User talk:Alvesgaspar/archive12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Please use sub-categories[edit]

dansk | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | русский | svenska | +/−


Over-categorization.svg
Start hand.svg
When categorising files, please avoid placing them into several categories that are directly linked within the same tree (e.g. a parent category and a child category – like Category:United Kingdom and Category:London), to prevent over-categorization of files and over-population of categories. Usually, only the most specific category should be used. See Commons:Categories for more details. Thank you.

--Apalsola tc 22:53, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Fly April 2008-12.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stomorhina lunata.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Tipulidae April 2008-2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nephrotoma appendiculata (Spotted Crane-Fly), female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Aloe July 2009-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aloe July 2009-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fly and bug June 2009-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fly and bug June 2009-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dragonfly July 2009-3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dragonfly July 2009-3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File:Tomar December 2008-4.jpg[edit]

The latest version of your picture seems to be corrupted. Can you please check this and perhaps upload the last version again? Sorry, when this is only a problem in Germany. thx --Mbdortmund (talk) 21:49, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dragonfly July 2009-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dragonfly July 2009-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bug June 2009-5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bug June 2009-5.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File:Butterfly_October_2007-3.jpg[edit]

Hello! I am not a butterfly expert and today I went out and took some images of butterflies in a park in Stockholm. As I tried to detemine the species of the ones in my pictures, I used a book on butteflies that I borrowed at the library, but the pictures are quite small, so I tried to compare with the images on wikimedia, as they are often bigger and better. I just could not decide if my butterfly was Pieris brassicae or Pieris rapae. So I found your beautiful picture of a pieris rapae, but then I got confused because the black markings on the top of the forewing, as seen though looks very much like the example of the Pieris brassicae because it goes down the wing, while the black marking on the P. rapae only has a black triangle on the top of the wing. As the same species of butterflies can look a bit different depending on which generation of the year they are, male female, I cannot tell you you were wrong about your species determination. I can only say it looks like the example of Pieris brassicae shown in the book "Svenska Fjärilar En Fälthandbok" written by Bo Söderström. --Korall (talk) 21:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rana June 2009-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rana June 2009-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Photo Use[edit]

I would like to use your photo of "mullein" in a gardening calendar I'm writing, which I will propose to a publisher. The photo is at http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2a/Verbascum_sinuatum_August_2007-1.jpg May I use it, and if so how shall I attribute it? Thanks, Annie

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tomar December 2008-4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tomar December 2008-4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Bug July 2009-2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ploiaria domestica.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tomar December 2008-8.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tomar December 2008-8.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Porto July 2009-1a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto July 2009-1a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Porto July 2009-8.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto July 2009-8.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Porto July 2009-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto July 2009-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Porto Covo April 2009-6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo April 2009-6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Waves July 2009-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waves July 2009-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.