User talk:Agamitsudo/Archives 2011

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Agamitsudo      Discussion      Gallery      W-circle.svg

Archives

Archive





Centrale_nucléaire_du_Bugey_et_champ_de_tournesol.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Centrale_nucléaire_du_Bugey_et_champ_de_tournesol.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MorganKevinJ(talk) 00:25, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

why ?[edit]

Hello,

I have seen your removal of categories in the File:Blason Bonnefamille.svg. I do not understand what can be the reasons for such a removal. Could you please explain this to me ?

Yours, Frédéric (talk) 19:35, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello Frédéric,
Actually, this article Armorial des communes de l'Isère indicates another coat of arms for Bonnefamille, the "official" one. I meant to create a category like 'Others known coat of arms of Bonnefamille'; finally, I decided to do an "undo" on my change. In real, Bonnefamille owns only one coat, but it is not an issue if its commons category has two coats.
Sorry for wonderings that I have caused,
--Agamitsudo (talk) 09:17, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Canal-de-Miribel-A-la-gare-deCrépieux.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Canal-de-Miribel-A-la-gare-deCrépieux.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Copyright status: File:Viaduc H et V Basch.JPG[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Viaduc H et V Basch.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

matanya talk 07:49, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Viaduc H et V Basch.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

File:Cristiano Ronaldo - december 8, 2010 in Madrid - Real Madrid vs AJ Auxerre.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Cristiano Ronaldo - december 8, 2010 in Madrid - Real Madrid vs AJ Auxerre.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ytoyoda (talk) 09:39, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

User_talk:Frachet#File:Bourg_011.JPG[edit]

Hallo Agamitsudo, you might want to participate at those DRs here User_talk:Frachet#File:Bourg_011.JPG. And a general tip: please notify the uploaders on their talk pages if you tag something for deletion. They should know it. There is a copy and paste template on each tag which you can copy and paste it on the uploader's talk page. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 21:50, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:L'église Saint-Romain de Miribel en juillet 2011 - 2.JPG[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:L'église Saint-Romain de Miribel en juillet 2011 - 2.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

GeorgHHtalk   13:30, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:L'église Saint-Romain de Miribel en juillet 2011.JPG[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:L'église Saint-Romain de Miribel en juillet 2011.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

GeorgHHtalk   13:30, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:StatueGastonBoulevardPachecoBruxelles.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:StatueGastonBoulevardPachecoBruxelles.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:StatueGastonBoulevardPachecoBruxelles.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Esby (talk) 21:09, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Carillon du Mas Rillier[edit]

Bonsoir,

L'auteur du carillon, Louis Mortamet, est mort en 1956. Son travail est toujours soumis au droit d'auteur en France. Par conséquent, ces images vont être supprimées.

Cordialement, Trizek here or on fr:wp 16:33, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Carillon_du_Mas_Rillier_-_septembre_2011_-_01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Carillon_du_Mas_Rillier_-_septembre_2011_-_01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Trizek here or on fr:wp 16:39, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Catégorisation de Gratte-ciel[edit]

Bonjour,

Oui, Gratte-ciel est un bien quartier de Villeurbanne (et sans doute le plus connu) mais il est paradoxalement enfoui sous deux catégories pas évidentes : il faut le chercher d'abord dans "Geography of Villeurbanne" puis dans une sous-catégorie "Neighbourhoods of Villeurbanne", qui ne contient qu'une seule sous-catégorie : "Gratte-ciel". Cela me semble assez peu logique et surtout peu pratique. Dans un premier temps j'ai conclu que la catégorie "Gratte-ciel" n'existait pas. Il me semblerait préférable au moins de faire dépendre "Gratte-ciel" directement de "Villeurbanne", quitte à passer aussi par les cases "Geography" et "Neighbourhoods".

Je voudrais aussi faire observer que "quartier" se dit plutôt "district" ou "quarter" en anglais, et que "neighbourhood" (qu'on trouve aussi dans les dictionnaires pour "quartier") est plutôt le voisinage, c'est-à-dire le quartier par rapport auquel on se situe. "There are 10 neighbourhoods in the city", par exemple, ne se dit pas, alors qu'on peut dire "Is there a swimming-pool in your neighbourhood?"

Cordialement, Camster (talk) 14:20, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour Camster,
La catégorisation sur commons est destinée à donner toujours plus de sens aux images (processus probablement infini) et non à économiser un ou deux clics à un amateur de photographies villeurbannaises. En l’occurrence, Gratte-ciel est un quartier de Villeurbanne, il y a donc plus de sens à le placer dans la catégorie:Quartier de Villeurbanne que dans catégorie:Villeurbanne ou dans catégorie:Quartier.
Concernant vos observations au sujet du nommage en anglais : district revêt plutôt un caractère administratif. De plus, Neighborhoods est largement utilisé (dans le sens de quartier) sur commons (voir Category:Neighborhoods by city) ; mais vous avez raison, quarter est (dans une moindre mesure mais avec les interwikis), également utilisé (voir Category:City quarters). À vrai dire, ces deux catégories mériteraient sans doute d'être fusionner. Tout cela ne doit néanmoins pas remettre en cause votre abonnement à Today in English Clin.
Cordialement, --Agamitsudo (talk) 15:24, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Bonjour Agamitsudo, et merci pour votre réponse.
Vous avez raison sur le fait que "la catégorisation sur commons est destinée à donner toujours plus de sens aux images" ; toutefois elle sert aussi à l'utilisateur de l'encyclopédie à s'orienter et à trouver, aussi rapidement que possible, ce qu'il cherche, le problème n'étant pas essentiellement d'"économiser quelques clics". Il faut donc trouver un compromis, je pense, entre une arborescence fine de catégories et la commodité d'emploi. Je vais donc faire dépendre aussi la catégorie "Gratte-ciel" directement de "Villeurbanne". Ce sera redondant, mais la redondance n'est pas toujours inutile à la transmission de l'information...
Pour le reste et en toute modestie je me permets de vous signaler que je suis agrégé d'anglais, ce qui ne m'a pas empêché il y a quelques années de m'abonner à Today in English Clin - Camster (talk) 07:06, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Bonjour Camster,
J'ai modifié hier, un certain nombre de choses autour de la catégorie en question dans laquelle apparaissent maintenant d'autres quartiers. Si vous voulez jeter un œil ?
Cordialement, --Agamitsudo (talk) 07:13, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Effectivement c'est mieux : "Neighbourhoods" a maintenant plusieurs sous-catégories et est plus facile à trouver, donc "Gratte-ciel" aussi. Je renonce donc à ma modification - Bonne journée, Camster (talk) 08:19, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Usine Tase[edit]

Salut,

Désolé pour ma modification trop rapide sur Category:Usine Tase. Je n’avais pas pensé/eu le temps de vérifier l’article sur WP. Ceci dit, il faut au moins laisser le numéro d’inventaire en attendant que la base Mérimée soit mise à jour (si elle l’est un jour…).

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 17:40, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Bonsoir Vigneron,
Oulà, pas de problème. Du coup, j'en profite pour te féliciter pour ton travail de vérification des uploads liés à WLM 2011.
À bientôt,
--Agamitsudo (talk) 19:04, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Rennomeur de Fichier[edit]

Comme demandé tu fais maintenant partie des renommeurs de fichiers petit veinard ;) bien sûr à n'utiliser que sur les cas confus et en prévenant les auteurs quand ce n'est pas de toi qu'il s'agit ;) Otourly (talk) 08:57, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Merci mon grand.
Je te recontacte rapidement. --Agamitsudo (talk) 07:35, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Category:Monuments_historiques_in_Saint-Maurice-de-Gourdans[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Monuments_historiques_in_Saint-Maurice-de-Gourdans has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

GFreihalter (talk) 12:00, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Category:Religious_buildings_in_Saint-Maurice-de-Gourdans[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Religious_buildings_in_Saint-Maurice-de-Gourdans has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

GFreihalter (talk) 12:03, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Category:Buildings_in_Saint-Maurice-de-Gourdans[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Buildings_in_Saint-Maurice-de-Gourdans has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

GFreihalter (talk) 12:04, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Agamitsudo,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:10, 17 October 2011 (UTC)