User talk:Amada44/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
← Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 →

Contents

File:Industrial_Robot_.jpg

Industrial robot.jpg

I aren't able to look at OTRS messages either, but have added comments to Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#File:Industrial_Robot_.jpg, I suspect that the OTRS email won't cover this image, so I have recreated a very similar (but smaller) image from the transparent GIF - File:Industrial robot.jpg. If we can't get the original back, I propose creating a link from the badname (has a space on the end) to the new image, or if that is too inefficient (not sure how much extra load is generated by redirects), just move the new one over the top of this one. --Tony Wills (talk) 11:11, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Yea let's see what OTRS has to say. Probably the permission is for those 6 files only as the file in question has been deleted long before the DR. But I don't really think its worth it to get a new permission for that file. We can just place a redirect from the deleted file to the one you did. Amada44  talk to me 12:44, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
I created the redirect. load is no problem. cheers, Amada44  talk to me 15:28, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
Great. It looks as though it was mainly used in anti-vandalism messages by a bot, and they now use a different image, but at least all those old messages now have an illustration again :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 20:37, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the help for File:UNDG.gif

Thanks for editing the license; I just don't get Commons that well. Can you help me also for this File:ODI.gif ? I uploaded it to represent the logo in the main wikipedia page. Thanks. Foxhound66.

Hi. Sure I can help. The problem is, that the site claims copyright on everything they publish and I think that includes the logo (see here: http://www.odi.org.uk/about/terms-conditions/copyright.asp ). One could argue, that the logo is too simple for copyright but I am not sure about that. I will place a deletion on the file and that will give us more opinions. cheers, Amada44  talk to me 17:08, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Bilder aus dem Mitteilungsblatt "Cactáceas y Suculentas Mexicanas"

Hallo Amada44, herzlichen Dank für die Benachrichtigungen über diese Sache. Ich konnte erst heute mit Dr. Jorge Meyrán, Redakteur dieses Mitteilungsblattes für über 40 Jahren, nochmal über die rechtliche Situation, Wiedergabe und Nutzung des Inhalts sprechen. Er hat bestätigt, die Wiedergabe des Inhalts sei ganz erlaubt, sofern ganze Anerkennung auch gegeben wird.

Ferner hat er auf das Impressum des Mitteilungsblatts hingewiesen, wo absichtlich keinerlei Urheberrechte genannt sind um eine eventuelle Wiedergabe nicht zu verhindern. Im Impressum gibt es ein Ort, wo tatsächlich erklärt wird, dass die Absicht der Publikation die Förderung dieses Teils der Botanik ist und deshalb sie gemeinnützig ist.

Als Beweis kann ich das gescannte Impressum schicken. Nur muss ich wissen, an wen sollte ich mich wenden. Kann ich Dir es schicken oder wie sollte ich es machen?

Außer diesen zwei Bildern gibt es auch dieses: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Digitostigmacaputmedusae.jpg

Für dieses Bild gilt dieselbe Logik, da es wurde auch durch das Mitteilungsblatt veröffentlicht.

Danke für Deine Hilfe.

Kauderwelsch (talk) 21:31, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Hallo. Danke für dein Input. Könntest du diese Informationen (mit links zu den betreffenden Bildern) an das OTRS Team schicken? Falls was dabei nicht klappt, kann ich Dir gerne helfen. LG, Amada44  talk to me 12:32, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Ich habe eine E-mail mit der Information und zwei Fotos vom Impressum geschickt. Danke sehr!
Kauderwelsch (talk) 20:06, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Danke sehr!

Vielen Dank für die Hilfe mit File:Arthropoda.jpg! Beste Grüße Hekerui (talk) 18:23, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Und danke auch vielmals für die Wasserzeichen-Entfernung in den Circus-Bildern! Bist echt eine gute Fee :) Toter Alter Mann (talk) 15:05, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Gerne ;) danke hierfür! LG, Amada44  talk to me 16:14, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Elisabethkirche Schneeberg

Hallo!

Nochmals vielen Dank für Deine Verbesserungen an meinem Foto. Ich habe es inzwischen für die Nominierung als Featured Picture gelistet. Ich würde Dich herzlich einladen, die Kandidatur zu unterstützen, wenn es Deiner Meinung nach FP-würdig ist. Vielen Dank & freundliche Grüße, Hendric Stattmann (talk) 20:39, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Unidentified plantKew6.jpg

Hi,

Please delete this picture. Exist a better copy. This is it File:1 Növény Kew Gardens 8 2009. szeptember.jpg. Thanks. DenesFeri (talk) 08:35, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

sure, done. Amada44  talk to me 11:26, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

OK, Thank you! DenesFeri (talk) 11:32, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

thank you for deleting large files

Thank you for deleting the large versions of files. I am the rightful copyright holder; however the larger files were edited by my partner who requested that the smallest possible versions are posted online so that further edits cannot be as easily facilitated. Thank you again!TheRightPost (talk) 14:33, 24 August 2011 (UTC)TheRightPost

thanks for the thanks

I was going to wait until there were a few less files in the section that I am looking at now before I responded to your kind barnstar thing.

I confess that I do not understand those things.

For a lot of reasons, a task which mostly empties my mind of other things and fills it with a different complicated mess has a certain appeal to me right now. My idea about wiki software is that the quick and easy categorization is the only real advantage that it has over regular old html. I might be wrong about that, but it is my idea for a long while now.

What is really really great and nice here is that the opportunity to do this was here and that I have been allowed to mostly complete it.

More importantly, interesting videos. I have not uploaded any of these (higher resolution versions of videos that were already here do not count). Original and interesting videos in particular. I have seen several of these from you and one, in particular, I look for in my bookmarks -- fail to find it -- and then rebookmark it (at least I think that is the process) several times now File:Cannon ball mill.ogv

In the several thousand (I think this many) videos I have watched over the last few months here, if there had not been a few interesting ones, like at least that one of yours and perhaps several of yours, since I recognized your "name", a dreadful and tedious task would have been so very much more so.

If the barnstar is a positive thing, you should perhaps have given it to yourself or if I understood it correctly, maybe I should have given it to those uploaders who made it much more worth my time. (I'd rather put them on the main page instead.)

I watched those things -- well, most of them. I really know what I am saying about good and interesting. At least in respect to scope and what is here.

At its best and with its scope and all of that, the commons has an opportunity to eh, "be itself" as far as the Main Page goes. Not that the cannonball mill is cheesey, but some of the better videos here are cheesey and are, good or even great cheese. I am attempting to encourage you to take more videos, but the qualities I am talking about are not found in your Cannonball video, unfortunately.

I have enough videos bookmarked that I can fill MOTD for a few months and I have not really looked at the audio files yet.

I really appreciate your "belief" as expressed in your videos also, btw. They are just the video. They are unmarked with flickr account information -- nothing is more pathetic/sad to me than a pointer to another web site here. How sad for the commercial failures that need so much of that! Also, the sorry little creative commons graphic. What a bad experience it should be for them if where ever that license is found, everything below it is rudely and wrongly "tampered with". It might become obvious that some licenses and/or license ideas are just simply not good and not good to have around.

Commons has a lot of "belief based" videos here -- it should be the standard for its own front page and I would like to see the people who would challenge that idea and also see what the hell they are doing here and/or anyone who voted for them.

So, I am attempting to dilute the importance of the categorization of the videos and inspire you to take more videos. Perhaps if you fill in the missing inspirational devices I could meet this goal?

while I do not understand the barnstars, I am less suspicious of them as I used to be. -- Queeg (talk) 09:53, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Cannonball mill

I've posted a request for more explanation of File:Cannon ball mill.ogv on the main page talkpage. I'm hoping you might be able to help out as you made the clip.

Peter Isotalo 11:25, 7 September 2011 (UTC)


USUARIO. CALANDRIA--Neru (talk) 13:54, 10 September 2011 (UTC) YO NO AGO CAMBIOS DE PREVISUALIZACION Y AÑAD FOTOS ANTERIORES. ESAS FOTOS REALIZADAS POR MI Y VAYASE USTED A MOLESTAR A OTRO SITIO POR FAVOR.BUENAS TARDES.............--Neru (talk) 13:54, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

File renaming request

A renaming here: File:Pseudocordylus plated lizard - Hottentots Holland Mountains South Africa.JPG, would be similarly appreciated. JMK (talk) 08:55, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Neuestes rhein panorama von mainz-cöln 1909.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuestes rhein panorama von mainz-cöln 1909.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--Vera (talk) 12:31, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Unidentified fish6.JPG

Thanks huge! :)--Хомелка (talk) 13:26, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

picture for deletion

Hi Amada44,

Please delete the following pictures: File:Asparagales - Agave sp. 1.jpg, File:Asparagales - Agave sp. 2.jpg, File:Asparagales - Agave sp. 3.jpg and File:1 Plant sp. - Kew 60.jpg. Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 10:02, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

And this one too. File:1 Plant sp. - Kew 63.jpg DenesFeri (talk) 10:06, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Another for deletion, File:1 Plant sp. - Kew 65.jpg. DenesFeri (talk) 10:44, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Today is the deletion day :) File:Caryophyllales - Schlumbergera truncata 1 - 2011.06.05.jpg, File:Caryophyllales - Schlumbergera truncata 2 - 2011.06.05.jpg, File:Caryophyllales - Schlumbergera truncata 3 - 2011.06.16.jpg, File:Caryophyllales - Schlumbergera truncata 4 - 2011.06.16.jpg, File:Caryophyllales - Schlumbergera truncata 5 - 2011.06.16.jpg, File:Caryophyllales - Schlumbergera truncata 6 - 2011.06.16.jpg and File:Caryophyllales - Schlumbergera truncata 7 - 2011.06.16.jpg. OK? DenesFeri (talk) 12:05, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Hey DenesFeri. I deleted them. Could you use {{rename}} next time? Its much simpler to rename wrong file names than to upload them again and deleting the old ones. cheers, Amada44  talk to me 14:54, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

OK, Thank you very much! Next time I will. DenesFeri (talk) 15:07, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Pseudocordylus melanotus subviridis 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pseudocordylus melanotus subviridis 10.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:1 - Perciformes sp. Kew.jpg

Hi,

Please show me how to rename a picture. I want this File:1 - Perciformes sp. Kew.jpg to be renamed Brycinus longipinnis - Kew 1

OK? Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 09:13, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Or explain step by step. DenesFeri (talk) 09:14, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Sure, just check out what I have added to the image. Does that explain it? Cheers, Amada44  talk to me 11:04, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Yes, I see now. Thanks! But what plant has been identified in this picture? DenesFeri (talk) 11:12, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, fish :-) . Amada44  talk to me 11:30, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

ok, than. DenesFeri (talk) 11:36, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Scaevola plumieri (Inkberry).jpg

Believe I found the id. If you agree you may like to update the file name. JMK (talk) 10:38, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

cool! thank you very much! I have corrected the filename. cheers, Amada44  talk to me 11:04, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

File:1 Pisces sp..jpg

Hi Amada44,

Please rename this picture Ancistrus stigmaticus - NHM 1. ok? Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 12:13, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

hi DenesFeri. Don't worry, it will be done very soon by a filemover. Cheers, Amada44  talk to me 14:21, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Done, --Pristurus (talk) 15:07, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thxs :) - Amada44  talk to me 16:52, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Vicco von buelow loriot 08 2005.JPG

hoi, what is missing on that image page? thanks in advance, —Pill (talk) 00:02, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

yea, I'll convert it to a DR to avoid confusion. cheers, Amada44  talk to me 12:43, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Deletion Request

The image File:Aberpergwm_House,_Glynneath,_West_Glamorgan,_6_March_2010.jpg from user Vouliagmeni needs to be deleted please, he claims it is in a public place, whereas it is not, it is on private property with no public right of way, please remove this image

It has been discussed before here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Aberpergwm_House,_Glynneath,_West_Glamorgan,_6_March_2010.jpg . If you have a good reason to believe that it was not taken on public ground then please start a Deletion requests yourself and elaborate your reasons. Amada44  talk to me 20:33, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Request for assistance

Can you help me? I uploaded File:1805-Lawrence-Marchioness-of-Ely-AnnaMariaDashwood.jpg several weeks ago and put a request (IFC) on it for color correction. The original image came from a museum website and was high-res but only medium-sized, and very dark. The image was subsequently "enhanced," but IMO quite badly: First, the colors still aren't right, and even worse, the editor enlarged the image, so now it is bigger, but lower resolution! Please take a look and tell me if you agree that the enhancement is not an improvement. I am fairly new to Commons. How should I handle this? Revert and request color correction again? With or without notifying the editor who "enhanced" the image? Is this something an admin (or at least someone higher up than I in the hierarchy) should handle? Is there another Wikigraphist who specializes in portrait paintings who might be a better person to consult? Thanks for any guidance you can provide! Laura1822 (talk) 18:19, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

sure. To upscale images is always a bad idea. Therefor it was not an improvement. I did a bit of color correction on the original resolution and replaced the image. I hope its okay like that. You could have just reverted it with the comment that you didn't think upscaling was a good idea. Then you could have requested the ifc again or you could have gone here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Graphic_Lab/Photography_workshop generally people there are very helpful and you can specify what you want. There is no need to notify the person who did the ifc. You could have if you wanted to. Things like that don't need to be handled by admins. Hope its okay what I did otherwise feel free to revert :) Also feel free to ask any questions you have! Cheers, Amada44  talk to me 20:26, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Thank you, that's great! I found you in the Graphics Lab.  :) Laura1822 (talk) 20:48, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Yea, I do quite a bit there. Btw: Nice uploads you have! Amada44  talk to me 21:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Wappen

Hallo Amada44,

mir ist aufgefallen, dass Du das ehemalige Stettener Wappen in svg umgewandelt hast File:Wappen Loerrach-Stetten.svg. Falls Du magst, kannst Du es gerne noch für die anderen Wappen der restlichen fünf Lörracher Stadtteil gleich tun, da ist die Auflösung der png recht mickrig. Danke und Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 13:12, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

hey, ja mal schauen. Die anderen sind schon noch aufwendiger. Wenn ich mal Lust habe ;) LG, Amada44  talk to me 16:29, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Kigyo1.jpg

Hi Amada44,

Please delete this picture. Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 09:30, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

✓ Done. cheers, Amada44  talk to me 16:29, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you! DenesFeri (talk) 11:58, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Landscape kruger-park.jpg

Hi! I wanted to add to the description of this photo. The exif says it was taken in August (winter), but the infotable say October (spring). Can you remember which is right? And possibly the location? JMK (talk) 17:59, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

By the way, I found id's for some of your insect photos. I believe they have been renamed. JMK (talk) 17:59, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
I really don't know why the date was wrong in the description. The exif info was correct and I fixed that. Now to the position, that is really difficult to say. I looked at my photo stream to try and narrow the position down. We entered the park in the morning (7AM right down in the south) at 13:30 we where near a big river (most likely Sabie, could also be Crocodile though) at 14:24 we where near a lodge. I don't think that this helps to narrow it down as I don't remember which lodge that was. If you know the park well I could upload the images and maybe you can recognize which lodge that was and or which river. Otherwise it would be save to say that the image was taken in the southern part of the Krugerpark.
Thanks for helping with the insects photos!! Amada44  talk to me 11:10, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, I inserted an approximate coord for the meanwhile - couldn't pinpoint it. Any further Kruger uploads, or African plant uploads would be useful and interesting. JMK (talk) 10:07, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Category:Windows (GUI)

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Windows (GUI) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

--Oxguy3 (talk) 03:46, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

categories

Hi Amada44,

If you can, and want to, than please check the authority citations of the following categories as I don't realy know how to cite in zoology: Urticina felina, Pristis pristis, Amphibolurus muricatus, Amphisbaena fuliginosa, Pelusios gabonensis, Phrynosoma orbiculare, Bougainvillia muscus, Scolopendra viridicornis, Gastrotheca griswoldi and Thenea muricata. Best regards. DenesFeri (talk) 10:15, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

christmas

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! DenesFeri (talk) 09:08, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

thank you! Same to you. Cheers, Amada44  talk to me 19:13, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

* * * Gutes Neues Jahr 2012! * * *

-- George Chernilevsky talk 17:16, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

re: Question

Hi! I haven't. I think that low quality isn't reason, and the file Bola_de_volei_de_quadra.JPG was derivated of one unknown from internet. Luan fala! 00:55, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Artzuordnung von File:OM59.JPG

Hallo Amada44/Archive 4, ich habe soeben das Bild File:OM59.JPG von Category:Carduus nutans zu Category:Carduus acanthoides verschoben. Die Hüllblätter sehen zu gleichmäßig schmal aus für Carduus nutans und überhaupt wirkt die Pflanze sehr wie Carduus acanthoides. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 21:18, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Hallo. Ja vielen Dank. Ich kann gerade nicht mehr nachvollziehen, warum ich die in Category:Carduus nutans eingeordnet hatte. LG, Amada44  talk to me 15:30, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Dioscorea mexicana

Das Schlid kam mir gleich so bekannt vor. Da waren wir wohl im selben botanischen Garten. Amorphophallus titanum war da leider nicht mehr.

Alles Gute im Neuen Jahr! -- RE rillke questions? 12:59, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

hehe, ja ist wohl der selbe :) Amorphophallus titanum war super. Leider wars gerade eine geruchslose Phase. Hätte gerne gewusst wie das Ding stinkt :) Ich habe alle Bilder von dort noch in die cat Category:Botanischer_Garten_der_Universität_Basel geladen, falls du das mit deinen Bildern auch machen willst. LG, Amada44  talk to me 15:30, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Ich weiß nicht. Sollte so eine Kategorie eine Sammlung aller im Garten enthaltenen Pflanzen sein? Sicher gut zu gebrauchen wenn man sich des Nachts, mit Schaufel bewaffnet, die ein oder andere Seltenheit ausgraben möchte. Wenn bereits die Schienen oder Oberleitungen geklaut werden, abgelegene Solaranlagen mit Satellitenphotos ausspioniert werden, würde es mich nicht wundern, wenn auch teure Pflanzen dran glauben müssen. -- RE rillke questions? 17:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Didelphis pernigra

Thanks for cropping File:Didelphis_pernigra-crop.jpg, I wanted to do it myself but did non know how to. Yours, --Awkiku (talk) 13:19, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

helpme

Hallo Amada44, danke, dass du an der Kategorie mithilfst! Zwei Kommentare hätte ich aber: 1, 2. Wenn es nicht klar ist, dann frage hier. :-) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 01:36, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

3 fehlbestimmte Pflanzenbilder

Hallo Amada44/Archive 4, ich habe folgende Bilder gefunden, die angeblich Anemone narcissiflora zeigen sollen:

Anemone narcissiflora hat in der Regel keine großen Einzelblüten, sondern doldige Blütenstände aus mehreren kleineren Blüten, an deren Basis ein Quirl von Hochblättern zu finden ist. Ansonsten hat die Pflanze wohl nur Grundblätter, also keine Stengelblätter. Die im Dateinamen erwähnte f. viridis habe ich im "Hegi" nicht finden können. Wenn man von den (wohl japanischen) anderen Bildern dieser Form auf Wikimedia Commons ausgeht (File:Anemone narcissiflora f. viridis 01.jpg und File:Anemone narcissiflora f. viridis 01.jpg), dann handelt es sich um einigermaßen normale Anemone narcissiflora mit teilweise etwas grünlichen Blüten. Nach Hegi oder "Flora Helvetica" sind die Blüten der in den europäischen Alpen gefundenen Pflanzen in der Regel weiß, allenfalls mal (laut "Flora Helvetica") mit etwas Rosafärbung an der Außenseite. Da ich davon ausgehe, dass die Koordinaten der Bilder auf eine Herkunft aus der Schweiz hinweisen, auch wenn ich gerade mal wieder keine Verbindung zu toolserver.org bekomme, passt die gelbliche Blütenfarbe also auch nicht. Ich halte die Pflanzen auf den drei Aufnahmen daher für Alpen-Kuhschellen, und zwar wegen der (allerdings recht hellen) Gelbfärbung möglicherweise um die Gelbe Alpen-Kuhschelle (Pulsatilla alpina ssp. apiifolia). Nach meiner Erfahrung sieht die helle Gelbfärbung im Original oft wesentlich beeindruckender aus als auf Fotos, besonders bei schönem Sonnenschein, und das auch ohne Überstrahlung. Aber es gibt wohl auch Standorte, auf denen weißblühende und gelbliche Formen in allen Schattierungen nebeneinander blühen, bei deren Zuordnung ich mir unsicher bin. Pulsatilla alpina ssp. apiifolia wächst übrigens gerne auf sauren Böden, wogegen Anemone narcissiflora wohl auf Kalkböden spezialisiert ist. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 12:56, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Hallo. Danke für die ausführliche Recherche! Ich vermute mal, dass du recht hast. Vor allem das die Anemone narcissiflora doldige Blütenstände hat spricht sehr dagegen. Die Aufname kommt aus der Gegend der Chelenalphütte und wie ich mich erinnern kann ist dort alles Granit und nicht Kalk. Ich werde mal alles umändern auf Pulsatilla alpina. (Ich kann mich leider auch nicht mehr erinnern, wie ich die Pflanze bestimmt habe. Ob in einem Forum oder selbst... Ich weiss es nicht mehr.) Vielen Dank! LG, Amada44  talk to me 19:02, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Dann spricht auch der Boden sehr für Pulsatilla alpina ssp. apiifolia. Auch die weißblühende Pulsatilla alpina ssp. alpina ist nämlich eine Kalkart. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 21:19, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Kam Air Logo.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kam Air Logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bob Re-born (talk) 10:03, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Categorizing job

Hello. I think that you are looking for images for commons. Category:Media from the National Archives and Records Administration needing categories as of 8 October 2011 has many JPEG images without a category. You might be able to give a few images a category once a week ;) Regards --Chris.urs-o (talk) 09:34, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

more than anything else, most of these images need color correction :) CATTLE EGRET WITH BREEDING PLUMAGE NEAR JETPORT - NARA - 544478.tif CATTLE EGRET WITH BREEDING PLUMAGE NEAR JETPORT - NARA - 544478.jpg. cheers, Amada44  talk to me 10:26, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Well, I think that voluntary work is very rare these days and Wikipedia/ Wikimedia can be improved on many locations. So something might be better than nothing ;) --Chris.urs-o (talk) 14:12, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

File: Jammu,_Kashmir_and_Ladakh.JPG

Hello there,

I recently noticed that you had deleted File:Jammu,_Kashmir_and_Ladakh.JPG as it was a copyright violation of the site (http://img4.ph.126.net/RMPDqGcLMKL_yJ2clVVfPQ==/2631791032261678004.jpg). This image was not a copyright violation however, as it was a derivative of File:Kashmir_map.svg created by User:PlaneMad and 126.net does not have a home page available (DNS lookup failed), so there is no suggestion of prior copyright of the image. Therefore, it seems, the derivative was created here and uploaded there afterwards..

Please re-upload the image for this reason.

Cheers

--Rvd4life (talk) 20:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Thie file I have deleted was much smaller than the source I have linked. So it was most likely create off wiki with File:Kashmir_map.svg as source. The changes where not done by uploader thus uploader had no rights to upload the image (the author of the changes has to agree too!). Uploader had uploaded ONLY copyvios (see here: Commons:Deletion requests/Photos uploaded by user Opus88888) so I am not going to undelete it. You can however go to Commons:Undeletion_requests and request undeletion there. Amada44  talk to me 21:14, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
I process photos from the web, and put them in articles that don't have illustrations. I made changes on this file File:Kashmir_map.svg, to illustrate the border of Kashmir. In the license it is written: You are free: to remix – to adapt the work. So I will upload this file again. Now I'm going to use orange color for the border line. --Opus88888 (talk) 07:47, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
You are not allowed to process images from the web! That is called copyright violation and is not permitted. Please refrain from doing that in future. What you did now to the image File:Kashmir_border.JPG is okay. But you are not allowed to use {{own}} as source. The source of the image is this image: File:Kashmir_map.svg. I have fixed that. Please be more careful with copyright! Amada44  talk to me 11:55, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kashmir_border.JPG --Opus88888 (talk) 08:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Aloe hexapetala

Hi Amada44,

Please look at the Aloe hexapetala category. Can you tell me, why one of my pictures does'nt show? Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 10:36, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

This is that picture, which can't be seen in categories File:Asparagales - Aloe hexapetala - kew 2.jpg. Delete it, and I could upload it again. OK? DenesFeri (talk) 15:47, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

fixed - Amada44  talk to me 20:20, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi,

Thank you, but now there are two of them. Delete one of them, please. One of them is not necessary. File:Asparagales - Aloe hexapetala - kew 3.jpg Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 10:03, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

lossles removal of watermark

So, how do you losslessly remove a watermark? – JBarta (talk) 18:44, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Well, the trick is to not recompress the existing image. Opening a jpeg and saving it again degenerates the image quality. For photoshop there is a plugin which avoids that. It only saves the parts of the image which have been edited and leaves the rest of the jpeg data untouched. But yea, the the title is a bit misleading. Cheers, Amada44  talk to me 19:28, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Interesting bit about the Photoshop plugin. I'd never heard of such a thing. I guess that just about is "lossless watermark removal". – JBarta (talk) 11:04, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Znak A-7.svg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Znak A-7.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

178.212.217.138 11:18, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Torcs-NG-pylon2.png deletion

Hi, I see that you have removed this file because of "copyright violation". So what? The original file is licensed under FAL and it featured correct attribution, and I can provide - though unnecessary - written permission to publish... Ocirne94 (talk) 21:03, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Hey. You are right. I have deleted it in error, I'm sorry and I have undeleted it. As far as I can see the license isn't {{FAL}} but {{GFDL}} (see here). Could you point me to where it says that the image is licensed as FAL? cheers, Amada44  talk to me 13:56, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
See here: the whole program's artwork is licensed under FAL. Thank you for undeleting :-) BTW, I see that you have removed the file from Category:Textures; you're probably right, but can you point me to the right category for a "texture" intended in the video game meaning? Thanks, Ocirne94 (talk) 14:41, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Herramientas personales

Easter

I wish you Happy Easter! DenesFeri (talk) 16:50, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

oh thank you :-) Amada44  talk to me 13:52, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

File deletion for source - File:Poesia visual fingista.jpg

Hi, Amada44 for User:Skapheandros I have already changed it, I am let know you now the source ¨Own work¨and 2 links as well for File:Poesia visual fingista.jpg while I have written you.thks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skapheandros (talk • contribs) 13 may 2012 (UTC)

Hi Skapheandros. Did you take all those images in your collage? Or did you cut them out from magazines? Because that is what it look like to me. If you did that and you don't know who the original author of those images is, then you have used the images without permission which makes it a copy violation and your image will be deleted. Amada44  talk to me 13:51, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Sorry again! what´s you see? it is a collage, an art composition of several images from me without procedence was cut to illustrate a visual poetry, we didn´t know from where, maybe consider it is art-work get done for this fine same funtion can be observed as only an object of meaning manufacturing ideas of an artist.For what´s have you got a cat died at the front of your User page? What´s the meaning of funtion? what´s you mind with this image of an unprotected animal died?.Think in the for it same and never like.all THXs! comentary signed by Skapheandros  talk to me 21:10, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

the cat is not dead. yes, you may make an art collage with images which do not belong to you but then you are not allowed to upload it here on commons. It would be the best to delete the images which use materials which you didn't make. Amada44  talk to me 21:28, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

This picture is now featured. Thanks for your contribution! Gidip (talk) 17:22, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Dreamtime picture

Hello,

Thanks a lot for the picture you'va added on the French article about Dreamtime boulder. This is really nice works you've done. Regarding to the lines you've added on the picture I'm wondering that you are a climber. Am I wrong? --Helgismidh (talk) 15:23, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! yea, I do climb and was there just this weekend. But I am good enough to climb the dreamtime boulder :-) . By the way: I have also taken a picture of the hold that has broke off. If you want to add that to the article? My french isn't good enough that I could write the caption for it. I have added it to the wp:en and de article. And thank you for the french + better description to the image! cheers, Amada44  talk to me 15:52, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Video too green

Hey there, thanks for uploading all those videos. I just wanted to let you know that File:Round ray.ogv is much more green in the .ogv than it is in the Flickr video. Can that be fixed?
Also: The person from the ManU video replied, and wanted to let you know about http://www.flickr.com/photos/apasciuto/4841704859/in/set-72157624487458865/ (which, IMO, has a lot of value and I'd upload it myself if I knew how.)
Keep up the good work! Sven Manguard Wha? 03:40, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Yea, they are a bit greener I don't know where that comes from. the problem is though, that the video is so green that I can't really do any color correction. I don't quite get it about the other video. Should I convert and upload it for you? Cheers, Amada44  talk to me 06:49, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Shark identification

How was the identification reaches for the shark on File:UShaka Sea World 1072.jpg? It appears to have several features that would be strange for Carcharhinus limbatus, notably no white flank stripe, has poorly defined (blurry edge) black tips to underside of pectoral fins, no dark tip to lower lobe of tail fin, and appears to have a quite errect first dorsal fin with a very rounded tip. The first dorsal fin shape could perhaps be explained by age of shark and angle of photo, but the remaining features are harder to explain. Carcharhinus identifications can be quite difficult and I'm not sure what I'd call the shark on the photo, but I'm struggling to see it as C. limbatus. Regards, RN1970 (talk) 00:40, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for looking closely at the shark image. I did't identify it (Lupo did) So I am not sure to how he identified the shark. There was a list somewhere on the uShaka homepage of all species they have (the list was not complete and not very scientific) and I think Lupo and I used that list to narrow down the possibilities. So please feel free to modify the species. There are also some more unidentified sharks of the uShaka aquarium here: Category:UShaka Sea World (unidentified) maybe you can identify some there. Thanks for the help. cheers, Amada44  talk to me 06:49, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply and sorry for the delay (vacation). When I get the time, I'll look further into this matter. If you remember where the uShaka shark list was, it might be a good starting point. If not, I'll have a go anyway. Cheers, RN1970 (talk) 16:50, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
np. I was looking for the links but its seems that uShaka redesigned the homepage because all the links are dead. (Here the part where Lupo an I posted the useful links: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lupo#Danke ) sorry. Thanks for looking into it though and I hope that you have enjoyed your holiday. cheers, Amada44  talk to me 17:42, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Minjhih administration center.jpg

A question. Can you make the pink sculpture in middle of this photo disappear so that this image can be saved? The image can only be used with the buildings but the modern sculpture violates COM:FOP in Taiwan. If you can't, that's OK, I suppose. This image will be deleted. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:58, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Leoboudv. I did something but its by no means perfect. cheers, Amada44  talk to me 10:21, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Thank You. I think the image can be kept now. The restoration is pretty good. Kind Regards from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:31, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Laguna1.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Laguna1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Laguna1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Stefan4 (talk) 13:28, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Help: no-FoP Italy

Hi. When you have a moment, could you do me a favor. I decided to occupy my time to list the no-FoP files in Italy. It has been a long and difficult work that needs to be reviewed by administrators. Please, could you check if everything is correct on User:Raoli/Deletion requests/FoP Italy? Thanks! Raoli ✉ (talk) 18:35, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:200 Lean 004.tif

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:200 Lean 004.tif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 20:14, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

2013!

Juletræet.jpg * * * 2013 !!! * * *
Hallo Amada! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Georgij -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:20, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Österreichische Briefmarke Edition Magisches Waldviertel Schloss Grafenegg.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Österreichische Briefmarke Edition Magisches Waldviertel Schloss Grafenegg.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Philafrenzy (talk) 21:54, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Luftwaffenmusikkorps1.svg

Hi, ich hab gesehen das du vor einiger Zeit mal die Datei File:Luftwaffenmusikkorps1.svg erstellt hast. Könntest du hiervon auch varianten mit jeweils einer Luftwaffenmusikkorps 2, Luftwaffenmusikkorps 3 und Luftwaffenmusikkorps 4 erstellen? --Flor!an (talk) 19:28, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Ja im Prinzip kein Problem. Muss ich einfach nur die Nummer austauschen? LG, Amada44  talk to me 20:45, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Habs mal gemacht: Category:Coats of arms Luftwaffenmusikkorps (Bundeswehr). LG, Amada44  talk to me 21:27, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Wow super das es so schnell ging. Danke. Nummer 5 gibts zwar nicht aber so ist echt spitze. --Flor!an (talk) 09:11, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
gerne ;). Hab die Nr 5 wieder gelöscht. Macht ja keinen Sinn wenn es die nicht gibt. LG, Amada44  talk to me 13:00, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Flor!an (talk)

Danke für die Bildbearbeitung

Hallo Amada44, Ich wollte mich bei dir bedanken mein Bild bearbeitet zu haben. So sieht es viel besser aus. Ist das einfach zu machen? Vielen Dank und Grüße :) --Hoff1980 (talk) 20:58, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Hey gern geschehen! Naja, schwierig ist es nicht. Bei Photoshop gibt es einen Filter um unterbelichtete Bereiche aufzuhellen. Es heisst (ich habe die englische Version) Shadows/Highlights. Liebe Grüsse, Amada44  talk to me 20:45, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
danke, werde es mal versuchen. mfg --Hoff1980 (talk) 20:48, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
bitte ;) sonst kannst du auch jederzeit mich fragen! LG, Amada44  talk to me 20:49, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Tireless Contributor Barnstar Hires.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I see you took a big chunk out of the photosubmissions backlog. Nice work!!! Sphilbrick (talk) 13:55, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thank you so much! my first barnstar ever ;) cheers, Amada44  talk to me 13:59, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Thai OTRS request

OTRS ticket 2013021610001575

I see that you asked if the person could speak English, and the response was positive. However, I had reached out to the Thai Wikipedia to find an admin who could help. Taweetham offered to help, so I forwarded the email to that admin. IF they end up wanting to do something on Commons or the English Wikipedia, if may make sense for you to take it back over, but I had already reached out to the Thai admin, so I think it makes sense to start there is that OK?--Sphilbrick (talk) 03:03, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

oh great. Sure no problem ;) cheers, Amada44  talk to me 09:04, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Photosubmissions

I'd like to see if we could get Photosubmissions down to zero, at least for a moment. I know you've worked there a lot, can we do this today?--Sphilbrick (talk) 14:30, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

all right. Since I am fairly new to OTRS: Is it normal to take over threads of other people or does one leave them alone? Or does it depend on the age? cheers, Amada44  talk to me 14:33, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
I guess I'm no longer new, but there doesn't seem to be any formal training.
I've been working at the back of the queue, where some were over 60 days old. I made the decision that if the agent hasn't responded in that time,, they won't be unhappy if someone else takes it over. As we get to the front of the queue, we'll have to address it. My OTTOMH proposal, if an email form the person has not been touched for two weeks, we can take over (unless we see some complicated issues that might be best left to another agent.) If shorter, then I'll sent a polite note to the agent indicating my goal to get it down to zero, and asking if they plan to respond soon, or would mind if someone else did.--Sphilbrick (talk) 14:44, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
all right. I have to have a small break. After that: letz hit zero! Amada44  talk to me 15:06, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Are you on the mailing lists? I got cold feet after your question, so posted it to the mailing list, and got an OK from a Steward, so we are good to go.--Sphilbrick (talk) 15:17, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
I guess we won't be able to get it literally to zero without some help from our German and Spanish compatriots, but we are down to three English requests, so we are just about there. Thanks for the help.--Sphilbrick (talk) 17:59, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
I can look at one of the german ones. What now? permissions-commons (379) queue? ;) Thanks for helping getting the photo queue down. Lets keep it down now! Amada44  talk to me 18:12, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
One of my goals is to try to keep it down. Many tickets are easier to handle early on, when the person writing is likely to be very responsive. It doesn't take longer to handle when it is new, and sometimes less time, so if we can keep it down, it should be less work.

The Commons queue has some challenges.

There was some talk of having an IRC session to goes through some of the backlog, I don;t recall now whether this was info inspired, permissions inspired, or both, but it was proposed, and I haven't heard anything recently.

I'd love to do that with some of the experienced agents in to help with some questions.

Another challenge with commons is if it is more than seven days old, the odds are high that the image has been deleted, then you have to track down a Commons admin. So I've love to have a group session, with a Commons admin joining in, so they could be handled.

Since I'm on a roll, I have one other vague theory related to Commons. Some of the requests are problematic, because the person clearly hasn't seen how to write a proper permission statement. I'd like to identify where people are getting the address, so we can give them better advice at the beginning. However, this is still a vague plan, and I haven't done much on it.--Sphilbrick (talk) 19:13, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

I am admin on commons. sooo, are you in irc at all? I'm away tomorrow all day, but an other time?
people mostly get the email from the no permission tag. example: File:Delayed_offside_or_icing.png. Amada44  talk to me 20:12, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
I can't believe that didn't occur to me. That sounds likely. Let me work on my thoughts about a different process.
I didn't realize you were a Commons admin. That's helpful.
I will be fairly busy at work Tu-Fr, but can do something either over the weekend, or on Monday. Manybe we can knock off a few old ones.--Sphilbrick (talk) 20:51, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Location?

Hi Amada44 - could you add a photo location to File:Tiputip.jpg, please? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 13:03, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

I have. And I have uploaded a few more. cheers, Amada44  talk to me 07:57, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Thrissops Eichstätt

Hallo Amanda, vielen Dank für Deine Bemühungen. Ich habe noch die Koordinaten vom Jura-Museum hinzugefügt und die Anmerkung, dass in Karlsruhe fotografiert wurde. Ebenso habe ich die Kategorie "Jura-Museum Eichstätt" noch hinzugefügt. Somit müsste jetzt der Text vollständig sein. Mit den besten Grüßen --Llez (talk) 19:53, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Upload Bot

Servus Amada44! Ich weiß nicht, ob dir bewusst ist, dass bei dieser Serie von Uploads offenbar etwas schief gegangen ist. Grüße --Franz Xaver (talk) 21:04, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Und hier auch. --Franz Xaver (talk) 21:05, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Ja danke! Manchmal hat der bot von magnus Schluckauf. Ich war grad dabei ihm das zu schreiben. Danke! LG, Amada44  talk to me 21:21, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

"BIRDS PARADISE" uploads

Hi Amada - these uploads need some editing, the location given for them shows up as in the middle of the Florida Everglades, but they are in a zoo somewhere, not there. So the location needs deleting or editing to make it invisible, see e.g. my edit here. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 15:22, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you! I only check the location once so I didn't notice. What I did see now is that ALL locations from the images I have uploaded from that user are wrong. I will get someone with a bot to delete them. Thanks for the note! Amada44  talk to me 18:48, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! Any progress? Some at least I'm pretty sure are from Miami Zoo (e.g. this; c.f. this - not a common species in captivity) - MPF (talk) 22:27, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
they have been removed. thanks for notifying me! Amada44  talk to me 19:01, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Excellent, thanks! - MPF (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Cat a Lot?

Noticed you fixed some categories of various horse photos from "Kentucky" to "Animals of Kentucky." Probably best to just toss both categories, as the basic thing about most of those photos is that someone took them at various horse shows IN Kentucky, the horses themselves may or may not be from Kentucky, the breeds are not necessarily developed in Kentucky (one is, but not most) and so on. Best to categorize as "Horses" if there is no other animal-related category on a given image (in some cases, we've been by and tagged the proper breed, but not all, there were about 400 of these "Heather Moreton" images uploaded). But if you have a categorization tool that does a bunch fast, that is SO cool and we DO appreciate your help! Thanks! Montanabw (talk) 16:44, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Sure I can move them out. But you do know, that you can activate the cat-a-lot tool in your prefernences? Amada44  talk to me 17:26, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Hm. I didn't know that! I'll peek and see. But in the meantime, there are hundreds of images in that collection and need many eyes to help. Thanks! Montanabw (talk) 18:07, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Aristocracia, La Merced, Arequipa.JPG

Beautiful job. – JBarta (talk) 17:56, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

ohh, thank you :-) - Amada44  talk to me 19:01, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

a heads-up

In 2011 you participated in Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb_(de-adminship 2). That discussion ended with User:Jcb losing his administrator privileges.

This note is to inform you that User:Odder proposed Jcb have unconconditional access to administrator privileges restored.

Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb (readmin) is scheduled to close on May 20th.

Cheers Geo Swan (talk) 23:42, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Eine Pilz Identifizierung

Guten Tag, Amada44!
Ich habe die Informationen über diesen Pilz ergänzt.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen, --George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Hallo George, vielen Dank! LG, Amada44  talk to me 06:09, 13 June 2013 (UTC)