User talk:Afrank99/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Quality Image Promotion

[[File:|75px|center|]]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! [[:File:|]], which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

[[File:|75px|center|]]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! [[:File:|]], which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

[[File:|75px|center|]]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! [[:File:|]], which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

MicroDrive1GB.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Microdrive.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Black diamond character

Hi Afrank99; You seem to have inadvertently introduced an extraneous character, which displays as a black diamond in my browser, when you reformated QI yesterday.[1] Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 21:01, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi, this sometimes happens when I use my mouse buttons to navigate back/forth in pages. It's a Firefox bug. Sorry for that. --afrank99 (talk) 06:53, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
That would explain it. I spent some time yesterday to no avail trying to generate that character. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:16, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

CompactFlash SecureDigital Adapter.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CompactFlash SecureDigital Adapter.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Transceiver 10Base2 CentreCom.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Transceiver 10Base2 CentreCom.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

M4 Inbusschraube focusstacked.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! M4 Inbusschraube focusstacked.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

SgiOctaneOpenDoor.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SgiOctaneOpenDoor.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Ethernet NIC 100Mbit PCI.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ethernet NIC 100Mbit PCI.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Toolserver

As you may have noticed, indicating VI usage with a link to the toolserver is not always effective (it is down too often for my liking...). Please use links like you did for the de: sites. Thanks. Lycaon (talk) 16:58, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes, you are right, I noticed that too late. --Afrank99 (talk) 17:47, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

HP PhotoSmart SDIO Kamera.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:SDIO devices.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

360° Staubern Rheintal.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 360° Staubern Rheintal.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Silbergibbon mit Nachwuchs.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hylobates moloch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion

Commodore 1541 white.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Commodore 1541.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Commons:Valued image candidates/13W3 Stecker.jpg

Hi Afrank99,

Did you see my comment on this, where I propose a more concise and short scope (i.e. drop the photograph of.. and consider using the full official name for this connector)? It is about to be closed as undecided. --Slaunger (talk) 20:26, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Pete York 2009.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pete York.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion

13W3 Stecker.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DB13W3.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

I believe,,,

... that your voting against my images is more politically motivated than for other reasons, especially after I oppose the relicensing of images from GFDL to CC as an illegal act. --Eva K. is evil 17:46, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Hm, Verfolgungswahn? Nein, ehrlich gesagt interessiert mich die Lizenzgeschichte überhaupt nicht, und deine Position dazu habe ich erst vor kurzem zufällig entdeckt, nachdem ich gegen eines deiner Bilder gestimmt habe. Damit hat das nichts zu tun. Da ich keinen einzigen der Fotografen auf Commons persönlich kenne, bewerte ich sämtliche Bilder völlig unabhängig von der Person. Dass du allerdings ziemlich kritikresistent bist, stinkt mir ehrlich gesagt. Wenn du mit der Kritik nicht klarkommst, warum nominierst du deine Bilder überhaupt auf QI? Mir wurden selbst auch schon genügend Bilder abgelehnt (auf QI und auf FP), aber ich nehme die Kritik lieber zum Anlass meine Fähigkeiten zu verbessern, statt rumzuschmollen. Wie gesagt, das ist nichts persönliches, und sobald du ein Bild nominierst, das die entsprechende Qualität aufweist, bekommst du auch von mir ein Promotion-Bapperl. --Afrank99 (talk) 18:08, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Be careful with words like "Verfolgungswahn" or "paranoia", Mr. Psychologist. I'd consider such would-be diagnoses of self-established amateur psychologists as quite dorky. It's more than stupid to drag medical terms into everyday language as noone actually knows what they are really talking about. What drives me up the wall is the pixelpicking of some criticasters in photos for encyclopedic use as if these photos are candidates for an international prize in art photography and not simple documentary photos. This attitude seems to me somewhat snobbish. --Eva K. is evil 08:32, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Well, that's what Quality Images is all about. I think you should calm down. --Afrank99 (talk) 09:44, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Afrank99!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:36, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done --Afrank99 (talk) 10:57, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello i like your svg graphics :) Do you have Canon Powershot SX10 IS logo ?


File:Fastpass_peter_pan_2007.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fastpass_peter_pan_2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Powers (talk) 17:57, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Tartine_et_pot_de_Nutella.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tartine_et_pot_de_Nutella.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kelly (talk) 15:48, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Hessen Löwe.svg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hessen Löwe.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Perhelion (talk) 21:34, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Bildungnutzung

HIer http://www.gruenderszene.de/allgemein/technologien-generation-y wird eine Bildnutzung erwähnt; ich konnte es aber nicht identifizieren. --Túrelio (talk) 16:43, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Na, die Diskette :-) --Afrank99 (talk) 18:11, 19 November 2013 (UTC)