User talk:Angelo.romano

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Image:Terry Fox Statue, Ottawa.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading images on Commons.

Please author/source information. If you did it yourself please say this fact explicitly. If it's your own picture you could use {{GFDL-self}} tag.

EugeneZelenko June 26, 2005 15:26 (UTC)

Flickr[edit]

Please not that Commons does accept images from Flickr tagged with "nc", "nd" or "All rights reserved". --|EPO| 16:52, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

POTY 2006[edit]

The diff indicated in your vote is not valid, it should link directly to your home wiki. Please see the instructions and try again. Alvesgaspar 14:48, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bronze Fountain, Mazara.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Bronze Fountain, Mazara.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

User:G.dallorto 14:43, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Come soluzione ti suggerisco di trasferire l'immagine cancellata su It.Wiki, dove hanno adottato una nuova politica che leggi qui http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:EDP_per_it.wiki , e di marcarlo come {{EDP}} . Ti chiedo di fare lo stesso per altre immagini di autori (scultori, architetti) morti meno di 70 anni fa o viventi, perché sto facendo un lavoro di verifica delle immagini italiane e presto o tardi quanto è stato creato da ogni autore morto morto da meno di 70 anni verrà messo in cancellazione. Specifico di aver dovuto mettere in cancellazione decine di foto scattate da me. Ciao. --User:G.dallorto 14:43, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Tuo quesito[edit]

Purtroppo è la legge italiana stessa che lo esige. Ti suggerisco di leggere qui: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_Panorama#Italy ed il dibattito che in corso su questo problema, che ovviamente non sei né il primo né il solo di noi ad avere:

(Segnalo soprattutto l'ultimo link). Mi dispiace, le leggi non le faccio io. Ciao, e buon lavoro. --User:G.dallorto 16:53, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

rfa[edit]

Hi Angelo, I thought I'd drop you a line. Commons:Administrators#What is expected from an administrator? states "You can request adminship on the Commons if you meet the following criteria: ... are a Commons contributor with 200 edits (uploads or texts) minimum". Having reviewed the most recent RFAs prior to my own request, people take it pretty seriously. It would probably be a good idea to archive your own candidacy and come back later. Commons RFA is a remarkably civilized place compared to the street fight that is en wiki RFA, and it's possible nobody wants to archive for you for fear of being considered rude. - BanyanTree 00:59, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

TUSC token 45a0a3e280a498cdd717d4d375352bbc[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Angelo.romano!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:40, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


File:Palermo-Catania 2006.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Palermo-Catania 2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

(I have no idea why it was nominated, but I'm letting you know about the discussion since 92.81.162.233 failed to do so.) LX (talk, contribs) 23:48, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Antonio Di Natale[edit]

Ciao. Ti volevo chiedere perché hai sostituito questo file a questo (il secondo è fatto molto meglio). -- SteGrifo27 (scrivimi) 15:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Nuovo Romagnoli di Campobasso.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Nuovo Romagnoli di Campobasso.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Raoli ✉ (talk) 23:04, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Kit body thindarkbluestripes.png[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kit body thindarkbluestripes.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

JuTa 21:59, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 03:43, 19 October 2014 (UTC)