User talk:Allstarecho/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Archive 1 Archive 2 →

Sorry about that

Those are good interesting images, but not particularly easy to work on. Durova (talk) 03:13, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Welty image

I replied to you on my talk page, maybe not as helpfully as either of us would wish. Another point I forgot to mention is something those of us who work regularly with LOC online images have noticed: Sometimes some of their images are inexplicably temporarily unavailible or don't show up on searches; but might pop back up a week or a month later. *shrug* Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 13:14, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Foto di Trace Cyrus

Non ha muscoli allle braccia ed al torace dovrebba fare un po di pesi. in palestra almeno per sei mesi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.167.13.29 (talk • contribs)

Oh no, è caldo e bello come egli è. - ALLSTRecho wuz here @ 08:28, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Videos

Hi. I saw this, and was wondering, how do you upload videos? Can it be done with wmv files? I don't come to Commons that often, so can you reply here? Thanks! Nightscream (talk) 15:08, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Yet another Commons newbie asking for help

On Wikimedia, the reward for a job well done are another three jobs. So. File:Free Software Portal Logo.svg is widely used as a small icon. For example, it's on articles on free software projects on en.wikipedia. A friend of mine found it to be an eyesore and created File:Free Software Portal Logo-2.svg, which honestly looks better.

I've no particular interest in changing links in thousands of articles to point to the new version. How could I replace older file with the newer one, while respecting copyrights and any applicable copyrights? If you are unable or unwilling to ponder this, who else should I bug?

Both versions are marked with the Free Art License and the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 License. The newer one also bears a template that identifies it as a retouched version of the older one. The editor behind the first version has not responded to being asked about this twice. The second time, I asked him to if he had any objections. Thanks, --Kizor (talk) 13:42, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

First, save the new logo to your computer. Then go to the old logo image page. At the bottom of the old logo image page you'll see a link that says Upload a new version of this file. Click that link. Once it loads, at the Source filename field, browse for the new logo on your computer. In the File changes field box, not what you did like "cleaned up image", then be sure to note who the author of the new logo is and finally, place a [[link]] to the new logo's current page so that it'll be preserved in the history at least for admins to be able to go back and see once it's deleted. Then click the Upload file button. The new logo will replace the old logo on every page the old logo is currently in use. - ALLSTRecho wuz here @ 14:50, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Oops, overlooked one image!

Allstarecho, thanks for your updates. I did forget to add the same information at this link, on the image for Mid facelift (rhytidectomy) upper incision.png. If you could also check this one, that would be GREAT! Thanks again for all your time/help. Paravis (talk) 19:14, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Your deletion request (SeniorGayCouple50Years.gif)

You requested the deletion of File:SeniorGayCouple50Years.gif on Yanns talk page in this edit. The log states copyright violation as reason for deletion.

What was this violation about? Is it possible to bring this picture back on commons with a proper license? Whose credit is it? I'm very interested in this nice substantiation of gay marriage [as a straight] Icon wink.gif -- Gohnarch░░░░ 20:54, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

It was a copyright violation on Commons without the author's permission. If you'd like to contact the author at Flickr and ask the author to make the images available, feel free to do so here but please note he does have some "Not safe for work" images there. Here are some of the related images: The one that was on Commons, another - ALLSTRecho wuz here @ 21:15, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
It seems we won't see this files on Commons again. However, great thanks for the links Icon smile.gif -- Gohnarch░░░░ 16:44, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Eudora_Welty.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Eudora_Welty.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 00:39, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Wrong deletion, no follow up

I agree that we should keep Wikipedia free of copyright violations, but you deleted the picture I uploaded, though it was not violating copyright. You provided a link to a page that did not even have the same picture on it, only a video about a photo shoot taken that day. Are photos taken at photo shoots? Yes. Does that mean they are copyright? No, because the photographer can release them under a Creative Commons license. It seems like you don't understand copyright rules. So that's annoying for my picture to be deleted, and the picture that reverted for bikini still has a copyright. Twocs (talk) 10:54, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

I didn't delete the image. An administrator deleted it. I only tagged it as a copyright violation. Let me explain this to you again. The image you uploaded was published in copyrighted material, a calendar and a DVD, by BetUS.com. It can't be used here regardless of what someone on Flickr uploads the image and sets the copyright as. We don't even know if that person on Flickr actually took the photo. As to the image reverted to in the bikini article, it was originally uploaded to Flickr with a free-to-use license but has since been changed. Because it was originally a free-to-use license, and because such free-ness can not by law be revoked later, the image remains free-to-use. - ALLSTRecho wuz here @ 17:22, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Uhh

What exactly is with the reluctance to delete that Transformers street artwork photo that always gets kept even though its a non-blatant copyvio? ViperSnake151 (talk) 03:03, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Ole_Miss_Rebels_football_2009_Unsatisfied.gif

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ole_Miss_Rebels_football_2009_Unsatisfied.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

AvruchT * ER 01:48, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files from Bob Bobster on Flickr

Hi Allstarecho! Bob Bobster (bobster855) on Flickr is known to upload files created by others, marking them with licenses that he has no legal right to release them under, and failing to credit the actual authors. The account is therefore listed as an unreliable source at Commons:Questionable Flickr images.

I have initiated a review of all files taken from this Flickr user that I could find. Since you uploaded one or more of those files to Commons, you may wish to comment at Commons:Deletion requests/Files from Bob Bobster on Flickr. It is possible that some of the files should be kept, but even most of the ones that may be okay to keep need to have their authorship, licensing and other information corrected. LX (talk, contribs) 15:22, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Claude_Passeau.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Claude_Passeau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Secret (talk) 20:57, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Ray Rogers Pearl quarterback.jpg

Hi. It looks to me like you made a mistake in the description of File:Ray Rogers Pearl quarterback.jpg. I was getting ready to categorize it as being from 1921 in Mississippi, but I've never seen a football helmet like that from such an early era, so I did a quick google-- per [1], the team didn't even exist until 1948. So I removed the date -- if you have better info, please provide it. By the way, is he the same Ray Rogers as this politician? Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 06:22, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

You are correct and I did notice that later on but never went back and changed it as it slipped my mind and my time for Wiki related web sites became very limited. The year for the scan should be the same year as the team's founding, which would be 1948. And yes, he is the same person as the politician. Also last year the football stadium at Pearl High School was renovated and named in his honor to Ray Rogers Stadium. - ALLSTRecho wuz here 07:22, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Useful icons

Thanks for the gallery, that is indeed useful. — Hex (❝?!❞) 16:07, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

File:German concentration camp chart of prisoner markings.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:German concentration camp chart of prisoner markings.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 21:18, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Kindness Barnstar Hires.png The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
helloooo Xd Maik Gustavo Ovando (talk) 05:42, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:39, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Ray Rogers Pearl quarterback.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ray Rogers Pearl quarterback.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ray Rogers Pearl quarterback.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Jaranda wat's sup 00:01, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Ray Rogers Pearl quarterback.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ray Rogers Pearl quarterback.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jaranda wat's sup 20:47, 7 May 2014 (UTC)