User talk:Amalthea
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
|
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Български | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | English | Ελληνικά | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | हिन्दी | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | Latina | Lietuvių | 日本語 | 한국어 | Magyar | Македонски | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk (bokmål) | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Scots | Shqip | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / Srpski | Suomi | Svenska | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | Vèneto | 中文 | 中文(繁體) | +/− |
|
Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
|
|
| (P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) | ||
Kimsə (talk) 02:08, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Sarah pic.jpg
hello,
There is no proof she is really the sister-in-law of the subject. But if it's true, she can send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). Okki (talk) 11:07, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hello Amalthea, I take the liberty to jump into the discussion after Okki asked me for advice.
- First, thank you for your interest and your contributions.
- On the specific matter, File:Sarah pic.jpg will raise alarms amongst our experienced users because it is a photograph of good quality (colours, composition, lightening, ...) whose resolution is rather low by today's standards. This evokes the case of images taken on a website. The absence of meta-data (EXIF and the like) furthers this suspicion.
- Please understand that nobody doubts your good faith: many people do not know what they can do and what they cannot. Uploading images taken on a website on Commons is often a honnest mistake. It would be easy to alleviate any doubt by uploading a full-resolution version of your image, preferably with the EXIF. If you did take this photograph yourself, congratulations, it turns out really well!
- The fact that you are Sarah's sister-in-law is not relevant to the copyright status of the image. Of course, it is always very useful that people who have access to VIPs contribute to Commons, since we can hope for privileged points of view; but in itself, it does not have an effect on copyright.
- I am at your service for any further information. Thank you again and cheers! Rama (talk) 14:24, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Flickr review request
Hi Amalthea, per your request at Commons talk:Flickr images/reviewers and consensus, I have promoted you. The backlog can be found at Category:Flickr images needing human review and Category:Flickr review needed. More information about Flickr images can be found at COM:FLICKR and COM:L. An optional userbox is at {{user reviewer}} or {{user trusted}}. Good luck and thanks for your work on Commons. :) PeterSymonds (talk) 10:30, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] TUSC token a5c7c30f4c71f2fe22fe23ba5163d633
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
[edit] File Image:Qc211
Hi Amalthea, just a note of thanks for your help with file Qc211. The image now appears where it's supposed to. What a relief! :) Gordalmighty (talk) 14:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)