read thus: heraldic images can be uploaded of an otherwise copyrighted heraldic image as long as the artistic representation of that image is different from the copyrighted one. What that one sentence does not cover, however, is what really constitutes "different" when it comes to heraldry? I guess what I would like is a few good examples of heraldic images which went through the grind of a deletion discussion and at the end of it were either kept or deleted for some reason, or even just your own summary of the kinds of things which will make a heraldic image keepable versus those which will cause it to end up in the rubbish bin. No obligation, and take your time. Any thoughts you would be willing to share I would appreciate. Thanks! KDS444 (talk) 04:46, 24 May 2014 (UTC)


File:Coat of Arms of the Queen of the Netherlands as a Stranger Lady of the Order of the Garter.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Coat of Arms of the Queen of the Netherlands as a Stranger Lady of the Order of the Garter.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dqfn13 (talk) 16:39, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Integriteit[edit]

Beste Tom,

In de bovenstaande DR wek je de intentie dat ik mijn knopjes zou misbruiken om een bestand weg te krijgen. Dat zou ik dus nooit doen. Wat ik wel doe is mijn mening geven in discussies wanneer ik daar toe uitgenodigd wordt. Dat lijkt me niet verboden. Wanner ik een bepaald gedrag beschrijf wat ik zie in deletions requests gerelateerd aan COA's over het algemeen dan moet dat kunnen. Wat ik daar heb aangegeven is dat ik niet zomaar een bestand kan gaan verwijderen. Dat klopt want ook zoiets zou natuurlijk misbruik zijn. Dat ik het problematisch vind dat er slechte COA's in artikelen geplaatst worden is nou niet echt een geheim. Wanneer ik het over wolven had heb ik niet gezien dat jij dit wapen had gemaakt. Dus excuus als je je aangesproken voelde, ik bedoelde jou er niet mee. En volgens mij doelde de andere discussianten ook niet op jou. Dat ik naar user problems verwees is enkel omdat ik kort de suggestie gaf van waar je zoiets nou aan kan kaarten wanneer je daadwerkelijk tegen constante problemen aanloopt. En dat lijkt me ook de aangewezen plek om dat te doen. Misschien kwam het wat onnodig hard over, waarvoor excuus. Overigens is het nooit verstandig om een vector-versie van een wapen te baseren op een tekening van Robert Prummel en dat is waarschijnlijk ook de reden waarom er nu kritiek is op het wapen. Jammer dat je jezelf kritiek aan hebt getrokken die niet voor jou bedoeld was. Daarbij vind ik het ook jammer dat je zo van kwade wil uit gaat bij andere in deze discussie. Men heeft namelijk allemaal hetzelfde doel en dat is de kwaliteit van de wapens oke houden. Natuur12 (talk) 18:25, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Ik blijf van mening dat de overlegpaginadiscussie, die perfect vermeden had kunnen worden met een bericht op dezelfde pagina, gelinkt had moeten zijn. Op de DR-discussie heb ik gelinkt naar de ordeplaten van de Serafimorde, die ik toen als leidraad hanteerde voor het verzoek. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 18:52, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Tja.... Je mist mijn punt. Die discussie ging voornamelijk over een probleem wat mensen op NL-wiki ondervinden. Overigens vind ik dit dan ook niet echt een nette actie na je eigen verklaringen. Want wat je daar citeert heeft weinig te doen met Commons maar alles met nl-wiki. En als administrator daar mag ik best meedenken over hoe ongewenste toevoegingen daar opgelost worden of niet? Ik waardeer het dat je dit bericht weg hebt gehaald maar je opmerking hierboven heeft nu enkel een hoog pot en ketelgehalte. Natuur12 (talk) 19:10, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Je hebt je uiterst vijandig geuit richting bepaalde gebruikers. Ik heb mijn bericht weggehaald omdat je verklaard hebt niet te arbitreren op de pagina zelf. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 19:14, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Tja, ook dat verwijst naar gedrag van gebruikers dat op de Nederlandstalige wiki plaats vindt. Als je je stoort aan mijn opmerkingen gerelateerd aan gedrag op de Nederlandstalige Wikipedia kan je me daar aanspreken. Ik wens dan niet geciteerd te worden op een ander project. Dat is logisch want nu haal je het dusdanig uit de context dat het veel heftiger overkomt dan het daadwerkelijk is. Namelijk een wat harde beschrijving van wat er eerder gebeurt is. Natuur12 (talk) 19:24, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
De opmerkingen betreffen gebruikers op Wikimedia Commons. Ik heb verder duidelijk gelinkt naar de pagina in kwestie, en de optie Google Translate vermeld, om een volledig gebrek aan context te vermijden. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 19:28, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Again, het betreft gedrag dat plaats vindt op de Nederlandstalige Wiki. Dat die gebruikers hier actief zijn doet er niet toe. Natuur12 (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Gedrag dat leidde tot een verwijderingsnominatie op Wikimedia Commons, zonder link naar die discussie in kwestie. In het licht van een eerdere kwestie, waar de kennis van één betrokken lid indirect in vraag getrokken werd, en de kennis van een ander betrokken lid als feit aangenomen, vreesde ik voor een conflict of interest. Het is in dat licht dat mijn acties begrepen dienen te worden. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 19:36, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Die DR was ik al lang weer vergeten en herinner me ook niet dat ik ook maar iets van doen heb gehad met dat wapen elders maar was het gewoon een routine-sluiting zoals ik meestal doe bij controversiële onderwerpen zoals vlaggen, kaarten en COA's wanneer het conflict over de inhoud gaat en de bestanden gewoon in gebruik zijn. Ik sluit heel veel van die dingen dus je zal mijn naam geregeld tegenkomen, ook bij de controversiële en soms politiek gevoelige onderdelen. En dan zal je meestal dezelfde sluiting zien, is het bestand in gebruik dan behoud ik het tenzij het een regelrecht verzinsel is. Dus voor een COI hoef je niet bang te zijn. Natuur12 (talk) 19:48, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Coat of Arms of the Duchy of Cleves.svg[edit]

Hallo Adelbrecht, ik kwam toevallig dit wapen van je tegen. In het midden is er een rode plek tussen de sperenbundel, waardoor het lijkt alsof er een gat in het hartschild zit. Uit historische bronnen 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 is die plek meestal in de kleur zilver weergegeven (soms de kleur groen, hoewel ik dat niet begrijp) zodat het hartschild intact blijft. Misschien kan je wat met de info. MVG Arch (talk) 19:06, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Ja, dat is een stuk logischer. Groene invulling is wellicht een soort van contaminatie met het wapen van Navarra? Rode invulling lijkt een Engelse fout te zijn. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 19:14, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Nu, dit is een voorlopige oplossing. Op middellange termijn ga een ik gewoonweg File:Blaeu 1645 - Wappen des Herzogtums Kleve.png traceren. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 19:20, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks you[edit]

Thanks so much for your support the attributed coat of arms and standard. This is the link to the official regulation of the Standard [7] it is in Spanish at the guindon (military flag) the background has 800 x 800 millimeters and the coat of arms 440 millimeters (height) according to Rule 1.3 "Medidas". The drawing of the standard and the coat is not correct according to the description. The coat of arms of the standard has the same proportions but it has different versions so there isn't a fixed size for the coat of arms but the proportions are equivalent to the guindon ones. Rule 2.1 and 2.3 "Tipos"
Number 1-a: 1,600 millimeters.
Number 2-a: 1,200 millimeters.
Number 3-a: 1,000 millimeters.
Number 4-a: 800 millimeters.
Number 5-a: 400 millimeters.
According to the previous reform (the flags of Felipe as Crown Prince) the size of the coat of arms of the guindon and therefore, the proportions of the standard are equivalent to the adopted at the guindon and standard of the heir) [8] Rule 3.3 "Medidas" guindon (military flag) the background has 800 x 800 millimeters and the coat of arms 440 millimeters (height) according to Rule. The coat of arms of the standard has the same proportions but it has different versions equivalent to the new ensigns Rule 4.1 and 4.3
Important, the standard and guindon of King Juan Carlos are still in use (with their different proportions, smaller)
Disposición transitoria única: Guión y estandarte de Don Juan Carlos de Borbón y Borbón.
Su Majestad, Don Juan Carlos de Borbón y Borbón seguirá usando el guión y el estandarte que venía utilizando hasta su abdicación como rey, tal y como aparecen descritos en las reglas 1 y 2 del título II del Reglamento de Banderas y Estandartes, Guiones, Insignias y Distintivos, antes de su modificación por medio de este real decreto.


Single Transitional Provision. Guindon and Standard of Don Juan Carlos of Bourbon and Bourbon.
HM, Don Juan Carlos of Bourbon and Bourbon will continue using the guindon and the standard that was coming using up to his abdication as king, as 1 and 2 of the title turn out to be described in the rules of the 2nd Tittle of the Regulation of Flags and Ensigns, Standards, Emblems and Badges, before his modification by means of this royal decree.
The coat of arms is regulated as an element of the royal ensigns so there aren't special rules.
Carlos Navarro is the designer of the official version of the new standard, the coat of arms at ensigns is more simplified than an heraldic emblem HERE you can see the new official design of the King Felipe's new coat [9] done by Mr Navarro (Mr Navarro's facebook), his standard and non-adopted coats of ams of his daughters (infanta Sofia's ams without charge because it's not officially adopted only the heir can use a plain label). In my opinion the coat of arms of the princess should be the same than the used by her father because she is titular (is the same case of Elizabeth II in UK,Canada and other Realms she doesn't use a female shape of her arms of dominion). The Queen as Princess used a logenze shield but she was never proclamed Princess of Wales.

Regards--Heralder (talk) 23:42, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Graphic Designer Barnstar Hires.png The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
Your coats of arms are of excellent quality! Superawesomeperson (talk) 20:20, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! Lemmens, Tom (talk) 15:13, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Busy[edit]

Enjoy - you deserve some holidays :) -- Maxxl² - talk 16:57, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Won't be a holiday, sadly. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 16:50, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely Эlcobbola talk 16:27, 24 July 2014 (UTC)