User talk:Amine Brikci N
|(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)|
SieBot 14:18, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
File source is not properly indicated: File:Venedig_(Satellitenaufnahme).jpg
|This media may be deleted.|
|A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Venedig_(Satellitenaufnahme).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter
If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.
- "http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Venedig_%28Satellitenaufnahme%29.jpg" ist keine valide Quelle. Bitte den original-NASA-link einfügen (html-Seite). Danke. --High Contrast (talk) 13:38, 20 February 2010 (UTC)