User talk:AlMare

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Ramsau-extra+F16.gif

Contents

Image Tagging Image:Bassai Temple Of Apollo Protection.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bassai Temple Of Apollo Protection.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. skINMATE 14:17, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

I appended the license. Photo was taken by myself. --AlMare 21:07, 2 April 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Prunus cerasus blossom am.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Prunus cerasus blossom am.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}}to release it under the GFDL or{{PD-self}}to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 22:22, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

I specified the origin, where you can find the licence. -- AlMare 22:29, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Monterozzi[edit]

Thanks; i've redirect the doubled page to this one. --mac 15:20, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Vladimir Luxuria and Fausto Bertinotti.jpg[edit]

The image was tagged for possible deletion since June 15th, and the uploader was notified. There was an URL for the picture in the description, but it did not stated that the picture was available for free use.

If you can get a proper authorization according Commons:Licensing we can restore the picture,

Regards, Barcex 23:29, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

I see. Could you give me this URL and the name of the uploader. I'll try to contact them. Thank you in advance. -- AM 07:58, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

The source is: http://www.repubblica.it/2003/e/gallerie/politica/luxuria/1.html and the uploader was User:Square87 Barcex 22:46, 8 July 2006 (UTC) PS: Next time please reply in my discussion page.

Via Appia map.jpg[edit]

Hi, did you actually draw Image:Via Appia map.jpg yourself or did you scan it from a book? I notice the blue is off-register, which is a hallmark of physical printing, not of a computer-generated diagram. Stan Shebs 12:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

I photographed it off a poster at the archeological site of Minturno in Italy. Afterwards it was retouched. -- AM 12:40, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
OK then, you're not the copyright owner and don't have the right to put it in the public domain. (Otherwise I could take photographs of every page in a book and claim I own copyright on the book.) Who made the poster at the site? Private organization? Government? Stan Shebs 18:14, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
This was an exhibition of the local findings at this archeological site. I presume it was state-run. They had pictures and explaining articles on the walls with open access for anybody. Photos were NOT prohibited. -- AM 20:30, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Sure, if you had a picture of the whole exhibition and you could see the map somewhere in it if you looked closely, that would be fine. But that's not what you did, you positioned and focussed to make sure that you made an exact a copy as possible. To make a comparison, many museums of modern art allow photography, but if you stood in front of a painting and got an exact representation, no frame, no room, then that photo is copyrighted by the painter. In any case, it would take a half-hour with a computer drawing program to create a better-quality version of this map, so we should do that instead. Stan Shebs 13:18, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
I'll do that when I have the time. -- AM 14:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

If you're ready to upload now, I'll just delete the existing image, and you can upload under the same name, then no need to edit usages. Thanks for working on a replacement! Stan Shebs 00:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

OK done. Stan Shebs 17:06, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:BW 4.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:BW 4.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --snty-tact (Talk) 16:04, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

It's tagged now. -- AM 17:02, 2 July 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Locri Pinax Of Persephone And Hades.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Locri Pinax Of Persephone And Hades.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 212.11.21.151 12:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

I specified the source. -- AM 14:18, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

It is not enough, you have to specify who is the copyright holder of the image and then state why the image is in the public domain. REgards, Barcex 22:48, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

When you browse the category "PD-old" you can find lots of pictures tagged only with PD-old and lots of them even without a source. Should it not be enough, that the author of a work of art is dead since 2500 years? -- AM 12:45, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Museo Nazionale Napoli Gabinetto Segreto Mercury.jpg[edit]

Hi; you have forgott to put you name as reviewer for this image. See you. --mac 12:44, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Oops, thank you. :-) -- AM 12:52, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Not always I can use an high speed connection.... ;-) ciaociao--mac 13:33, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
I see. Even with ADSL the uploads are rather slow. Greetings from hot Germany, -- AM 15:03, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Licenses[edit]

Added to the first two, the third one is not my work, is a derived one. Best wishes. --G.dallorto 19:52, 22 August 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Bronzi Di Riace Statua A Detail.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bronzi Di Riace Statua A Detail.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 00:34, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Hello,
Sadly, these scans can be considered as copyvios because of the photographer's rights: PD-old can't apply because photographies are recent, neither PD-art because these are reproductions of 3D objects (statues). So if you don't bring more safe informations about the copyright status, we should make a deletion request (adieu bronzes de Riace !). Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 20:27, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Adieu! In the future I will upload my scans to german wiki. Copyright problems with statues 2500 years old! I can't believe it! Ciao, AM 20:34, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

If you took the photo yourself, there would not be any problem; but what about the photographer's rights? His work (high-resolution photography without reflect nor background) need to be protected. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 12:54, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Bronzi Di Riace Statua A+B.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Bronzi Di Riace Statua A+B.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 12:48, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

WARNING: If these scans are deleted I will upload the photos of the statues I took myself at the Museo Nazionale in Reggio C.. They are very bad. -- AM 11:52, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Well, a free image is always better than a copyrighted one, no matter of the quality. You can upload them now. Better quality versions will be uploaded in the future, so goes the wiki. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 13:27, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
NEVER will there be any better photos! When I have been at the location I could take photos, but no flash and no tripods were allowed. The second time I have been there NO photos were allowed. So, how do you expect getting better photos? The only way is scanning. There should not be any copyright for such archeological things because they belong to the heritage of mankind. By the way, if you want to be consequent in this field you would have to delete a lot, if not the most, of the pictures of ancient drawings here on commons. -- AM 14:30, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
The point you don't understand—or admit—is that you didn't scan a drawing; but a photography of a 3D object. There is absolutly no country in which this is legal, because every country protects the photographer's right in that particular case (3D object). And if you know other images concerned (scans of photos of 3D objects, or simply photos of 3D object non "user-made"), please consider make a deletion request or just notifying them to me. They will be deleted soon or later.
Now the B warrior is not so bad. And if we can't obtain better images because photos were forbidden, tant pis. It seems like museums in Italy become very silly. Ciao. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 21:49, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Maybe my understanding of copyright is a little bit more ähhh.. open, than yours. What I think is: There is a grey area concerning copyright. We should not give away this advantage concernig important items. If the affected don't complain... and how could Museums do that? With which justification? Anyway, bon nuit. -- AM 22:10, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Locri Pinax Of Persephone And Hades.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Locri Pinax Of Persephone And Hades.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.


Same questions as above. I guess it is the same source? Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 13:25, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

You've guessed it. I have a bad photo of it, too. -- AM 16:06, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
So what are you waiting for?. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 23:27, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
As long as these scans are not deleted I'll do nothing. -- AM 09:36, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Ok, you'll get it. -- AM 22:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Biennale Di Venezia 51.jpg, Image:Leone di Venezia.png[edit]

On what ground do you claim authorship? --Cat out 19:48, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Because I took the photo. The lion ist just cropped. -- AM 22:46, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Does not matter. You didnt prepare the poster.
I have redeleted it and its source. Copyvios are not welcome on commons, do not reupload them.
--Cat out 13:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Maybe I'll do. -- AM 21:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

FP promotion[edit]

Venice Lagoon December 9 2001.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Venice Lagoon December 9 2001.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Venice Lagoon December 9 2001.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

Alvesgaspar 18:45, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

I know, I'll do so. :-)) -- AM 20:53, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Proposal: Picture of the Year and Picture of the Month contests[edit]

I have posted a new proposal on Commons talk:Featured picture candidates regarding the creation of FP-related contests and would like your feedback on the idea. This message is being sent to some of the regular contributors to Commons:Featured picture candidates. Alvesgaspar 16:03, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Commons Picture of the Year 2006 Competition[edit]

POTY barnstar 1.svg
Interested in honouring the best of the best? Vote now in the
Commons Picture of the Year competition 2006
Voting to select the finalists is open until 14th February.

Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 日本語 | Nederlands | português | svenska | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All Featured Pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As a past contributor to Featured Pictures, we invite you to participate in the competition (but please wait until tomorrow to vote). --MichaelMaggs 21:56, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Populonia Necropoli Etrusca modified.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Populonia Necropoli Etrusca modified.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hallo AlMare, ich habe das Original dieses Bildes direkt durch eine verbesserte Version ersetzt, sodass mir diese Version jetzt überflüssig erscheint. Gruß, --Wikipeder 17:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Ist ok, aber eigentlich bräuchte man da ein gescheites Bild, nicht so eine Briefmarke. Gruß zurück. -- AM 17:32, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Allerdings. Du bist nicht zufällig demnächst in der Gegend? :-) --Wikipeder 22:56, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Könnte womöglich sein, im Mai. Ich war sogar schon dort. Allerdings war das 1982 oder so. Da gab es noch keinen "Parco archeologico", sondern nur einige eröffnete Hügelgräber und Schmelzöfen und Schlackenhäufen; und es gab einen wunderschönen Strand und ausgezeichneten "Risotto alla Marinara". WENN ich hinkomme, dann werde ich ausgiebig knipsen :-) . Ciao, -- AM 20:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC)


Image:Vesuvius Quickbird July 12 2002.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Vesuvius Quickbird July 12 2002.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Davepape 19:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

This was a mistake. I didn't see the copyright remark. -- AM 21:14, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
A picture is restricted by copyright by default; no copyright remark is necessary. --Rtc 15:29, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Vesuv retouched.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Vesuv retouched.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rtc 15:29, 26 March 2007 (UTC)


Image:Orata al Cartoccio.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Orata al Cartoccio.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MECUtalk 15:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

The photographer at flickr obviously changed the license! When I uploaded it, it was creative commons. You can't rely on flickr. -- AM 17:20, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Documenta_1955.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Documenta_1955.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

BLueFiSH 19:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Rifondazione comunista.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Rifondazione comunista.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

xyzzyn 14:15, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Categorising your photos[edit]

I think you should then be pleased to contact not only me but also User:Jastrow, User:Marsyas and User:Bibi Saint-Pol: these are the three people most active in improving the part dealing with ancient archaeology, art and museums. As for myself, I am categorising art and history of Italy, therefore my interest is not strictly archaeological. But yes, I like ancient history, and I attended a classical school. Best wishes. --User:G.dallorto 20:23, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

I saw that other people are active on these items, but in the last time your changes cought my eye. I am an amateur interested in the ancient world and I love Italy! I will be there soon. Ciao, --AM 20:34, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Museo Nazionale Reggio Calabria.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Museo Nazionale Reggio Calabria.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--User:G.dallorto 21:30, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Ciao, ti suggerisco di trasferire l'immagine su It.Wiki, dove hanno adottato una nuova politica che leggi qui http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:EDP_per_it.wiki , e di marcarlo come {{EDP}}. Ti chiedo di fare lo stesso per altre immagini di autori (scultori, architetti) morti meno di 70 anni fa o viventi. --User:G.dallorto 21:30, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


Image:Rauenstein modified.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Rauenstein modified.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Deadstar 08:47, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Populonia_Panorama.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 11:56, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Ooops, forgot the license. I tagged it now. Regards, --AM 12:46, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Plaque d'Arman sur la préfecture de police de Paris[edit]

Salut, j'ai dû supprimer Image:Prefecure de police retouched.jpg que tu avais téléchargé sur Commons : la photo représente une œuvre protégées par le droit d'auteur. Malheureusement, la France ne reconnaît pas d'exception de panorama. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 07:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

J'ai seulement retouchée l'image. Ciao, --AM 15:58, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Kartoffelsalat.jpg[edit]

Antwort. Gruß --Kobako 14:47, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Ich antworte doch lieber hier, da ich den unten stehenden Weblink nicht auf einer Bilderdisk. hinterlassen möchte!

Leider habe ich für weitere Photos und auch für Wikipedia keine Zeit mehr (ich hatte nur zufällig dein Posting bemerkt, wäre es jemand anders gewesen, hätte ich wahrscheinlich gar nicht geantwortet), ich hatte mich früher mit Ölmalerei beschäftigt und auch schon Ausstellungen in Wien, Burgenland und Ungarn. Mit Nebenjops konnte ich sogar einigermaßen davon Leben, dann wurde ich plötzlich krank, vegetative Störungen, motorische Unruhe, Zittern, da war es dann mit den Malen vorbei, vor ca. 3 Jahren kaufte ich mir meinen ersten Computer, bin dann über Wikipedia gestolpert. Aber eigentlich wollte ich immer Computer Kunst machen, eben Bilder mit dem PC. Und das mache ich nun auch mit Adobe Photoshop, hier spiele ich schon den „Großen Computer Graphik Künstler“, ist nur so als Spaß gedacht, bekomme aber oft sehr gute Kritik für meine Bilder aus der ganzen Welt, das hat mich eigentlich dazu gebracht daran weiter zu arbeiten. Ich glaube, Zugriff auf die Bilder haben nur Angemeldete Besucher, nur durch die Slideshow können auch Unangemeldete Besucher etwas sehen. Gruß --Kobako 18:24, 24 July 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Bigcancoat.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bigcancoat.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Michelet-密是力 18:33, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Can't do nothing about it. I just retouched that pic. --AM 21:32, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ostia Antica Rete Viaria.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Ostia Antica Rete Viaria.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--User:G.dallorto 03:14, 7 October 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Fausto Bertinotti 2006.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Fausto Bertinotti 2006.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 88.134.232.95 03:15, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Verblockung.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Verblockung.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 07:36, 12 October 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Ringing.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ringing.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 21:11, 12 October 2007 (UTC)


Image:Fellatio_Isis_Osiris_modified.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Fellatio_Isis_Osiris_modified.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

70.20.139.119 00:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


Image:Aspic_Powder.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Aspic_Powder.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

__ ABF __ ϑ 15:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:VillaBarbaro 2007 07 08 01 retouched.jpg[edit]

Thanks for the retouch job. Now that I took a closer look, I can see you did a very good job. If you should need to retouch any other of my pictures, you may ask me for a version - fresh from the camera with perhaps just a comment in the exif added, and without the extra compression I usually saves them with to reduce the filesize for upload here. Haros 11:30, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi Haros, this edit I've made a long time ago. I have been there too, but I have no good photos of the location. Next time I'll contact you before editing, greetings, --AM 14:07, 20 March 2008 (UTC)


Image:Mussolini Casa Natale Predappio.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Mussolini Casa Natale Predappio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--62.216.206.141 01:55, 23 March 2008 (UTC)


Image:Dilthey1_retouched.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Dilthey1_retouched.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tischbeinahe 10:30, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Vercingetorix stater n2 CdM.jpg[edit]

Hi! I'll revert my new version and upload it separately if you like. White balance is tricky because it's a mix of tungsten and (mainly) daylight. I picked as reference the museum notices which are printed on white paper. Now that you say it, there is a pinkish tinge on the picture. I'll upload new versions. Anyway, I shoot in RAW so you can try to cook up your own version if you wish. It's a bit late now in France; I'll do it all tomorrow. Don't hesitate to give me a little prod if I forget you. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 22:12, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you in advance. Ciao, --AM 14:37, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
I uploaded the new version at Image:Vercingetorix stater n2 CdM alternate.jpg. Does it look more natural to you? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:29, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm not really convinced. But there is no comparison, so it is hard to tell for me how it looks in reality. What material is it? Gold? Bronze? At least the three-dimensional impression is much better here. --AM 17:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
I suspect those are gold staters. I've always found it difficult to "recreate" a correct colour for gold when I couldn't control exactly the colour balance. Following your remarks, I'll revert my updates and upload them separately. Still, can I crop Image:Vercingetorix stater n2 CdM.jpg? I feel there's too much empty space around the coin. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:39, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
I wouldn't do it, it's perfect like it is, the coin needs some space around to develop its irregular shape. But this is a question of your personal taste. And it is your photo. You can try several versions. Sometimes you are blind and don't see the obvious. In the end Trial and error never fails. ;-) --AM 21:09, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


Image:Totò.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Totò.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Trixt 23:59, 23 May 2008 (UTC)


Image:Hitler_in_Paris.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Hitler_in_Paris.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kam Solusar 04:17, 26 May 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Albert_I._Of_Monaco_Nadar.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Albert_I._Of_Monaco_Nadar.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 17:01, 28 May 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Alexander_III._Czar_Of_Russia_Nadar.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Alexander_III._Czar_Of_Russia_Nadar.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 17:11, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Absolutely ridiculous! Nadar died in 1910. --AM (talk) 20:54, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

USB Flash Drive[edit]

Hi AlMare, I've already written on your german talkpage, but you've said you're 'vorwiegend hier tätig'. My friend has got a USB Flash Drive with no name or box with a name on it and so we can't get it running on her old Windows 98, without a driver. The stick exactly looks like your animation. Could you please write me the name oder product number or whatever, so we can look for it? Thanks a lot. Sven 19:43, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

No idea. I bought it and threw the papers away. But it works fine under XP. --AM (talk) 20:49, 15 June 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Atelier_Nadar_35BoulevardDesCapucines_1860_Nadar.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Atelier_Nadar_35BoulevardDesCapucines_1860_Nadar.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 10:44, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Added source. --AM (talk) 11:25, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Great. Could you add book name? "a Book" is very wide source, you know :)--OsamaK 12:43, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Good enough? :) --AM (talk) 21:38, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Sure, thanks! Don't stop uploading.--OsamaK 12:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Banana flower[edit]

Hey

Thanks or voting for my image at FPC [I would have preferred a support :)]. When you say it need dusting, what do you mean? Is there anything I can do to convince you to change your vote, as you are probably the deciding factor? Regards Muhammad 05:31, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

On the upper part of the flower there are a lot of light dust particles. You could clone them out. I'm sorry, but Crapload is right. Still a nice pic! By the way, I've taken this one Hornets on Banana Flower.jpg last year. Regards, --AM (talk) 16:30, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know. Shouldn't the presence of dust increase its EV ;)? What lens did you use for your picture? Muhammad 05:44, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Nothing special, it'a a macro-shot with a simple Canon Ixus 70. Ciao, --AM (talk) 08:33, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Adolphe_Thiers_Nadar.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Adolphe_Thiers_Nadar.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 19:54, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Please read {{PD-old}} twice. It says in bold text "life of the author plus 70 years". Now, we have no idea about the author and hir life. Nader book was published in 2006, which makes the work non-free—at least with {{PD-old}} license. Please check COM:CT#Public_domain and tell me if you find any acceptable (no doubts, no assumptions) license for this image.--OsamaK 02:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Gaspard-Félix Tournachon alias NADAR, died 21. of march 1910! --AM (talk) 16:57, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Great. Please add this information to the image(s) that taken by Nader. A book is not a reason to be free.--OsamaK 15:30, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
This information you can find already in the description of all my Nadar-scans: Creator:Félix Nadar

Now please undelete Image:Albert_I._Of_Monaco_Nadar.jpg, regards, --AM (talk) 17:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

If you don't undelete it I will have to re-upload it. --AM (talk) 20:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, I'm not an admin. Please report this in COM:UNDEL.--OsamaK 03:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Ok, I see. --AM (talk) 14:27, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Italian problems[edit]

Hi AlMare, I think you should read this. There is at least one photo you took among those that the Sopraintendenza ai Beni Culturali dell'Etruria meridionale want to be deleted. There is no consensus on deleting all the photos, but you may want to have the photos you uploaded to be deleted. Bye --Jaqen (talk) 23:18, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

I read parts of this discussion before and I can't believe it! I'm taking photos in italian museums since 30 years and nobody ever wanted a fee for photographing inside the museums. I remember darkly one or two cases where they sold tickets for using tipods and some museums that did not allow cameras. But in the big majority photos without flash where allowed. We should not give away theses pieces of the heritage of human culture in advance. And, no, I don't want my photos to be deleted. Ciao, --AM (talk) 17:22, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


Image:NorbertBlüm.GeorgSteinitz.Salzburg_retouched.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:NorbertBlüm.GeorgSteinitz.Salzburg_retouched.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

sугсго 10:02, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Schade, war ein gutes Plakat. --AM (talk) 23:52, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


File:2008-Dirmstein-Laurentius-kath-Hochaltar-037_retouched.jpg[edit]

File deletion warning File:2008-Dirmstein-Laurentius-kath-Hochaltar-037_retouched.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

sугсго 10:32, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, AlMare!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:36, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Via Appia.jpg[edit]

You are right, the Sinuessa red track is now wrong. I will fix it as soon as possible. Thanks --EH101 (talk) 12:54, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. Regards, --AM (talk) 16:26, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion for File:Museo Nazionale di Reggio Calabria.jpg[edit]

File:Museo Nazionale di Reggio Calabria.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Museo Nazionale di Reggio Calabria.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-93.144.188.53 10:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Further Information for File:Teltowkanal im Winter retouched.jpg[edit]

Hi AlMare. Can you please add further information to File:Teltowkanal im Winter retouched.jpg? The given license cannot be fulfilled without information on author and source. Also image desciption would be useful. Regards, norro 10:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Done. This was a retouche-job and I forgot to remove the format and to adjust the links. Ciao, --AM (talk) 17:55, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. --norro 22:03, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Camparibottle hd.jpg[edit]

Hello,

It seems that this image comes from http://www.camparigroup.com/en/press_media/image_gallery.jsp that's not your own photo. Yann (talk) 11:16, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Excuse me, I've mixed up two pics. Originally, in the german article de:Campari there was a photo I've edited a long time before. Afterwards somebody modified the article and replaced my photo with the one you've deleted. Regards, --AM (talk) 12:10, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Hanspeter Kraft.jpg[edit]

Hallo, AlMare! Ich war mal so frei und habe Deinen Schnellöschantrag für das Bild durch die entsprechende Permission-Seite für die MFO-Bilder ersetzt. Ich hoffe, das war o.k. Viele Grüße --Angela H. (talk) 16:32, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh, ich hatte nur die deutsche Seite gelesen, da steht nichts von creative commons. Ist dann wohl ok. Gruß zurück, --AM (talk) 16:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Es sieht so aus, als hätten sie die deutsche Fassung mit dem Haftungsausschluß bei sich selbst abgeschrieben… ;-) Und als wäre danach jemand gekommen, der ihnen gesagt hätte, daß eine Creative-Commons-Lizenz auch toll wäre. Viele Grüße --Angela H. (talk) 17:18, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Ah, ja... :) --AM (talk) 17:53, 19 March 2009 (UTC)


File:Roman Bar.jpg[edit]

You've uploaded a derivative work We're sorry, but File:Roman Bar.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

--Polarlys (talk) 19:22, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Airport FRA Kimorg-20090331-125204+0200 (Mathias Ortmann) retouched.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

I added the license. --AM (talk) 13:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Minturno_Plan.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Minturno_Plan.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Minturno_Plan.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Teofilo (talk) 09:11, 21 April 2009 (UTC)


File:Michele_Merkin_1_ad.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Michele_Merkin_1_ad.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 19:43, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Knuffig: Als Urheber/Bearbeiter einer anderen Version werde ich erst gar nicht benachrichtigt und finde das hier per Zufall? -- smial (talk) 10:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Ich weiß nicht was das soll. Sind wir einem seiner Lieblingsmodells auf die Zehen getreten?? --AM (talk) 13:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Ich habe keine Ahnung. Die Nacktfotos sehr junger Frauen eines "reputablen Künstlers" wie Klashorst werden beinahe allesamt durchgewunken auch ohne jede Freigabe durch die fotografierten Personen, weil sie ja möglicherwesie irgendwo verwendet werden könnten, abgeleitete Werke eines freigegebenen Fotos eines professionellen Models werden als "Spaß-Edit" abqualifiziert und sollen gelöscht wedren, obwohl sie in Verwendung sind. Da steht doch irgendwas auf dem Kopf. -- smial (talk) 13:55, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Es geschehen noch Zeichen und Wunder... -- smial (talk) 16:48, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Michele Merkin 1-42.jpgMit Mattbuck hatte ich schon irgendwannmal zu tun, scheint vernünftig zu sein. Die Aktion war ja auch ein Witz. Ciao, --AM (talk) 17:34, 1 July 2009 (UTC)Michele Merkin 1 ad.jpg
Mattbuck gehört m.E. zu den Leuten, die sich Argumente durchaus ohne Scheuklappen ansehen und nicht ideologisch argumentieren. -- smial (talk) 10:08, 2 July 2009 (UTC)


File tagging Image:Orecchiette Pugliesi.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Orecchiette Pugliesi.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:Orecchiette Pugliesi.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Jodo (talk) 18:52, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Hold your breath. --AM (talk) 21:29, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Museum of Ethnology Vienna 001.JPG[edit]

Hi, do you think you could retouch this image and increase the sharpness File:Museum of Ethnology Vienna 001.JPG? Thank you very much. Gryffindor (talk) 16:59, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

This photo was already edited. Do you have the original too? It is out of focus indeed. But I could try to sharpen it a bit. Regards, --AM (talk) 12:43, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
I made a first try. But the shutter speed was too long - you can't get it really sharp. --AM (talk) 13:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. I just uploaded the original image, will it help you? File:Museum of Ethnology Vienna 001 original.jpg. Thank you. Gryffindor (talk) 23:15, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I see. But I don't have the time right now. Be patient, maybe next weekend. Regards, --AM (talk) 20:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Alright thank you. Also if you could maybe improve some of this image that would be fantastic File:Cathedral Holy Resurrection Stanislawow3.jpg? thank you. Gryffindor (talk) 21:00, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
I had a try on this one, but maybe it is a little over-sharpened now. Ciao, --AM (talk) 17:54, 29 July 2009 (UTC) Cathedral Holy Resurrection Stanislawow3 retouched.jpg
Thanks alot. Gryffindor (talk) 08:26, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Via Appia map[edit]

Hi, you are the author of the file File:Via Appia map.jpg. If you have some free time, do you think you could put on the map Aequum Tuticum, between Beneventum and Aecae (its position is on the detailed map File:Via Appia.jpg. If had been able to do, I would've put it by myself, but I had not. I hope you could help me. Thanks in advance.--Thecinic (talk) 10:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Done, I looked for this place and it really was a bigger town 200 BC. In the italian wikipedia they haven an article. Regards. --AM (talk) 16:28, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Well done, thank you again. see you.--Thecinic (talk) 18:06, 27 July 2009 (UTC)


File:Orata al Cartoccio.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Orata al Cartoccio.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--High Contrast (talk) 18:32, 24 August 2009 (UTC)


File:Le_Donne_Del_Vino.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Le_Donne_Del_Vino.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 19:02, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

amaro bottles![edit]

I love your pictures of amaro bottles; did you collect the bottles in Italy? We have a large collection ourselves, but haven't gotten around to photographing them all. good work! (unsigned edit by user:Shabbychef on 16:34, 12 October 2009)

Thank you :-) Most of the bottles we bought in Italy. I know, there are much more different brands with very funny labels there. Just use one dull autum sunday and take photos of your collection. Salute! --AM (talk) 16:34, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

I ask about "Fellatio_Isis_Osiris_modified.jpg"[edit]

Excuse me,I want to ask about an image called "Fellatio_Isis_Osiris_modified.jpg" which you contributed. That image is a trimming with Chapter 1 of "Book of the Dead" possessed by the British Museum. That it is a mummy of a man called "ANI" that it is drawn and that the woman who wrote that you do a fellatio is a wife of "ANI" or a younger sister be written by "エジプトの死者の書―宗教思想の根源を探る" ISBN-10: 4409420070 ISBN-13: 978-4409420072

I think this image not to be Isis with Osiris who is ancient Egyptian God. Please show the grounds that you named "Fellatio_Isis_Osiris_modified" to the title of the file.Thank you.Arude (talk) 08:02, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

I have only retouched this photo, origininal uploader was Cherubino, you better should ask him. Regards, --AM (talk) 21:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
I thank for quick correspondence.--Arude (talk) 20:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


File:Erna_Wazinski_retouched.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Erna_Wazinski_retouched.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ALE! ¿…? 08:34, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Jacopo de' Barbari - Venetie MD retouched.png[edit]

Not sure why you reverted back to your earlier version of this image; it has blown out highlights in central lower part, has inconsistent tone and is lacking in detail (again, especially in the lower half). Would you prefer I just upload my retouched version as another file? Earthsound (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes. No problem to have several versions. Regards, --AM (talk) 02:19, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Sounds good, thanks. Earthsound (talk) 20:28, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
You're welcome. --AM (talk) 21:32, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Danke ![edit]

Hallo AlMare. Herzlichen Dank für deine Verbesserung der Map von der Provinz Neapel. Ich habe gar keine Fähigkeiten dieser Art! Falls du Spass haben solltest an solchen Korrekturen, hier hätte es noch eine, und hier noch eine andere die zu machen wäre. Was ich bis jetzt so entdeckt habe... Herzliche Grüsse, --DenghiùComm (talk) 23:23, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Erledigt. Wenn Du öfter solche Sachen hast, dann kannst Du die Bilder auch bei uns in der Fotowerkstatt einstellen. Da sind einige Leute, die sich mit digitaler Bildbearbeitung auskennen. Schönen Gruß, --AM (talk) 17:07, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Danke für den Hinweis. Leider sind die zwei Maps nicht verbessert worden. Irgend etwas ist nicht geraten. Beide haben noch dieselben Fehler! Liebe Grüsse, --DenghiùComm (talk) 17:30, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Doch die Karten sind jetzt ok. Du mußt nur den Browser-cache leeren. --AM (talk) 18:00, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Ok, jetz sehe ich es auch. Nun "Cannobio" is jetz ok, aber die Gemeinde "Anzasca" (die es nicht gibt!) sollte in "Macugnaga" umgetauft werden. Nochmals herzlichen dank dafür! --DenghiùComm (talk) 17:18, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Geändert, schönen Sonntag, --AM (talk) 11:54, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Perfekt! Wunderbar! Nochmals denghiù weri motch! Herzlichst, --DenghiùComm (talk) 22:12, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Stalin-Lenin-Kalinin-1919.jpg[edit]

Hi!

Just to be exact - back in 1919 there was actually neither Soviet Union nor Communist Party of the Soviet Union. There were the Soviet Russia and the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party.--Uostofchuodnego (talk) 09:28, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

You are right, the name at that time was "Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic" or simply "Soviet Russia". But the "Russian Social Democratic Labour Party" was renamed to "Russian Communist Party" in 1918. I will change that. Thank you. Regards, --AM (talk) 16:30, 11 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Heinz Klein-Arendt-07 retouched.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Heinz Klein-Arendt-07 retouched.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Z.Zt. wohl noch copyvio da keine OTRS-permission. Jocian kümmert sich drum.--Túrelio (talk) 10:35, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Danke, ich weiß. --AM (talk) 22:40, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Regards[edit]

Happy new year to you too --Carlomorino (talk) 18:43, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Disturbing foreground[edit]

Hi AlMare, sowas muss doch nicht unbedingt sein ... -- Gruß, aka 10:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Mag ja sein, aber der Typ kotzt mich an. Nichts für ungut, Gruß --AM (talk) 21:04, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Noch mehr heißes Wasser draufkippen kühlt den Streß aber auch nicht ab. Tässken Tee und Plätzchen? :-) -- smial (talk) 00:13, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Werden sehen, ich geh' jetzt erst mal ins Thermalbad. :-) Tee und Plätzchen dann hinterher, danke gerne. Ich steuer dann noch etwas Rum bei. (minus 5 hier und 20 cm Neuschnee in der Nacht -->Schneeschippen) Schönen Gruß und nachträglich gute Wünsche für das Neue Jahr! --AM (talk) 09:20, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

No idea about both. I' m working on retouching and enhancing photos. --AM (talk) 21:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Max-bill junghans retouched.jpg[edit]

Hallo!

Bist du Christos Vittoratos? Wenn nicht, so musst du von dieser Person die Erlaubnis einholen die besagte Datei unter der angegebenen Lizenz zu veröffentlichen. Hierbei ist ein sog. OTRS-Ticket notwendig: alles wichtige hier: Commons:OTRS. --High Contrast (talk) 00:18, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Was kann AlMare dafür, daß der GFDL-Baustein diese alberne "Ich, der Nutzungsinhaber...."-Formulierung enthält? Im Beschreibungstext steht eindeutig drin, daß das eine bearbeitete Version von File:Max-bill junghans.jpg ist, und da ist Christos Vittoratos der Uploader. @AlMare: Ich baller bei sowas übrigens immer den Fotowerkstatt-Baustein rein, auch wenn die Überarbeitung gar nicht im Rahmen der Fotowerkstatt, sondern auf eigene Initiative hin erfolgt ist. Hat sich noch nie jemand drüber beschwert, und der leuchtet dann auch schön auffällig. -- smial (talk) 09:45, 19 January 2010 (UTC) Ps.: Ich hätte in dem Fall (nur aufgerichtet/gedreht) einfach das Original überschrieben...... Pps.: Ich sehe, gerade erst, ist ja sogar aus der Fotowerkstatt........
Danke smial ;-) Ich habe dem nichts mehr hinzuzufügen. --AM (talk) 15:58, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Ppps: Wo ich das schiefe Bild gefunden habe, hab ich's gegen die gerade Version ausgetauscht. -- smial (talk) 16:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Mannheimer fernmeldeturm retouched.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:18, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

License added. --AM (talk) 22:23, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Files you uploaded may be deleted[edit]

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 22:47, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I've only retouched this pic, original uploader was Neozoon. You'd better ask him. Regards, --AM (talk) 14:28, 12 March 2010 (UTC)


File:Mycenae_plan.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mycenae_plan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

38.111.13.130 13:36, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Auditorio de Tenerife Pano[edit]

Hallo, wegen [1] und [2] bitte ich dich noch einmal eindringlich, auf sowas zu verzichten. Commons:Image annotations nennt solche Kommentare ausdrücklich als unsachgemäße Anwendung dieser Anmerkungsfunktion. -- aka 14:28, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Katakomben Fresko[edit]

Hallo AlMare. Habe dein schönes Fresko Bild auf Italienisch und Deutsch beschrieben. Könnte ich dich bitten der Deutsche Text zu korrigieren (oder wie du willst auch zu ändern), und wenn möglich ihn ins Englische zu übersetzen? Ich währe dir sehr dankbahr! Saluti italiani --DenghiùComm (talk) 08:38, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Danke für die Blumen :-) , aber die Bildqualität ist leider nicht so gut. Ich habe die deutsche Beschreibung etwas angepaßt. Ach ja, englisch fehlt ja auch noch, das mach ich jetzt noch schnell. Viele Grüße zurück nach Bella Italia! --AM (talk) 16:35, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Danke dir für die Korrekturen und die gute englische Uebersetzung! Saluti, --DenghiùComm (talk) 10:02, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Karte korrigieren[edit]

Hallo AlMare. Darf ich dich wieder mal stören, und bitten / beauftragen diese Karte zu korrigieren? (Tuscony --> Tuscany) Nur wenn du Zeit und Lust hast, of course... Alles Gute, --DenghiùComm (talk) 15:26, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Erledigt, ciao, --AM (talk) 18:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Mille grazie! --DenghiùComm (talk) 19:32, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Please give images good descriptions[edit]

العربية | català | dansk | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | occitan | polski | português | русский | українська | +/−


I noticed you've uploaded File:Kalamos real.jpg and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!

--Santosga (talk) 14:59, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Redpin.svg --AM (talk) 21:10, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Koms-vestib_retouched.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Koms-vestib_retouched.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 23:18, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Tower_St._Chrischona_schmal_quer.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tower_St._Chrischona_schmal_quer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:17, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:A-lambsdorff-fotowerkstatt.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:A-lambsdorff-fotowerkstatt.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:A-lambsdorff-fotowerkstatt.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

4028mdk09 (talk) 08:46, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Pancevgoldenkopacka_retouched.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Pancevgoldenkopacka_retouched.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ytoyoda (talk) 14:52, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

I've just retouched the original pic - no idea about the license, --AM (talk) 22:40, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Bruxelles_Juste_Lipse_retouched.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bruxelles_Juste_Lipse_retouched.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.61.170.180 12:19, 18 March 2011 (UTC)


File:Alexander Binder retouched.jpg wurde zur Schnelllöschung vorgeschlagen. --Túrelio (talk) 09:31, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Alexander_Binder_retouched.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Alexander_Binder_retouched.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FASTILY (TALK) 09:01, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Tower_St._Chrischona_schmal_quer.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tower_St._Chrischona_schmal_quer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:24, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Grabmal_1_psycho.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Grabmal_1_psycho.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Avron (talk) 18:34, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Biennale di Venezia 2001 Hard Smoked Sausage.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Biennale di Venezia 2001 Hard Smoked Sausage.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Biennale di Venezia 2001 Hard Smoked Sausage.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

AndreasPraefcke (talk) 22:21, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Jesko Friedrich 3 retouched.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Jesko Friedrich 3 retouched.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

mabdul 07:14, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Maximilian Emanuel von Washington retouched.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Maximilian Emanuel von Washington retouched.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Saibo (Δ) 17:26, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

File:L-Westreich 1908 retouched.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:L-Westreich 1908 retouched.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Saibo (Δ) 17:36, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Oberlin Smith 1888a retouched.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Oberlin Smith 1888a retouched.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Saibo (Δ) 17:40, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Ich habe es in die deWP unter gleichem Namen verschoben (wo auch die anderen Bearbeitungen und das Original sind). Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 17:21, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Schuko plug and socket.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

I've made an edit, thats it. --AM (talk) 21:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Permission request to use one of your pictures in a textbook[edit]

I would like to include your picture of the dolia at Villa Rustica in Boscoreale http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Boscoreale_Villa_Rustica_Dolia.jpg in an architecture textbook translation I am working on. This would show at about 1/15 of a page in an illustrations appendix I am adding.

I wanted to check that would be OK with you, and ask about additional information (real name, perhaps location) that I could add to the credits, which would show in the legend immediately below the picture. [Just in case, I can be contacted at thechabon ATT!! hotmail DOTT!! com.]

Iiiiaaaa (talk) 08:37, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Villa Regina
No problem, you can use the picture. Quotation with my commons-nick is enough. The location is inside the "Villa Regina", a partly reconstructed roman villa rustica besides the Museum (See here). There was a wine press in this house and the dolia probably contained the wine. Maybe you send me a copy when it is printed? If yes, I will email you my adress. Ciao, --AM (talk) 16:35, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Questions about the Tomb of the Leopards image[edit]

Hello,

I am working on a two-part paper for an online magazine and have a few questions about the Tomb of the Leopards image you have posted here. Part 1 identifies the various kinds of contextual information people have noted as being useful for digital preservation (technical details, intellectual meaning of the object, copyright, etc.) and Part 2 shows how the framework I developed can be applied in practice using several examples. There are a few questions requiring your input since you are the creator of the image. Hopefully the questions aren't too onerous. :-)

Questions:

Did you create the image with a camera while within the tomb, or was this image created by scanning a previously published image?

Can you tell me what equipment was used in creating the digital image?

If the image was scanned, do you know the title (and other pertinent details) of the publication?

If you took the image in the tomb, do you happen to remember if there were any copyright restrictions placed on images taken of the tomb? (I remember hearing several years ago that the Italian gov wanted to copyright the Italian landscape and so I am curious about whether or not this ever came to pass.)

Are there any restrictions on how the digital image you created can be accessed, used or exchanged?

After you created the image did you upload the file to a computer, an external drive or other device before uploading it to Wikimedia? (This question gets to the issue of authenticity and integrity of the file.)

Many thanks for answering my questions.

JEB

PS. If you want to learn more about the kind of work I do: http://slis.wayne.edu/faculty/bio.php?id=61932


Hi JEB,

I took this photo within the tomb on 16th of june 2001.

Camera was a (that time brandnew) Canon Digital IXUS 300 (US: Powershot S300).

There were no restictions and I took several photos (like I did at numerous other italian archeologic sites).

I uploaded (as I regularly do) the photo to a harddrive in my computer.

I hope this helps you.

Regards, AM (talk) 14:46, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Biennale Di Venezia Pavillon Of Sweden And Norway 2007.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Biennale Di Venezia Pavillon Of Sweden And Norway 2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

124.149.151.113 14:51, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Washington DC FBI J. Edgar Hoover Building Brunswyk (2012). Edgar Hoover Building Brunswyk (2012) retouched.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:06, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Fixed now! --AM (talk) 16:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Washington DC Botschaft Kanada Brunswyk (2012) retouched.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:21, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Fixed now! --AM (talk) 16:30, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Licence[edit]

Hi, I work for the german "Gesellschaft für antike Philosophie" which organizes a congress in Munich in the next year (7.-11.10.2013). We would like to use your photo of the tomb of the diver (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Paestum_Tuffatore.jpg#filelinks) on our brochures and other materials. Under which conditions is that possible? Thank you! - D90

Hi D90, just a quote of my commons user name and specimen copy. Please send me an email: hsapiens@cooltoad.com Regards, --AM (talk) 16:47, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Biennale di Venezia 2009 Chen Zhen.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Biennale di Venezia 2009 Chen Zhen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bob247 (talk) 20:30, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

License:Canosa_Ponte_Romano.jpg[edit]

Dear AlMare, I would like to use your photography of this Roman bridge on the cover of a book, memories of a friend o mine that are dealing a lot with journeys: "Weite Wege - Zwischen muslimischen Engeln und teuflischen Diplomaten" (Far Ways - Between Muslim angels and satanic diplomates). This book is going to be printed soon (400 copies). To be sure that I am allowed this, I would ask for your permission. I would also like to learn if you prefer to be referred as "AlMare" or with another name or organisation. Then, I need an adress of you for sending a couple of copies of the book. Thank you very much for your attention. Tevfik Turan, Verlag auf dem Ruffel (ruffel.de) http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Canosa_Ponte_Romano.jpg

Hallo Tevfik Turan, Sie können das Bild gerne verwenden. Bitte kontaktieren Sie mich unter: hsapiens@cooltoad.com Ciao, --AM (talk) 16:13, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 02:49, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Fallreepsknoten.3-kardeelig turnedleft+flipped.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Fallreepsknoten.3-kardeelig turnedleft+flipped.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 18:29, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Fallreepsknoten.3-kardeelig turnedleft.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Fallreepsknoten.3-kardeelig turnedleft.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 18:30, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Picture of Diane de Poitiers[edit]

I was writing a post on Chenonceau and noticed your picture of Diane des Poitiers is not correct. In fact, I think it is Gabrielle d'Estrées as the huntress Diana by Ambroise Dubois. The actual painting by Francesco Primaticcio, Le Primatice, from 1556 is shown in my post on the interior of Chenonceau (sorry, can't figure out how to include the picture). I think you should replace the picture. Thanks

Kurt Buzard MD FACS www.traveltoeat.com kurtab@cox.net

File:Tetradrachm Attica 449-404 BC cropped.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tetradrachm Attica 449-404 BC cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 08:43, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Tetradrachm Attica 449-404 BC.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tetradrachm Attica 449-404 BC.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 09:42, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:11, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:27, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Teramo Provincia cartina.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Teramo Provincia cartina.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Teramo Provincia cartina.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

AndreasPraefcke (talk) 11:25, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Ostia Antica Plan.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ostia Antica Plan.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ostia Antica Plan.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

AndreasPraefcke (talk) 11:28, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Populonia Necropoli di San Cerbone.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Populonia Necropoli di San Cerbone.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Populonia Necropoli di San Cerbone.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

AndreasPraefcke (talk) 11:28, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Sutri Anfiteatro Sign.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sutri Anfiteatro Sign.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sutri Anfiteatro Sign.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

AndreasPraefcke (talk) 11:28, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Grotta Di Pertosa pianta.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Grotta Di Pertosa pianta.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Grotta Di Pertosa pianta.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

AndreasPraefcke (talk) 11:28, 27 May 2014 (UTC)