User talk:Alvesgaspar/archive20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2011-06-27. Nasas na praia de Louro- Muros.jpg[edit]

Espero explicações--Miguel Bugallo 01:49, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Que tal esperar ... sentado? ;-) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:41, 1 July 2011 (UTC)


Hi There

I am from an ad agency in Australia. We would like to purchase your chicken running picture as roiyalty free. Is this available for purchase and if so, how much. My email address is nburrows@bcm.om.au

Thanks

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Seagull June 2011-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seagull June 2011-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Category:Featured pictures of Lisbon[edit]

Hello. This new category is to fit in Category:Featured pictures by city, where all the cities of the world with around ten or more than ten featured pictures each have their own category. There are not a lot of them, so I think it is important to have a complete list. Lisbon and Porto Covo should not be an exception. At least, that's what I think. Thierry Caro (talk) 12:04, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Porto Covo pano June 2011-2b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo pano June 2011-2b.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Seagull June 2011-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seagull June 2011-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


File tagging File:Paris July 2011-2.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Paris July 2011-2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Don-kun (talk) 16:50, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info -- The tag was removed as it does not apply to the situation: I am the author of the file. Please consider to start a DR instead. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:52, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Paris_July_2011-2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Paris_July_2011-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

/人 ‿‿ 人\ 苦情処理係 19:39, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Alvesgaspar!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Moscow July 2011-4a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow July 2011-4a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Moscow July 2011-1a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow July 2011-1a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Moscow July 2011-2a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow July 2011-2a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Paris July 2011-10a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris July 2011-10a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Heliopsis July 2011-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coreopsis July 2011-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gaillardia July 2011-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gaillardia July 2011-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Coreopsis July 2011-3.jpg[edit]

Hi Alvesgaspar; I could still see an artifact in File:Coreopsis July 2011-3.jpg, so I used the magic wand tool (Photoshop) to select the area, the scratch removal tool to blur the linear artifact, and the gradient tool to darken the corner. If you don't like the result, just revert it. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:54, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Thank you, Walter, it's perfect. My eyes aren't what they used to be?... -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:11, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Moscow July 2011-7a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow July 2011-7a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

L'Arc de Triomphe[edit]

L’Arc de Triomphe est un monument que je connais ou... que je crois connaitre. Car systématiquement je reste planté et fasciné par le « Départ » et je m’aperçois, grâce à toi, que j’ai dénigré les 3 autres. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:57, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Ouis, c'est souvent le cas. Parfois j'ai honte de ne pas connaitre assez de Lisbonne pour la montrer aux amis! Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:12, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Permission[edit]

Hello.

I have written a book for children about animals that I want to publish. In searching for photographic images, I have found your pictures that is very beautiful and fit the storyline that I want to convey. I will appreciate it if you will give me permission to use these photo's in my book. Below are the animals that will represents your photo's. I will also include all info that will accompany the acknowledgements.

I will acknowledge your work - Beneath the photo and at the end of the book, your information. I ask that if you agree, to kindly send me your Name and appropriate information as you wish it to be published.

Photographer: Joaquim Alves Gaspar. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mantid_August_2007-2.jpg Praying Mantis. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bumblebee_October_2007-3.jpg Honey Bee

Thank you very much. Louise - zandtree@yahoo.com

  • Please feel free to use those two pictures in the terms you mention. But please notice that the second insect is not a "Honey bee" but a "Bumblebee". They belong to the same big family of the Apidae but are very different creatures. Bumblebees don't produce honey!-- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:15, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Moscow July 2011-11a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow July 2011-11a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Moscow July 2011-35b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow July 2011-35b.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Echinops July 2011-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Echinops July 2011-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Moscow_July_2011-38a.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Moscow_July_2011-38a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.187.106.46 17:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Foeniculum July 2011-1a.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Foeniculum vulgare (Fennel).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Ipomoea July 2011-2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ipomoea lobata (Fire vine).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Nelumbo July 2011-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nelumbo July 2011-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Moscow July 2011-37a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow July 2011-37a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Heliopsis July 2011-3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coreopsis July 2011-3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Opéra de Paris[edit]

J'ai mis une note sur ta photo de l'opéra. Ce n'est pas une plaisanterie. Par contre je ne suis pas très sûr de mon anglais si tu voulais la laisser. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:13, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Paris July 2011-21b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris July 2011-21b.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paris July 2011-22a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris July 2011-22a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Eryngium July 2011-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eryngium July 2011-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Images Set Promotion[edit]

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: The main sculptures of the Arc du Triomphe, Paris.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
The main sculptures of the Arc du Triomphe, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

--George Chernilevsky talk 12:11, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Moscow July 2011-34a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow July 2011-34a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP Promotion[edit]

Moscow July 2011-4a.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Moscow July 2011-4a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moscow July 2011-4a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Caesalpinia July 2011-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Caesalpinia July 2011-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cynara July 2011-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cynara July 2011-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP Promotion[edit]

Heliopsis July 2011-2.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Coreopsis July 2011-2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Coreopsis July 2011-2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Paris July 2011-11a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris July 2011-11a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Moscow July 2011-6a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow July 2011-6a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paris July 2011-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris July 2011-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow July 2011-38a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nelumbo July 2011-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nelumbo July 2011-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Moscow July 2011-16.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow July 2011-16.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Moscow_July_2011-37a.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Moscow_July_2011-37a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

79.237.182.28 23:06, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Porto Covo July 2011-6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo July 2011-6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paris July 2011-35.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris July 2011-35.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paris July 2011-27a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris July 2011-27a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Paris July 2011-30.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris July 2011-30.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Moscow July 2011-3c.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow July 2011-3c.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paris July 2011-26a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris July 2011-26a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Agave July 2011-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agave July 2011-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Ipomoea purpurea en VI[edit]

J'ai un doute sur la détermination, je crains que tu ne sois victime du jardiner du Muséum. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:18, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

  • J'ai eu la même impression, hélas! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:59, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Vague en FP[edit]

Bonjour mon ami,

Je veux être le premier à te féliciter pour la promotion en FP de ton "saut de vague", c'est vraiment une très belle image, très réussie. On a l'impression que le personnage veut marcher sur l'eau ! Et 20/0, c'est un beau score, comme pour un match de volley-ball ! ;)
J'ai bien reçu ton mail, je suis content que le livre te plaise et te soit utile, tiens moi au courant !
Amitiés, --Jebulon (talk) 09:12, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Merci bien de tes compliments, Jebulon! But the truth is I didn't believe much in the success of the photo in FPC. That is why I called the nomination 'a joke'. It is, of course, a "lucky shot" and one could take hundreds of them before getting a similar result. Yes, it is nice to have such an unanimous result. But I'm not the only one, there is some gentleman from German who has presented recently gorgeous panoramas! and another user from Tanzania who shot one of the most beautiful animal portraits to date in FPC! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:49, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Porto Covo July 2011-1.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Porto Covo July 2011-1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porto Covo July 2011-1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Paris July 2011-4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris July 2011-4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Porto Covo July 2011-29.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo July 2011-29.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Porto Covo July 2011-32.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo July 2011-32.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paris July 2011-33.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris July 2011-33.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Caesalpinia July 2011-1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caesalpinia gilliesii (Bird of Paradise), flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Flower April 2010-3.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Centaurea sphaerocephala, flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Heliopsis July 2011-2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coreopsis grandiflora, flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Echinops July 2011-1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Echinops ritro (Globe thistle).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Eryngium July 2011-1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eryngium amethystinum (Amethyst Sea Holly).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Flowers February 2009-1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Freesia alba, flowers and buds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Ipomoea July 2011-4.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ipomoea tricolor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Ludwigia July 2011-1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ludwigia grandiflora (Primrose willow), flower and leaves.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Trifolium July 2011-1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trifolium montanum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Moscow church[edit]

Why cant I use the email user? You have me blocked? You know I cannot be nice to you in public!

I would saturate the wall colors with photoshop levels, maybe a little burning in. Maybe a polarizing filter would have helped. Just a friendly comment... nice shot. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:52, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

  • For some reason, probably a clumsy change by myself, the email from other users was not enabled. It is fixed now. Yes, the aesthetics of the image would benefit from an increase in the saturation, especially of the washed out colors of the fresco paintings. But I feel some scruples in exagerating when the subject is historical (in spite of what I say in my profile about the interpretation of reality bla bla). Thanks for the friendly suggestion anyway. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:36, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Porto Covo July 2011-4b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo July 2011-4b.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP Promotion[edit]

Moscow July 2011-34a.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Moscow July 2011-34a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moscow July 2011-34a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:08, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Moscow July 2011-3d.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Moscow_July_2011-edit_by_Böhringer.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moscow July 2011-3c.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:09, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Moscow July 2011-39a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow July 2011-39a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Porto Covo July 2011-34.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo July 2011-34.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Paris_July_2011-27a.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Paris_July_2011-27a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

195.169.141.54 15:15, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Porto Covo July 2011-30a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto Covo July 2011-30a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Silybum March 2008-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silybum March 2008-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paris July 2011-24.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris July 2011-24.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Ruellia July 2011-1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ruellia humilis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Paris July 2011-28a.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arc de Triomphe du Carrousel, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Paris July 2011-28a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris July 2011-28a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Alcea July 2011-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcea July 2011-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Morning glory September 2007-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morning glory September 2007-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hoverfly May 2008-6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoverfly May 2008-6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Pollenia June 2011-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pollenia June 2011-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hoverfly July 2011-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoverfly July 2011-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Flower July 2011-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flower July 2011-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Flower July 2011-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flower July 2011-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paris July 2011-41.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris July 2011-41.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Agave July 2011-1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agave americana in bloom.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Campanula July 2011-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campanula July 2011-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Moscow July 2011-49.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow July 2011-49.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Moscow July 2011-48.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow July 2011-48.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Flower July 2011-3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flower July 2011-3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Moscow July 2011-13a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow July 2011-13a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Moscow July 2011-10a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow July 2011-10a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Featured Picture[edit]

Obrigada pelas boas vindas, e também pelas considerações.
Efectivamente tenho aprendido bastante com os comentários negativos, pois fala de coisas em que não tinha reparado. Gosto muito de fotografia, mas como nunca aprendi com ninguém, os pormenores técnicos fogem-me, mas acho que vou aprender muito aqui. Ás vezes vejo fotografias que não gosto mesmo nada, mas não ponho voto porque não sei explicar a razão por palavras, talvez melhore com o tempo. Vou seguir o conselho e tentar não ser impulsiva a avaliar uma fotografia só porque gosto do tema.--Celia Ascenso (talk) 10:42, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Moscow July 2011-13a.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Moscow State Historical Museum, north façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Involuntary vacation[edit]

Hi Joaquim,

It was nice of you to assume that I am backSmile. It makes me smile to get such a reaction when I drop by to make just a single silly comment. Unfortunately, I am not back as a contributor at this time. This summer my DSLR and 200 mm lens suffered a fatal accident, which shattered the lens and resulted in a camera body, which is completely out of order. Also, we are in the process of reworking a majority of the rooms in our house including the roof, which is taking a lot of resources (both economically and timewise). Maybe, when the dust settles (literally, there is a lot of dust on the keyboard I am writing on), I can get back to Commons. Till then, enjoy! Best wishes, --Slaunger (talk) 20:10, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

FP quality advice[edit]

Hey Alvesgaspar, I was wanting to get your opinion on whether you think the following are FP candidates:

The photographer will be providing them to me in much higher resolution (prob max resolution), so they will meet that criteria before too long. Anyway, am interested in what you think. Cheers, russavia (talk) 21:11, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

  • Hi Russavia, thank you for asking my advice. I'm afraid none of the pictures have a real chance of promotion. The problem of almost all is the tight crop, much affecting the composition (which is one of the most important components of a FP). Size is also an issue, with pictures 1 and 5 below FP requirement. The best are probably 2 and 3 but, again, the extreme crop makes them poor candidates, even for QI. Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:32, 26 September 2011 (UTC)